Stephan Eggeling

The future in diagnosis and staging of lung cancer : Molecular techniques

Lung cancers at the same stage of disease have markedly different rates of disease progression. In this review, we will address current molecular techniques which provide new opportunities according to diagnosis, prediction of survival or selection of therapy. New molecular techniques might be helpful in TNM staging and lead to additional individual prognostic information. A revised TNM system could include a TNM component and a molecular supplemental component allowing new markers to be evaluated without undermining the value of classic TNM staging. Furthermore, molecular techniques might be helpful in the early or differential diagnosis of lung cancer. Since many new targeted agents are effective only if their respective molecular markers are mutated or expressed at sufficient levels, DNA-based or RNA-based techniques have the potential to influence treatment selection in the future. Overall, we can expect that molecular markers will contribute to a more personalized lung cancer treatment.

Neuroendocrine differentiation and neuroendocrine morphology as two different patterns in large-cell bronchial carcinomas: outcome after complete resection.

BackgroundIn 1999, large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung was introduced by the World Health Organization (WHO) as a new tumor entity in the group of non-small cell, epithelial tumors, a differentiated classification of neuroendocrine tumors of the lung not existing until this time. Scientific knowledge on prognosis and therapy of these tumors, especially between those with neuroendocrine morphology only and those showing additional expression of neuroendocrine markers, is fragmentary. In this analysis, we studied the clinical behavior and the prognosis of these two rare tumor entities.Patients and MethodsThe analysis comprises 12 patients of a total of 2053, who underwent thoracotomy for non small-cell lung carcinoma between 1997 and 2005 in the Department of Thoracic Surgery at the University Hospital of Freiburg. Clinical data, pathological examinations as well as complete follow-up were reviewed from large-cell carcinoma with neuroendocrine morphology only (n=4) and from large-cell carcinoma expressing neuroendocrine markers (n=8).ResultsThe median survival of patients with neuroendocrine morphology was 30 months (11–96 months). In the patient group showing the expression of neuroendocrine markers, the median survival time was 20 months (2–26 months). Tumor recurrences occurred in the group with neuroendocrine morphology, without exception, in the form of distant metastases and in the group with neuroendocrine markers as intrapulmonary metastases.ConclusionLarge-cell neuroendocrine carcinomas of the lung show aggressive behavior with a poor prognosis. Expression of neuroendocrine markers markedly reduce tumor-free interval as well as survival and might influence the site of metastases.

Management of Spontaneous Pneumothorax and Post-Interventional Pneumothorax: German S3 Guideline

In Germany, 10,000 cases of spontaneous pneumothorax are treated inpatient every year. The German Society for Thoracic Surgery, in co-operation with the German Society for Pulmonology, the German Radiological Society, and the German Society of Internal Medicine has developed an S3 guideline on spontaneous pneumothorax and post-interventional pneumothorax moderated by the German Association of Scientific Medical Societies. Method: Based on the source guideline of the British Thoracic Society (2010) for spontaneous pneumothorax, a literature search on spontaneous pneumothorax was carried out from 2008 onwards, for post-interventional pneumothorax from 1960 onwards. Evidence levels according to the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine (2011) were assigned to the relevant studies found. Recommendations according to grade (A: “we recommend”/“we do not recommend,” B: “we suggest”/“we do not suggest”) were determined in 3 consensus conferences by the nominal group process. Results: The algorithms for primary and secondary pneumothorax differ in the indication for CT scan as well as in the indication for chest drainage application and video-assisted thoracic surgery. Indication for surgery is recommended individually taking into account the risk of recurrence, life circumstances, patient preferences, and procedure risks. For some forms of secondary pneumothorax, a reserved indication for surgery is recommended. Therapy of post-interventional spontaneous pneumothorax is similar to that of primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Discussion: The recommendations of the S3 Guideline provide assistance in managing spontaneous pneumothorax and post-interventional pneumothorax. Whether this will affect existing deviant diagnostic and therapeutic measures will be demonstrated by future epidemiological studies.