Stefan Matschke

Effect of an Unrepaired Fracture of the Ulnar Styloid Base on Outcome After Plate-and-Screw Fixation of a Distal Radial Fracture

BACKGROUND The impact of an unrepaired fracture of the ulnar styloid base on recovery after internal fixation of a fracture of the distal part of the radius is uncertain. We evaluated a series of patients with an internally fixed fracture of the distal part of the radius to test the hypothesis that there is no difference in wrist motion or function scores between those with an untreated fracture of the ulnar styloid base and those with no ulnar fracture. METHODS Two cohorts of seventy-six matched patients, one with a fracture of the ulnar styloid base and the other with no ulnar fracture, were retrospectively analyzed by examining data gathered in a prospective study of plate-and-screw fixation of distal radial fractures. Patients were matched for age, sex, AO fracture type, and injury mechanism. The two cohorts were analyzed for differences in motion, grip strength, pain, the Gartland and Werley score, the DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) score, and the SF-36 (Short Form-36) score at six, twelve, and twenty-four months postoperatively. In a second analysis, sixty-four patients with <2 mm of displacement of a fracture of the ulnar styloid base were compared with forty-nine patients with greater displacement. Differences between cohorts and within cohorts over time were determined with use of regression analysis and the likelihood ratio test. RESULTS No significant differences were found between patients with an unrepaired fracture of the ulnar styloid base and those with no ulnar fracture at any of the follow-up intervals. However, a trend was observed toward less grip strength at six months (71% [of that on the contralateral side] compared with 79%; mean difference, -8% [95% confidence interval=-15.3% to -0.6%]; p=0.03) and less flexion (54 degrees compared with 59 degrees ; mean difference, -5 degrees [95% confidence interval=-11.7 degrees to -0.8 degrees ]; p=0.02) and ulnar deviation (32 degrees compared with 36 degrees ; mean difference, -4 degrees [95% confidence interval=-7 degrees to -0.1 degrees ]; p=0.05) at twenty-four months after surgery in patients with an untreated fracture of the ulnar styloid base. There were no significant differences with regard to any tested outcome measure between the patients with >or=2 mm of displacement of an unrepaired fracture of the ulnar styloid base and those with less displacement. CONCLUSIONS An unrepaired fracture of the base of the ulnar styloid does not appear to influence function or outcome after treatment of a distal radial fracture with plate-and-screw fixation, even when the ulnar fracture was initially displaced >or=2 mm.

The Surgical Treatment of Unstable Distal Radius Fractures by Angle Stable Implants: A Multicenter Prospective Study

Objectives: The goal of this study is to document the 2-year outcome after surgical treatment of distal radius fractures using an angle stable implant. Design: Prospective case-series. Setting: Multicenter study in nine trauma units with recruitment between December 2001 and May 2003. Patients: One hundred eight patients with the same number of distal radius fractures. Intervention: Open reduction and internal fixation with the LCP DR 3.5 mm (Synthes GmbH, Oberdorf, Switzerland). Main Outcome Measurements: Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand, Gartland and Werley, SF-36 scores, radiologic assessment, and return to work status at 2 years. Results: At 2 years, the mean range of motion (relative to the contralateral wrist) was 83% for palmar flexion, 91% for extension, 94% for radial deviation, 92% for ulnar deviation, and 98%/94% for pronation/supination angles. Grip strength was 90% of the mean uninjured side. The average radiographic measurements were 23.6° for radial inclination angle, 6.1° for palmar (volar) tilt angle, and 0 mm for ulnar variance. The proportion of fractures for which the Gartland and Werley score was categorized as either good or excellent was 89%. Minor complications occurred in 14 patients, although none of these events were considered to be directly related to the implant. Conclusion: After a 2-year follow-up period, the use of an angle stable implant for unstable distal radius fractures provides adequate fixation with minimal loss of reduction. This device is associated with good functional and radiologic outcome for the patient and is indicated for distal radius fractures classified as Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) Type 23-A2/A3, OTA Type 23-B2/B3, and OTA Type 23-C.

Comparison of angle stable plate fixation approaches for distal radius fractures

INTRODUCTION The aim of the study was to compare radiological and functional outcomes between volar and dorsal surgical fixation of distal radius fractures using low-profile, fixed-angle implants. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 305 distal radius fracture patients were treated with Synthes locking compression plate (LCP) 2.4- or 3.5-mm fixation using either a volar (n=266) or dorsal (n=39) approach. The patients were examined at 6 months, 1 and 2 years for radiological assessment of fracture healing, alignment, reduction and arthritis, as well as the determination of various functional outcome scores. RESULTS Both groups were comparable with respect to baseline and injury characteristics. The complication rate was higher for the volar approach (15%). No significant differences were observed for Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) scores, pain, arthritis grade, grip strength and radiological measurements. However, a significantly better functional outcome represented by a low mean Gartland and Werley score was observed for the volar approach after 6 and 12 months. Significantly higher percentages of dorsal extension, palmar flexion, ulnar deviation and supination angle (relative to the mean contralateral healthy wrist) were also reported for volar approach patients at the 6-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Volar internal fixation of distal radius fractures with LCP DR implants can result in earlier and better functional outcome compared with the dorsal approach, yet is associated with a higher incidence of complications. After 2 years, these differences are no longer observed between the two surgical methods.

Five years’ clinical experience with the unreamed humeral nail in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures

With the development of interlocking nail systems especially designed for the upper arm, standards for the operative treatment of humeral shaft fractures have appeared to change. The trumpet-like shape of the medullary cavity does not allow stable splinting with a nail alone, and therefore the bone--nail complex is commonly stabilized with interlocking bolts. Between June 1996 and June 2001, 51 fractures of the humeral shaft were treated operatively at the BG Unfallklinik Ludwigshafen with the unreamed humeral nail (UHN; Synthes). All nails were inserted by the retrograde technique. Ninety-five percent of the patients showed excellent or good shoulder function at follow-up examinations. For elbow function, 91.4% of the patients showed excellent or good results. Three out of four patients with poor elbow function had suffered from an additional injury to the brachial plexus; one patient developed heterotopic ossification. Intraoperative complications were: one iatrogenic lesion of the radial nerve, two intraoperative shaft fractures, one split at the insertion point, and one supracondylar fracture. As implants we used 7.5 mm nails in 36 cases and 6.7 mm nails in 15 cases. Among the 47 patients undergoing follow-up examinations, we found two cases of non-union. All patients were pain-free. Thirty-seven patients were very satisfied, six satisfied and four dissatisfied with the therapy. Decisive criteria for the use of a new implant are a high safety standard and simple reproducibility; these appear to be fulfilled by retrograde nailing of humeral fractures with the UHN. Interlocking nailing with the UHN enriches the range of therapeutic options for humeral shaft fractures.

Comparison of Functional Outcome After Volar Plate Fixation With 2.4-mm Titanium Versus 3.5-mm Stainless-Steel Plate for Extra-Articular Fracture of Distal Radius

PURPOSE Open reduction and locked volar plate and screw fixation is a popular treatment method for extra-articular distal radius fractures with dorsal metaphyseal comminution. In this study, we compared the use of a titanium 2.4-mm precontoured plate with that of a stainless-steel oblique 3.5-mm T-shaped plate to test the null hypothesis that there would be no difference in wrist function or upper extremity-specific health status in the internal fixation of AO-type A3.2 distal radius fractures. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 24 patients treated with a 2.4-mm titanium plate and 38 patients treated with a 3.5-mm stainless-steel plate for an extra-articular and dorsally angulated distal radius fracture, from data gathered in a prospective cohort study of plate and screw fixation of distal radius fractures. The 2 cohorts were analyzed for differences in motion, grip strength, pain, Gartland and Werley score, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score, and Short Form-36 score at 6, 12, and 24 months of follow-up. Group differences and their change over time were determined using regression analysis and the likelihood ratio test. RESULTS There were no significant differences in wrist function and arm-specific health status between patients treated with a 2.4-mm plate and those treated with a 3.5-mm plate at 6, 12, or 24 months of follow-up. However, we observed a trend toward greater wrist flexion at 1 year (66 degrees vs 55 degrees ; p=.07) and greater flexion-extension arc (137 degrees vs 123 degrees ; p=.08) and pronation-supination arc (172 degrees vs 160 degrees ; p=.07) at 24 months after surgery in patients treated with a 2.4-mm plate. CONCLUSIONS Patients with a dorsally angulated extra-articular distal radius facture can expect similar results when treated with either a precontoured 2.4-mm titanium plate or a 3.5-mm stainless-steel T-shaped plate. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic III.

Comparison of AO Type-B and Type-C volar shearing fractures of the distal part of the radius.

BACKGROUND Fractures of the volar articular margin of the distal part of the radius with volar radiocarpal subluxation (volar shearing, or Barton, fractures) can be accompanied by a fracture of the dorsal metaphyseal cortex. We tested the null hypothesis that there is no difference in wrist function or health status after open reduction and plate-and-screw fixation between volar shearing fractures with a dorsal cortical fracture (complete articular, AO Type C) and those without a dorsal cortical fracture (partial articular, AO Type B). METHODS In a multicenter cohort study, fifty-seven patients with a volar marginal shearing fracture of the distal part of the radius and volar radiocarpal subluxation were followed for at least one year following plate-and-screw fixation. Thirty-seven patients who also had a dorsal metaphyseal cortical fracture (Type-C fracture) were compared with twenty patients who had a partial articular (Type-B) fracture. The two cohorts were analyzed for differences in wrist and forearm motion, grip strength, pain, and the Gartland and Werley, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), and Short Form-36 (SF-36) scores at six, twelve, and twenty-four months postoperatively. Differences in mean values and their change over time were determined. RESULTS There were no significant differences between patients with a Type-B fracture and those with a Type-C fracture with respect to motion, grip strength, or the Gartland and Werley or DASH score at any time point. At six months after the surgery, the patients with a Type-B volar shearing fracture reported a mean score for pain in motion of 0.5 point on a 10-point visual analogue scale compared with 2.2 points for patients with a Type-C fracture (difference in means, 1.7 points [95% confidence interval, 0.7 to 2.6 points]; p < 0.001), but no significant difference was seen at twelve or twenty-four months. CONCLUSIONS Volar shearing fractures are usually complete articular, Type-C injuries. Patients with a Type-C volar shearing fracture experience more pain during early recovery, but ultimately their outcome is comparable with that for patients with a Type-B (partial articular) volar shearing fracture.

Comparison of Intra-Articular Simple Compression and Extra-Articular Distal Radial Fractures

BACKGROUND The impact of a single well-reduced or stable intra-articular fracture oriented in the sagittal plane on the outcome of internal fixation of a distal radial fracture is uncertain. We tested the hypothesis that wrist motion and function scores would not differ between patients with an extra-articular fracture and those with a single sagittal intra-articular fracture following open fracture reduction and internal fixation with use of a volar locking plate. METHODS Thirty-seven patients with a single sagittal intra-articular fracture of the distal aspect of the radius and seventy-four age and sex-matched patients with an extra-articular distal radial fracture were retrospectively analyzed with use of data gathered in a cohort study of plate and screw fixation of distal radial fractures. A volar locking plate was used in all patients. The two cohorts were analyzed for differences in motion, grip strength, pain, and Gartland and Werley, DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand), and SF-36 (Short Form-36) scores six, twelve, and twenty-four months after surgery. Differences between the cohorts and differences within each cohort over time were determined with use of regression analysis and the likelihood ratio test. RESULTS Patients with a single sagittal intra-articular fracture and those an extra-articular fracture did not differ significantly with respect to motion, grip strength, Gartland and Werley score, or DASH score at any time point. However, there was a trend toward less pronation (95% compared with 98% of that in the contralateral arm) and less grip strength (76% compared with 81% of that in the contralateral arm) at six months and toward a smaller flexion-extension arc (118° compared with 128°) at one year after surgery in patients with a single sagittal intra-articular fracture. CONCLUSIONS Open reduction and volar locking plate and screw fixation of extra-articular fractures and of simple intra-articular fractures of the distal aspect of the radius are associated with comparable impairment and disability within two years of surgery.

Analysis of complications and perioperative data after open or percutaneous dorsal instrumentation following traumatic spinal fracture of the thoracic and lumbar spine: a retrospective cohort study including 491 patients

PurposeThe aim of the current study is to analyze perioperative data and complications of open vs. percutaneous dorsal instrumentation after dorsal stabilization in patients suffering from fractures of the thoracic or lumbar spine.MethodsIn the time period from 01/2007 to 06/2009, open surgical approach was used for dorsal stabilization. The percutaneous surgical approach was used from 05/2009 to 03/2014. In every time period, all types of fractures were treated only by open or by percutaneous approach, respectively, to avoid any selection bias. Retrospectively, epidemiological data, complications and perioperative data were documented and statistically analyzed.ResultsA total of 491 patients met the inclusion criteria. Open surgery procedure was carried out on 169 patients, and percutaneous surgery procedure was carried out on 322 patients. Fracture level ranged from T1 to L5, and fractures were classified types A, B, and C. In 91.4% of all patients, no complication occured following dorsal stabilization after traumatic spine fracture during their hospital stay. However, 42 complications related to dorsal stabilization have been documented during the hospital stay. The complication rate was 14.8% if open surgical approach has been used and was significantly reduced to 5.3% using percutaneous surgical approach. Post-operative hospital stay was also reduced significantly using the percutaneous surgical approach.ConclusionsAccording to the current study, percutaneous dorsal stabilization of the spine could also be safely used in trauma cases and is not restricted to degenerative spinal surgery.

Characteristics of two different locking compression plates in the volar fixation of complex articular distal radius fractures

Objectives To investigate the differences of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of complex AO Type C distal radius fractures between two different models of a single implant type. Methods A total of 136 patients who received either a 2.4 mm (n = 61) or 3.5 mm (n = 75) distal radius locking compression plate (LCP DR) using a volar approach were followed over two years. The main outcome measurements included motion, grip strength, pain, and the scores of Gartland and Werley, the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH). Differences between the treatment groups were evaluated using regression analysis and the likelihood ratio test with significance based on the Bonferroni corrected p-value of < 0.003. Results The groups were similar with respect to baseline and injury characteristics as well as general surgical details. The risk of experiencing a complication after ORIF with a LCP DR 2.4 mm was 18% (n = 11) compared with 11% (n = 8) after receiving a LCP DR 3.5 mm (p = 0.45). Wrist function was also similar between the cohorts based on the mean ranges of movement (all p > 0.052) and grip strength measurements relative to the contralateral healthy side (p = 0.583). In addition, DASH and SF-36 component scores as well as pain were not significantly different between the treatment groups throughout the two-year period (all p ≥ 0.005). No patient from either treatment group had a step-off > 2 mm. Conclusions Differences in plate design do not influence the overall final outcome of fracture fixation using LCP.

Complications in Endoscopic Anterior Thoracolumbar Spinal Reconstructive Surgery

The use of endoscopic, minimally invasive surgical techniques in the reconstruction of the anterior column of the spine results in a significant decrease of approach-related complications. Depending on the level of injury, every stage of the surgical procedure is associated with a specific risk of complications requiring a detailed preparation of the operation. Preoperative preparations aim at recognition and improvement of preexisting cardiopulmonary diseases (e. g. chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases) as well as planning of anesthesia (twin tube airway, monitoring) and surgical technique, including optimal position of the patient, approach, reduction and stabilization of the fracture. Intraoperatively, a specific management is necessary to avoid complications, e. g. vascular, dura, or spinal cord injuries or lesions of the lung and the abdominal organs. In the postoperative course, general complications (infection, wound healing problems, bleeding, atelectasis), implant- associated complications (aseptic loosening, cage sinking), or fusion-associated complications (loss of reduction, pseudarthrosis, corresponding problems) have to be differentiated.