Srinivas Chakravarthy
Illinois Institute of Technology
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Srinivas Chakravarthy.
Methods in Enzymology | 2003
Pamela N. Dyer; Raji S. Edayathumangalam; Cindy L. White; Yunhe Bao; Srinivas Chakravarthy; Uma M. Muthurajan; Karolin Luger
Publisher Summary The ability to prepare nucleosome core particles (NCPs), or nucleosomal arrays, from recombinant histone proteins and defined-sequence DNA has become a requirement in many projects that address the role of histone modifications, histone variants, or histone mutations in nucleosome and chromatin structure. The cloning strategies for the construction of plasmids containing multiple repeats of defined DNA sequences, and the subsequent large-scale isolation of defined sequence DNA for nucleosome reconstitution are described. This chapter also describes adapted procedures to prepare nucleosomes with histones from other species, and for the refolding and reconstitution of (H2A– H2B) dimers and (H3–H4) 2 tetramers. Methods to reconstitute nucleosomes from different histone subcomplexes are described. A flow chart for all procedures involved in the preparation of synthetic nucleosomes is also presented.
Nature | 2004
Ben E. Black; Daniel R. Foltz; Srinivas Chakravarthy; Karolin Luger; Virgil L. Woods; Don W. Cleveland
Mammalian centromeres are not defined by a consensus DNA sequence. In all eukaryotes a hallmark of functional centromeres—both normal ones and those formed aberrantly at atypical loci—is the accumulation of centromere protein A (CENP-A), a histone variant that replaces H3 in centromeric nucleosomes. Here we show using deuterium exchange/mass spectrometry coupled with hydrodynamic measures that CENP-A and histone H4 form sub-nucleosomal tetramers that are more compact and conformationally more rigid than the corresponding tetramers of histones H3 and H4. Substitution into histone H3 of the domain of CENP-A responsible for compaction is sufficient to direct it to centromeres. Thus, the centromere-targeting domain of CENP-A confers a unique structural rigidity to the nucleosomes into which it assembles, and is likely to have a role in maintaining centromere identity.
Molecular and Cellular Biology | 2005
Srinivas Chakravarthy; Sampath Kumar Y. Gundimella; Cécile Caron; Pierre-Yves Perche; John R. Pehrson; Saadi Khochbin; Karolin Luger
ABSTRACT macroH2A is an H2A variant with a highly unusual structural organization. It has a C-terminal domain connected to the N-terminal histone domain by a linker. Crystallographic and biochemical studies show that changes in the L1 loop in the histone fold region of macroH2A impact the structure and potentially the function of nucleosomes. The 1.6-Å X-ray structure of the nonhistone region reveals an α/β fold which has previously been found in a functionally diverse group of proteins. This region associates with histone deacetylases and affects the acetylation status of nucleosomes containing macroH2A. Thus, the unusual domain structure of macroH2A integrates independent functions that are instrumental in establishing a structurally and functionally unique chromatin domain.
FEBS Letters | 2005
Srinivas Chakravarthy; Young-Jun Park; Jayanth V. Chodaparambil; Rajeswari S. Edayathumangalam; Karolin Luger
It is now widely recognized that the packaging of genomic DNA, together with core histones, linker histones, and other functional proteins into chromatin profoundly influences nuclear processes such as transcription, replication, DNA repair, and recombination. Whereas earlier structural studies portrayed nucleosomes (the basic repeating unit of chromatin) as monolithic and static macromolecular assemblies, we now know that they are highly dynamic and capable of extensive crosstalk with the cellular machinery. Histone variants have evolved to locally alter chromatin structure, whereas histone chaperones and other cellular factors promote histone exchange and chromatin fluidity. Both of these phenomena likely facilitate interconversion between different chromatin states that show varying degrees of transcriptional activity.
Journal of Biological Chemistry | 2006
Srinivas Chakravarthy; Karolin Luger
The histone domain of macro-H2A, which constitutes the N-terminal one third of this histone variant, is only 64% identical to major H2A. We have shown previously that the main structural differences in a nucleosome in which both H2A moieties have been replaced by macro-H2A reside in the only point of contact between the two histone dimers, the L1-L1 interface of macro-H2A. Here we show that the L1 loop of macro-H2A is responsible for the increased salt-dependent stability of the histone octamer, with implications for the nucleosome assembly pathway. It is unknown whether only one or both of the H2A-H2B dimers within a nucleosome are replaced with H2A variant containing nucleosomes in vivo. We demonstrate that macro-H2A preferentially forms hybrid nucleosomes containing one chain each of major H2A and macro-HA in vitro. The 2.9-Å crystal structure of such a hybrid nucleosome shows significant structural differences in the L1-L1 interface when comparing with homotypic major H2A- and macro-H2A-containing nucleosomes. Both homotypic and hybrid macro-nucleosome core particles (NCPs) are resistant to chaperone-assisted H2A-H2B dimer exchange. Together, our findings suggest that the histone domain of macro-H2A modifies the dynamic properties of the nucleosome. We propose that the possibility of forming hybrid macro-NCP adds yet another level of complexity to variant nucleosome structure and function.
Journal of Synchrotron Radiation | 2013
Rita Graceffa; Robert P. Nobrega; Raúl A. Barrea; Sagar V. Kathuria; Srinivas Chakravarthy; Osman Bilsel; Thomas C. Irving
The development of a high-duty-cycle microsecond time-resolution SAXS capability at the Biophysics Collaborative Access Team beamline (BioCAT) 18ID at the Advanced Photon Source, Argonne National Laboratory, USA, is reported.
Proteins | 2008
Cedric R. Clapier; Srinivas Chakravarthy; Carlos Petosa; Carlos Fernández-Tornero; Karolin Luger; Christoph W. Müller
We determined the 2.45 Å crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle from Drosophila melanogaster and compared it to that of Xenopus laevis bound to the identical 147 base‐pair DNA fragment derived from human α‐satellite DNA. Differences between the two structures primarily reflect 16 amino acid substitutions between species, 15 of which are in histones H2A and H2B. Four of these involve histone tail residues, resulting in subtly altered protein–DNA interactions that exemplify the structural plasticity of these tails. Of the 12 substitutions occurring within the histone core regions, five involve small, solvent‐exposed residues not involved in intraparticle interactions. The remaining seven involve buried hydrophobic residues, and appear to have coevolved so as to preserve the volume of side chains within the H2A hydrophobic core and H2A‐H2B dimer interface. Thus, apart from variations in the histone tails, amino acid substitutions that differentiate Drosophila from Xenopus histones occur in mutually compensatory combinations. This highlights the tight evolutionary constraints exerted on histones since the vertebrate and invertebrate lineages diverged. Proteins 2008.
EMBO Reports | 2013
Julian L. Klosowiak; Pamela J. Focia; Srinivas Chakravarthy; Eric C. Landahl; Douglas M. Freymann; Sarah E. Rice
Miro is a highly conserved calcium‐binding GTPase at the regulatory nexus of mitochondrial transport and autophagy. Here we present crystal structures comprising the tandem EF hand and carboxy terminal GTPase (cGTPase) domains of Drosophila Miro. The structures reveal two previously unidentified ‘hidden’ EF hands, each paired with a canonical EF hand. Each EF hand pair is bound to a helix that structurally mimics an EF hand ligand. A key nucleotide‐sensing element and a Pink1 phosphorylation site both lie within an extensive EF hand–cGTPase interface. Our results indicate structural mechanisms for calcium, nucleotide and phosphorylation‐dependent regulation of mitochondrial function by Miro.
Journal of Molecular Biology | 2014
Sagar V. Kathuria; Can Kayatekin; Raúl A. Barrea; Elena Kondrashkina; Rita Graceffa; Liang Guo; R. Paul Nobrega; Srinivas Chakravarthy; C. Robert Matthews; Thomas C. Irving; Osman Bilsel
It is generally held that random-coil polypeptide chains undergo a barrier-less continuous collapse when the solvent conditions are changed to favor the fully folded native conformation. We test this hypothesis by probing intramolecular distance distributions during folding in one of the paradigms of folding reactions, that of cytochrome c. The Trp59-to-heme distance was probed by time-resolved Förster resonance energy transfer in the microsecond time range of refolding. Contrary to expectation, a state with a Trp59-heme distance close to that of the guanidinium hydrochloride (GdnHCl) denatured state is present after ~27 μs of folding. A concomitant decrease in the population of this state and an increase in the population of a compact high-FRET (Förster resonance energy transfer) state (efficiency>90%) show that the collapse is barrier limited. Small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) measurements over a similar time range show that the radius of gyration under native favoring conditions is comparable to that of the GdnHCl denatured unfolded state. An independent comprehensive global thermodynamic analysis reveals that marginally stable partially folded structures are also present in the nominally unfolded GdnHCl denatured state. These observations suggest that specifically collapsed intermediate structures with low stability in rapid equilibrium with the unfolded state may contribute to the apparent chain contraction observed in previous fluorescence studies using steady-state detection. In the absence of significant dynamic averaging of marginally stable partially folded states and with the use of probes sensitive to distance distributions, barrier-limited chain contraction is observed upon transfer of the GdnHCl denatured state ensemble to native-like conditions.
Nucleic Acids Research | 2013
Ashok Patel; Srinivas Chakravarthy; Seamus R. Morrone; Ilana M. Nodelman; Jeffrey N. McKnight; Gregory D. Bowman
Chromatin remodelers can either organize or disrupt nucleosomal arrays, yet the mechanisms specifying these opposing actions are not clear. Here, we show that the outcome of nucleosome sliding by Chd1 changes dramatically depending on how the chromatin remodeler is targeted to nucleosomes. Using a Chd1–streptavidin fusion remodeler, we found that targeting via biotinylated DNA resulted in directional sliding towards the recruitment site, whereas targeting via biotinylated histones produced a distribution of nucleosome positions. Remarkably, the fusion remodeler shifted nucleosomes with biotinylated histones up to 50 bp off the ends of DNA and was capable of reducing negative supercoiling of plasmids containing biotinylated chromatin, similar to remodelling characteristics observed for SWI/SNF-type remodelers. These data suggest that forming a stable attachment to nucleosomes via histones, and thus lacking sensitivity to extranucleosomal DNA, seems to be sufficient for allowing a chromatin remodeler to possess SWI/SNF-like disruptive properties.