Stefan Lewold

The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register 1975-1997: an update with special emphasis on 41,223 knees operated on in 1988-1997

From 1975, when the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register (SKAR) started, until the end of 1997, 57,533 primary arthroplasties and revisions have been registered. Recently, the register underwent a comprehensive validation and update regarding revisions. We now report on general demographic and epidemiological data for the whole period and on the survivorship of arthroplasties performed in Sweden during 1988-1997. During this 10-year period, 41,223 primary knee arthroplasties were performed on 34,877 patients. We found, as in our earlier reports, that survivorship was affected by patient-, time-, implant- and method-related factors but, apart from an overall higher cumulative revision rate, general conclusions reported from the register in recent years appeared to be unaffected.

The routine of surgical management reduces failure after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

A total of 10,474 unicompartmental knee arthroplasties was performed for medial osteoarthritis in Sweden between 1986 and 1995. We sought to establish whether the number of operations performed in an orthopaedic unit affected the incidence of revision. Three different implants were analysed: one with a high revision rate, known to have unfavourable mechanical and design properties; a prosthesis which is technically demanding with a known increased rate of revision; and the most commonly used unicompartmental device. Most of the units performed relatively few unicompartmental knee arthroplasties per year and there was an association between the mean number carried out and the risk of later revision. The effect of the mean number of operations per year on the risk of revision varied. The technically demanding implant was most affected, that most commonly used less so, and the outcome of the unfavourable design was not influenced by the number of operations performed. For unicompartmental arthroplasty, the long-term results are related to the number performed by the unit, probably expressing the standards of management in selecting the patients and performing the operation.

Revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: outcome in 1,135 cases from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty study

From 1975 through 1995, 45,025 knee arthroplasties were recorded in the prospective Swedish Knee Arthroplasty study. By the end of 1995, 1,135 of 14,772 primary unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (UKA) for localized, mainly medial arthrosis had been revised. The Marmor/Richards and St. Georg sledge/Endo-Link prostheses were used in 65%. Mean age at revision was 72 (71) years. 232 revisions were performed as an exchange UKA (partial in 97) and 750 as a total knee arthroplasty (TKA). 153 were revised by other modes. In medial UKA, the indication for revision was component loosening in 45% and joint degeneration in 25% and in lateral UKA, the corresponding figures were 31% and 35%, respectively. In 94 cases, unicompartmental components were added to the initially untreated compartment, in 14 with partial exchange of a component. The CRRR was estimated using survival statistics. After only 5 years, the risk of having a second revision was more than three times higher for failed UKAs revised to a new UKA (cumulative rerevision rate (CRRR 26%) than for those revised to a TKA (CRRR 7%). This difference remained, even if those revised before 1985, when modern operating technique was introduced, were excluded (CRRR 31% and 5%, respectively). UKA is a safe primary procedure, when performed with well-designed components and modern surgical technique. It gives documented good patient satisfaction, range of motion, pain relief and relatively few serious complications. However, once failed, the knee should be revised to a TKA. This applies to most modes of failure. Not even joint degeneration of the unoperated compartment can be safely treated by adding contralateral components; CRRR after this procedure was 17%, while it was 7% when converted to a TKA.

Oxford meniscal bearing knee versus the Marmor knee in unicompartmental arthroplasty for arthrosis. A Swedish multicenter survival study

In the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Study, all 699 Oxford meniscal bearing cemented unicompartmental prostheses (Biomet, Bridgend, UK) were identified and analyzed regarding failure pattern and compared with all Marmor prostheses (Smith & Nephew Richards, Orthez, France) and with a time-, age-, and sex-matched subset of Marmor prostheses using survival statistics expressed as cumulative revision rates. After 1 year there was already a higher rate, and after 6 years the rate of the Oxford group was more than twice that of the Marmor group. There were 50 revisions in the Oxford group: dislocating meniscus in 16, loosening of the femoral component in 6, tibial component in 4, both components in 4, contralateral arthrosis in 10, infection in 4, and technical failure with instability, pain, and/or impingement of the meniscal bearing anterior in the femoral condyle in 6. It is still unclear if the design with the sliding menisci will, in the long turn, reduce wear and loosening, thereby compensating for the initially inferior results. It is recommended that until this question is clarified, the Oxford knee should be used on a limited scale for long-term comparative studies only.

Osteoarthrosis of the knee in men and women in association with overweight, smoking, and hormone therapy

OBJECTIVES The aim was to examine the relation between osteoarthrosis of the knee leading to prosthetic surgery among men and women and overweight, smoking, and hormone therapy. METHODS A case-referent study was performed with a study base of all men and women, born 1921–1938, living in 14 counties in Sweden during 1991–95. The cases (n=625) were identified through the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register. The referents (n=548) were randomly selected through the central population register from the same counties. Detailed information on general health status, height, weight, smoking habits, medication, use of hormones, specific physical loads from occupation and housework, and sports activities was collected by a telephone interview and a postal questionnaire. The cases were classified in terms of high, medium or low/non-exposure to the factors studied, according to the distribution of variables among the referents. RESULTS Women with high body mass index (BMI) at the age of 40 had a relative risk of 9.2 (95%CI 5.3, 16.0) of developing severe knee osteoarthrosis later in life, and for men at the same age the relative risk was 3.9 (95%CI 2.3, 6.4). Smokers were less likely to develop severe knee osteoarthrosis compared with non-smokers. Oestrogen therapy for women over 50 showed an increased relative risk of 1.8 (95%CI 1.2, 2.6), while use of oral contraceptives did not influence the risk . CONCLUSION Overweight is a risk factor for knee osteoarthrosis leading to prosthetic surgery in men and women, with the strongest relation for women. Oestrogen therapy after 50 increased the relative risk, while smoking decreased it.

Use of unicompartmental instead of tricompartmental prostheses for unicompartmental arthrosis in the knee is a cost-effective alternative. 15,437 primary tricompartmental prostheses were compared with 10,624 primary medial or lateral unicompartmental prostheses.

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is known to have a higher risk of revision than tricompartmental arthroplasty (TKA), while UKA implants are generally less expensive than TKA implants. We estimated the costs of implants and hospital stay of both procedures and related the cost difference at primary operation to the difference in number of revisions to be expected. We compared 15,437 primary TKAs and 10,624 primary medial or lateral UKAs. The operations were all done on patients with arthrosis during 1985-1995. By matching patients in the Swedish Patient Administration System with the Swedish National Knee Arthroplasty Register, the groups could be compared regarding the length of the hospital stay. The cumulative revision rate (CRR) and the relative risk of revision were calculated with survival statistics, as well as the risk of a second revision and the risk of infection. The weighted mean cost of the commonest implants in each group was used as an estimate of the implant cost. We found that the TKA patients were, on average, 2 years older at operation and had a lower CRR than the UKA patients-i.e., 10-year CRR of 12% and 16%, respectively. After adjusting for age, gender and year of operation, UKA patients were found to have a 2-day shorter hospital stay and fewer serious complications than TKA patients. The mean estimated cost of a unicompartmental implant was 57% of that of a tricompartmental implant. We conclude, that by using UKA instead of TKA in appropriate patients, money can be saved, even after taking into account the increased number of revisions to be expected.

Knee arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis: A report from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register on 4, 381 primary operations 1985–1995

The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register has data on 4,381 primary operations performed 1985-1995 for rheumatoid arthritis. Of these, 192 were performed with unicompartmental prostheses and 4143 with tricompartmental. 77% were women and the mean age was 66 years. There were 126 first, 20 second, and 1 third revision in tricompartmental arthroplasties, mainly for loosening, infection and patellar problems. There were 38 first, 3 second, and 1 third revision in unicompartmental arthroplasties, mainly for progression of RA and loosening. Cumulative revision rates (Kaplan-Meier) were calculated. Tricompartmental knees had a 10-year cumulative revision rate of 5% and uni-knees 25%. Patients treated before 1990, men and patients younger than 55 had higher revision rates than patients treated after 1990, women and older patients, respectively. Cemented tibial components resulted in lower revision rates than uncemented ones. There was no significant difference in revision rates between patellar replaced and unreplaced knees or between the 9 commonest implant types.

Validation of the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register: a postal survey regarding 30,376 knees operated on between 1975 and 1995

The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register is dependent on the participating clinics regarding accuracy of information. As the register is prospective, and since revision is used as the endpoint in survival analyses, it is important that all revisions of registered primary arthroplasties are reported. To validate the register, we sent a questionnaire to all living patients with 30,796 knees registered as having been operated on from 1975-1995. Of living patients, 99% could be located and 93% answered. We found that one fifth of the revisions had not been reported and that relatively fewer revisions were lost to follow-up during the first decade of the register than in the following years. To investigate whether the Patient Administrative System (PAS), a database based on ICD coding and run by the Swedish health authorities, could be used to locate missing revisions found by the postal survey, we compared this database with the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register. 84% of the missing revisions revealed by the postal survey were found by using this method. Hence after the survey and the use of the PAS to find unreported revisions in deceased and non-responding patients, we estimate that 94% of all revisions are accounted for. Apart from a generally higher cumulative revision rate, conclusions reported from the Register in recent years regarding survivorship seem to be unaffected by the underreporting.

The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Project

25 years ago, members of the Swedish Orthopedic Society, at a meeting in Uppsala, initiated a nationwide multicenter study which should monitor endoprosthetic knee surgery prospectively. The project evolved into the creation of a database, later known as the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register (SKAR), the oldest national arthroplasty register. It was a success and comprised more than 65,000 primary knee arthroplasties, with their revisions, at the end of 1999.

Incidence of surgically treated osteoarthritis in the hip and knee in male construction workers.

Objective: Occupational workload has been associated with an increased risk of osteoarthritis. The objective was to further examine the association between workload and occurrence of osteoarthritis and in particular to study whether heavy workload has similar importance as a causative factor for osteoarthritis of the hip and knee. Methods: In a cohort study, the authors investigated the incidence of surgically treated osteoarthritis in the hip and knee among men employed in the Swedish construction industry (n = 204 741). Incident cases were found by linkage with the Swedish hospital discharge register between 1987 and 1998. Incidence rates adjusted for age and BMI were compared between different occupational groups. Results: The incidence rates for osteoarthritis in hip and knee were positively correlated (r = 0.62; p = 0.01). There was a significantly increased risk of surgically treated osteoarthritis in the knee among floor layers, asphalt workers, sheet-metal workers, rock workers, plumbers, brick layers, wood workers and concrete workers. Even if there was a trend towards increased relative risks for osteoarthritis in the hip in floor layers, asphalt workers, wood workers and concrete workers they were not statistically significant. The relative risk for surgically treated osteoarthritis of the knee was 4.7 (95% CI 1.8 to 12.3) among floor layers, indicating an attributable fraction for work factors of 79%. Conclusions: This study shows that some work-related factors seem to be risk factors for osteoarthritis both in the knee and hip. However, the risk factors seem to be of greater importance for osteoarthritis in the knee compared with the hip. This study indicates that at least 50% of the cases of severe osteoarthritis of the knee can be prevented through decreasing occupational risk factors in some occupational groups.