Stephanie Majkut
University of Pennsylvania
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Stephanie Majkut.
Current Biology | 2013
Stephanie Majkut; Timon Idema; Joe Swift; Christine Krieger; Andrea J. Liu; Dennis E. Discher
In development and differentiation, morphological changes often accompany mechanical changes [1], but it is unclear whether or when cells in embryos sense tissue elasticity. The earliest embryo is uniformly pliable, while adult tissues vary widely in mechanics from soft brain and stiff heart to rigid bone [2]. However, cell sensitivity to microenvironment elasticity is debated based in part on results from complex three-dimensional culture models [3]. Regenerative cardiology provides strong motivation to clarify any cell-level sensitivities to tissue elasticity because rigid postinfarct regions limit pumping by the adult heart [4]. Here, we focus on the spontaneously beating embryonic heart and sparsely cultured cardiomyocytes, including cells derived from pluripotent stem cells. Tissue elasticity, Et, increases daily for heart to 1-2 kPa by embryonic day 4 (E4), and although this is ~10-fold softer than adult heart, the beating contractions of E4 cardiomyocytes prove optimal at ~Et,E4 both in vivo and in vitro. Proteomics reveals daily increases in a small subset of proteins, namely collagen plus cardiac-specific excitation-contraction proteins. Rapid softening of the hearts matrix with collagenase or stiffening it with enzymatic crosslinking suppresses beating. Sparsely cultured E4 cardiomyocytes on collagen-coated gels likewise show maximal contraction on matrices with native E4 stiffness, highlighting cell-intrinsic mechanosensitivity. While an optimal elasticity for striation proves consistent with the mathematics of force-driven sarcomere registration, contraction wave speed is linear in Et as theorized for excitation-contraction coupled to matrix elasticity. Pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes also prove to be mechanosensitive to matrix and thus generalize the main observation that myosin II organization and contractile function are optimally matched to the load contributed by matrix elasticity.
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology | 2012
Stephanie Majkut; Dennis E. Discher
In this review, we discuss recent studies on the mechanosensitive morphology and function of cardiomyocytes derived from embryos and neonates. For early cardiomyocytes cultured on substrates of various stiffnesses, contractile function as measured by force production, work output and calcium handling is optimized when the culture substrate stiffness mimics that of the tissue from which the cells were obtained. This optimal contractile function corresponds to changes in sarcomeric protein conformation and organization that promote contractile ability. In light of current models for myofibillogenesis, a recent mathematical model of striation and alignment on elastic substrates helps to illuminate how substrate stiffness modulates early myofibril formation and organization. During embryonic heart formation and maturation, cardiac tissue mechanics change dynamically. Experiments and models highlighted here have important implications for understanding cardiomyocyte differentiation and function in development and perhaps in regeneration processes.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2016
Kevin K. Chiou; Jason W. Rocks; Christina Yingxian Chen; Sangkyun Cho; Ke Koen Merkus; Anjali Rajaratnam; Patrick Robison; Manorama Tewari; Kenneth Vogel; Stephanie Majkut; Benjamin L. Prosser; Dennis E. Discher; Andrea J. Liu
Significance There is a mounting body of evidence that physical forces induce biochemical changes. Here, we suggest that the early embryonic heart provides a striking illustration of the importance of mechanics in living matter. Whereas adult hearts use electrical signaling to coordinate the heartbeat, we propose that embryonic hearts use mechanical signaling. We model the embryonic heart as mechanically excitable tissue, with cardiac myocytes that are triggered to contract under strain. Such contractions exert strains on nearby cells and induce further contraction, thus propagating the signal through the heart. This simple model captures key features observed in the heartbeat of stiffness-modified embryonic hearts that cannot be explained by standard electrochemical signaling and yields predictions that we confirm with experiments. In the beating heart, cardiac myocytes (CMs) contract in a coordinated fashion, generating contractile wave fronts that propagate through the heart with each beat. Coordinating this wave front requires fast and robust signaling mechanisms between CMs. The primary signaling mechanism has long been identified as electrical: gap junctions conduct ions between CMs, triggering membrane depolarization, intracellular calcium release, and actomyosin contraction. In contrast, we propose here that, in the early embryonic heart tube, the signaling mechanism coordinating beats is mechanical rather than electrical. We present a simple biophysical model in which CMs are mechanically excitable inclusions embedded within the extracellular matrix (ECM), modeled as an elastic-fluid biphasic material. Our model predicts strong stiffness dependence in both the heartbeat velocity and strain in isolated hearts, as well as the strain for a hydrogel-cultured CM, in quantitative agreement with recent experiments. We challenge our model with experiments disrupting electrical conduction by perfusing intact adult and embryonic hearts with a gap junction blocker, β-glycyrrhetinic acid (BGA). We find this treatment causes rapid failure in adult hearts but not embryonic hearts—consistent with our hypothesis. Last, our model predicts a minimum matrix stiffness necessary to propagate a mechanically coordinated wave front. The predicted value is in accord with our stiffness measurements at the onset of beating, suggesting that mechanical signaling may initiate the very first heartbeats.
Current Biology | 2014
Stephanie Majkut; P. C Dave P Dingal; Dennis E. Discher
Biophysical Journal | 2018
Sangkyun Cho; Stephanie Majkut; Amal Abbas; Ken Vogel; Manasvita Vashisth; Jerome Irianto; Manorama Tewari; Andrea J. Liu; Ben Prosser; Dennis E. Discher
Biophysical Journal | 2016
Sangkyun Cho; Stephanie Majkut; Amal Abbas; Ken Vogel; Jerome Irianto; Christina Yingxian Chen; Manorama Tewari; Andrea J. Liu; Benjamin L. Prosser; Dennis E. Discher
Bulletin of the American Physical Society | 2014
Kevin Chiou; Stephanie Majkut; Dennis E. Discher; T. C. Lubensky; Andrea J. Liu
Archive | 2013
Stephanie Majkut
Biophysical Journal | 2013
Stephanie Majkut; Dennis E. Discher; Joseph Swift
Bulletin of the American Physical Society | 2011
Stephanie Majkut; Joe Swift; Christine Krieger; Dennis E. Discher