Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Steffen Hennies is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Steffen Hennies.


Strahlentherapie Und Onkologie | 2010

High-grade acute organ toxicity as positive prognostic factor in primary radio(chemo)therapy for locally advanced, inoperable head and neck cancer.

Hendrik A. Wolff; Jan Bosch; Klaus Jung; Tobias Overbeck; Steffen Hennies; Christoph Matthias; Clemens F. Hess; Ralph M.W. Roedel; Hans Christiansen

Purpose:To test for a possible correlation between high-grade acute organ toxicity during primary radio(chemo)therapy and treatment outcome in patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).Patients and Methods:From 05/1994 to 01/2009, 216 HNSCC patients were treated with radio(chemo)therapy in primary approach. They received normofractionated (2 Gy/fraction) irradiation including associated nodal drainage sites to a cumulative dose of 70 Gy. 151 patients received additional concomitant chemotherapy (111 patients 5-fluorouracil/mitomycin C, 40 patients cisplatin-based). Toxicity during treatment was monitored weekly according to the Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC), and any toxicity grade CTC ≥ 3 of mucositis, dysphagia or skin reaction was assessed as high-grade acute organ toxicity for later analysis.Results:A statistically significant coherency between high-grade acute organ toxicity and overall survival as well as locoregional control was found: patients with CTC ≥ 3 acute organ toxicity had a 5-year overall survival rate of 44% compared to 8% in patients without (p < 0.01). Thereby, multivariate analyses revealed that the correlation was independent of other possible prognostic factors or factors that may influence treatment toxicity, especially concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy technique or treatment-planning procedure.Conclusion:These data indicate that normal tissue and tumor tissue may behave similarly with respect to treatment response, as high-grade acute organ toxicity during radio(chemo)therapy showed to be an independent prognostic marker in the own patient population. However, the authors are aware of the fact that a multivariate analysis in a retrospective study generally has statistical limitations. Therefore, their hypothesis should be further analyzed on biomolecular and clinical levels and other tumor entities in prospective trials.ZusammenfassungHintergrund und Ziel:Nach primärer Radio(chemo)therapie lokal fortgeschrittener Kopf-Hals-Tumoren kommt es bei einigen Patienten zu einer kompletten Remission, bei anderen lediglich zu einer partiellen Remission mit frühem Rezidiv. Unterschiedlich ist auch die Strahlenempfindlichkeit des Normalgewebes: Einige Patienten zeigen starke, andere hingegen weniger intensive Akutreaktionen. Im Rahmen dieser Arbeit wurde geprüft, ob Patienten, die höhergradige Akutreaktionen entwickeln, im Vergleich zu Patienten, bei denen diese nicht auftreten, eine bessere Prognose haben.Patienten und Methodik:Von 1994 bis 2009 wurden 216 Patienten mit lokal fortgeschrittenen Plattenepithelkarzinomen im Kopf-Hals-Bereich in der eigenen Klinik primär radiotherapiert (70 Gy). 151 Patienten erhielten begleitend eine Chemotherapie (111 Patienten 5-Fluorouracil/Mitomycin C, 40 Patienten Cisplatin-basiert). Jede Akuttoxizität ≥ Grad 3 in Form von Hautreaktion, Mukositis oder Dysphagie wurde als höhergradige akute Organtoxizität gewertet. Akuttoxizität ≥ Grad 3 wurde vor Beginn der Analyse als „cutoff value“ gewählt, da es ab dieser Toxizität zu einer signifikanten Einschränkung der Lebensqualität der Patienten kommt.Ergebnisse:Das Gesamtüberleben sowie die lokoregionäre Kontrolle nach 5 Jahren betrugen 18% bzw. 63%. Es fand sich dabei eine statistisch signifikante Korrelation zwischen höhergradiger akuter Organtoxizität und der Prognose: In der Gruppe der Patienten mit höhergradiger akuter Organtoxizität betrugen das Gesamtüberleben und die lokale Kontrolle nach 5 Jahren 44% und 74% im Vergleich zu 8% und 56% bei den Patienten ohne akute höhergradige Nebenwirkungen (p < 0,01, p = 0,04). Diese Korrelation war in multivariater Analyse statistisch unabhängig von anderen Faktoren, die möglicherweise die Toxizität beeinflussen, wie begleitende Chemotherapie oder Strahlentherapieplanung (konventionell/dreidimensional).Schlussfolgerung:Höhergradige akute Organtoxizität ist im untersuchten Kollektiv ein unabhängiger positiver prognostischer Faktor. Der Zusammenhang zwischen höhergradiger akuter Organtoxizität unter Radio(chemo)therapie und der Prognose sollte in prospektiven Studien weiter evaluiert werden.


Radiotherapy and Oncology | 2012

Irradiation with protons for the individualized treatment of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: A planning study with clinical implications

Hendrik A. Wolff; Daniela Wagner; Lena-Christin Conradi; Steffen Hennies; Michael Ghadimi; Clemens F. Hess; Hans Christiansen

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Ongoing clinical trials aim to improve local control and overall survival rates by intensification of therapy regimen for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. It is well known that whenever treatment is intensified, risk of therapy-related toxicity rises. An irradiation with protons could possibly present an approach to solve this dilemma by lowering the exposure to the organs-at-risk (OAR) without compromising tumor response. MATERIAL AND METHODS Twenty five consecutive patients were treated from 04/2009 to 5/2010. For all patients, four different treatment plans including protons, RapidArc, IMRT and 3D-conformal-technique were retrospectively calculated and analyzed according to dosimetric aspects. RESULTS Detailed DVH-analyses revealed that protons clearly reduced the dose to the OAR and entire normal tissue when compared to other techniques. Furthermore, the conformity index was significantly better and target volumes were covered consistent with the ICRU guidelines. CONCLUSIONS Planning results suggest that treatment with protons can improve the therapeutic tolerance for the irradiation of rectal cancer, particularly for patients scheduled for an irradiation with an intensified chemotherapy regimen and identified to be at high risk for acute therapy-related toxicity. However, clinical experiences and long-term observation are needed to assess tumor response and related toxicity rates.


Strahlentherapie Und Onkologie | 2010

High-Grade Acute Organ Toxicity During Preoperative Radiochemotherapy as Positive Predictor for Complete Histopathologic Tumor Regression in Multimodal Treatment of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer*

Hendrik A. Wolff; Jochen Gaedcke; Klaus Jung; Robert Michael Hermann; Hilka Rothe; Markus Schirmer; Torsten Liersch; Markus K. A. Herrmann; Steffen Hennies; Margret Rave-Fränk; Clemens F. Hess; Hans Christiansen

Purpose:To test for a possible correlation between high-grade acute organ toxicity during preoperative radiochemotherapy and complete tumor regression after total mesorectal excision in multimodal treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer.Patients and Methods:From 2001 to 2008, 120 patients were treated. Preoperative treatment consisted of normofractionated radiotherapy at a total dose of 50.4 Gy, and either two cycles of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or two cycles of 5-FU and oxaliplatin. Toxicity during treatment was monitored weekly, and any toxicity CTC (Common Toxicity Criteria) ≥ grade 2 of enteritis, proctitis or cystitis was assessed as high-grade organ toxicity for later analysis. Complete histopathologic tumor regression (TRG4) was defined as the absence of any viable tumor cells.Results:A significant coherency between high-grade acute organ toxicity and complete histopathologic tumor regression was found, which was independent of other factors like the preoperative chemotherapy schedule. The probability of patients with acute organ toxicity ≥ grade 2 to achieve TRG4 after neoadjuvant treatment was more than three times higher than for patients without toxicity (odds ratio: 3.29, 95% confidence interval: [1.01, 10.96]).Conclusion:Acute organ toxicity during preoperative radiochemotherapy in rectal cancer could be an early predictor of treatment response in terms of complete tumor regression. Its possible impact on local control and survival is under further prospective evaluation by the authors’ working group.Ziel:Überprüfung einer möglichen Korrelation zwischen höhergradiger akuter Organtoxizität während präoperativer Radiochemotherapie und kompletter Tumorregression nach totaler mesorektaler Exzision in der multimodalen Behandlung von lokal fortgeschrittenen Rektumkarzinomen.Patienten und Methodik:Im Zeitraum von 2001 bis 2008 wurden 120 Patienten behandelt. Die präoperative Behandlung bestand aus einer normofraktionierten Radiotherapie mit einer Gesamtdosis von 50,4 Gy und entweder zwei Zyklen 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) oder zwei Zyklen 5-FU und Oxaliplatin. Die Toxizität während der Behandlung wurde wöchentlich untersucht. Jede Toxizität ≥ Grad 2 nach CTC (Common Toxicity Criteria) in Form von Enteritis, Proktitis oder Zystitis wurde dabei als höhergradige Organtoxizität gewertet und für spätere Analysen verwendet. Bei vollständigem histopathologischen Tumoransprechen (TRG4) konnten im Operationspräparat nach neoadjuvanter Therapie keine vitalen Tumorzellen mehr identifiziert werden.Ergebnisse:Es fand sich eine signifikante Korrelation zwischen höhergradiger akuter Organtoxizität und kompletter Tumorregression, und zwar in multivariater Analyse unabhängig von anderen Faktoren wie z.B. dem präoperativen Chemotherapieregime. Die Wahrscheinlichkeit für die Patienten mit höhergradigen Nebenwirkungen, eine histopathologische Komplettremission zu entwickeln, war mehr als dreimal höher als für Patienten ohne Toxizität (Odds-Ratio: 3,29, 95%-Konfidenzintervall: [1,01, 10,96]).Schlussfolgerung:Höhergradige akute Organtoxizität während präoperativer Radiochemotherapie bei Patienten mit multimodaler Therapie lokal fortgeschrittener Rektumkarzinome könnte einen frühen Prädiktor für das Ansprechen auf die Therapie in Bezug auf die histopathologische Remission darstellen. Ob dieser Parameter auch für die lokale Kontrolle sowie das Gesamtüberleben prädiktiv sein kann, wird in weiteren prospektiven Untersuchungen durch die Arbeitsgruppe der Autoren untersucht.


Oncologist | 2011

Gender-Specific Acute Organ Toxicity during Intensified Preoperative Radiochemotherapy for Rectal Cancer

Hendrik A. Wolff; Lena-Christin Conradi; Markus Schirmer; Tim Beissbarth; Thilo Sprenger; Margret Rave-Fränk; Steffen Hennies; Clemens F. Hess; Heinz Becker; Hans Christiansen; Torsten Liersch

Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (cUICC stages II/III) are typically treated with preoperative 5-fluorouracil-based (5-FU-based) radiochemotherapy (RCT). However, trials are currently being conducted to improve the complete remission rates and the systemic control by combining 5-FU with oxaliplatin. The primary objective was to identify the subgroups of rectal cancer patients who were at risk for high-grade toxicity. All 196 patients who were included in the present study were treated with 50.4 Gy and chemotherapy that included either 5-FU (n = 115) or 5-FU+oxaliplatin (n = 81). The preoperative RCT was followed by a total mesorectal excision and adjuvant chemotherapy. Acute toxicity was monitored weekly and a toxicity grade ≥3 (Common Toxicity Criteria) for a skin reaction, cystitis, proctitis, or enteritis was defined as high-grade acute organ toxicity. After RCT with 5-FU+oxaliplatin, complete tumor remission was achieved in 13.6% of the patients and in 11.3% after RCT with 5-FU alone. Complete irradiation dosages of 50.4 Gy were given to 99% (5-FU) and 95% (5-FU+oxaliplatin) of the patients. Concomitant chemotherapy was fully administered in 95% of the patients treated with 5-FU compared with the 84% of patients treated with 5-FU+oxaliplatin. A significantly higher proportion of acute organ toxicity was found in the patients who were treated with 5-FU+oxaliplatin compared with those who were treated with 5-FU. Additionally, women with a low body mass index were at the highest risk for acute organ toxicity. These results suggest that there are basic clinical parameters, such as gender and body mass index, that may be potential markers for generating individual risk profiles of RCT-induced toxicity.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2011

High-Grade Acute Organ Toxicity as a Positive Prognostic Factor in Primary Radiochemotherapy for Anal Carcinoma

Hendrik A. Wolff; Ismene Raus; Klaus Jung; P. Schüler; Markus K. A. Herrmann; Steffen Hennies; Hilke Vorwerk; Andrea Hille; Clemens F. Hess; Hans Christiansen

PURPOSE To test for a possible correlation between high-grade acute organ toxicity during primary radiochemotherapy and treatment outcome for patients with anal carcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS From 1991 to 2009, 72 patients with anal carcinoma were treated at our department (10 patients had stage I, 28 patients had stage II, 11 patients had stage IIIA, and 13 patients had stage IIIB cancer [Union Internationale Contre le Cancer criteria]). All patients received normofractionated (1.8 Gy/day, five times/week) whole-pelvis irradiation including iliac and inguinal lymph nodes with a cumulative dose of 50.4 Gy. Concomitant chemotherapy regimen consisted of two cycles of 5-fluorouracil (1,000 mg/m(2)total body surface area (TBSA)/day as continuous intravenous infusion on days 1-4 and 29-32) and mitomycin C (10 mg/m(2)/TBSA, intravenously on days 1 and 29). Toxicity during treatment was monitored weekly, and any incidence of Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) grade of ≥3 for skin reaction, cystitis, proctitis, or enteritis was assessed as high-grade acute organ toxicity for later analysis. RESULTS We found significant correlation between high-grade acute organ toxicity and overall survival, locoregional control, and stoma-free survival, which was independent in multivariate analysis from other possible prognostic factors: patients with a CTC acute organ toxicity grade of ≥3 had a 5-year overall survival rate of 97% compared to 30% in patients without (p < 0.01, multivariate analysis; 97% vs. 48%, p = 0.03 for locoregional control, and 95% vs. 59%, p = 0.05 for stoma-free survival). CONCLUSIONS Our data indicate that normal tissue and tumor tissue may behave similarly with respect to treatment response, since high-grade acute organ toxicity during radiochemotherapy showed itself to be an independent prognostic marker in our patient population. This hypothesis should be further analyzed by using biomolecular and clinical levels in future clinical trials.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2012

Acute Toxicity of Radiochemotherapy in Rectal Cancer Patients: A Risk Particularly for Carriers of the TGFB1 Pro25 variant

Markus A. Schirmer; Caroline Patricia Nadine Mergler; Margret Rave-Fränk; Markus K. A. Herrmann; Steffen Hennies; Jochen Gaedcke; Lena-Christin Conradi; Peter Jo; Tim Beissbarth; Clemens F. Hess; Heinz Becker; Michael Ghadimi; Jürgen Brockmöller; Hans Christiansen; Hendrik A. Wolff

PURPOSE Transforming growth factor-beta1 is related to adverse events in radiochemotherapy. We investigated TGFB1 genetic variability in relation to quality of life-impairing acute organ toxicity (QAOT) of neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy under clinical trial conditions. METHODS AND MATERIALS Two independent patient cohorts (n = 88 and n = 75) diagnosed with International Union Against Cancer stage II/III rectal cancer received neoadjuvant radiation doses of 50.4 Gy combined with 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. Toxicity was monitored according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. QAOT was defined as a CTCAE grade ≥2 for at least one case of enteritis, proctitis, cystitis, or dermatitis. Nine germline polymorphisms covering the common genetic diversity in the TGFB1 gene were genotyped. RESULTS In both cohorts, all patients carrying the TGFB1 Pro25 variant experienced QAOT (positive predictive value of 100%, adjusted p = 0.0006). In a multivariate logistic regression model, gender, age, body mass index, type of chemotherapy, or disease state had no significant impact on QAOT. CONCLUSION The TGFB1 Pro25 variant could be a relevant marker for individual treatment stratification and carriers may benefit from adaptive clinical care or specific radiation techniques.


Strahlentherapie Und Onkologie | 2011

Comparison of the Micronucleus and Chromosome Aberration Techniques for the Documentationof Cytogenetic Damage in Radiochemotherapy-Treated Patients with Rectal Cancer

Hendrik A. Wolff; Steffen Hennies; Markus K. A. Herrmann; Margret Rave-Fränk; David Eickelmann; Patricia Virsik; Klaus Jung; Markus Schirmer; Michael Ghadimi; Clemens F. Hess; Robert Michael Hermann; Hans Christiansen

AbstractPurpose:The goal of the interdisciplinary Clinical Research Unit KFO179 (Biological Basis of Individual Tumor Response in Patients with Rectal Cancer) is to develop an individual Response and Toxicity Score for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy. The aim of the present study was to find a reliable and sensitive method with easy scoring criteria and high numbers of cell counts in a short period of time in order to analyze DNA damage in peripheral blood lymphocytes. Thus, the cytokinesis-block micronucleus (CBMN) assay and the chromosome aberration technique (CAT) were tested.Materials and Methods:Peripheral blood lymphocytes obtained from 22 patients with rectal cancer before (0 Gy), during (21.6 Gy), and after (50.4 Gy) radiochemotherapy were stimulated in vitro by phytohemagglutinin (PHA); the cultures were then processed for the CBMN assay and the CAT to compare the two methods.Results:A significant increase of chromosomal damage was observed in the course of radiochemotherapy parallel to increasing radiation doses, but independent of the chemotherapy applied. The equivalence of both methods was shown by Westlake’s equivalence test.Conclusion:The results show that the CBMN assay and the CAT are equivalent. For further investigations, we prefer the CBMN assay, because it is simpler through easy scoring criteria, allows high numbers of cell counts in less time, is reliable, sensitive, and has higher statistical power. In the future, we plan to integrate cytogenetic damage during radiochemotherapy into the planned Response and Toxicity Score within our interdisciplinary Clinical Research Unit.ZusammenfassungZiel:Ziel der interdisziplinären Klinischen Forschergruppe KFO179 (Biological Basis of Individual Tumor Response in Patients with Rectal Cancer) ist es, einen individuellen Response-/Toxizitätsscore für Patienten zu entwickeln, die bei diagnostiziertem lokal fortgeschrittenem Rektumkarzinom mit neoadjuvanter Radiochemotherapie behandelt werden. Ziel der vorliegenden Arbeit war, eine einfache und zuverlässige Methode zur Detektion des individuellen zytogenetischen Schadens durch die Radiochemotherapie herauszuarbeiten, die im weiteren Verlauf der Arbeit der Forschergruppe Anwendung finden soll. Wir verglichen dabei den Mikronukleustest (MN) mit der Chromosomenaberrationsanalyse (CAA).Patienten und Methodik:Periphere Blutlymphozyten von 22 Patienten wurden vor (0 Gy), während (21,6 Gy) und nach (50,4 Gy) Radiochemotherapie untersucht. Der zytogenetische Schaden wurde mittels MN und CAA analysiert und die Äquivalenz beider Methoden geprüft.Ergebnisse:Eine signifikante Zunahme chromosomaler Schädigungen durch die Bestrahlung in Abhängigkeit von der applizierten Dosis konnte bei beiden Techniken, unabhängig von der applizierten Chemotherapie, beobachtet werden. Die Gleichwertigkeit beider Methoden konnte durch den Äquivalenztest nach Westlake gezeigt werden.Schlussfolgerung:Es zeigte sich eine Äquivalenz der angewandten Methoden, was uns nun die Möglichkeit bietet, den MN gleichwertig gegenüber der CAA anzuwenden und für die geplanten Analysen bezüglich des individuellen Response-/Toxizitätsscores zu verwenden. Die Mikronukleustechnik ermöglicht durch leichtere Zählkriterien in kürzerer Zeit eine größere Anzahl von Zellen zu zählen, was zu einem valideren statistischen Endergebnis führt.


European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | 2016

MRI versus 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for gross tumour volume delineation in radiation treatment planning of primary prostate cancer

Constantinos Zamboglou; Gesche Wieser; Steffen Hennies; Irene Rempel; Simon Kirste; Martin Soschynski; Hans Christian Rischke; T. Fechter; Cordula Jilg; Mathias Langer; Philipp T. Meyer; Michael Bock; Anca-Ligia Grosu


Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology | 2010

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma in adults: treatment results after long-term follow-up with special reference to adjuvant interferon- beta in undifferentiated carcinomas

Hendrik A. Wolff; Ralph M. W. Rödel; Bastian Gunawan; Tobias Overbeck; Markus K. A. Herrmann; Steffen Hennies; Andrea Hille; Hilke Vorwerk; Christoph Matthias; Clemens F. Hess; Hans Christiansen


BMC Cancer | 2015

Reduced toxicity in the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer: a comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy and 3D conformal radiotherapy

Leif Hendrik Dröge; Hanne Elisabeth Weber; Manuel Guhlich; Martin Leu; Lena-Christin Conradi; Jochen Gaedcke; Steffen Hennies; Markus K. A. Herrmann; Margret Rave-Fränk; Hendrik A. Wolff

Collaboration


Dive into the Steffen Hennies's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jochen Gaedcke

University of Göttingen

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Klaus Jung

University of Göttingen

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Heinz Becker

University of Göttingen

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge