Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Stanley R. Krystek is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Stanley R. Krystek.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2001

Crystallographic structures of the ligand-binding domains of the androgen receptor and its T877A mutant complexed with the natural agonist dihydrotestosterone

John S. Sack; Kevin Kish; Chihuei Wang; Ricardo M. Attar; Susan E. Kiefer; Yongmi An; Ginger Y. Wu; Julie E. Scheffler; Mark E. Salvati; Stanley R. Krystek; Roberto Weinmann; Howard M. Einspahr

The structures of the ligand-binding domains (LBD) of the wild-type androgen receptor (AR) and the T877A mutant corresponding to that in LNCaP cells, both bound to dihydrotestosterone, have been refined at 2.0 Å resolution. In contrast to the homodimer seen in the retinoid-X receptor and estrogen receptor LBD structures, the AR LBD is monomeric, possibly because of the extended C terminus of AR, which lies in a groove at the dimerization interface. Binding of the natural ligand dihydrotestosterone by the mutant LBD involves interactions with the same residues as in the wild-type receptor, with the exception of the side chain of threonine 877, which is an alanine residue in the mutant. This structural difference in the binding pocket can explain the ability of the mutant AR found in LNCaP cells (T877A) to accommodate progesterone and other ligands that the wild-type receptor cannot.


Protein Science | 2006

A comparative study of available software for high‐accuracy homology modeling: From sequence alignments to structural models

Akbar Nayeem; Doree Sitkoff; Stanley R. Krystek

An open question in protein homology modeling is, how well do current modeling packages satisfy the dual criteria of quality of results and practical ease of use? To address this question objectively, we examined homology‐built models of a variety of therapeutically relevant proteins. The sequence identities across these proteins range from 19% to 76%. A novel metric, the difference alignment index (DAI), is developed to aid in quantifying the quality of local sequence alignments. The DAI is also used to construct the relative sequence alignment (RSA), a new representation of global sequence alignment that facilitates comparison of sequence alignments from different methods. Comparisons of the sequence alignments in terms of the RSA and alignment methodologies are made to better understand the advantages and caveats of each method. All sequence alignments and corresponding 3D models are compared to their respective structure‐based alignments and crystal structures. A variety of protein modeling software was used. We find that at sequence identities >40%, all packages give similar (and satisfactory) results; at lower sequence identities (<25%), the sequence alignments generated by Profit and Prime, which incorporate structural information in their sequence alignment, stand out from the rest. Moreover, the model generated by Prime in this low sequence identity region is noted to be superior to the rest. Additionally, we note that DSModeler and MOE, which generate reasonable models for sequence identities >25%, are significantly more functional and easier to use when compared with the other structure‐building software.


Structure | 2012

Structures of adnectin/protein complexes reveal an expanded binding footprint.

Vidhyashankar Ramamurthy; Stanley R. Krystek; Alexander Bush; Anzhi Wei; Stuart Emanuel; Ruchira Das Gupta; Ahsen Janjua; Lin Cheng; Melissa Murdock; Bozena Abramczyk; Daniel Cohen; Zheng Lin; Paul E. Morin; Jonathan Davis; Michael Dabritz; Douglas C. McLaughlin; Katie A. Russo; Ginger Chao; Martin C. Wright; Victoria Jenny; Linda Engle; Eric Furfine; Steven Sheriff

Adnectins are targeted biologics derived from the tenth type III domain of human fibronectin (¹⁰Fn3), a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily. Target-specific binders are selected from libraries generated by diversifying the three ¹⁰Fn3 loops that are analogous to the complementarity determining regions of antibodies. The crystal structures of two Adnectins were determined, each in complex with its therapeutic target, EGFR or IL-23. Both Adnectins bind different epitopes than those bound by known monoclonal antibodies. Molecular modeling suggests that some of these epitopes might not be accessible to antibodies because of the size and concave shape of the antibody combining site. In addition to interactions from the Adnectin diversified loops, residues from the N terminus and/or the β strands interact with the target proteins in both complexes. Alanine-scanning mutagenesis confirmed the calculated binding energies of these β strand interactions, indicating that these nonloop residues can expand the available binding footprint.


FEBS Letters | 1995

Aspartate mutation distinguishes ETA but not ETB receptor subtype-selective ligand binding while abolishing phospholipase C activation in both receptors

Patricia M. Rose; Stanley R. Krystek; Pramathesh S. Patel; Eddie C.-K. Liu; Jean S. Lynch; David A. Lach; Susan M. Fisher; Maria L. Webb

The endothelin receptors, ETA and ETB, are G protein‐coupled receptors (GPCR) that show distinctively different binding profiles for the endothelin peptides and other ligands. We recently reported that Tyr129 in the second transmembrane region (TM2) of the ETA receptor was critical for subtype‐specific ligand binding [Krystek, S.R. et al. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 12383–12386]. Receptor models indicated that aspartic acids located one helical turn above (Asp133) and below (Asp126) Tyr129 in ETA had their side chains directed toward the putative binding cavity. Similarly in ETB, Asp147 and Asp154 are located one turn below and above His150, the residue that corresponds to Tyr129. Asp126 in ETA and Asp147 in ETB corresponds to the highly conserved aspartate present in TM2 of many GPCR that has frequently been shown to be crucial for agonist efficacy. Mutagenesis of Asp126 of the human ETA receptor to alanine resulted in an unaltered affinity for ET‐1, a 160‐fold increase in ET‐3 affinity and a decrease in affinity for the ETA selective naphthalenesulfonamide, BMS‐182874. ET‐1 activation of phospholipase C was abolished. In addition, despite the gain in binding affinity, ET‐3 failed to activate phospholipase C, suggesting that Asp126 is required for signal transduction. Mutagenesis of Asp133 to alanine indicated that it was critical only for the binding of BMS‐182874. In the ETB receptor, mutation of His150 to alanine or tyrosine indicated that it plays a minor role in ETB subtype‐selective ligand binding; mutation of the aspartates in TM2 of ETB did not alter ligand binding. As in the Asp126Ala ETA variant, ET‐1 and ET‐3 failed to increase intracellular levels of inositol phosphates in the Asp147Ala ETB mutant. Taken together, these data support the hypothesis that Asp126 and Asp133 flanking Tyr129 in TM2 of the ETA receptor play a role in defining ETA subtype‐selective ligand binding but Asp147 and Asp154 that flank the His150 in TM2 of the ETB receptor do not. Furthermore, these data indicate that Asp126 in ETA and Asp147 in ETB are important for transmembrane signaling via phospholipase C.


Journal of Molecular Graphics & Modelling | 2003

Analysis and optimization of structure-based virtual screening protocols. 2. Examination of docked ligand orientation sampling methodology: mapping a pharmacophore for success.

Andrew C. Good; Daniel L. Cheney; Doree Sitkoff; John S. Tokarski; Terry R. Stouch; Donna A. Bassolino; Stanley R. Krystek; Yi Li; Jonathan S. Mason; Timothy D.J. Perkins

An important element of any structure-based virtual screening (SVS) technique is the method used to orient the ligands in the target active site. This has been a somewhat overlooked issue in recent SVS validation studies, with the assumption being made that the performance of an algorithm for a given set of orientation sampling settings will be representative for the general behavior of said technique. Here, we analyze five different SVS targets using a variety of sampling paradigms within the DOCK, GOLD and PROMETHEUS programs over a data set of approximately 10,000 noise compounds, combined with data sets containing multiple active compounds. These sets have been broken down by chemotype, with chemotype hit rate used to provide a measure of enrichment with a potentially improved relevance to real world SVS experiments. The variability in enrichment results produced by different sampling paradigms is illustrated, as is the utility of using pharmacophores to constrain sampling to regions that reflect known structural biology. The difference in results when comparing chemotype with compound hit rates is also highlighted.


FEBS Letters | 1992

Solution conformation of a cyclic pentapeptide endothelin antagonist : comparison of structures obtained from constrained dynamics and conformational search

Stanley R. Krystek; Donna A. Bassolino; Robert E. Bruccoleri; John T. Hunt; Michael A. Porubcan; Charles F. Wandler; Niels H. Andersen

The structure of a cyclic pentapeptide, cyclo‐(d‐Trp‐d‐Asp‐l‐Pro‐d‐Val‐l‐Leu), that has high selectivity for the endothelin ETAA receptor has been determined by NMR spectroscopy using constrained molecular dynamics and conformational search procedures. Structures obtained using two methods of refinement, namely (i) constrained molecular dynamics; and (ii) systematic searches of conformational space for optimal satisfaction of distance constraints, were compared to those obtained from systematic searches of conformational space without NMR data. The two different procedures of refinement produce similar conformations that are consistent with the NMR distance constraints. Conformational searches for optimal energy without any NMR distance constraints produced several low‐energy structures, two of which have essentially the same backbone as those structures derived from distance‐constrained procedures and one of these even reproduces several side‐chain positions well. The pentapeptide backbone consists of a linked γ and β‐turn conformation, with the leucine and tryptophan as corner residues of the type II β‐turn. The side chains are highly ordered both in aqueous solvent and in dimethyl sulfoxide. In aqueous media the leucine side chain is directed towards the indole ring, presumably to reduce the non‐polar surface exposure, producing unusual upfield shifts for the methyls (and particularly Hγ). This structural feature was reproduced in one of the structures obtained from conformational searches performed without NMR data. Exhaustive conformational searches appear to provide an alternative method for structure generation for cyclic peptides.


Protein Science | 2007

Loopholes and missing links in protein modeling.

Karen A. Rossi; Carolyn A. Weigelt; Akbar Nayeem; Stanley R. Krystek

This paper provides an unbiased comparison of four commercially available programs for loop sampling, Prime, Modeler, ICM, and Sybyl, each of which uses a different modeling protocol. The study assesses the quality of results and examines the relative strengths and weaknesses of each method. The set of loops to be modeled varied in length from 4–12 amino acids. The approaches used for loop modeling can be classified into two methodologies: ab initio loop generation (Modeler and Prime) and database searches (Sybyl and ICM). Comparison of the modeled loops to the native structures was used to determine the accuracy of each method. All of the protocols returned similar results for short loop lengths (four to six residues), but as loop length increased, the quality of the results varied among the programs. Prime generated loops with RMSDs <2.5 Å for loops up to 10 residues, while the other three methods met the 2.5 Å criteria at seven‐residue loops. Additionally, the ability of the software to utilize disulfide bonds and X‐ray crystal packing influenced the quality of the results. In the final analysis, the top‐ranking loop from each program was rarely the loop with the lowest RMSD with respect to the native template, revealing a weakness in all programs to correctly rank the modeled loops.


Journal of Medicinal Chemistry | 2010

Discovery of an oxybenzylglycine based peroxisome proliferator activated receptor alpha selective agonist 2-((3-((2-(4-chlorophenyl)-5-methyloxazol-4-yl)methoxy)benzyl)(methoxycarbonyl)amino)acetic acid (BMS-687453).

Jun Li; Lawrence J. Kennedy; Yan Shi; Shiwei Tao; Xiang-Yang Ye; Stephanie Y. Chen; Ying Wang; Andres S. Hernandez; Wei Wang; Pratik Devasthale; Sean Chen; Zhi Lai; Hao Zhang; Shung Wu; Rebecca A. Smirk; Scott A. Bolton; Denis E. Ryono; Huiping Zhang; Ngiap-Kie Lim; Bang-Chi Chen; Kenneth T. Locke; Kevin O’Malley; Litao Zhang; Rai Ajit Srivastava; Bowman Miao; Daniel Meyers; Hossain Monshizadegan; Debra Search; Denise Grimm; Rongan Zhang

An 1,3-oxybenzylglycine based compound 2 (BMS-687453) was discovered to be a potent and selective peroxisome proliferator activated receptor (PPAR) alpha agonist, with an EC(50) of 10 nM for human PPARalpha and approximately 410-fold selectivity vs human PPARgamma in PPAR-GAL4 transactivation assays. Similar potencies and selectivity were also observed in the full length receptor co-transfection assays. Compound 2 has negligible cross-reactivity against a panel of human nuclear hormone receptors including PPARdelta. Compound 2 demonstrated an excellent pharmacological and safety profile in preclinical studies and thus was chosen as a development candidate for the treatment of atherosclerosis and dyslipidemia. The X-ray cocrystal structures of the early lead compound 12 and compound 2 in complex with PPARalpha ligand binding domain (LBD) were determined. The role of the crystal structure of compound 12 with PPARalpha in the development of the SAR that ultimately resulted in the discovery of compound 2 is discussed.


PLOS Genetics | 2006

Chemical Genetics Reveals an RGS/G-Protein Role in the Action of a Compound

Kevin Fitzgerald; Svetlana Tertyshnikova; Lisa Moore; Lynn Margaret Bjerke; Ben Burley; Jian Cao; Pamela M. Carroll; Robert Choy; Steve Doberstein; Yves Dubaquie; Yvonne Franke; Jenny Kopczynski; Hendrik C. Korswagen; Stanley R. Krystek; Nicholas J. Lodge; Ronald H.A. Plasterk; John E. Starrett; Terry R. Stouch; George Thalody; Honey Wayne; Alexander M. van der Linden; Yongmei Zhang; Stephen G. Walker; Mark Cockett; Judi Wardwell-Swanson; Petra Ross-Macdonald; Rachel M. Kindt

We report here on a chemical genetic screen designed to address the mechanism of action of a small molecule. Small molecules that were active in models of urinary incontinence were tested on the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, and the resulting phenotypes were used as readouts in a genetic screen to identify possible molecular targets. The mutations giving resistance to compound were found to affect members of the RGS protein/G-protein complex. Studies in mammalian systems confirmed that the small molecules inhibit muscarinic G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling involving G-αq (G-protein alpha subunit). Our studies suggest that the small molecules act at the level of the RGS/G-αq signaling complex, and define new mutations in both RGS and G-αq, including a unique hypo-adapation allele of G-αq. These findings suggest that therapeutics targeted to downstream components of GPCR signaling may be effective for treatment of diseases involving inappropriate receptor activation.


Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters | 2008

Pyridine amides as potent and selective inhibitors of 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1

Haixia Wang; Zheming Ruan; James J. Li; Ligaya M. Simpkins; Rebecca A. Smirk; Shung C. Wu; Robert Hutchins; David S. Nirschl; Katy Van Kirk; Christopher B. Cooper; James C. Sutton; Zhengping Ma; Rajasree Golla; Ramakrishna Seethala; Mary Ellen K. Salyan; Akbar Nayeem; Stanley R. Krystek; Steven Sheriff; Daniel M. Camac; Paul E. Morin; Brian Carpenter; Jeffrey A. Robl; Robert Zahler; David A. Gordon; Lawrence G. Hamann

Several series of pyridine amides were identified as selective and potent 11beta-HSD1 inhibitors. The most potent inhibitors feature 2,6- or 3,5-disubstitution on the pyridine core. Various linkers (CH(2)SO(2), CH(2)S, CH(2)O, S, O, N, bond) between the distal aryl and central pyridyl groups are tolerated, and lipophilic amide groups are generally favored. On the distal aryl group, a number of substitutions are well tolerated. A crystal structure was obtained for a complex between 11beta-HSD1 and the most potent inhibitor in this series.

Collaboration


Dive into the Stanley R. Krystek's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Hui Wei

Bristol-Myers Squibb

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge