Stephanie Laufs

A combination of granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and plerixafor mobilizes more primitive peripheral blood progenitor cells than G-CSF alone: results of a European phase II study

BACKGROUND AIMS Previous studies in xenograft models have shown that human peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) mobilized with the CXCR4 antagonist plerixafor (AMD3100) have a higher bone marrow (BM) reconstitution potential than granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-mobilized PBPC. METHODS PBPC obtained during G-CSF-supported mobilization before and after a supplementary administration of AMD3100 from patients with multiple myeloma and non-Hodgkins lymphoma (n=15; phase II study) were investigated for co-expression of primitive and lineage-associated markers, their proliferative activity in vitro and repopulation potential after clinical transplantation. RESULTS A significant increase in primitive CD34+ CD38(-) cells was observed in intraindividual comparisons of all patients after administration of G-CSF+AMD3100 (peripheral blood: median 8-fold, range 2,4-fold - 39-fold) compared with G-CSF alone. Using a long-term culture-initiating cell assay, this increase was confirmed. After transplantation of G-CSF+AMD3100-mobilized PBPC, the time to leukocyte reconstitution > 1 x 10(3)/microL and platelet reconstitution > 2 x 10(4)/microL was 14 (10-19 days) and 13 days (10-15 days), respectively. A complete and stable hematologic reconstitution (platelets > 1.5 x 10(5)/microL) was observed in 91% of all patients within 35 days. CONCLUSIONS An additional application of AMD3100 to a standard G-CSF mobilization regimen leads to a significant increase in primitive PBPC with high repopulation capacity.

Synergistic activity of imatinib and 17-AAG in imatinib-resistant CML cells overexpressing BCR-ABL – Inhibition of P-glycoprotein function by 17-AAG

Overexpression of BCR-ABL and P-glycoprotein (Pgp) are two of the known mechanisms of imatinib resistance. As combination therapy may allow to overcome drug resistance, we investigated the effect of combination treatment with imatinib and 17-allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin (17-AAG), a heat-shock protein 90 (Hsp90) inhibitor, on different imatinib-sensitive and imatinib-resistant CML cell lines. In imatinib-sensitive cells, combination index (CI) values obtained using the method of Chou and Talalay indicated additive (CI=1) or marginally antagonistic (CI>1) effects following simultaneous treatment with imatinib and 17-AAG. In imatinib-resistant cells both drugs acted synergistically (CI<1). In primary chronic-phase CML cells additive or synergistic effects of the combination of imatinib plus 17-AAG were discernible. Annexin V/propidium iodide staining showed that the activity of imatinib plus 17-AAG is mediated by apoptosis. Combination treatment with imatinib plus 17-AAG was more effective in reducing the BCR-ABL protein level than 17-AAG alone. Monotherapy with 17-AAG decreased P-glycoprotein activity, which may increase intracellular imatinib levels and contribute to the sensitization of CML cells to imatinib. The results suggest that combination of imatinib and 17-AAG may be useful to overcome imatinib resistance in a clinical setting.

Urokinase-receptor (u-PAR): an essential player in multiple games of cancer: a review on its role in tumor progression, invasion, metastasis, proliferation/dormancy, clinical outcome and minimal residual disease.

The relevance of the u-PA system in mediating tumor-associated proteolysis, invasion and metastasis, amongst other phenomena associated with tumor progression, has been clearly demonstrated in diverse cancer entities. This review will update on the biological and clinical relevance of the urokinase-receptor (u-PAR). Specifically, the article focuses on the potential importance of u-PAR for the development of minimal residual disease in solid cancer, and in this context reviews the biological relevance of the u-PAR for tumor cell dormancy. Furthermore, transcriptional mechanisms regulating u-PAR in vitro and in vivo, and their potential clinical and therapeutic relevance in gastrointestinal cancers, are elucidated.

Plerixafor inhibits chemotaxis toward SDF-1 and CXCR4-mediated stroma contact in a dose-dependent manner resulting in increased susceptibility of BCR-ABL+ cell to Imatinib and Nilotinib.

Despite Imatinibs remarkable success in chronic myelogenous leukemia treatment, monotherapy frequently causes resistance, underlining the rationale for combination chemotherapy. A potential approach would be interrupting the SDF-1/CXCR4 axis using the selective CXCR4 antagonist Plerixafor (previously AMD3100), as this axis has been reported to provide survival-enhancing effects to myeloid progenitor cells. By efficient CXCR4 blocking in the CXCR4+/BCR-ABL+ cell line BV-173, plerixafor (1–100 μM) significantly inhibits SDF-1α-mediated chemotaxis and cell migration toward the murine stroma cell line FBMD-1. Furthermore, plerixafor also significantly (10–100 μM) increased the detachment rate of SDF-1-mediated/VCAM-1-associated cell adherence under shear stress. Using a stroma-dependent coculture assay, plerixafor sensitized BCR-ABL+ cells toward tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. Because the level of cell killing nearly reached that of samples cultured without stroma, a cell–cell interaction disruption seems to improve the efficacy of BCR-ABL-targeting drugs. In addition, we could show that exposure of BCR-ABL+ cells to Imatinib or Nilotinib induced an increase in surface CXCR4 expression. Our data suggest that for BCR-ABL+ leukemia, the selective blocking of the SDF-1/CXCR4 axis by plerixafor is a potential mechanism to overcome the protective effect of the bone marrow environment, thereby increasing the therapeutic potency of anti-BCR-ABL drugs and the therapeutic window.

Multidrug Resistance 1 Gene Transfer Can Confer Chemoprotection to Human Peripheral Blood Progenitor Cells Engrafted in Immunodeficient Mice

Myelosuppression is the main side effect of cancer chemotherapy. An improved rate of retroviral vector-mediated gene transfer to hematopoietic stem cells, shown in more recent clinical trials, has created the basis to test the concept of myeloprotective gene therapy. We transplanted clinical-scale human peripheral blood progenitor cell grafts (n = 2) transduced with retroviral vector SF91m3, which contains the human multidrug resistance 1 gene (MDR1), into nonobese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficient (NOD/SCID) mice. Engrafted mice of one cohort were protected from paclitaxel toxicity (p < 0.05) and we noted a similar trend in the second cohort. In paclitaxel-treated mice that had received gene-transduced cells we found a significant increase in gene marking (p < 0.05 - p < 0.01) or P-glycoprotein expression (p < 0.01) compared with their chemotherapy-naive counterparts. This is the first report showing that cytostatic drug resistance gene therapy can mediate chemoprotection of human clinically relevant stem cell populations with marrow engraftment potential.

Lentiviral vector integration sites in human NOD/SCID repopulating cells.

Recent observations of insertional mutagenesis in preclinical and clinical settings emphasize the relevance of investigating comprehensively the spectrum of integration sites targeted by specific vectors.

Retroviral vectors for gene therapy

The present invention provides novel, improved retroviral vectors which can be used for gene therapy, more specifically, retroviral vectors which are not only safer, more versatile, and more convenient than any other existing vectors, but they also drive high levels of gene expression and high viral titer. In retroviral vectors of the present invention, gag and env coding sequences are deleted, and all or part of U3 can be readily substituted with heterologous, non-retroviral promoter elements. Furthermore, at least one internal ribosome entry site is employed to express more than one genes, and multicloning sites are placed in an insertion site for cloning of a heterologous promoter or a foreign gene.Since their first clinical trial 20 years ago, retroviral (gretroviral and lentiviral) vectors have now been used in more than 350 gene-therapy studies. Retroviral vectors are particularly suited for gene-correction of cells due to long-term and stable expression of the transferred transgene(s), and also because little effort is required for their cloning and production. Several monogenic inherited diseases, mostly immunodeficiencies, can now be successfully treated. The occurrence of insertional mutagenesis in some studies allowed extensive analysis of integration profiles of retroviral vectors, as well as the design of lentiviral vectors with increased safety properties. These new-generation vectors will enable us to continue the successful story of gene therapy, and treat more patients and even more complex diseases.

QuickMap: a public tool for large-scale gene therapy vector insertion site mapping and analysis

Several events of insertional mutagenesis in pre-clinical and clinical gene therapy studies have created intense interest in assessing the genomic insertion profiles of gene therapy vectors. For the construction of such profiles, vector-flanking sequences detected by inverse PCR, linear amplification-mediated-PCR or ligation-mediated-PCR need to be mapped to the host cells genome and compared to a reference set. Although remarkable progress has been achieved in mapping gene therapy vector insertion sites, public reference sets are lacking, as are the possibilities to quickly detect non-random patterns in experimental data. We developed a tool termed QuickMap, which uniformly maps and analyzes human and murine vector-flanking sequences within seconds (available at www.gtsg.org). Besides information about hits in chromosomes and fragile sites, QuickMap automatically determines insertion frequencies in +/− 250 kb adjacency to genes, cancer genes, pseudogenes, transcription factor and (post-transcriptional) miRNA binding sites, CpG islands and repetitive elements (short interspersed nuclear elements (SINE), long interspersed nuclear elements (LINE), Type II elements and LTR elements). Additionally, all experimental frequencies are compared with the data obtained from a reference set, containing 1 000 000 random integrations (‘random set’). Thus, for the first time a tool allowing high-throughput profiling of gene therapy vector insertion sites is available. It provides a basis for large-scale insertion site analyses, which is now urgently needed to discover novel gene therapy vectors with ‘safe’ insertion profiles.

Chemoprotection of human hematopoietic stem cells by simultaneous lentiviral overexpression of multidrug resistance 1 and O 6 -methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase P140K

Myelotoxicity is a dose-limiting effect of many chemotherapeutic regimens. Thus, there is great interest in protecting human hematopoietic stem cells by the transfer of drug resistance genes. The main focus of this study was the simultaneous overexpression of multidrug resistance 1 (MDR1) and the O6-benzylguanine (O6-BG)-resistant mutant MGMTP140K (O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase) with a bicistronic lentiviral vector (HR′SIN–MDR1–IRES–MGMTP140K), with regard to the capability to convey chemoprotection in the leukemia cell line, HL60, and human hematopoietic stem cells (CD34+). Combination therapy with O6-BG/1-(2-chloroethyl)-3-(4-amino-2-methylpyrimidine-5-yl)methyl-1-nitrosourea) (ACNU) plus paclitaxel showed a significant survival advantage of HL60 cells transduced with this combination vector. In CD34+ cells, monotherapy with O6-BG/temozolomide (TMZ) resulted in an increased percentage of MGMT-positive cells (vs untreated cells) after transduction with HR′SIN–MDR1–IRES–MGMTP140K (28.3%). For combination therapy with O6-BG/temozolomide plus paclitaxel the increase was higher with the combination vector (52.8%) than with a vector expressing MGMTP140K solely (29.1%). With regard to MDR1-positive cells the protective effect of the combination vector (88.5%) was comparable to the single vector HR′SIN–MDR1 (90.0%) for monotherapy with paclitaxel and superior for combination therapy with O6-BG/temozolomide plus paclitaxel (84.6 vs 69.7%). In conclusion, the combination vector presents simultaneous protective effects of two drug-resistance genes, offering an opportunity to increase the cancer therapeutic index.

The Disparate Twins: A Comparative Study of CXCR4 and CXCR7 in SDF-1α–Induced Gene Expression, Invasion and Chemosensitivity of Colon Cancer

Purpose: In colorectal cancer, increased expression of the CXC chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) has been shown to provoke metastatic disease due to the interaction with its ligand stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1). Recently, a second SDF-1 receptor, CXCR7, was found to enhance tumor growth in solid tumors. Albeit signaling cascades via SDF-1/CXCR4 have been intensively studied, the significance of the SDF-1/CXCR7–induced intracellular communication triggering malignancy is still only marginally understood. Experimental Design: In tumor tissue of 52 patients with colorectal cancer, we observed that expression of CXCR7 and CXCR4 increased with tumor stage and tumor size. Asking whether activation of CXCR4 or CXCR7 might result in a similar expression pattern, we performed microarray expression analyses using lentivirally CXCR4- and/or CXCR7-overexpressing SW480 colon cancer cell lines with and without stimulation by SDF-1α. Results: Gene regulation via SDF-1α/CXCR4 and SDF-1α/CXCR7 was completely different and partly antidromic. Differentially regulated genes were assigned by gene ontology to migration, proliferation, and lipid metabolic processes. Expressions of AKR1C3, AXL, C5, IGFBP7, IL24, RRAS, and TNNC1 were confirmed by quantitative real-time PCR. Using the in silico gene set enrichment analysis, we showed that expressions of miR-217 and miR-218 were increased in CXCR4 and reduced in CXCR7 cells after stimulation with SDF-1α. Functionally, exposure to SDF-1α increased invasiveness of CXCR4 and CXCR7 cells, AXL knockdown hampered invasion. Compared with controls, CXCR4 cells showed increased sensitivity against 5-FU, whereas CXCR7 cells were more chemoresistant. Conclusions: These opposing results for CXCR4- or CXCR7-overexpressing colon carcinoma cells demand an unexpected attention in the clinical application of chemokine receptor antagonists such as plerixafor. Clin Cancer Res; 20(3); 604–16. ©2013 AACR.