Stephan Morbach
University of Düsseldorf
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Stephan Morbach.
Diabetes Care | 2011
Lee C. Rogers; Robert G. Frykberg; David Armstrong; Andrew J.M. Boulton; Michael Edmonds; Georges Ha Van; A. Hartemann; Frances L. Game; William Jeffcoate; A. Jirkovska; Edward B. Jude; Stephan Morbach; William B. Morrison; Michael S. Pinzur; Dario Pitocco; Lee J. Sanders; Luigi Uccioli
The diabetic Charcot foot syndrome is a serious and potentially limb-threatening lower-extremity complication of diabetes. First described in 1883, this enigmatic condition continues to challenge even the most experienced practitioners. Now considered an inflammatory syndrome, the diabetic Charcot foot is characterized by varying degrees of bone and joint disorganization secondary to underlying neuropathy, trauma, and perturbations of bone metabolism. An international task force of experts was convened by the American Diabetes Association and the American Podiatric Medical Association in January 2011 to summarize available evidence on the pathophysiology, natural history, presentations, and treatment recommendations for this entity.
Diabetes Care | 2012
Stephan Morbach; Heike Furchert; Ute Gröblinghoff; Heribert Hoffmeier; Kerstin Kersten; Gerd Thomas Klauke; Ulrike Klemp; Thomas Roden; Andrea Icks; Burkhard Haastert; Gerhard Rümenapf; Zulfiqarali G. Abbas; Manish Bharara; David Armstrong
OBJECTIVE There is a dearth of long-term data regarding patient and limb survival in patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). The purpose of our study was therefore to prospectively investigate the limb and person survival of DFU patients during a follow-up period of more than 10 years. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Two hundred forty-seven patients with DFUs and without previous major amputation consecutively presenting to a single diabetes center between June 1998 and December 1999 were included in this study and followed up until May 2011. Mean patient age was 68.8 ± 10.9 years, 58.7% were male, and 55.5% had peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Times to first major amputation and to death were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox multiple regression. RESULTS A first major amputation occurred in 38 patients (15.4%) during follow-up. All but one of these patients had evidence of PAD at inclusion in the study, and 51.4% had severe PAD [ankle-brachial pressure index ≤0.4]). Age (hazard ratio [HR] per year, 1.05 [95% CI, 1.01–1.10]), being on dialysis (3.51 [1.02–12.07]), and PAD (35.34 [4.81–259.79]) were significant predictors for first major amputation. Cumulative mortalities at years 1, 3, 5, and 10 were 15.4, 33.1, 45.8, and 70.4%, respectively. Significant predictors for death were age (HR per year, 1.08 [95% CI, 1.06–1.10]), male sex ([1.18–2.32]), chronic renal insufficiency (1.83 [1.25–2.66]), dialysis (6.43 [3.14–13.16]), and PAD (1.44 [1.05–1.98]). CONCLUSIONS Although long-term limb salvage in this modern series of diabetic foot patients is favorable, long-term survival remains poor, especially among patients with PAD or renal insufficiency.
Diabetes and Vascular Disease Research | 2008
Martin Schönauer; Andreas Thomas; Stephan Morbach; Josef Niebauer; Ulrike Schönauer; Holger Thiele
Cardiovascular autonomic diabetic neuropathy (CADN) is one of the most common diabetes-associated complications. Disturbed heart rate variability (HRV) is very often the earliest symptom, even in clinically asymptomatic patients. The following article offers a topical overview for those working or interested in the fields of diabetology and cardiology.
Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association | 2011
Lee C. Rogers; Robert G. Frykberg; David Armstrong; Andrew J.M. Boulton; Michael Edmonds; Georges Ha Van; A. Hartemann; Frances L. Game; William Jeffcoate; A. Jirkovska; Edward B. Jude; Stephan Morbach; William B. Morrison; Michael S. Pinzur; Dario Pitocco; Lee J. Sanders; Luigi Uccioli
The diabetic Charcot foot syndrome is a serious and potentially limb-threatening lower-extremity complication of diabetes. First described in 1883, this enigmatic condition continues to challenge even the most experienced practitioners. Now considered an inflammatory syndrome, the diabetic Charcot foot is characterized by varying degrees of bone and joint disorganization secondary to underlying neuropathy, trauma, and perturbations of bone metabolism. An international task force of experts was convened by the American Diabetes Association and the American Podiatric Medical Association in January 2011 to summarize available evidence on the pathophysiology, natural history, presentations, and treatment recommendations for this entity.
Diabetes Care | 2011
Andrea Icks; Marsel Scheer; Stephan Morbach; Jutta Genz; Burkhard Haastert; Guido Giani; Gerd Glaeske; Falk Hoffmann
OBJECTIVE To estimate the impact of diabetes on mortality in patients after first major lower extremity amputation (LEA). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Using claims data of a nationwide statutory health insurance, we assessed all deaths in a cohort of all 444 patients with a first major LEA since 2005 (71.8% male; mean age 69.1 years; 58.3% diabetic; 43% with amputation above the knee) up to 2009. Using Cox regression, we estimated the time-dependent hazard ratios to compare patients with and without diabetes. RESULTS The cumulative 5-year mortality was 68% in diabetic and 59% in nondiabetic individuals. In the first course, mortality was lower in diabetic compared with nondiabetic patients. Later, the diabetes risk increased yielding crossed survival curves after 2 to 3 years (time dependency of diabetes; P = 0.003). Age- and sex-adjusted hazard ratios for diabetes were as follows: 0–30 days: 0.50 [95% CI 0.31–0.84]; 31–60 days: 0.60 [0.25–1.41]; 61 days to 6 months: 0.75 [0.38–1.48]; >6–12 months: 1.27 [0.63–2.53]; >12–24 months: 1.65 [0.88–3.08]; >24–36 months: 2.02 [0.80–5.09]; and >36–60 months: 1.91 [0.70–5.21]. The pattern was similar in both sexes. In the full model, significant risk factors for mortality were age (1.05; 1.03–1.06), amputation above the knee (1.50; 1.16–1.94), and quartile category 3 or 4 of the number of prescribed medications (1.64; 1.12–2.40 and 1.76; 1.20–2.59). Further adjustment for comorbidity did not alter the results. CONCLUSIONS In this population-based study, we found a time-dependent mortality risk of diabetes following first major LEA, which may be in part a result of a healthier lifestyle in diabetic patients or the access to specific treatment structures in diabetic individuals.
Diabetes Care | 2012
Andrea Icks; Heiner Claessen; Stephan Morbach; Gerd Glaeske; Falk Hoffmann
OBJECTIVE To estimate the impact of diabetes on mortality in patients after first stroke event. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Using claims data from a nationwide statutory health insurance fund (Gmünder ErsatzKasse), we assessed all deaths in a cohort of 5,757 patients with a first stroke between 2005 and 2007 (69.3% male, mean age 68.1 years, 32.2% with diabetes) up to 2009. By use of Cox regression, we estimated time-dependent hazard ratios (HRs) to compare patients with and without diabetes stratified by sex. RESULTS The cumulative 5-year mortality was 40.0 and 54.2% in diabetic men and women, and 32.3 and 38.1% in their nondiabetic counterparts, respectively. In males, mortality was significantly lower in diabetic compared with nondiabetic patients in the first 30 days (multiple-adjusted HR 0.67 [95% CI 0.53–0.84]). After approximately a quarter of a year, the diabetes risk increased, yielding crossed survival curves. Later on, mortality risk tended to be similar in diabetic and nondiabetic men (1–2 years: 1.42 [1.09–1.85]; 3–5 years: 1.00 [0.67–1.41]; time dependency of diabetes, P = 0.008). In women, the pattern was similar; however, time dependency was not statistically significant (P = 0.89). Increasing age, hemorrhagic stroke, renal failure (only in men), levels of care dependency, and number of prescribed medications were significantly associated with mortality. CONCLUSIONS We found a time-dependent mortality risk of diabetes after first stroke in men. Possible explanations may be type of stroke or earlier and more intensive treatment of risk factors in diabetic patients.
Vasa-european Journal of Vascular Medicine | 2013
Gerhard Rümenapf; Sandra Geiger; Brigitte Schneider; Klaus Amendt; Norbert Wilhelm; Stephan Morbach; Norbert Nagel
BACKGROUND Patients with neuroischemic diabetic foot syndrome (DFS) may need arterial revascularization, minor amputations, débridements as well as meticulous wound care. Unfortunately, postoperative outpatient care is frequently inadequate. This is especially true for Germany, where the in- and outpatient sectors are funded and managed separately, with poor communication between the two. Thus, many patients may be readmitted to the hospital following successful treatment and discharge. In an attempt to overcome these problems, we looked at whether an integrated case management (CM) system for outpatient care according to in-hospital standards might improve patients care and avoid readmissions. In addition we analyzed the length of hospital stay (LOS) as well as hospital costs. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this retrospective cohort study patients with DFS, bypass surgery and foot surgery after implementation of the CM (study group; n = 376) were compared with a matched historic control group (HCG; n = 190) including the flat rate revenues (G-DRG K01B). Following a standardized assessment, integrated trans-sectoral CM care was offered to 116 patients (CMP). RESULTS The proportion of patients who were readmitted to hospital was reduced in CMP compared to HCG (8.8 vs. 16.4 %; p < 0.01), with consequent reduction of case consolidations (9.7 % versus 17.8 %, p < 0.001). Although initially, the mean LOS was higher in the CMP patients, the reduction in readmissions meant that this integrated CM program improved the hospitals economic situation. CONCLUSIONS A hospital-based integrated CM system significantly reduces the hospital readmissions in patients with neuroischemic DFS following bypass surgery, with lower hospital costs.
Journal of Diabetes and Its Complications | 2013
Falk Hoffmann; Heiner Claessen; Stephan Morbach; Regina Waldeyer; Gerd Glaeske; Andrea Icks
AIMS To compare direct medical costs 1 year before up to 3 years after first major lower extremity amputation (LEA) between patients with and without diabetes. METHODS We used health insurance claims data and included patients with a first major LEA between 2005 and 2009. Costs for hospitalization, rehabilitation, outpatient care, outpatient drug prescriptions, non-physician services, durable medical equipment and long-term care were assessed. We estimated cost ratios (CR) for diabetes status using generalized linear models adjusted for age, sex, amputation level, care dependency as well as observation time and mortality within the corresponding period and costs before LEA. RESULTS We included 444 patients with first major LEA (58.3% had diabetes), 71.8% were male and the average age was 69.1 years. Total mean costs for 1 year before LEA were higher in patients with diabetes (24,504 vs. 18,961 Euros), which was also confirmed by the multivariate analysis (CR: 1.27; 95% CI: 1.06-1.52). Costs up to 24 weeks after LEA were virtually the same in both groups (36,686 vs. 35,858 Euros), but thereafter differences increase again with higher costs for diabetics. Costs for 3 years after LEA were 115,676 vs. 92,862 Euros, respectively (CR: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.12-1.42). Hospitalizations accounted for more than 50% of total costs irrespective of diabetes status and period. CONCLUSIONS Costs up to 24 weeks after first major LEA are mainly driven by the amputation itself irrespective of diabetes. Thereafter, costs for diabetic patients were higher again, which underlines the importance of studying long-term costs.
PLOS ONE | 2017
Maria Narres; Tatjana Kvitkina; Heiner Claessen; Sigrid Droste; Björn Schuster; Stephan Morbach; Gerhard Rümenapf; Kristien Van Acker; Andrea Icks
Lower extremity amputation (LEA) in patients with diabetes results in high mortality, reduced quality of life, and increased medical costs. Exact data on incidences of LEA in diabetic and non-diabetic patients are important for improvements in preventative diabetic foot care, avoidance of fatal outcomes, as well as a solid basis for health policy and the economy. However, published data are conflicting, underlining the necessity for the present systematic review of population-based studies on incidence, relative risks and changes of amputation rates over time. It was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Nineteen out of 1582 studies retrieved were included in the analysis. The incidence of LEA in the diabetic population ranged from 78 to 704 per 100,000 person-years and the relative risks between diabetic and non-diabetic patients varied between 7.4 and 41.3. Study designs, statistical methods, definitions of major and minor amputations, as well as the methods to identify patients with diabetes differed greatly, explaining in part these considerable differences. Some studies found a decrease in incidence of LEA as well as relative risks over time. This obvious lack of evidence should be overcome by new studies using a standardized design with comparable methods and definitions. Systematic review registration number PROSPERO CRD4201501780
Diabetes Care | 2009
Stephan Morbach; Ute Gröblinghoff; Hansjörg Schulze; Sebastian Wulff; Martin Schönauer; Gerhard Rümenapf; Janet Lutale; Zulfiqarali G. Abbas
Alarmingly high mortality rates have been reported in diabetic patients with ulcerations—especially if complicated by amputation. In a recent issue of Diabetes Care , Hambleton et al. (1) raise the possibility of a “different hierarchy” of postamputation complications and causes of death in patients with diabetes from developed and developing areas of the world, comparing their data with published work from the U.S. (2). To examine this further we have analyzed data from a cohort of German and Tanzanian patients in an ongoing multinational follow-up study of diabetic foot ulcer patients (3) and compared them with the patients of Hambleton et al. Diabetic foot patients from Germany and Tanzania were included in …