Stephen Freestone
Royal Hallamshire Hospital
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Stephen Freestone.
The New England Journal of Medicine | 1982
M. S. Lennard; Jh Silas; Stephen Freestone; Lawrence E. Ramsay; Geoffrey T. Tucker; Hf Woods
GENETIC polymorphism in the oxidative metabolism of debrisoquine1 is largely responsible for individual differences in its plasma concentration and antihypertensive effect.2 Poor hydroxylators have...
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics | 1983
M. S. Lennard; Geoffrey T. Tucker; Jh Silas; Stephen Freestone; Lawrence E. Ramsay; Hf Woods
The hypothesis that variability in metoprolol metabolism stereoselectivity is related to debrisoquin oxidation phenotype was tested in six extensive (EM) and six poor (PM) debrisoquin metabolizers. In EM, plasma AUCs for (S)‐metoprolol were 35% higher than for (R)‐metoprolol, whereas in PM, AUCs for (S)‐metoprolol were lower than for (R)‐metoprolol. AUCs for total metoprolol correlated with the ratio of (S)‐ to (R)‐metoprolol AUC. The renal clearance of metoprolol was also stereoselective but to the same extent in both EM and PM. Findings suggest that the enzyme system responsible for polymorphic oxidation of the debrisoquin‐type is stereoselective. The relation between log total metoprolol plasma concentration and response (β‐blockade) was shifted to the right in PM relative to EM, which is compatible with a difference in pharmacologic activity of metoprolol enantiomers. Kinetic predictions based on total drug measurements will tend to overestimate dynamic differences between EM and PM, but the magnitude of the error is relatively small, and, in absolute terms, there is a large difference in pharmacologic activity between the phenotypes (β‐blockade at 24 hr: EM = 5.3 ± 5.6%; PM = 18.9 ± 3.8%).
The American Journal of Medicine | 1982
Stephen Freestone; Lawrence E. Ramsay
Patients with mild hypertension who habitually smoked cigarettes and consumed caffeine were examined after they abstained from caffeine and cigarettes overnight. Their mean blood pressure (147/89 mm Hg) was substantially lower than values recorded in the clinic (164/102 mm Hg) and remained so when they continued to abstain (149/94 mm Hg at two hours). Smoking two cigarettes (3.4 mg nicotine) elevated blood pressure by 10/8 mm Hg, but for only 15 minutes. Drinking coffee (200 mg caffeine) elevated blood pressure by up to 10/7 mm Hg between one and two hours. Combined coffee ingestion and cigarette smoking caused a sustained rise in blood pressure from 5 to 120 minutes to levels similar to those measured in the clinic (162/102 mm Hg at two hours). Similar results were obtained in thiazide-treated patients. The interaction of coffee and cigarettes on blood pressure, but not on pulse rate, was significant. The pressor effect of cigarette smoking and caffeine ingestion in combination may be important in the evaluation of patients with mild hypertension.
BMJ | 1980
Lawrence E. Ramsay; Jh Silas; Stephen Freestone
In patients with hypertension resistant to three or four drugs including a thiazide diuretic substitution of frusemide for the thiazide, or the addition of spironolactone, produced significant reductions in blood pressure and body weight. The response did not depend on the presence of overt fluid retention, renal impairment, or the use of antihypertensive drugs of high potency. Women had larger responses than men. Expansion of the plasma or extracellular fluid volume is an important cause of resistance to treatment even when a thiazide diuretic is used. An increase in diuretic treatment should be tried before using the postganglionic adrenergic blockers or minoxidil in resistant hypertension.
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology | 1984
Lawrence E. Ramsay; J. H. Silas; J. D. Ollerenshaw; Geoffrey T. Tucker; F. C. Phillips; Stephen Freestone
SummaryThe role of acetylator phenotype in determining the response to hydralazine when it was added to diuretic and β-blocker at doses not exceeding 200 mg daily was examined in 57 hypertensive patients. 81% of rapid acetylators needed 200 mg hydralazine daily compared to 38% of slow acetylators (p<0.01). Despite higher doses of hydralazine the blood pressure was controlled in only 27% of rapid acetylators compared to 65% of slow acetylators (p<0.02). The relation of acetylator phenotype to blood pressure response was statistically independent of initial blood pressure, age, sex, body weight and serum creatinine (p<0.005). Current recommendations on hydralazine dosage are unsatisfactory for the 40% of hypertensive patients who are rapid acetylators. We suggest measurement of the acetylator phenotype in patients who respond incompletely to 200 mg hydralazine daily. About 70% of these patients will be rapid acetylators in whom the dose of hydralazine can be increased safely.
Drugs | 1983
Stephen Freestone; Lawrence E. Ramsay
SummaryIn mild hypertension, a combination of drinking coffee (200mg caffeine) and smoking cigarettes (3.4mg nicotine) elevates blood pressure by 10/9mm Hg for at least two hours. Treatment with the β- blockers propranolol (80mg bid; non- selective with no partial agonist activity) or oxprenolol (80mg bid; non- selective with partial agonist activity) did not alter the pressor effect of coffee and cigarettes, with blood pressure rises of 9/8mm Hg and 12/9mm Hg, respectively. With atenolol (100mg daily; β1- selective with no partial agonist activity) the rise in blood pressure was only 5/4mm Hg, to levels significantly lower than those for oxprenolol (− 12/− 8mm Hg; p < 0.05/p < 0.01) or propranolol (− 7/− 5mm Hg; p = ns/ p < 0.05). The significant difference in diastolic pressure between atenolol and propranolol was observed despite similar degrees of β- blockade and similar baseline blood pressures for the two drugs, suggesting that the attenuation of the pressor effect of coffee plus smoking by atenolol was a function of its β1- selectivity.
BMJ | 1982
Jh Silas; Lawrence E. Ramsay; Stephen Freestone
The effects of hydralazine formulation and dose interval were assessed in 20 patients with hypertension well controlled on conventional hydralazine tablets, 100 mg twice daily, in addition to atenolol and a diuretic. The double-blind study used four regimens crossed over in random order at five-week intervals; placebo; conventional hydralazine 100 mg twice daily; conventional hydralazine 200 mg once daily; and slow-release hydralazine 200 mg once daily. Blood pressure and pulse rate were assessed soon after (2.5 +/- 0.9 h) and immediately before taking hydralazine (previous dose: once daily, 26.5 +/- 0.9 h; twice daily, 13.6 +/- 2.0 h). Seventeen patients completed the study. All hydralazine regimens were associated with significant falls in blood pressure. Once-daily treatment with conventional hydralazine was unsatisfactory, as its hypotensive effect waned at 24 h; there was a significant difference between the peak and trough effects on blood pressure and pulse in rapid acetylators. Compared with placebo twice-daily conventional hydralazine and once-daily slow-release hydralazine gave satisfactory control for 24 hours in both rapid and slow acetylators, though the hypotensive effect was larger in the slow acetylators. It is concluded that there is no need to administer hydralazine more than twice daily.
Human & Experimental Toxicology | 1982
Lawrence E. Ramsay; Stephen Freestone; Jh Silas
1 A survey of urgent admissions to a general medical unit in Sheffield in 1978 showed that about 25% of admissions were caused by drug-related illness; 18% by self-poisoning, 3.1% by definite or probable adverse reactions, 3.1 % by possible adverse reactions, and 1.4 % by non-compliance with drug treatment. These patients accounted for 10.8% of the bed use by patients admitted urgently. 2 Drug-related admissions to the unit did not increase between 1974 and 1980. 3 The use of barbiturates for self-poisoning declined sharply, while that of paracetamol increased steadily. Self-poisoning with dextropropoxyphene appeared to peak in 1978, and then decline. 4 While drug-related illness caused the admission of 81 % of all patients under the age of 30 years, they rarely came to harm. Self-poisoning had a high mortality in older patients, and they were also the principal sufferers from adverse drug reactions.
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology | 1981
Jh Silas; F. C. Phillips; Stephen Freestone; Geoffrey T. Tucker; Lawrence E. Ramsay
SummaryThe pharmacokinetics, hypotensive effect and tolerability of a new vasodilator, tolmesoxide (T), have been studied in 6 uncontrolled hypertensive patients receiving atenolol and a diuretic. After a 50 mg oral dose mean (± SD) peak plasma concentration of T was 1.13±0.29 µg/ml−1 and occurred 0.79±0.40 h after the dose; mean peak plasma concentration of its sulphone metabolite (M) was 0.37±0.09 µg/ml−1 at 1.92±1.32 h after the dose. Following peak plasma concentrations there was a monoexponential decline in T and M concentrations with half-lives of 2.78±0.77 h and 10.78±7.85 h respectively. There was a linear increase in plasma concentration of T and M during incremental dosing with 50–200 mg t. i. d. During in-patient administration of 600–900 mg T daily (n=6) there was no significant change in blood pressure, pulse rate or body weight. Out-patient administration of 900 mg T daily (n=4) was associated with a significant fall in mean systolic but not diastolic bp (lying −15/+1 mm Hg. standing −25/−8 mm Hg). A further fall was observed in 2 subjects receiving 1200 mg and 1500 mg daily. Supine pulse rate increased (mean ± SD) significantly from 55±5/min to 66±8/min following 900–1500 mg T in 4 out-patients. Severe nausea and other gastro-intestinal side-effects in all subjects receiving 600–900 mg daily eventually necessitated drug withdrawal. In its present from T is not recommended for the treatment of hypertension.
BMJ | 1984
Simon Cocksedge; Stephen Freestone; John Martin