Stephen M. Katz

Immunosuppressive effects and safety of a sirolimus/cyclosporine combination regimen for renal transplantation

Background. Sirolimus, a novel immunosuppressant that inhibits cytokine-driven cell proliferation and maturation, prolongs allograft survival in animal models. After a phase I trial in stable renal transplant recipients documented that cyclosporine and sirolimus have few overlapping toxicities, we conducted an open-label, single-center, phase I/II dose-escalation trial to examine the safety and efficacy of this drug combination. Methods. Forty mismatched living-donor renal transplant recipients were sequentially assigned to receive escalating initial doses of sirolimus (0.5-7.0 mg/m 2 /day), in addition to courses of prednisone and a concentration-controlled regimen of cyclosporine. We conducted surveillance for drug-induced side effects among sirolimus-treated patients and compared their incidence of acute rejection episodes as well as mean laboratory values with those of a historical cohort of 65 consecutive, immediately precedent, demographically similar recipients treated with the same concentration-controlled regimen of cyclosporine and tapering doses of prednisone. Results. The addition of sirolimus reduced the overall incidence of acute allograft rejection episodes to 7.5% from 32% in the immediately precedent cyclosporine/prednisone-treated patients. At 18- to 47-month follow-up periods, both treatment groups displayed similar rates of patient and graft survival, as well as morbid complications. Although sirolimus-treated patients displayed comparatively lower platelet and white blood cell counts and higher levels of serum cholesterol and triglycerides, sirolimus did not augment the nephrotoxic or hypertensive proclivities of cyclosporine. The degree of change in the laboratory values was more directly associated with whole blood trough drug concentrations than with doses of sirolimus. Conclusions. Sirolimus potentiates the immunosuppressive effects of a cyclosporine-based regimen by reducing the rate of acute rejection episodes.

Variable oral absorption of cyclosporine : A biopharmaceutical risk factor for chronic renal allograft rejection

The inter- and intrapatient variability in cyclosporine (CsA) pharmacokinetics obfuscates the relationship between therapeutic outcome and administered dose, thereby impeding the development of secure algorithms for CsA therapy. In an attempt to understand these variabilities, we previously performed serial pharmacokinetic profiles on 160 renal transplant recipients during the first 3 posttransplant months. Drug exposure was estimated by the average CsA concentration (Cav), which was defined as a time-corrected (tau, hours) expression of the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), i.e., Cav = (AUC/tau). Low Cav values correlated with an increased occurrence of acute rejection episodes and 1-year rate of renal transplant loss. The present study examines the results of serial pharmacokinetic profiling of a cohort of 204 patients treated for up to 5 years with CsA doses selected to achieve target Cav values. Multivariate analyses correlated demographic factors, laboratory values, clinical parameters, and CsA pharmacokinetic parameters with the occurrence of chronic rejection. The factors that predisposed to chronic rejection included a previous acute rejection episode, initial acute tubular necrosis, diastolic blood pressure above 85 mmHg, and African-American race. Once regression models were adjusted to account for the impact of these factors, we examined the association between the incidence of chronic rejection and individual pharmacokinetic parameters, including the mean values of the absolute and dose-corrected trough, peak, and Cav concentrations, as well as the percent coefficient of variation of each of these values. Receiver operating characteristic curves documented that 27% of the total risk for the occurrence of chronic rejection was attributable to a greater than 20% coefficient of variation of the dose-corrected Cav, namely, AUC/(tau.mg). This study suggests that variable oral bioavailability of CsA represents a biopharmaceutical risk factor for the occurrence of chronic rejection.

Low Incidence of Malignancy among Sirolimus/ Cyclosporine-Treated Renal Transplant Recipients

Background. Malignancies, a well-known complication of immunosuppressive therapy in renal transplant recipients, represent an important cause of long-term morbidity and mortality. One approach to addressing this problem is identifying agents that display antineoplastic properties concomitant with their immunosuppressive effects. Methods. We examined the neoplasms among 1008 renal transplant recipients treated at a single center with sirolimus-cyclosporine ± prednisone. Results. Clinical and laboratory data, including 62.3±26.1 months follow-up (range 27.1–131), revealed 36 tumors in 35 patients (3.6%) presenting at 32.5±29.8 months. The 2.4% incidence of skin tumors, the most common neoplasms, was 1.58-fold greater than the general U.S. population. In addition to a 0.4% incidence of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) and a 0.2% incidence of renal cell carcinomas, we observed single cases of breast, bladder, endometrial, lung, and brain neoplasms as well as leukemia. The mean trough drug concentrations at the time of diagnosis in affected recipients were within our putative target ranges. In addition to eleven graft losses due to death with a functioning kidney, two were related to chronic rejection following reduced immunosuppression, and one, therapeutic nephrectomy for PTLD. Five of twelve deaths were caused by malignancies; four others among 1008 patients over the entire follow-up were attributed to cardiovascular events; one, to respiratory failure; and two, at distant locations to unknown causes. Conclusions. The sirolimus-cyclosporine ± prednisone combination appears likely to be associated with a reduced incidence of tumors.

Ten years of sirolimus therapy for human renal transplantation: the University of Texas at Houston experience.

ON APRIL 13, 1993, a phase I trial was initiated to assess the safety and pharmacokinetic behavior of ascending doses of a new immunosuppressant discovered by Sehgal and applied in animal transplant models by Calne et al and Morris et al. Forty stable renal transplant patients who received either the oral liquid formulation of sirolimus (SRL) or placebo, displayed only modest adverse reactions. Drug development proceeded rapidly through a subsequent phase I/II study of de novo drug administration which confirmed the safety and documented the efficacy of a sirolimus-cyclosporine (CsA) combination to reduce the incidence of acute rejection episodes. The first multicenter phase II trial showed that reduced doses of CsA were efficacious in non–African Americans when administered in combination with sirolimus. The pivotal phase III trials performed in the United States (US) and across the world (Global) demonstrated the benefit of a sirolimus-CsAPrednisone (Pred) regimen for acute rejection prophylaxis, leading to approval by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). This contribution reviews not only the milestones up to FDA approval, but also our present strategies, as utilized in 1008 renal transplant recipients, to deliver the maximal benefit of sirolimus with minimal CsA exposure, thereby reducing the hazards of chronic immunosuppression.

Decreased protein binding of mycophenolic acid associated with leukopenia in a pancreas transplant recipient with renal failure.

BACKGROUND Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is rapidly hydrolyzed to its active metabolite mycophenolic acid (MPA), which is excreted by the kidney after undergoing glucuronidation to MPAG. MPAG has been shown to accumulate in patients with renal failure. MPA is extensively and avidly bound to human serum albumin. In vitro inhibition of the pharmacologic target, inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase, is dependent on free MPA. It has been demonstrated that high MPAG concentrations decrease MPA protein binding in vitro. In addition, the uremic state is associated with altered protein binding of many drugs. METHODS We assessed free MPA, total MPA, and MPAG kinetics in a patient with renal failure receiving MMF for a pancreas transplant, who presented with signs of MMF toxicity. MPA, MPAG, and free MPA were measured by high performance liquid chromatography and a validated 14C-MPA ultrafiltration methodology. RESULTS The MPAG area under the concentration curve (AUC) in this patient was extremely high (5899 microg x hr/ml). The total MPA AUC of 36.8 microg x hr/ml was within the range usually obtained in stable renal patients. The free fraction of MPA and the free MPA AUC were markedly elevated (13.8% and 5.07 microg x hr/ml, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Patients with severe renal insufficiency may have markedly increased free MPA levels that may not be reflected in total MPA concentrations. These patients may be at increased risk for MMF-related toxicity.

Risk factors for impaired wound healing in sirolimus‐treated renal transplant recipients

Abstract:  Aim:  As sirolimus has been implicated in impaired wound healing, the aim of this study was to evaluate risk factors for wound complications after renal transplantation in patients treated with this drug de novo.

Correlation of ELISA-detected IgG and IgA anti-HLA antibodies in pretransplant sera with renal allograft rejection.

The present study compared the occurrence of rejection episodes during the first twelve posttransplant (Tx) months and the 1-, 2-, and 3-year graft survivals among recipients stratified by the percent panel reactive antibody (% PRA) of pre-Tx sera as detected using either an antihuman globulin determined PRA (AHG-% PRA) or an ELISA methodology detecting IgG reactive against soluble HLA class I antigens (% PRA-STAT). There was a significant correlation between AHG-PRA greater than or equal to 10% and a PRA-STAT greater than or equal to 10% (P<0.001). However, among 200 sera displaying an AHG-PRA greater than or equal to 10% (mean 57 +/- 2l%), only 69% (138/200) displayed a PRA-STAT greater than or equal to 10%. With further study the discrepant finding, of 62 sera that were AHG-PRA greater than or equal to 10% but PRA-STAT <10%, was due to the presence of IgM and/or IgG non-MHC reactivity. In contrast, among 293 sera displaying an AHG-PRA < 100% (mean 3 +/- 2%), 15% (43/293) displayed a PRA-STAT greater than or equal to 10%. There was no correlation between AHG-% PRA and rejection episodes occurring during the first twelve post Tx months. In contrast, however, there was a highly significant correlation between PRA-STAT greater than or equal to 10% and the occurrence of rejection episodes during the first twelve post-Tx months (P < 0.001). Patients with PRA-STAT greater than of equal to 10% experienced a 70% rejection frequency compared with the 35% rejection frequency for patients with PRA-STAT sera < 10% (P<0.001). A significant correlation was observed between the presence of IgG-1 and rejection (P<0.01) but not IgG-subclasses 2, 3, or 4. Of particular interest was the observation in 11 patients that the presence of ELISA-detected IgA anti-HLA class I antigen (ELISA-IgA PRA greater than or equal to 10%) was associated with a significantly reduced rejection risk compared with sera where only PRA-STAT greater than or equal to 10% was present (27% vs. 70% incidence of rejection episodes, P<0.01). Finally, patients displaying pretransplant PRA-STAT results < 10% experienced significantly improved l-, 2-, and 3- year graft survivals of 85% vs. 74%, 82% vs. 70% and 81% vs. 67%, respectively (P<0.01 for each time point), compared with patients displaying PRA-STAT results greater than or equal to 10%. These data suggest that the use of the ELISA methodology to detect IgG reactivity against soluble HLA class I antigens (PRA-STAT) may allow for the determination of a more clinically informative % PRA than the AHG-% PRA. Moreover, the presence of ELISA-detected IgA anti-HLA may act to inhibit rejection mechanisms associated with ELISA-detected IgG anti-HLA greater than or equal to 10%.

Flow cytometry-detected IgG is not a contraindication to renal transplantation : IgM may be beneficial to outcome

BACKGROUND At our transplant center, primary recipients of either a haplo-identical (haplo-ID) living related (LRD) or a cadaveric (CAD) donor renal allograft are transplanted after a negative donor-specific IgG anti-human globulin (AHG) cross-match (XM). Testing included the historically highest panel-reactive antibody and the immediate (0-7 days) pretransplant sera. A positive donor specific IgM-AHG XM has not been a contraindication to transplant. Reports suggest that donor-specific flow cytometry cross-matches (FCXM) may be more clinically informative than the AHG-XM. METHODS We therefore evaluated the impact of a positive FCXM (IgG or IgM) on the rejection frequency (0-12 months after transplant) and 1-year graft survival for cyclosporine-prednisone-treated primary (haplo-ID and CAD) renal allograft recipients. All transplants were performed after a negative donor-specific IgG AHG-XM regardless of the IgM-AHG XM status. RESULTS Rejection frequencies (26% vs. 31%, P = NS) and 1-year graft survivals (92% vs. 89%, P = NS) were comparable for haplo-ID LRD FCXM-negative and IgG-FCXM-positive recipients. However, IgM-FCXM-positive LRD recipients experienced significantly fewer rejections (13% vs. 26% P<0.02) and an improved 1-year graft survival (100% vs. 92%, P<0.02) than FCXM-negative LRD recipients. Similar results were observed for primary CAD recipients. Rejection frequencies (40% vs. 44%, P = NS) and 1-year graft survivals (83% vs. 81%, P = NS) were comparable for primary CAD FCXM-negative and IgG-FCXM-positive recipients. Again, IgM-FCXM-positive primary CAD recipients experienced significantly fewer rejections (22% vs. 40%, P<0.02) and improved 1-year graft survivals (89% vs. 83%, P<0.05) than FCXM-negative recipients. CONCLUSION These data suggest that, after a negative donor-specific IgG-AHG XM, an IgG-positive FCXM is not a contraindication to transplantation. The presence of IgM may be beneficial in reducing the occurrence of rejection episodes and improving graft survivals.

De novo hemolytic uremic syndrome after kidney transplantation in patients treated with cyclosporine-sirolimus combination.

Objective. We sought to examine factors that predisposed 1.5% (10/672) of renal transplant recipients treated with a cyclosporine (CsA)/sirolimus (SRL)/steroid immunosuppressive regimen to develop hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS). Methods. Two cohorts of recipients were treated for 1–212 months (mean: 25.0±26.4, median: 18.1) with concentration-control CsA regimens based upon either area under the concentration-time curve (AUC; n=412 patients) or trough measurements (C0; n=260 patients). Results. The only demographic feature more common to affected patients was an original glomerulopathic disease in 7 patients, 4 of whom had displayed IgA glomerulonephritis. All 10 affected patients showed a clinical picture of hemolysis with schistocytes, thrombocytopenia (nadir: 35,000±19,600 platelets/mm3), as well as elevated serum levels of lactate dehydrogenase (1697±1427 IU) and creatinine (Scr; 2.05±1.52 mg/dL prediagnosis to 5.13±2.43 mg/dL at diagnosis). Seven patients experienced adverse events concomitant with the bout of HUS, namely, acute rejection episodes prior to (n=2) or during (n=3), and 2 patients, infections (Herpes simplex and pancolitis). The mean values of daily steroid dose and the immunosuppressive drug C0 values were above the putative therapeutic targets: namely, CsA C0=294.9±153.2 ng/ml versus 150±50 ng/ml and SRL C0=20.1±14.0 ng/ml versus 10±5 ng/ml, respectively. The therapeutic approach included discontinuation of CsA in 9/10, which was transient in 6/9; discontinuation of SRL in all 10, which was transient in 3, OKT3 for concurrent rejection in 3, and plasmapheresis in 5 patients. At 24 weeks postdiagnosis 9/10 patients have well-functioning kidneys with a mean Scr value of 1.6±0.59 mg/dL. One patient who underwent transplant nephrectomy subsequently succumbed due to a cluster of refractory thrombocytopenia, Aspergillus infection, and multiorgan failure. Conclusion. This initial experience suggests that a time-limited and reversible de novo HUS syndrome may be less frequent and milder among renal transplant recipients treated with SRL-based immunosuppression.

The selective use of basiliximab versus thymoglobulin in combination with sirolimus for cadaveric renal transplant recipients at low risk versus high risk for delayed graft function.

Background. We previously reported that the use of basiliximab together with sirolimus permits a window of recovery from delayed graft function before the introduction of reduced-dose cyclosporine. The present study reviews our experience with the substitution of thymoglobulin for basiliximab as induction therapy for recipients at increased risk for early acute rejection episodes. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed 145 cadaveric renal allograft recipients who received either basiliximab (n=115) or thymoglobulin (n=30) in combination with sirolimus and prednisone, followed by delayed introduction of reduced doses of cyclosporine. Recipients were stratified as high immune responders if they were African American, a retransplant recipient, or a recipient with a panel-reactive antibody greater than 50%. All other recipients were considered low immune responders. Results. Basiliximab-treated high immune responders exhibited a higher incidence of acute rejection episodes (26%) than either basiliximab-treated low immune responders (10%, P=0.04) or thymoglobulin-treated high immune responders (3%, P=0.01). The median time to initiation of cyclosporine was 12 days; cyclosporine was initiated when the serum creatinine level was 2.5 mg/dL or less. Patients with early return of renal function displayed a lower incidence of acute rejection episodes than those with later recovery of function (P=0.003). High immune responders treated with basiliximab expressed a higher mean serum creatinine level at 3 months (P<0.01), 6 months (P=0.02) and 12 months (P=0.01) than either low immune responders treated with basiliximab or high immune responders treated with thymoglobulin. Conclusion. A strategy combining sirolimus with basiliximab for low-immunologic risk recipients and thymoglobulin for high-risk recipients leads to prompt recovery of renal function with a low risk of acute rejection episodes.