Stephen Brier
City University of New York
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Stephen Brier.
Radical History Review | 2011
Stephen Brier; Joshua Brown
After September 11 everything was different. This phrase became the mantra employed to justify nearly every action taken by the Bush administration in the aftermath of the attacks in New York, Washington, D.C., and Shanksville, Pennsylvania — whether the circumstances had anything to do with the attacks or not. The repetition of and rationale for misadventure behind the “9/11 made everything different” trope quickly became a cliché, a dismissible simplification that unfortunately obscured some of the events’ actual and unique attributes. One of those attributes, one difference demarcating September 11, 2001, from previous epochal historical moments, was its status as the first truly digital event of world historical importance: a significant part of its historical record — from email to photography to audio to video — was expressed, captured, disseminated, or viewed in (or converted to) digital forms and formats. Moreover, the impact of all that digital activity extended beyond downtown Manhattan or northern Virginia, or even beyond the United States, becoming worldwide in scope. And yet, if any form of historical evidence was vulnerable to destruction, whether because of sins of commission or of omission, it was the eminently disposable and ephemeral forms of communication composed of ones and zeroes. The fate of digital evidence was not the first item on historians’ agendas following September 11. While still confronting both the palpable and the psychological effects of the attacks, academic and public historians grappled with the role they should play as they made tentative efforts to identify the historical significance of
Journal of the Canadian Historical Association / Revue de la Société historique du Canada | 2012
Stephen Brier
Based on a keynote presentation at the 2012 Canadian Historical Association conference, this paper surveys the state of digital technology and its impact on academic publication and teaching in the contemporary university. Focusing on the dramatic rise of the Digital Humanities in the last few years, the paper examines alternative forms of peer review, academic scholarship and publication, and classroom teaching as they have been reshaped by the adoption of a variety of digital technologies and formats, including open-access, online peer reviewing, use of databases and visualization techniques in humanities work, online journal publication, and the use of blogs and wikis as teaching tools. Examining the digital production and education work of the American Social History Project at CUNY, which he co-founded, and the Interactive Technology and Pedagogy doctoral certificate program that he heads at the CUNY Graduate Center, the author discusses a range of digital projects and approaches designed to improve the quality of teaching and learning in college classrooms.
The American Historical Review | 1987
W. Andrew Achenbaum; Susan Porter Benson; Stephen Brier; Roy Rosenzweig; Barbara J. Howe; Emory L. Kemp; Richard E. Neustadt; Ernest R. May; David F. Trask; Robert W. Pomeroy
Archive | 2012
Stephen Brier
Archive | 2011
Stephen Brier; Joshua Brown
Archive | 2016
Michael Fabricant; Stephen Brier
Labour | 2011
Stephen Brier; Ferdinando Fasce
Archive | 2000
Stephen Brier; Joshua Brown
College Board Review | 1995
Stephen Brier
Radical History Review | 1988
Stephen Brier