Stefano Cannata

One- and Twelve-Month Safety and Efficacy Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Edge-to-Edge Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair (from the GRASP Registry)

The aim of this study was to report on the 30-day and 1-year outcomes of percutaneous mitral valve repair with the MitraClip technique in patients with grade ≥3+ mitral regurgitation (MR) at high risk for conventional surgical therapy enrolled in the prospective Getting Reduction of Mitral Insufficiency by Percutaneous Clip Implantation (GRASP) registry. Acute device success was defined as residual MR ≤2+ after clip implantation. The primary safety end point was the rate of major adverse events at 30 days. The primary efficacy end point was freedom from death, surgery for mitral valve dysfunction, or grade ≥3+ MR at 30 days and 1 year. A total of 117 patients were treated. Eighty-nine patients (76%) presented with functional MR and 28 patients (24%) with organic MR. Acute device success was observed in all patients. Device implantation time significantly diminished with experience and varied significantly between cases with 1 versus ≥2 clips. No procedural mortality was recorded. Major adverse events occurred in 4 patients at 30 days (4.3%). Deterioration to MR ≥3+ was recorded in 25% of patients with degenerative MR and 7% of those with functional MR at 1 year. No surgery for mitral valve dysfunction occurred within 1 year. Freedom from death, surgery for mitral valve dysfunction, or grade ≥3+ MR was 96.4% and 75.8% at 30 days and 1 year, respectively. No significant differences were noted in the primary efficacy end point between patients with degenerative MR and those with functional MR. In conclusion, percutaneous mitral valve repair with the MitraClip technique was shown to be safe and reasonably effective in 117 patients from a real-world setting.

Extended use of percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve repair beyond EVEREST (Endovascular Valve Edge-to-Edge Repair) criteria: 30-day and 12-month clinical and echocardiographic outcomes from the GRASP (Getting Reduction of Mitral Insufficiency by Percutaneous Clip Implantation) registry.

OBJECTIVES This study sought to compare, in high-risk patients with 3+ to 4+ mitral regurgitation (MR) dichotomized by baseline echocardiographic features, acute, 30-day, and 12-month outcomes following percutaneous mitral valve repair using the MitraClip. BACKGROUND The feasibility and mid-term outcomes after MitraClip implantation in patients with echocardiographic features different from the EVEREST (Endovascular Valve Edge-to-Edge Repair) I and II trials have been scarcely studied. METHODS Clinical and echocardiographic outcomes through 12-month follow-up of consecutive patients who underwent MitraClip implantation were obtained from an ongoing prospective registry. Two different groups, divided according to baseline echocardiographic criteria (investigational group [EVERESTOFF] and control group [EVERESTON]), were compared. RESULTS Seventy-eight patients were included in EVERESTOFF and 93 patients in EVERESTON groups. Important and comparable acute reductions in MR and no clip-related complications were revealed. The primary safety endpoint at 30 days was comparable between groups (2.6% vs. 6.5%, respectively, p = 0.204); in addition, MR reduction was mostly sustained, whereas equivalent improvement in New York Heart Association functional class were demonstrated. Kaplan-Meier freedom from death, surgery for mitral valve dysfunction, or grade ≥3+ MR at 12 months was demonstrated in 71.4% and 76.2%, respectively, in the EVERESTOFF and EVERESTON groups (log rank p = 0.378). Significant improvements in ejection fraction and reduction in left ventricle volumes were demonstrated in both groups over time, but the baseline between-group differences were sustained. CONCLUSIONS MitraClip implantation in patients with expanded baseline echocardiographic features, compared with the control group, was associated with similar rates of safety and efficacy through 12-month follow-up. Further validation of our findings is warranted.

Association of tricuspid regurgitation with clinical and echocardiographic outcomes after percutaneous mitral valve repair with the MitraClip System: 30-day and 12-month follow-up from the GRASP Registry

AIM The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of baseline tricuspid regurgitation (TR) on the outcomes after percutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVR) with the MitraClip system. METHODS AND RESULTS Data from 146 consecutive patients with functional mitral regurgitation (MR) were obtained. Two different groups, dichotomized according to the degree of pre-procedural TR (moderate/severe, n = 47 and none/mild, n = 99), had their clinical and echocardiographic outcomes through 12-month compared. At 30-day, the primary safety endpoint was significantly higher in moderate/severe TR compared with none/mild TR (10.6 vs. 2.0%, P = 0.035). Marked reduction in MR grades observed post-procedure were maintained through 12 months. Although NYHA functional class significantly improved in both groups compared with baseline, it was impaired in moderate/severe TR compared with the none/mild TR group (NYHA > II at 30 day: 33.3 vs. 9.2%, P < 0.001; at 1 year: 38.5 vs. 12.3%, respectively, P = 0.006). Left ventricle reverse remodelling and ejection fraction improvement were revealed in both groups. The primary efficacy endpoint at 12-month determined by freedom from death, surgery for mitral valve dysfunction, or grade ≥ 3+ MR was comparable between groups, but combined death and re-hospitalization for heart failure rates were higher in the moderate/severe TR group. Multivariable Cox regression analysis demonstrated that baseline moderate/severe TR and chronic kidney disease were independent predictors of this combined endpoint. CONCLUSIONS Although PMVR with MitraClip led to improvement in MR, TR, and NYHA functional class in patients with baseline moderate/severe TR, the primary safety endpoint at 30-day was impaired, while moderate/severe TR independently predicted death and re-hospitalization for heart failure at 12-month.

Acute kidney injury after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with self-expanding CoreValve prosthesis: Results from a large multicentre Italian research project

AIMS Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) can be associated with varying degrees of new renal impairment. The aim of this multicentre analysis was to determine the impact and predictors of periprocedural acute kidney injury (AKI) on prognosis after TAVI. METHODS AND RESULTS From the ClinicalService (a nation-based data repository and medical care project) dataset, 1,157 patients with severe aortic stenosis treated with the third-generation CoreValve prosthesis in seven Italian sites, and with creatinine data available at baseline and during the post-TAVI in-hospital course, were included in this analysis. All outcomes were defined according to the VARC criteria. Overall, AKI occurred in 231 (20.0%): 15.4% stage 1, 2.7% stage 2, and 1.9% stage 3. Compared to patients without AKI, patients who suffered post-procedural AKI had significantly higher three-year all-cause mortality (31% vs. 12%; adjusted HR: 2.09; 95% CI: 1.52-2.87, p<0.001) and cardiovascular mortality (14% vs. 6%; adjusted HR: 2.28; 95% CI: 1.41-3.71, p=0.001). No significant differences in terms of stroke, spontaneous MI, and bleeding were reported. Female gender (adjusted OR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.01-1.87; p=0.045), baseline renal insufficiency (adjusted OR: 11.02, 95% CI: 5.12-23.73; p<0.001), general anaesthesia (adjusted OR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.00-1.87; p=0.050), and transfusion ≥3 red blood cell (RBC) units within 72 hrs from TAVI (adjusted OR: 1.65, 95% CI: 1.02-2.68; p=0.041) were found to be independent predictors of AKI. CONCLUSIONS Acute kidney injury is a frequent complication and significantly impacts on both early and long-term TAVI survival. Females, subjects with impaired renal function at baseline, patients undergoing TAVI under general anaesthesia, and patients receiving ≥3 RBC units after the procedure should be considered populations at high risk for the development of AKI after TAVI.

Early discharge after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Background The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and the safety of early discharge (within 72 h) after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and to identify baseline features and/or peri-procedural variables, which may affect post-TAVI length-of-stay (LoS) duration. Methods and results Patients discharged within 72 h of TAVI (early discharge group) were compared with consecutive patients discharged after 3 days (late discharge group). Propensity-matched cohorts of patients with a 2:1 ratio were created to better control confounding bias. Among 465 patients, 107 (23.0%) were discharged within 3 days of the procedure. Multivariable regression analysis of unmatched patients demonstrated that baseline New York Heart Association (NYHA) class IV (OR: 0.22, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.96; p=0.045) and any bleeding (OR: 0.31, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.92; p=0.031) were less likely to be associated with early discharge after TAVI. Conversely, the year of procedure (OR: 1.66, 95% CI 1.25 to 2.20; p<0.001) and the presence of a permanent pacemaker (PPM) before TAVI (OR: 2.80, 95% CI 1.36 to 5.75; p=0.005) were associated with a higher probability of early discharge. In matched populations, patients in the early discharge group reported lower incidence of in-hospital bleeding (7.9% vs 19.4%, p=0.014), major vascular complications (2.3% vs 9.1%, p=0.038) and PPM implantation (7.9% vs18.5%, p=0.021), whereas after discharge, at 30-day, no significant differences were reported between groups in terms of death (2.2% vs 1.7%, p=0.540), bleeding (0.0% vs 1.1%, p=0.444), PPM implantation (1.1% vs 0.0%, p=0.333) and re-hospitalisation (1.1% vs 1.1%, p=1.000). Conclusions Early discharge (within 72 h) after transfemoral TAVI is feasible and does not seem to jeopardise the early safety of the procedure, when performed in a subset of patients selected by clinical judgement. Patients undergoing TAVI in unstable haemodynamic compensation and patients experiencing bleeding after the procedure demonstrated to be poorly suitable to this approach, whereas increasing experience in post-TAVI management was associated with a reduction of LoS.

Predictors of clinical outcomes after edge-to-edge percutaneous mitral valve repair

BACKGROUND There is limited information on the long-term outcomes and prognostic clinical predictors after edge-to-edge transcatheter mitral valve repair with the MitraClip system. METHODS Consecutive patients with mitral regurgitation (MR) undergoing MitraClip therapy between October 2008 and November 2013 in 4 Italian centers were analyzed. The primary end point of interest was all-cause death. The secondary end point was the composite of all-cause death or rehospitalization for heart failure. RESULTS A total of 304 patients were included, of which 79% had functional MR and 17% were in New York Heart Association functional class IV. Acute procedural success was obtained in 92% of cases, with no intraprocedural death. The cumulative incidences of all-cause death were 3.4%, 10.8%, and 18.6% at 30 days, 1 year, and 2 years, respectively. The corresponding incidences of the secondary end point were 4.4%, 22.0%, and 39.7%, respectively. In the Cox multivariate model, New York Heart Association functional class IV at baseline and ischemic MR etiology were found to significantly and independently predict both the primary and the secondary end point. A baseline, left ventricular end-systolic volume >110 mL was found to be an independent predictor of the secondary endpoint. Acute procedural success was independently associated with a lower risk of all-cause death and the combination of all-cause death or rehospitalization for heart failure at long-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS In a cohort of patients undergoing MitraClip therapy, those presenting at baseline with ischemic functional etiology, severely dilated ventricles, or advanced heart failure and those undergoing unsuccessful procedures carried the worst prognosis.

Transcatheter aortic bioprosthesis dislocation: technical aspects and midterm follow-up.

AIMS Prosthesis dislocation during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a rare but important complication. There is scarce data on the performance of prosthesis in the aorta that have become dislocated from their intended anatomical position in the aortic annulus. We investigated the causes of dislocation during TAVI of the self-expanding CoreValve ReValving™ System (CRS) (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA). This included midterm follow-up of patients experiencing this acute complication. METHODS AND RESULTS Among 176 consecutive patients undergoing TAVI with the CRS prosthesis, seven (3.9%) experienced acute valve dislocation. A comprehensive analysis of the mechanism of dislocation and clinical outcomes of patients experiencing this complication was performed. Based on the underlying mechanism, all cases of prosthesis displacement were classified into the following three groups: 1) accidental dislocation immediately after valve implantation (n=1; 14.3%); 2) dislocation during the snaring manoeuvre to reposition a low deployment of the CRS prosthesis (lower edge >10 mm) below the aortic annulus accompanied with haemodynamically significant regurgitation (n=4; 57.1%); 3) intentional dislocation performed with the snaring manoeuvre as a bailout in cases of coronary ostia impairment or severe prosthetic leak due to higher deployment for a suboptimal sealing of the device with valve calcifications (n=2; 28.6%). The majority of cases occurred during early experiences with the new Accutrak™ (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) delivery system. In six patients a second CRS was implanted in the appropriate position. The dislodged CRS functioned normally, without any evidence of structural deterioration, thrombosis or further distal migration and showed complete apposition against the aortic wall. No thromboembolic events were reported in any patient. CONCLUSIONS Dislocation of a CRS device can be managed effectively with the implantation of a second device in a standard fashion leaving the dislocated device safely in the aorta. Intentional repositioning of a CRS device in the aorta can be accomplished by experienced operators without any serious neurologic or vascular events in the post-procedure period or at midterm follow-up.

Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair With the MitraClip System for Severe Mitral Regurgitation in Patients With Surgical Mitral Valve Repair Failure

To the Editor: Surgical mitral valve repair (SMVR) is the preferred intervention for patients with either symptomatic severe mitral regurgitation (MR) or asymptomatic severe MR and left ventricular dysfunction [(1)][1]. The rate of freedom from severe MR 10 years after SMVR, however, is reported to

Optimized Screening of Coronary Artery Disease With Invasive Coronary Angiography and Ad Hoc Percutaneous Coronary Intervention During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Background— We sought to describe an optimized approach to coronary artery disease (CAD) screening and management in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Methods and Results— When invasive coronary angiography showed CAD, the treatment strategy and completeness of revascularization was determined based on coronary anatomy. TAVR was performed in the same setting if percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was uncomplicated; otherwise TAVR was postponed. A total of 604 patients undergoing CAD screening at the time of TAVR procedure were prospectively included in this study. Severe CAD was found in 136 patients (22.5%). Among patients with severe CAD, 53 patients (8.8%) underwent uncomplicated PCI. After PCI, TAVR was postponed in 2 patients (0.3%). In 83 patients (13.8%), coronary angiography showed severe CAD that was left untreated. After TAVR, all-cause and cardiovascular 30-day mortality rates were 2.4% and 1.4%, respectively. Disabling stroke, myocardial infarction, and life-threatening bleeding occurred in 0.5%, 0.8%, and 4.0% of patients, respectively. Acute kidney injury II or III rate was 3.3%. At 2 years, all-cause mortality rate was 14.1%. Disabling stroke and myocardial infarction occurred in 2.5% and 1.8% of patients, respectively. Patients undergoing TAVR and PCI in the same session had similar rate of the composite of death, disabling stroke, and myocardial infarction when compared with patients without CAD, and patients with severe CAD left untreated (TAVR+PCI: 10.4%; severe CAD left untreated: 15.4%; no-CAD: 14.8%; P=0.765). Conclusions— In patients undergoing TAVR, screening of CAD with invasive coronary angiography and ad hoc PCI during TAVR is feasible and was not associated with increased periprocedural risks. PCI followed by TAVR in the same session had similar outcomes than TAVR in which PCI was not performed.

Usefulness of contrast injection during balloon aortic valvuloplasty before transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a pilot study.

AIMS To describe a technique of simultaneous aortography and balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) before transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), and to show how this technique affected TAVR prosthesis selection and procedural outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS One hundred and eleven patients underwent simultaneous contrast injection during valvuloplasty pre-TAVR to confirm the indication for prosthesis size provided by non-invasive imaging studies. A successful injection was achieved in 95 patients (85.5%). No events occurred during simultaneous BAV and contrast injection. In 12 (10.8%) patients the prosthesis size implanted was different from the recommendations provided by the non-invasive imaging examinations. In nine of these cases (75.0%) it was decided to implant a larger prosthesis than that originally suggested, in the remaining three cases (25.0%) a smaller valve was implanted. Device success in this particular subset of patients was 100%. Overall device success was 92.8%. Post-procedural moderate paravalvular regurgitation was reported in 5.4% of patients. CONCLUSIONS In patients with severe aortic valve stenosis, a technique of simultaneous aortography and balloon valvuloplasty as an adjunct to non-invasive imaging modalities for transcatheter prosthesis selection is feasible, and leads to a change in TAVR strategy in a modest number of patients. Larger studies are necessary to confirm these findings, and to assess whether this method is capable of enhancing the safety of the TAVR procedure.