Stefan Fichtner-Feigl

Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Renal Transplant Recipients After Abdominal Surgical Procedures Not Connected With Transplantation

Background Due to the increasing number of renal transplantations, elective and emergency surgery in transplanted patients is becoming a relevant challenge in clinical routine. The current data on complication rates of renal transplant recipients, which must undergo another surgical procedure not connected with transplantation, is inhomogeneous. The rate of anastomotic leakage and wound infection appears to be increased in these patients. Perioperative acute kidney injury or even graft failure with need of dialysis might occur after surgery. Therefore, the indication for surgery has to be examined more than critically. The aim of this study was to analyze morbidity and mortality of renal transplant recipients after abdominal surgery for graft-unrelated surgical conditions. Method We performed a monocentric and retrospective observational study in the surgical critical care unit of the Department of Surgery at the Medical Center of the University of Freiburg, Germany. Clinical data was collected from all patients after kidney transplantation from 2005 to 2015, which had to undergo elective or emergency abdominal surgery for transplant-unrelated surgical problems. Results The overall postoperative hospital mortality of the renal transplant recipients was 21% with sepsis and multiple organ failure due to infectious complications being the major causes of death. Anastomotic leakage was the most common surgical complication followed by surgical site infection. The need of reoperation in this group of patients was 38% mainly due to anastomotic leakage and postoperative hemorrhage. Postoperative renal graft failure with need of dialysis was seen in 11% of our patients. Conclusions Kidney transplant recipient undergoing elective or emergency abdominal surgery not related to transplantation have worse postoperative outcomes. The overall mortality is high, mainly due to infectious complications and anastomotic leakage.

Oncological outcome of laparoscopically assisted pancreatoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma in a retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION Laparoscopic resections of the pancreatic head are increasingly performed. Several studies show that they are comparable to open operations in terms of postoperative morbidity. However, since a substantial proportion of pancreatic head resections are necessary for pancreatic adenocarcinoma the oncologic safety and outcome of minimally invasive operations is of interest. In this study we evaluated oncologic outcome and survival after laparoscopically assisted pancreatic head resection for ductal adenocarcinoma. METHODS Perioperative and oncological outcome of sixty-two laparoscopically assisted pancreatic head resections for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma performed between 2010 and 2016 was compared to outcome of 278 open resections between 2001 and 2016 in a retrospective study. Data was continuously collected in a prospectively maintained database. RESULTS Operation time was significantly longer in the laparoscopic group (477 vs. 428 min. p < 0.001). Tumor size, lymph node yield and lymph node state and need of portal vein resection were comparable. There was a higher rate of free resection margins in the laparoscopic group (87% vs. 71%, p < 0.01). There was no difference in postoperative mortality and morbidity. Patients with laparoscopic resection stayed in hospital significantly shorter (median 14 vs. 16 days, p < 0.003). Postoperative survival after 5 years was not different in both groups. CONCLUSION Laparoscopically assisted resection of adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head is equal to open resection concerning oncologic outcome and actuarial survival. However, minimally invasive resection shortened the hospital stay. However, further evaluations with a longer follow up time are needed.

Does the site of primary colorectal cancer influence the outcome after resection of isolated liver metastases

INTRODUCTION In unresectable patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC), the site of the primary is a strong prognostic factor warranting major adjustments in palliative medical treatment. Initial results suggested that the site of CRC influences prognosis after curative resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM). In this study, we evaluated outcome after resection of isolated CLM with regard to the location of the primary. METHODS 221 patients with macroscopically complete resection of CLM and no known extrahepatic disease were identified. 63 patients had right-sided and 158 had left-sided CRC. Tumors of the transverse colon and rectum were excluded. Survival was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS Characteristics of CLM, primary tumor stage and chemotherapeutic regimens were not significantly different between the two groups. Kaplan-Meier five-year survival was comparable (41%) in patients with right- or left-sided CRC (p = 0.64). Microscopic resection margin, number of liver metastases, age and nodal status but not the site of the primary tumor significantly influenced survival. CONCLUSION The site of the colorectal primary in this well-defined group of patients after resection of isolated CLM did not prove to be of significant prognostic value. Whether the primary tumor in CLM is located on the left side or the right should not preclude patients from surgery.

Hemoadsorption in a Case of Severe Septic Shock and Necrotizing Fasciitis Caused by Nontraumatic Renal Rupture due to Pyelonephritis with Obstructive Uropathy

Background Nontraumatic renal rupture due to pyelonephritis with obstructive uropathy is an uncommon but life-threatening situation. Case Presentation A 25-year-old female presented to the emergency department with acute worsening of abdominal pain that began four weeks earlier. She was found to have peritonitis, leukocytosis, severe lactic acidosis, and a pronounced anemia and imaging was consistent with nontraumatic renal rupture with retroperitoneal abscess, perforation of the colon, and severe necrotizing fasciitis of the right lower limb. She underwent a right nephrectomy, a right hemicolectomy, surgical debridement of the retroperitoneum, and an upper thigh amputation. Due to severe septic shock and rhabdomyolysis with acute renal failure we performed a combined treatment of hemoadsorption using a Cytosorb hemoadsorber and continuous venovenous hemodialysis (CVVHD). Subsequently the patient recovered and was discharged home with no signs of infections and with normal renal function. Conclusion We present a case of pyelonephritis with nontraumatic renal rupture leading to necrotizing fasciitis with osteomyelitis of the lower limb. The early treatment of the patient with a Cytosorb hemoadsorber led to a rapid hemodynamic and metabolic stabilization and preservation of the renal function, suggesting that hemoadsorption might be a rescue therapy in patients with severe septic shock and traumatic rhabdomyolysis.

Carcinosarcoma of the Pancreas: Case Report With Comprehensive Literature Review

Carcinosarcomas are rare biphasic neoplasms with distinct malignant epithelial and mesenchymal components. Most commonly, carcinosarcomas arise in the uterus as malignant mixed müllerian tumors, but also infrequently appear in other organs such as the ovaries and breast, the prostate and urinary tract, the lungs, or in the gastrointestinal system, among others. Pancreatic carcinosarcomas are exceedingly rare; only a few cases are reported in the English literature. Their pathogenesis remains to be fully clarified. We present here the case of a pancreatic carcinosarcoma with evidence for monoclonality via determination of Kras mutational status after microdissection and suggest a common origin of the 2 tumor components. Comprehensive review of the available literature allows the conclusion that most pancreatic carcinosarcomas appear to be of monoclonal origin and seem to have arisen from a carcinoma via metaplastic transformation of 1 part or subclone of the tumor, probably by epithelial-mesenchymal transition. All reported patients were treated with surgery. Adjuvant therapy, if administered, consisted predominantly of gemcitabine. Prognosis for this neoplasm occurs to be similar or even worse compared with classic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Despite the lack of evidence-based recommendations for its treatment, resection should be performed, if possible.

Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Surgical Patients with Intensive Care Unit Lengths of Stay of 90 Days and Greater

Background The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of prolonged length of stay in an intensive care unit (ICU) on the mortality and morbidity of surgical patients. Methods We performed a monocentric and retrospective observational study in the surgical critical care unit of the department of surgery at the Medical Center of the University of Freiburg, Germany. Clinical data was collected from patients assigned to the ICU with a length of stay (LOS) of 90 days and greater. Results From the total of the 19 patients with ICU LOS over 90 days, ten patients died in the ICU whereas nine patients were discharged to the normal ward. The ICU mortality rate was 52%. The overall survival one year after ICU discharge was 32%. Regarding factors affecting mortality of the patients, significantly higher mortality was associated with age of the patients at the time point of the ICU admission and with postoperative need of renal replacement therapy. Conclusions We found a high but in our opinion acceptable mortality rate in surgical patients with ICU LOS of 90 days and greater. We identified age and the need of renal replacement therapy as risk factors for mortality.

Postoperative changes of the microbiome: are surgical complications related to the gut flora? A systematic review

BackgroundThe purpose of this review was to identify the relationship between the gut microbiome and the development of postoperative complications like anastomotic leakage or a wound infection. Recent reviews focusing on underlying molecular biology suggested that postoperative complications might be influenced by the patients’ gut flora. Therefore, a review focusing on the available clinical data is needed.MethodsIn January 2017 a systematic search was carried out in Medline and WebOfScience to identify all clinical studies, which investigated postoperative complications after gastrointestinal surgery in relation to the microbiome of the gut.ResultsOf 337 results 10 studies were included into this analysis after checking for eligibility. In total, the studies comprised 677 patients. All studies reported a postoperative change of the gut flora. In five studies the amount of bacteria decreased to different degrees after surgery, but only one study found a significant reduction. Surgical procedures tended to result in an increase of potentially pathogenic bacteria and a decrease of Lactobacilli and Bifidobacteria. The rate of infectious complications was lower in patients treated with probiotics/symbiotics compared to control groups without a clear relation to the systemic inflammatory response. The treatment with synbiotics/probiotics in addition resulted in faster recovery of bowel movement and a lower rate of postoperative diarrhea and abdominal cramping.ConclusionsThere might be a relationship between the gut flora and the development of postoperative complications. Due to methodological shortcomings of the included studies and uncontrolled bias/confounding factors there remains a high level of uncertainty.