Stefania Zappettini

Salvinorin A exerts opposite presynaptic controls on neurotransmitter exocytosis from mouse brain nerve terminals

We investigated the effects of salvinorin A on the basal and the 12 mM K(+)-evoked release of preloaded [(3)H]noradenaline ([(3)H]NA) and [(3)H]serotonin ([(3)H]5-HT) from mouse hippocampal nerve terminals (synaptosomes), as well as on the basal and 12mM K(+)-evoked release of preloaded [(3)H]dopamine ([(3)H]DA) from mouse striatal and prefrontal cortex (PFc) synaptosomes. Salvinorin A (0.1-1000 nM) failed to affect the basal release of amines, but inhibited the 12 mM K(+)-evoked, Ca(2+)-dependent, exocytotic-like release of [(3)H]5-HT and [(3)H]DA. At the same concentration, salvinorin A facilitated the 12 mM K(+)-evoked, Ca(2+)-dependent, exocytotic-like release of [(3)H]NA. These effects could not be observed in pertussis toxin (PTx) entrapped synaptosomes. The broad spectrum kappa-opioid receptor (KOR) antagonist norbinaltorphimine (norBNI, 1-100 nM) antagonized the inhibition of [(3)H]5-HT and [(3)H]DA exocytosis as well as the facilitation of [(3)H]NA overflow induced by 100 nM salvinorin A. The KOR agonist U69593 (1-100 nM) mimicked salvinorin A in inhibiting [(3)H]5-HT and of [(3)H]DA exocytosis, its effect being prevented by norBNI, but leaving unchanged the K(+)-evoked release of [(3)H]NA. The effects of Salvinorin A on neurotransmitter exocytosis were not prevented by the selective mu opioid (MOR) receptor antagonist CTAP (10-100 nM), whereas facilitation of [(3)H]NA exocytosis, but not inhibition of [(3)H]5-HT and [(3)H]DA K(+)-evoked release, was counteracted by the delta opioid receptor (DOR) antagonist naltrindole (1-100 nM). We conclude that salvinorin A presynaptically modulates central NA, 5-HT, and DA exocytosis evoked by a mild depolarizing stimulus by acting at presynaptic opioid receptors having different pharmacological profiles.

Release-enhancing pre-synaptic muscarinic and nicotinic receptors co-exist and interact on dopaminergic nerve endings of rat nucleus accumbens.

Dopaminergic nerve endings in the corpus striatum possess nicotinic (nAChRs) and muscarinic cholinergic receptors (mAChRs) mediating release of dopamine (DA). Whether nAChRs and mAChRs co‐exist and interact on the same nerve endings is unknown. We here investigate on these possibilities using rat nucleus accumbens synaptosomes pre‐labeled with [3H]DA and exposed in superfusion to cholinergic receptor ligands. The mixed nAChR–mAChR agonists acetylcholine (ACh) and carbachol provoked [3H]DA release partially sensitive to the mAChR antagonist atropine but totally blocked by the nAChR antagonist mecamylamine. Addition of the mAChR agonist oxotremorine at the minimally effective concentration of 30 μmol/L, together with 3, 10, or 100 μmol/L (−)nicotine provoked synergistic effect on [3H]DA overflow. The [3H]DA overflow elicited by 100 μmol/L (−)nicotine plus 30 μmol/L oxotremorine was reduced by atropine down to the release produced by (−)nicotine alone and it was abolished by mecamylamine. The ryanodine receptor blockers dantrolene or 8‐bromo‐cADP‐ribose, but not the inositol 1,4,5‐trisphosphate receptor blocker xestospongin C inhibited the (−)nicotine/oxotremorine evoked [3H]DA overflow similarly to atropine. This overflow was partly sensitive to 100 nmol/L methyllycaconitine which did not prevent the synergistic effect of (−)nicotine/oxotremorine. Similarly to (−)nicotine, the selective α4β2 nAChR agonist RJR2403 exhibited synergism when added together with oxotremorine. To conclude, in rat nucleus accumbens, α4β2 nAChRs exert a permissive role on the releasing function of reportedly M5 mAChRs co‐existing on the same dopaminergic nerve endings.

Dual effect of beta-amyloid on α7 and α4β2 nicotinic receptors controlling the release of glutamate, aspartate and GABA in rat hippocampus.

Background We previously showed that beta-amyloid (Aβ), a peptide considered as relevant to Alzheimers Disease, is able to act as a neuromodulator affecting neurotransmitter release in absence of evident sign of neurotoxicity in two different rat brain areas. In this paper we focused on the hippocampus, a brain area which is sensitive to Alzheimers Disease pathology, evaluating the effect of Aβ (at different concentrations) on the neurotransmitter release stimulated by the activation of pre-synaptic cholinergic nicotinic receptors (nAChRs, α4β2 and α7 subtypes). Particularly, we focused on some neurotransmitters that are usually involved in learning and memory: glutamate, aspartate and GABA. Methodology/Findings We used a dual approach: in vivo experiments (microdialysis technique on freely moving rats) in parallel to in vitro experiments (isolated nerve endings derived from rat hippocampus). Both in vivo and in vitro the administration of nicotine stimulated an overflow of aspartate, glutamate and GABA. This effect was greatly inhibited by the highest concentrations of Aβ considered (10 µM in vivo and 100 nM in vitro). In vivo administration of 100 nM Aβ (the lowest concentration considered) potentiated the GABA overflow evoked by nicotine. All these effects were specific for Aβ and for nicotinic secretory stimuli. The in vitro administration of either choline or 5-Iodo-A-85380 dihydrochloride (α7 and α4β2 nAChRs selective agonists, respectively) elicited the hippocampal release of aspartate, glutamate, and GABA. High Aβ concentrations (100 nM) inhibited the overflow of all three neurotransmitters evoked by both choline and 5-Iodo-A-85380 dihydrochloride. On the contrary, low Aβ concentrations (1 nM and 100 pM) selectively acted on α7 subtypes potentiating the choline-induced release of both aspartate and glutamate, but not the one of GABA. Conclusions/Significance The results reinforce the concept that Aβ has relevant neuromodulatory effects, which may span from facilitation to inhibition of stimulated release depending upon the concentration used.

In vitro exposure to nicotine induces endocytosis of presynaptic AMPA receptors modulating dopamine release in rat nucleus accumbens nerve terminals.

Here we provide functional and immunocytochemical evidence supporting the presence on Nucleus Accumbens (NAc) dopaminergic terminals of cyclothiazide-sensitive, alfa-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolone propionate (AMPA) receptors, which activation causes Ca²⁺-dependent [³H]dopamine ([³H]DA) exocytosis. These AMPA receptors cross-talk with co-localized nicotinic receptors (nAChRs), as suggested by the finding that in vitro short-term pre-exposure of synaptosomes to 30 μM nicotine caused a significant reduction of both the 30 μM nicotine and the 100 μM AMPA-evoked [³H]DA overflow. Entrapping pep2-SVKI, a peptide known to compete for the binding of GluA2 subunit to scaffolding proteins involved in AMPA receptor endocytosis, in NAC synaptosomes prevented the nicotine-induced reduction of AMPA-mediated [³H]DA exocytosis, while pep2-SVKE, used as negative control, was inefficacious. Immunocytochemical studies showed that a significant percentage of NAc terminals were dopaminergic and that most of these terminals also posses GluA2 receptor subunits. Western blot analysis of GluA2 immunoreactivity showed that presynaptic GluA2 proteins in NAc terminals were reduced in nicotine-pretreated synaptosomes when compared to the control. The nACh-AMPA receptor-receptor interaction was not limited to dopaminergic terminals since nicotine pre-exposure also affected the presynaptic AMPA receptors controlling hippocampal noradrenaline release, but not the presynaptic AMPA receptors controlling GABA and acetylcholine release. These observations could be relevant to the comprehension of the molecular mechanisms at the basis of nicotine rewarding.

Nicotinic and muscarinic cholinergic receptors coexist on GABAergic nerve endings in the mouse striatum and interact in modulating GABA release

Muscarinic cholinergic receptors (mAChRs) and nicotinic cholinergic receptors (nAChRs) regulating GABA release from striatal nerve endings were studied by monitoring release of previously accumulated [(3)H]GABA or endogenous GABA from superfused mouse striatal synaptosomes. Oxotremorine inhibited the release of [(3)H]GABA elicited by depolarization with 4-aminopyridine (4-AP), an effect antagonized by atropine. Agonists at nAChRs, including the alpha(4)beta(2)( *) subunit-selective RJR2403, provoked the release of [(3)H]GABA as well as of the endogenous transmitter; these effects also were prevented by oxotremorine and pilocarpine suggesting coexpression of functional mAChRs and alpha(4)beta(2)( *) nAChRs on GABAergic nerve endings. The inhibitory effects of oxotremorine on the release of [(3)H]GABA evoked by 4-AP or by RJR2403 were: (i) prevented by the M(2)/M(4) mAChR antagonist himbacine; (ii) insensitive to the M2 antagonist AFDX116; (iii) blocked by the selective M(4) mAChR antagonists MT3, thus indicating the involvement of receptors of the M(4) subtype. In conclusion, in the corpus striatum, acetylcholine released from cholinergic interneurons can activate alpha(4)beta(2)( *) nAChRs mediating release of GABA; this evoked release can be negatively modulated by M(4) mAChRs coexpressed on the same GABAergic terminals.

Presynaptic Nicotinic α7 and Non-α7 Receptors Stimulate Endogenous GABA Release from Rat Hippocampal Synaptosomes through Two Mechanisms of Action

Background Although converging evidence has suggested that nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChR) play a role in the modulation of GABA release in rat hippocampus, the specific involvement of different nAChR subtypes at presynaptic level is still a matter of debate. In the present work we investigated, using selective α7 and α4β2 nAChR agonists, the presence of different nAChR subtypes on hippocampal GABA nerve endings to assess to what extent and through which mechanisms they stimulate endogenous GABA release. Methodology/Findings All agonists elicited GABA overflow. Choline (Ch)-evoked GABA overflow was dependent to external Ca2+, but unaltered in the presence of Cd2+, tetrodotoxin (TTX), dihydro-β-erythroidine (DHβE) and 1-(4,4-Diphenyl-3-butenyl)-3-piperidinecarboxylic acid hydrochloride SKF 89976A. The effect of Ch was blocked by methyllycaconitine (MLA), α-bungarotoxin (α-BTX), dantrolene, thapsigargin and xestospongin C, suggesting that GABA release might be triggered by Ca2+ entry into synaptosomes through the α7 nAChR channel with the involvement of calcium from intracellular stores. Additionally, 5-Iodo-A-85380 dihydrochloride (5IA85380) elicited GABA overflow, which was Ca2+ dependent, blocked by Cd2+, and significantly inhibited by TTX and DHβE, but unaffected by MLA, SKF 89976A, thapsigargin and xestospongin C and dantrolene. These findings confirm the involvement of α4β2 nAChR in 5IA85380-induced GABA release that seems to occur following membrane depolarization and opening calcium channels. Conclusions/Significance Rat hippocampal synaptosomes possess both α7 and α4β2 nAChR subtypes, which can modulate GABA release via two distinct mechanisms of action. The finding that GABA release evoked by the mixture of sub-maximal concentration of 5IA85380 plus sub-threshold concentrations of Ch was significantly larger than that elicited by the sum of the effects of the two agonists is compatible with the possibility that they coexist on the same nerve terminals. These findings would provide the basis for possible selective pharmacological strategies to treat neuronal disorders that involve the dysfunction of hippocampal cholinergic system.

Exposure to an enriched environment selectively increases the functional response of the pre-synaptic NMDA receptors which modulate noradrenaline release in mouse hippocampus.

We evaluated the impact of environmental training on the functions of pre‐synaptic glutamatergic NMDA and α‐amino‐3‐hydroxy‐5‐methyl‐4‐isoxazole propionate (AMPA) and nicotinic receptors expressed by hippocampal noradrenergic nerve terminals. Synaptosomes isolated from the hippocampi of mice housed in enriched (EE) or standard (SE) environment were labeled with [3H]noradrenaline ([3H]NA) and tritium release was monitored during exposure in superfusion to NMDA, AMPA, epibatidine or high K+. NMDA ‐evoked [3H]NA release from EE hippocampal synaptosomes was significantly higher than that from SE synaptosomes, while the [3H]NA overflow elicited by 100 μM AMPA, 1 μM epibatidine or (9, 15, 25 mM) KCl was unchanged. In EE mice, the apparent affinity of NMDA or glycine was unmodified, while the efficacy was significantly augmented. Sensitivity to non‐selective or subtype‐selective NMDA receptor antagonists (MK‐801, ifenprodil and Zn2+ ions) was not modified in EE. Finally, the analysis of NMDA receptor subunit mRNA expression in noradrenergic cell bodies of the locus coeruleus showed that NR1, NR2A, NR2B and NR2D subunits were unchanged, while NR2C decreased significantly in EE mice as compared to SE mice. Functional up‐regulation of the pre‐synaptic NMDA receptors modulating NA release might contribute to the improved learning and memory found in animals exposed to an EE.

Beta Amyloid Differently Modulate Nicotinic and Muscarinic Receptor Subtypes which Stimulate in vitro and in vivo the Release of Glycine in the Rat Hippocampus

Using both in vitro (hippocampal synaptosomes in superfusion) and in vivo (microdialysis) approaches we investigated whether and to what extent β amyloid peptide 1–40 (Aβ 1–40) interferes with the cholinergic modulation of the release of glycine (GLY) in the rat hippocampus. The nicotine-evoked overflow of endogenous GLY in hippocampal synaptosomes in superfusion was significantly inhibited by Aβ 1–40 (10 nM) while increasing the concentration to 100 nM the inhibitory effect did not further increase. Both the Choline (Ch; α7 agonist; 1 mM) and the 5-Iodo-A-85380 dihydrochloride (5IA85380, α4β2 agonist; 10 nM)-evoked GLY overflow were inhibited by Aβ 1–40 at 100 nM but not at 10 nM concentrations. The KCl evoked [3H]GLY and [3H]Acetylcholine (ACh) overflow were strongly inhibited in presence of oxotremorine; however this inhibitory muscarinic effect was not affected by Aβ 1–40. The effects of Aβ 1–40 on the administration of nicotine, veratridine, 5IA85380, and PHA543613 hydrochloride (PHA543613; a selective agonist of α7 subtypes) on hippocampal endogenous GLY release in vivo were also studied. Aβ 1–40 significantly reduced (at 10 μM but not at 1 μM) the nicotine-evoked in vivo release of GLY. Aβ 1–40 (at 10 μM but not at 1 μM) significantly inhibited the PHA543613 (1 mM)-elicited GLY overflow while was ineffective on the GLY overflow evoked by 5IA85380 (1 mM). Aβ 40–1 (10 μM) did not produce any inhibitory effect on nicotine-evoked GLY overflow both in the in vitro and in vivo experiments. Our results indicate that (a) the cholinergic modulation of the release of GLY occurs by the activation of both α7 and α4β2 nicotinic ACh receptors (nAChRs) as well as by the activation of inhibitory muscarinic ACh receptors (mAChRs) and (b) Aβ 1–40 can modulate cholinergic evoked GLY release exclusively through the interaction with α7 and the α4β2 nAChR nicotinic receptors but not through mAChR subtypes.

Pre-synaptic nicotinic and D2 receptors functionally interact on dopaminergic nerve endings of rat and mouse nucleus accumbens

The existence of pre‐synaptic auto‐ and hetero receptors which modulate neurotransmitter release is well documented. Emerging evidence show that in some cases these pre‐synaptic receptors may also cross‐talk with each other. The aim of the present work was to investigate whether acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) and dopamine (DA) autoreceptors, which are both able to modulate DA release, functionally interact on the same nerve endings. We used rat and mouse nucleus accumbens synaptosomes pre‐labeled with [3H]DA and exposed to nicotinic and dopaminergic receptor ligands. Both nicotinic agonists and 4‐aminopyridine (4‐AP) provoked [3H]DA release which was inhibited by quinpirole and blocked by sulpiride and raclopride. Both the inhibitory effect of quinpirole and the stimulatory effect of (−)nicotine did not change when the nAChRs or the DA receptors were desensitized. (−)Nicotine and 4‐AP were able to stimulate [3H]DA overflow also in mouse synaptosomes and this overflow was partially inhibited by quinpirole. In the β2 knockout mice quinpirole was still able to inhibit the [3H]DA overflow elicited by 4‐AP. To conclude: in rat and mouse the (−)nicotine evoked‐release can be modulated by D2/D3 autoreceptors present on the DA terminals and nAChRs function is independent from D2/D3 autoreceptors which themselves may function independently from the activation of nAChRs.

Dangerous Liaisons between Beta-Amyloid and Cholinergic Neurotransmission

The review examines the multifaceted interactions between cholinergic transmission and beta-amyloid suggesting a continuum in the action of the peptide that at low concentrations (picomolar-low nanomolar) may directly stimulate nicotinic cholinergic receptor while desensitizing them at increasing concentrations (high nanomolar-low micromolar). In addition high beta-amyloid concentrations may reduce the synaptic release of several neurotransmitters, including glutamate, aspartate, GABA, glycine and dopamine, when the release is elicited through cholinergic stimulation but not following depolarization. The effect of beta-amyloid has been observed both in vitro and in vivo in at least three different brain areas (nucleus accumbens, striatum, hippocampus) suggesting that the peptide may exert some general effects even if not all the brain areas have been evaluated. In turn the activation of cholinergic receptors may affect the amyloid precursor protein processing diverting the metabolism toward non-amyloidogenic products. These actions, dissociated from those described in the case of high beta-amyloid concentrations leading to neurotoxic oligomers, may participate to cause dysfunctions in the neurotransmitter activity, in turn leading, at least from a theoretical point of view, to early neuropsychiatric disturbances in the disease. Complexively these observations underscore novel relationships between two main players in Alzheimers disease pathogenesis that are beta-amyloid and cholinergic transmission. Also emerges the inherent difficulty of targeting beta-amyloid in a context in which the peptide exerts several actions beyond neurotoxicity.