Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Stephen F. Sands is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Stephen F. Sands.


Animal Learning & Behavior | 1988

Concept learning by pigeons: Matching-to-sample with trial-unique video picture stimuli

Anthony A. Wright; Robert G. Cook; Jacquelyne J. Rivera; Stephen F. Sands; Juan D. Delius

Pigeons were trained to match-to-sample with several new methodologies: a large number of stimuli, computer-drawn color picture stimuli, responses monitored by a computer touch screen, stimuli presented horizontally from the floor, and grain reinforcement delivered onto the picture stimuli. Following acquisition, matching-to-sample concept learning was assessed by transfer to novel stimuli on the first exposure to pairs of novel stimuli. One group (trial-unique), trained with 152 different pictures presented once daily, showed excellent transfer (80% correct). Transfer and baseline performances were equivalent, indicating that the matching-to-sample concept had been learned. A second group (2-stimulus), trained with only two different pictures, showed no evidence of transfer. These results are discussed in terms of the effect of numbers of exemplars on previous failures to find concept learning in pigeons, and the implications of the positive finding from this experiment on abstract concept learning and evolutionary cognitive development.


Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes | 1980

Serial probe recognition performance by a rhesus monkey and a human with 10- and 20-item lists

Stephen F. Sands; Anthony A. Wright

A rhesus monkey performed at high accuracy in a serial probe recognition task with color pictures as stimuli. The monkeys serial position curve was similar in form to a humans and demonstrated the theoretically important primacy and recency effects with lists containing as many as 10 or 20 items. The high accuracy of the monkey was shown to be largely due to the minimization of proactive interference through the use of more than 200 distinct items. These results encourage the view of similar mechanisms of memory in monkey and humans.


Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes | 1984

Monkey memory: same/different concept learning, serial probe acquisition, and probe delay effects.

Anthony A. Wright; Hector C. Santiago; Stephen F. Sands

Three rhesus monkeys were trained and tested in a same/different task with six successive sets of 70 item pairs to an 88% accuracy on each set. Their poor initial transfer performance (55% correct) with novel stimuli improved dramatically to 85% correct following daily item changes in the training stimuli. They acquired a serial-probe-recognition (SPR) task with variable (1-6) item list lengths. This SPR acquisition, although gradual, was more rapid for the monkeys than for pigeons similarly trained. Testing with a fixed list length of four items at different delays between the last list item and the probe test item revealed changes in the serial-position function: a recency effect (last items remembered well) for 0-s delay, recency and primacy effects (first and last list items remembered well) for 1-, 2-, and 10-s delays, and only a primacy effect for the longest 30-s delay. These results are compared with similar ones from pigeons and are discussed in relation to theories of memory processing.


Journal of Abnormal Psychology | 1992

Attentional Cues in Chronic Schizophrenia: Abnormal Disengagement of Attention

Paul G. Nestor; Steven F. Faux; Robert W. McCarley; Penhune; Martha Elizabeth Shenton; Pollak S; Stephen F. Sands

Posners (1980) reaction time (RT) paradigm was used to examine the engagement and disengagement operations of visual selective attention in patients with schizophrenia. In the 1st experiment, 14 medicated, chronic schizophrenic subjects (diagnosed by criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; American Psychiatric Association, 1987) and 15 age-matched normal control subjects made a speeded response to a target preceded by a valid, an invalid, or no cue. Control subjects showed the expected advantage and disadvantage in RT for valid and invalid cues, which suggests intact engagement and disengagement operations. For schizophrenic patients, valid cues also enhanced RT, but invalid cues did not slow RT. Similar results were found in the 2nd experiment. The failure of unpredictable, invalid cues to inhibit RT in chronic schizophrenia may be related to an abnormality in the disengagement operation of selective attention.


Learning & Behavior | 1991

Interstimulus interval and viewing time effects in monkey list memory

Robert G. Cook; Anthony A. Wright; Stephen F. Sands

Two rhesus monkeys were tested in 6- and 10-item list memory tasks for performance changes as a function of the exposure duration of the list stimuli and the interstimulus interval (ISI) between successive list stimuli. Accuracy increased with longer item exposure duration and tended to decrease with longer ISI duration. Humans, by contrast, typically show increases in accuracy with ISI, a result taken as evidence of rehearsal. The decrease in accuracy for monkeys suggests that they were not using rehearsal processes in these list memory experiments. Further tests in which choice accuracy with predictable ISIs was compared with choice accuracy with unpredictable ISIs also yielded no evidence of rehearsal by the monkeys. This apparent absence of rehearsal mechanisms in monkeys, in situations also shown to support human rehearsal, is discussed as a potential difference in the visual working memory processes of the two species.


Behavioral and Neural Biology | 1979

Enhancement and disruption of retention performance by ACTH in a choice task

Stephen F. Sands; Anthony A. Wright

One hundred twenty male rats escaped/avoided electric shock by moving into the lighted arm of a “Y” maze. Post-trial ACTH injections at one dose (1 IU/kg) enhanced retention (relative to saline controls), and at another dose (1000 IU/kg) disrupted retention; the overall dose-response function was an inverted “U” for the retention test conducted 24 hr after the original learning. Thus, ACTH was shown to affect retention performance of normal rats in a choice task. Delayed (4 hr) post-trial ACTH injections showed no enhanced or disrupted retention, from which it was concluded that ACTH acts upon some residual (memory?) from the learning experience.


Animal Learning & Behavior | 1981

Interference of delayed matching to sample in pigeons: Effects of interpolation at different periods within a trial and stimulus similarity

Anthony A. Wright; Peter J. Urcuioli; Stephen F. Sands; Hector C. Santiago

Delayed matching-to-sample performance by pigeons was interfered with by displaying a monochromatic annulus around the center (sample) pecking key. The wavelength of the annulus and its point of interpolation within a trial were varied to determine possible differential effects on matching accuracy. Experiment 1 showed that delayed matching was most disrupted when the interference stimulus (570 nm, 630 nm, or achromatic white) appeared during the delay interval of a trial. Little if any disruption occurred when the interference stimulus was present during the sample and choice periods. The spectral relationship between the chromatic interference stimuli (570 and 630 nm) and the sample stimuli (570 and 630 nm) did not consistently influence the degree to which matching accuracy was affected in any interpolation condition. Experiment 2 found a similar pattern of within-trial effects when the interference stimulus was simply a change from a white achromatic annulus to a chromatic one. This finding indicates that illumination changes, such as the popular houselight variation, are not necessary to produce interference in delayed matching to sample. Even with illumination held constant, however, performance was not differentially sensitive to the similarity between interference and sample stimulus wavelengths. It is suggested that other experiments showing similarity effects in interference of delayed matching to sample were conducted in such a way that subjects confused the interfering stimuli with the samples.


Science | 1985

Memory processing of serial lists by pigeons, monkeys, and people

Anthony A. Wright; Hector C. Santiago; Stephen F. Sands; Donald F. Kendrick; Robert G. Cook


Science | 1980

Primate memory: retention of serial list items by a rhesus monkey

Stephen F. Sands; Anthony A. Wright


Journal of Experimental Psychology: General | 1982

Pictorial similarity judgments and the organization of visual memory in the rhesus monkey.

Stephen F. Sands; Charles E. Lincoln; Anthony A. Wright

Collaboration


Dive into the Stephen F. Sands's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Anthony A. Wright

University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Hector C. Santiago

University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Paul G. Nestor

University of Massachusetts Boston

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Donald F. Kendrick

Middle Tennessee State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Héctor C. Santiago

University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jacquelyne J. Rivera

University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge