Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Stefan Hackel is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Stefan Hackel.


international geoscience and remote sensing symposium | 2015

Absolute 4-D positioning of persistent scatterers with TerraSAR-X by applying geodetic stereo SAR

Christoph Gisinger; Stefan Gernhardt; Stefan Auer; Ulrich Balss; Stefan Hackel; Roland Pail; Michael Eineder

The paper describes the direct retrieval of global coordinates of persistent scatterers (PS) including their secular displacement by plate tectonics from Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR). For this purpose we combine stereo SAR methods, least squares parameter estimation, and geodetic observation corrections. The procedure is based on our previous research with TerraSAR-X and now applied for PS situated on the facade of a building of Technische Universität München (TUM). In order to verify the PS-based solution, we have created an accurate building model with global coordinates suitable for SAR simulations, and we use the results of permanent Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) to validate the displacement rates. Our preliminary results for the simulated phase centers and stereo SAR already indicate similar phase centers on the building facade, and the displacement rates could be retrieved with mm/year accuracy.


international geoscience and remote sensing symposium | 2014

TerraSAR-X pixel localization accuracy: Approaching the centimeter level

Michael Eineder; Ulrich Balss; Christoph Gisinger; Stefan Hackel; Xiaoying Cong; Franz Georg Ulmer; Thomas Fritz

The German satellites TerraSAR-X/TanDEM-X are high resolution imaging SARs with a resolution in the meter and even sub-meter range. The original product specification document stated an absolute geometric pixel localization accuracy in the same order of magnitude i.e. 1 meter. It was shown by several teams that this accuracy requirement is easily met and even surpassed [1] by the operational products. During the last years the remaining residual error sources could be further studied and attributed mainly to tropospheric delay variations [2] geodynamic effects such as solid earth tides [3] and plate tectonics to refraction in the ionosphere and to technical limitations in the satellite [4]. Our team investigated all these contributions developed correction and calibration methods and validated them in experiments with corner reflectors at different locations. Furthermore we explore novel applications of this high geolocation accuracy that range from classical earth surface displacement measurements to the localization of scatterers in 3D space with a precision comparable to GNSS. This paper provides a summary of latest measurement results of our globally distributed corner reflectors which show consistently a high accuracy better than 2 cm in range and azimuth. Furthermore we report on new developments concerning tropospheric correction using ECMWF and numerical weather models (WRF). Using the best available compensation techniques we can demonstrate accurate 3D localization of corner reflectors and of other objects. Current investigations aim to further improve the orbital accuracy to sub-centimeter level by improved modelling of air-drag and solar radiation pressure on the spacecraft.


Remote Sensing | 2018

Long-Term Validation of TerraSAR-X and TanDEM-X Orbit Solutions with Laser and Radar Measurements

Stefan Hackel; Christoph Gisinger; Ulrich Balss; Martin Wermuth; Oliver Montenbruck

Precise orbit determination solutions for the two spacecrafts TerraSAR-X (TSX) and TanDEM-X (TDX) are operationally computed at the German Space Operations Center (GSOC/DLR). This publication makes use of 6 years of TSX and TDX orbit solutions for a detailed orbit validation. The validation compares the standard orbit products with newly determined enhanced orbit solutions, which additionally consider GPS ambiguity fixing and utilize a macro model for modeling non-gravitational forces. The technique of satellite laser ranging (SLR) serves as a key measure for validating the derived orbit solutions. In addition, the synthetic aperture radar (SAR) instruments on-board both spacecrafts are for the first time employed for orbit validation. Both the microwave instrument and the optical laser approach are compared and assessed. The average SLR residuals, obtained from the TSX and TDX enhanced orbit solutions within the analysis period, are at 1.6 ± 11.4 mm ( 1 σ ) and 1.2 ± 12.5 mm, respectively. Compared to the standard orbit products, this is an improvement of 33 % in standard deviation. The corresponding radar range biases are in the same order and amount to − 3.5 ± 12.5 mm and 4.5 ± 14.9 mm. Along with the millimeter level position offsets in radial, along-track and cross-track inferred from the SLR data on a monthly basis, the results confirm the advantage of the enhanced orbit solutions over the standard orbit products.


15th International Conference on Space Operations | 2018

Rethinking Ground Systems: Supporting New Mission Types through Modularity and Standardization

Stefan Gärtner; Michael Geyer; Stefan Hackel; Armin Hauke; Corey OMeara; Yi Wasser

We begin to see an increase in the diversity of todays space missions: Small student-designed satellites, unique scientific missions and fleets of commercial spacecraft are just a few of those mission types. In order to cater for new demands on the ground system and to offer customer-tailored solutions we started to rethink the foundations of the German Space Operations Center (GSOC) ground system in terms of a service-oriented architecture approach using standardized technology, mainly CCSDS Mission Operations services. We show how we modularize our ground system, identify and clearly name the mission functions present in the current system complete with timing information and data size requirements. We illustrate this process by employing a concrete prototypical mission with involvement across all departments from antenna control, data processing to mission planning and flight dynamics, and hint at the challenges encountered along the way. The chosen technical solution is motivated and explained, and aspects of deployment, performance, and security are discussed.


Archive | 2016

Challenging the Precision - Impact and Comparison of Non-Gravitational Force Models on Sentinel-3A Orbit Determination

Stefan Hackel; Daniel Arnold; Martin Wermuth; Adrian Jäggi; Oliver Montenbruck

Since the beginning of satellite altimetry missions, the ocean surface topography community requires precise and accurate satellite orbits. With start of the satellite Sentinel-3A on February 16, 2016, two radio- and one altimeter onboard the satellite accomplish the Copernicus program with a ocean- and land monitoring mission, planned for a nominal mission lifetime of 7 years. The satellite is orbiting the Earth on a polar, Sun-synchronous trajectory at an altitude of 815 km. For the purpose of precise orbit determination, the satellite is equipped with a geodetic-grade dual-frequency Global Positioning System (GPS) receiver. The GPS measurements are employed together with a set of gravitational and non-gravitational models in a Reduced-Dynamic Orbit Determination (RDOD) approach, which combines the advantages of a dynamic and a kinematic positioning for deriving precise satellite orbits. However, especially the non-gravitational force models require sophisticated modeling techniques. Therefore, a satellite macro model is introduced, which allows a proper modeling of accelerations due to Solar Radiation Pressure (SRP), Earth Radiation Pressure (ERP), and atmospheric drag. Especially the Sun-synchronous orbit, and the huge solar array, which is loosely coupled to the satellite body, makes the precise orbit determination challenging. As members of the Copernicus Quality Working Group, the Astronomical Institute of the University of Bern (AIUB), and the German Aerospace Center (DLR) are, among others, responsible for the orbit validation of Sentinel-3A. Both groups make use of a satellite macro model within a reduced-dynamic approach but differ in the employed software solutions and the pseudo-stochastic modeling. Basically, the pseudo-stochastic parameters allow to compensate potential deficits in the employed force models. Within this poster, the modeling aspects are briefly introduced, followed by comparing the results of both groups. The results include the estimated empirical accelerations, and the estimated satellite orbits of Sentinel-3A. Furthermore, the orbit quality is assessed by Satellite Laser Ranging (SLR), an external and independent tool for orbit validation.


Gps Solutions | 2015

Galileo orbit determination using combined GNSS and SLR observations

Stefan Hackel; Peter Steigenberger; Urs Hugentobler; Maik Uhlemann; Oliver Montenbruck


EUSAR 2014; 10th European Conference on Synthetic Aperture Radar; Proceedings of | 2014

Precise Measurements on the Absolute Localization Accuracy of TerraSAR-X on the Base of Far-Distributed Test Sites

Ulrich Balss; Christoph Gisinger; Xiao Ying Cong; Ramon Brcic; Stefan Hackel; Michael Eineder


Advances in Space Research | 2017

Sentinel-1A - First precise orbit determination results

Heike Peter; Adrian Jäggi; Jaime Fernández; Diego Sebastian Escobar; Francisco Ayuga; Daniel Arnold; Martin Wermuth; Stefan Hackel; Michiel Otten; Wim Simons; Pieter Visser; Urs Hugentobler; Pierre Féménias


Journal of Geodesy | 2017

Model improvements and validation of TerraSAR-X precise orbit determination

Stefan Hackel; Oliver Montenbruck; Peter Steigenberger; Ulrich Balss; Christoph Gisinger; Michael Eineder


Journal of Geodesy | 2018

Precise orbit determination of the Sentinel-3A altimetry satellite using ambiguity-fixed GPS carrier phase observations

Oliver Montenbruck; Stefan Hackel; Adrian Jäggi

Collaboration


Dive into the Stefan Hackel's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ulrich Balss

German Aerospace Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ramon Brcic

German Aerospace Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge