Søren A. Uldum

Designation of the European Working Group on Legionella infection (EWGLI) amplified fragment length polymorphism types of Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 and results of intercentre proficiency testing using a standard protocol

Abstract.The utility of amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) analysis as a genotyping method for the epidemiological typing of Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 has been previously demonstrated. This study (i) reports recommendations for the designation of the European Working Group on Legionella Infections (EWGLI) AFLP types, (ii) describes the EWGLI AFLP types identified for the 130 strains in the EWGLI culture collection, and (iii) reports the results of a newly introduced international programme of proficiency testing. Following preliminary analysis of 20 epidemiologically unrelated isolates, 16 major AFLP types were identified. A coded proficiency panel, comprising 12 additional isolates representing 9 of these 16 AFLP types, was sent to 17 centres in 14 European countries where it was analysed following a previously determined standard protocol. The identity of each coded strain (recorded as AFLP type 001–016 or untypeable) was determined by participants with reference to these 16 AFLP types, either visually or using gel analysis software where available, and reported to the coordinating centre. Nine of the 12 strains, including an epidemiologically related pair and two pairs of unrelated isolates of the same type, were correctly identified to the correct AFLP type by all or all but one of the participants. Seven laboratories correctly identified all 12 isolates, and a further seven laboratories correctly identified 11. Type identification scores ranged from 75% (1 centre), 83% (2 centres), and 92% (7 centres) to 100% (7 centres). The AFLP method as described is robust and rapid and allows the genotypic comparison of isolates of Legionella pneumophila between different testing centres without the need for exchange of the strains studied.

Assessment of intercentre reproducibility and epidemiological concordance of Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 genotyping by amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis

Abstract The aims of this work were to assess (i) the intercentre reproducibility and epidemiological concordance of amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis for epidemiological typing of Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1, and (ii) the suitability of the method for standardisation and implementation by members of the European Working Group on Legionella Infections. Fifty coded isolates comprising two panels of well-characterised strains, a “reproducibility” panel (n=20) and an “epidemiologically related” panel (n=30), were sent to 13 centres in 12 European countries. Analysis was undertaken in each centre following a previously determined standard protocol. Results were analysed by the participants, using gel analysis software where available, and submitted to the coordinating centre. The coordinating centre reanalysed all results visually and selected data-sets with gel analysis software. Data analysis by participants yielded reproducibility (R) values of 0.20–1.00 and epidemiological concordance (E) values of 0.11–1.00, with 6 to 34 types. Following visual analysis by the coordinating centre, R=0.78–1.00, and E=0.67–1.00, with 10–20 types. Analysis of three data-sets by the coordinating centre using gel analysis software yielded R=1.00 and E=1.00, with 12, 13 or 14 types. This method can be used as a simple, rapid screening tool for epidemiological typing of isolates of Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1. Results demonstrate that the method can be highly reproducible (R=1.00) and epidemiologically concordant (E=1.00), with good discrimination. The electropherograms generated are amenable to computer-aided analysis, but strict adherence to a previously defined laboratory protocol is required. Following designation of representative type strains and patterns, this method will be adopted by the European Working Group on Legionella Infections as the first internationally standardised typing method for use in the investigation of travel-associated Legionella infections.

Comparison of the sensitivity of the Legionella urinary antigen EIA kits from Binax and Biotest with urine from patients with infections caused by less common serogroups and subgroups of Legionella

The detection of urinary antigen is the most widely used method to diagnose Legionnaires’ disease (LD), so it is important that these assays have a high sensitivity for the disease. In this study, we compare two kits for their ability to detect urinary antigen in urine samples from patients infected with Legionella species and L. pneumophila sero- and subgroups not considered as the most common causes of LD. Urine samples (n = 33) from 30 culture-proven cases of L. pneumophila serogroup (sg) 1, subgroup non-Pontiac infection, and urine samples (n = 35) from 32 cases of non-L. pneumophila species or non-sg 1 infection were examined using the Binax EIA and Biotest EIA kits. For both groups, the overall diagnostic sensitivity of the Binax kit was significantly better than the sensitivity of the Biotest kits (P < 0.0001). For the non-Pontiac group, the sensitivity was 81.8 and 42.4%, respectively, and for the non-sg1 group, it was 51.4 and 28.6%, respectively. It was concluded that the Binax kit was more suitable for the general diagnosis of LD than the Biotest kit, but we still need urinary antigen detection methods with higher sensitivity for non-sg1 LD.

Determination of new cutoff values for indirect immunofluorescence antibody test for Q fever diagnosis in Denmark

Q fever is a ubiquitous zoonosis caused by Coxiella burnetii. The disease is emerging in many parts of the world, likely because of increased awareness and availability of better diagnostics. The diagnosis is primarily based on serology. Because the prevalence of the disease varies worldwide, the establishment of local cutoff values is needed. A baseline for antibodies against C. burnetii in Denmark was defined by testing sera from healthy Danish volunteers using a commercially available immunofluorescence antibody test. Cross-reactivity was studied on sera obtained from patients experiencing clinically related diseases. The cutoff titers suggested by the manufacturer were found to result in very low specificity of the test. The specificity was, however, effectively increased by using cutoff titers based on the local baseline and equal to immunoglobulin M (IgM) phase I > or =128, IgM phase II > or =256, IgG phase I > or =512, and IgG phase II > or =1024.

Dual infections with different Legionella strains

In 2010 a case of a dual infection with Legionella pneumophila serogroup (sg) 1 and sg 3 was identified by culture of a blood sample collected from a female Austrian patient with septic pneumonia. Subsequently all 35 European National Legionella Reference Laboratories were interviewed regarding the frequency of dual infections in legionellosis. The Reference Laboratories in Denmark, the UK and Germany reported the detection of another 14 cases of dual infections with different Legionella strains between 2002 and 2012. Among the 15 cases, there were four cases with different Legionella species, six cases with different L. pneumophila serogroups, and five cases of dual infections with L. pneumophila sg 1 with different MAb-types. The median age of the 15 cases was 56 years and the male to female ratio 1:1.14. Six of the 15 patients were receiving immunosuppressive treatment following organ transplantation (n = 3) or for underlying haematological and solid malignancies (n = 3). Five of the 15 cases died within 30 days following diagnosis. Efforts to detect dual infections with different Legionella strains will improve our ability to correctly elucidate the causative sources of infection and enhance our understanding of the epidemiology of Legionella infections.

Detection of Legionella by quantitative-polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) for monitoring and risk assessment

BackgroundCulture and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assays for the detection of Legionella were compared on samples from a residential area before and after two interventions. A total of 84 samples were collected from shower hoses and taps as first flush samples and at constant temperature. Samples were grouped according to the origin of the sample, a) circulation water b) water from empty apartments c) water from shower hoses. The aims were to investigate the usefulness of qPCR compared to culture for monitoring remedial actions for elimination of Legionella bacteria and as a tool for risk assessment.ResultsIn water collected from the apartments Legionella spp were detected by qPCR in the concentration range from LOQ to 9.6*105GU/L while L. pneumophila were detected in a range from LOQ to 6.8*105 GU/L. By culturing, the legionellae were detected in the range from below detection limit (> 10 CFU/L) to 1.6*106 CFU/L. In circulating water and in first flush water from shower hoses, culture and qPCR showed the same tendencies. The overall correlation between the bacteria number detected by culture and the two developed qPCR assays (L. spp and L. pneumophila) was relatively poor (r2 = 0.31 for culture and Legionella spp. assay, r2 = 0.20 for culture and L. pneumophila assay).ConclusionDetection by qPCR was suitable for monitoring changes in the concentration of Legionella but the precise determination of bacteria is difficult. Risk assessment by qPCR only on samples without any background information regarding treatment, timing, etc is dubious. However, the rapid detection by qPCR of high concentrations of Legionella - especially Legionella pneumophila - is valuable as an indicator of risk, although it may be false positive compared to culture results. On the other hand, the detection of a low number of bacteria by qPCR is a strong indication for the absence of risk.

Chlamydia trachomatis infection may increase the risk of preeclampsia

BACKGROUND Although the etiology of preeclampsia is not well understood, it has been suggested that excessive systemic inflammation may lead to oxidative stress, promoting the endothelial dysfunction characteristic of preeclampsia. Few prospective studies have examined the role of infection, an immune system stimulator, as a risk factor for preeclampsia. METHODS We conducted a longitudinal study of the relationships between Chlamydia trachomatis (CT), Chlamydophila pneumoniae (CP), cytomegalovirus (CMV), herpes simplex virus (HSV) and preeclampsia among 509 preeclamptic cases and 336 normotensive controls nested within the Danish National Birth Cohort study. Antibodies were analyzed at a first prenatal visit (mean 17.0weeks) and at a late second/third trimester study visit. Prenatal infections were identified as IgG/IgM seroconversion or a fourfold rise in IgG antibody titers. Multiple regression models were adjusted for maternal age, BMI, smoking status, and time between blood draws. RESULTS CT infection was associated with preeclampsia (ORadj 1.6, 95% CI 0.7, 3.6), severe preeclampsia (ORadj 1.8, 95% CI 0.6, 5.3), and preeclampsia resulting in preterm birth (ORadj 1.7, 95% CI 0.6-4.9) or birth of a small for gestational age infant (ORadj 2.1, 95% CI 0.6, 7.5), although CT infection was uncommon (n=33, 4.0%) and associations were not statistically significant. CP, CMV, and HSV infection were not associated with preeclampsia. CONCLUSIONS Women with serological evidence of prenatal CT infection were more likely to develop preeclampsia, although infection was infrequent and confidence intervals were wide. Studies in populations at higher risk for STIs are needed to corroborate this association.

Comparison and evaluation of four commercial kits relative to an in-house immunofluorescence test for detection of antibodies against Legionella pneumophila

Four commercially available kits from (1) Focus Diagnostics, (2) SERION, (3) Zeus and (4) Vircell for detection of antibodies to Legionella pneumophila were evaluated with panels of sera from patients with proven Legionella infection (n = 81) and/or other bacterial infections (n = 75). An in-house indirect Legionella immunofluorescence antibody test (IF test) was used as reference. All sera from the laboratory-proven Legionella pneumophila cases [culture, urinary antigen test and/or polymerase chain reaction] of Legionella infection were found to be positive by the in-house IF test. The relative sensitivity for Focus Diagnostics, SERION, Zeus and Vircell kits was 81.5, 76.5, 68.8 and 62.5%, respectively, and the false-positive rate was 16.0, 5.6, 29.0 and 2.7%, respectively. The in-house IF test had a false-positive rate of 4.0%. It was found that none of the four commercial kits were as sensitive and specific as the in-house IF test.

Genomic investigation of a suspected outbreak of Legionella pneumophila ST82 reveals undetected heterogeneity by the present gold-standard methods, Denmark, July to November 2014

Between July and November 2014, 15 community-acquired cases of Legionnaires´ disease (LD), including four with Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 sequence type (ST) 82, were diagnosed in Northern Zealand, Denmark. An outbreak was suspected. No ST82 isolates were found in environmental samples and no external source was established. Four putative-outbreak ST82 isolates were retrospectively subjected to whole genome sequencing (WGS) followed by phylogenetic analyses with epidemiologically unrelated ST82 sequences. The four putative-outbreak ST82 sequences fell into two clades, the two clades were separated by ca 1,700 single nt polymorphisms (SNP)s when recombination regions were included but only by 12 to 21 SNPs when these were removed. A single putative-outbreak ST82 isolate sequence segregated in the first clade. The other three clustered in the second clade, where all included sequences had < 5 SNP differences between them. Intriguingly, this clade also comprised epidemiologically unrelated isolate sequences from the UK and Denmark dating back as early as 2011. The study confirms that recombination plays a major role in L. pneumophila evolution. On the other hand, strains belonging to the same ST can have only few SNP differences despite being sampled over both large timespans and geographic distances. These are two important factors to consider in outbreak investigations.

Multi-center evaluation of one commercial and 12 in-house real-time PCR assays for detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae

Detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae by real-time PCR is not yet standardized across laboratories. We have implemented a standardization protocol to compare the performance of thirteen commercial and in-house approaches. Despite differences on threshold values of samples, all assays were able to detect at least 20M. pneumoniae genomes per reaction.