Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Steven C. Hardiman is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Steven C. Hardiman.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2010

Impact of stratospheric ozone on Southern Hemisphere circulation change: A multimodel assessment

Seok-Woo Son; Edwin P. Gerber; Judith Perlwitz; Lorenzo M. Polvani; Nathan P. Gillett; Kyong-Hwan Seo; Veronika Eyring; Theodore G. Shepherd; Darryn W. Waugh; Hideharu Akiyoshi; J. Austin; A. J. G. Baumgaertner; Slimane Bekki; Peter Braesicke; C. Brühl; Neal Butchart; M. P. Chipperfield; David Cugnet; Martin Dameris; S. Dhomse; S. M. Frith; Hella Garny; Rolando R. Garcia; Steven C. Hardiman; Patrick Jöckel; Jean-Francois Lamarque; E. Mancini; Marion Marchand; M. Michou; Tetsu Nakamura

The impact of stratospheric ozone on the tropospheric general circulation of the Southern Hemisphere (SH) is examined with a set of chemistry-climate models participating in the Stratospheric Processes and their Role in Climate (SPARC)/Chemistry-Climate Model Validation project phase 2 (CCMVal-2). Model integrations of both the past and future climates reveal the crucial role of stratospheric ozone in driving SH circulation change: stronger ozone depletion in late spring generally leads to greater poleward displacement and intensification of the tropospheric midlatitude jet, and greater expansion of the SH Hadley cell in the summer. These circulation changes are systematic as poleward displacement of the jet is typically accompanied by intensification of the jet and expansion of the Hadley cell. Overall results are compared with coupled models participating in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report (IPCC AR4), and possible mechanisms are discussed. While the tropospheric circulation response appears quasi-linearly related to stratospheric ozone changes, the quantitative response to a given forcing varies considerably from one model to another. This scatter partly results from differences in model climatology. It is shown that poleward intensification of the westerly jet is generally stronger in models whose climatological jet is biased toward lower latitudes. This result is discussed in the context of quasi-geostrophic zonal mean dynamics.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2010

Multimodel assessment of the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere: Tropics and global trends

Andrew Gettelman; M. I. Hegglin; Say-Jin Son; Jung-Hyun Kim; Masatomo Fujiwara; Thomas Birner; Stefanie Kremser; Markus Rex; Juan A. Añel; Hideharu Akiyoshi; John Austin; Slimane Bekki; P. Braesike; C. Brühl; Neal Butchart; M. P. Chipperfield; Martin Dameris; S. Dhomse; Hella Garny; Steven C. Hardiman; Patrick Jöckel; Douglas E. Kinnison; Jean-Francois Lamarque; E. Mancini; Marion Marchand; M. Michou; Olaf Morgenstern; Steven Pawson; G. Pitari; David A. Plummer

The performance of 18 coupled Chemistry Climate Models (CCMs) in the Tropical Tropopause Layer (TTL) is evaluated using qualitative and quantitative diagnostics. Trends in tropopause quantities in the tropics and the extratropical Upper Troposphere and Lower Stratosphere (UTLS) are analyzed. A quantitative grading methodology for evaluating CCMs is extended to include variability and used to develop four different grades for tropical tropopause temperature and pressure, water vapor and ozone. Four of the 18 models and the multi‐model mean meet quantitative and qualitative standards for reproducing key processes in the TTL. Several diagnostics are performed on a subset of the models analyzing the Tropopause Inversion Layer (TIL), Lagrangian cold point and TTL transit time. Historical decreases in tropical tropopause pressure and decreases in water vapor are simulated, lending confidence to future projections. The models simulate continued decreases in tropopause pressure in the 21st century, along with ∼1K increases per century in cold point tropopause temperature and 0.5–1 ppmv per century increases in water vapor above the tropical tropopause. TTL water vapor increases below the cold point. In two models, these trends are associated with 35% increases in TTL cloud fraction. These changes indicate significant perturbations to TTL processes, specifically to deep convective heating and humidity transport. Ozone in the extratropical lowermost stratosphere has significant and hemispheric asymmetric trends. O3 is projected to increase by nearly 30% due to ozone recovery in the Southern Hemisphere (SH) and due to enhancements in the stratospheric circulation. These UTLS ozone trends may have significant effects in the TTL and the troposphere.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2010

Review of the formulation of present‐generation stratospheric chemistry‐climate models and associated external forcings

Olaf Morgenstern; Marco A. Giorgetta; Kiyotaka Shibata; Veronika Eyring; Darryn W. Waugh; Theodore G. Shepherd; Hideharu Akiyoshi; J. Austin; A. J. G. Baumgaertner; Slimane Bekki; Peter Braesicke; C. Brühl; M. P. Chipperfield; David Cugnet; Martin Dameris; S. Dhomse; S. M. Frith; Hella Garny; Andrew Gettelman; Steven C. Hardiman; M. I. Hegglin; Patrick Jöckel; Douglas E. Kinnison; Jean-Francois Lamarque; E. Mancini; Elisa Manzini; Marion Marchand; M. Michou; Tetsu Nakamura; J. E. Nielsen

The goal of the Chemistry-Climate Model Validation (CCMVal) activity is to improve understanding of chemistry-climate models (CCMs) through process-oriented evaluation and to provide reliable projections of stratospheric ozone and its impact on climate. An appreciation of the details of model formulations is essential for understanding how models respond to the changing external forcings of greenhouse gases and ozone-depleting substances, and hence for understanding the ozone and climate forecasts produced by the models participating in this activity. Here we introduce and review the models used for the second round (CCMVal-2) of this intercomparison, regarding the implementation of chemical, transport, radiative, and dynamical processes in these models. In particular, we review the advantages and problems associated with approaches used to model processes of relevance to stratospheric dynamics and chemistry. Furthermore, we state the definitions of the reference simulations performed, and describe the forcing data used in these simulations. We identify some developments in chemistry-climate modeling that make models more physically based or more comprehensive, including the introduction of an interactive ocean, online photolysis, troposphere-stratosphere chemistry, and non-orographic gravity-wave deposition as linked to tropospheric convection. The relatively new developments indicate that stratospheric CCM modeling is becoming more consistent with our physically based understanding of the atmosphere.


Climate Dynamics | 2012

Climate change projections and stratosphere-troposphere interaction

Adam A. Scaife; Thomas Spangehl; David Fereday; Ulrich Cubasch; Ulrike Langematz; Hideharu Akiyoshi; Slimane Bekki; Peter Braesicke; Neal Butchart; M. P. Chipperfield; Andrew Gettelman; Steven C. Hardiman; M. Michou; E. Rozanov; Theodore G. Shepherd

Climate change is expected to increase winter rainfall and flooding in many extratropical regions as evaporation and precipitation rates increase, storms become more intense and storm tracks move polewards. Here, we show how changes in stratospheric circulation could play a significant role in future climate change in the extratropics through an additional shift in the tropospheric circulation. This shift in the circulation alters climate change in regional winter rainfall by an amount large enough to significantly alter regional climate change projections. The changes are consistent with changes in stratospheric winds inducing a change in the baroclinic eddy growth rate across the depth of the troposphere. A change in mean wind structure and an equatorward shift of the tropospheric storm tracks relative to models with poor stratospheric resolution allows coupling with surface climate. Using the Atlantic storm track as an example, we show how this can double the predicted increase in extreme winter rainfall over Western and Central Europe compared to other current climate projections.


Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society | 2015

Defining Sudden Stratospheric Warmings

Amy H. Butler; Dian J. Seidel; Steven C. Hardiman; Neal Butchart; Thomas Birner; Aaron Match

AbstractSudden stratospheric warmings (SSWs) are large, rapid temperature rises in the winter polar stratosphere, occurring predominantly in the Northern Hemisphere. Major SSWs are also associated with a reversal of the climatological westerly zonal-mean zonal winds. Circulation anomalies associated with SSWs can descend into the troposphere with substantial surface weather impacts, such as wintertime extreme cold air outbreaks. After their discovery in 1952, SSWs were classified by the World Meteorological Organization. An examination of literature suggests that a single, original reference for an exact definition of SSWs is elusive, but in many references a definition involves the reversal of the meridional temperature gradient and, for major warmings, the reversal of the zonal circulation poleward of 60° latitude at 10 hPa.Though versions of this definition are still commonly used to detect SSWs, the details of the definition and its implementation remain ambiguous. In addition, other SSW definitions h...


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2010

Stratosphere-troposphere coupling and annular mode variability in chemistry-climate models

Edwin P. Gerber; Mark P. Baldwin; Hideharu Akiyoshi; John Austin; Slimane Bekki; Peter Braesicke; Neal Butchart; M. P. Chipperfield; Martin Dameris; S. Dhomse; S. M. Frith; Rolando R. Garcia; Hella Garny; Andrew Gettelman; Steven C. Hardiman; Alexey Yu. Karpechko; Marion Marchand; Olaf Morgenstern; J. Eric Nielsen; Steven Pawson; Tom Peter; David A. Plummer; J. A. Pyle; E. Rozanov; J. F. Scinocca; Theodore G. Shepherd; Dan Smale

The internal variability and coupling between the stratosphere and troposphere in CCMValA¢Â�Â�2 chemistryA¢Â�Â�climate models are evaluated through analysis of the annular mode patterns of variability. Computation of the annular modes in long data sets with secular trends requires refinement of the standard definition of the annular mode, and a more robust procedure that allows for slowly varying trends is established and verified. The spatial and temporal structure of the modelsA¢Â�Â� annular modes is then compared with that of reanalyses. As a whole, the models capture the key features of observed intraseasonal variability, including the sharp vertical gradients in structure between stratosphere and troposphere, the asymmetries in the seasonal cycle between the Northern and Southern hemispheres, and the coupling between the polar stratospheric vortices and tropospheric midlatitude jets. It is also found that the annular mode variability changes little in time throughout simulations of the 21st century. There are, however, both common biases and significant differences in performance in the models. In the troposphere, the annular mode in models is generally too persistent, particularly in the Southern Hemisphere summer, a bias similar to that found in CMIP3 coupled climate models. In the stratosphere, the periods of peak variance and coupling with the troposphere are delayed by about a month in both hemispheres. The relationship between increased variability of the stratosphere and increased persistence in the troposphere suggests that some tropospheric biases may be related to stratospheric biases and that a wellA¢Â�Â�simulated stratosphere can improve simulation of tropospheric intraseasonal variability.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2011

Using transport diagnostics to understand chemistry climate model ozone simulations

S. E. Strahan; Anne R. Douglass; Richard S. Stolarski; Hideharu Akiyoshi; Slimane Bekki; Peter Braesicke; Neal Butchart; M. P. Chipperfield; David Cugnet; S. Dhomse; S. M. Frith; Andrew Gettelman; Steven C. Hardiman; Douglas E. Kinnison; Jean-Francois Lamarque; E. Mancini; Marion Marchand; M. Michou; Olaf Morgenstern; Tetsu Nakamura; D. Olivié; Steven Pawson; G. Pitari; David A. Plummer; J. A. Pyle; J. F. Scinocca; Theodore G. Shepherd; Kiyotaka Shibata; Dan Smale; H. Teyssèdre

We use observations of N2O and mean age to identify realistic transport in models in order to explain their ozone predictions. The results are applied to 15 chemistry climate models (CCMs) participating in the 2010 World Meteorological Organization ozone assessment. Comparison of the observed and simulated N2O, mean age and their compact correlation identifies models with fast or slow circulations and reveals details of model ascent and tropical isolation. This process-oriented diagnostic is more useful than mean age alone because it identifies models with compensating transport deficiencies that produce fortuitous agreement with mean age. The diagnosed model transport behavior is related to a models ability to produce realistic lower stratosphere (LS) O3 profiles. Models with the greatest tropical transport problems compare poorly with O3 observations. Models with the most realistic LS transport agree more closely with LS observations and each other. We incorporate the results of the chemistry evaluations in the Stratospheric Processes and their Role in Climate (SPARC) CCMVal Report to explain the range of CCM predictions for the return-to-1980 dates for global (60°S-60°N) and Antarctic column ozone. Antarctic O3 return dates are generally correlated with vortex Cly levels, and vortex Cly is generally correlated with the models circulation, although model Cl chemistry and conservation problems also have a significant effect on return date. In both regions, models with good LS transport and chemistry produce a smaller range of predictions for the return-to-1980 ozone values. This study suggests that the current range of predicted return dates is unnecessarily broad due to identifiable model deficiencies.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2014

Northern Winter Climate Change: Assessment of Uncertainty in CMIP5 Projections Related to Stratosphere-Troposphere Coupling

Elisa Manzini; A. Yu. Karpechko; James Anstey; Mark P. Baldwin; Robert X. Black; C. Cagnazzo; Natalia Calvo; Andrew Charlton-Perez; Bo Christiansen; Paolo Davini; Edwin P. Gerber; Marco A. Giorgetta; Lesley J. Gray; Steven C. Hardiman; Yun-Young Lee; Daniel R. Marsh; Brent A. McDaniel; Ariaan Purich; Adam A. Scaife; Drew T. Shindell; Seok Woo Son; Shingo Watanabe; Giuseppe Zappa

Future changes in the stratospheric circulation could have an important impact on northern winter tropospheric climate change, given that sea level pressure (SLP) responds not only to tropospheric circulation variations but also to vertically coherent variations in troposphere-stratosphere circulation. Here we assess northern winter stratospheric change and its potential to influence surface climate change in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project-Phase 5 (CMIP5) multimodel ensemble. In the stratosphere at high latitudes, an easterly change in zonally averaged zonal wind is found for the majority of the CMIP5 models, under the Representative Concentration Pathway 8.5 scenario. Comparable results are also found in the 1% CO2 increase per year projections, indicating that the stratospheric easterly change is common feature in future climate projections. This stratospheric wind change, however, shows a significant spread among the models. By using linear regression, we quantify the impact of tropical upper troposphere warming, polar amplification, and the stratospheric wind change on SLP. We find that the intermodel spread in stratospheric wind change contributes substantially to the intermodel spread in Arctic SLP change. The role of the stratosphere in determining part of the spread in SLP change is supported by the fact that the SLP change lags the stratospheric zonally averaged wind change. Taken together, these findings provide further support for the importance of simulating the coupling between the stratosphere and the troposphere, to narrow the uncertainty in the future projection of tropospheric circulation changes.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2010

Decline and recovery of total column ozone using a multimodel time series analysis

John Austin; J. F. Scinocca; David A. Plummer; Luke D. Oman; Darryn W. Waugh; Hideharu Akiyoshi; Slimane Bekki; Peter Braesicke; Neal Butchart; M. P. Chipperfield; David Cugnet; Martin Dameris; S. Dhomse; Veronika Eyring; S. M. Frith; Rolando R. Garcia; Hella Garny; Andrew Gettelman; Steven C. Hardiman; Douglas E. Kinnison; Jean-Francois Lamarque; E. Mancini; Marion Marchand; M. Michou; Olaf Morgenstern; Tetsu Nakamura; Steven Pawson; G. Pitari; J. A. Pyle; E. Rozanov

Simulations of 15 coupled chemistry climate models, for the period 1960–2100, are presented. The models include a detailed stratosphere, as well as including a realistic representation of the tropospheric climate. The simulations assume a consistent set of changing greenhouse gas concentrations, as well as temporally varying chlorofluorocarbon concentrations in accordance with observations for the past and expectations for the future. The ozone results are analyzed using a nonparametric additive statistical model. Comparisons are made with observations for the recent past, and the recovery of ozone, indicated by a return to 1960 and 1980 values, is investigated as a function of latitude. Although chlorine amounts are simulated to return to 1980 values by about 2050, with only weak latitudinal variations, column ozone amounts recover at different rates due to the influence of greenhouse gas changes. In the tropics, simulated peak ozone amounts occur by about 2050 and thereafter total ozone column declines. Consequently, simulated ozone does not recover to values which existed prior to the early 1980s. The results also show a distinct hemispheric asymmetry, with recovery to 1980 values in the Northern Hemisphere extratropics ahead of the chlorine return by about 20 years. In the Southern Hemisphere midlatitudes, ozone is simulated to return to 1980 levels only 10 years ahead of chlorine. In the Antarctic, annually averaged ozone recovers at about the same rate as chlorine in high latitudes and hence does not return to 1960s values until the last decade of the simulations.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2010

Multimodel assessment of the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere: Extratropics

M. I. Hegglin; Andrew Gettelman; P. Hoor; R. Krichevsky; G. L. Manney; Laura L. Pan; Say-Jin Son; G. P. Stiller; Simone Tilmes; Kaley A. Walker; Veronika Eyring; Theodore G. Shepherd; Darryn W. Waugh; Hideharu Akiyoshi; Juan A. Añel; J. Austin; A. J. G. Baumgaertner; Slimane Bekki; Peter Braesicke; C. Brühl; Neal Butchart; M. P. Chipperfield; Martin Dameris; S. Dhomse; S. M. Frith; Hella Garny; Steven C. Hardiman; Patrick Jöckel; Douglas E. Kinnison; Jean-Francois Lamarque

A multimodel assessment of the performance of chemistry-climate models (CCMs) in the extratropical upper troposphere/lower stratosphere (UTLS) is conducted for the first time. Process-oriented diagnostics are used to validate dynamical and transport characteristics of 18 CCMs using meteorological analyses and aircraft and satellite observations. The main dynamical and chemical climatological characteristics of the extratropical UTLS are generally well represented by the models, despite the limited horizontal and vertical resolution. The seasonal cycle of lowermost stratospheric mass is realistic, however with a wide spread in its mean value. A tropopause inversion layer is present in most models, although the maximum in static stability is located too high above the tropopause and is somewhat too weak, as expected from limited model resolution. Similar comments apply to the extratropical tropopause transition layer. The seasonality in lower stratospheric chemical tracers is consistent with the seasonality in the Brewer-Dobson circulation. Both vertical and meridional tracer gradients are of similar strength to those found in observations. Models that perform less well tend to use a semi-Lagrangian transport scheme and/or have a very low resolution. Two models, and the multimodel mean, score consistently well on all diagnostics, while seven other models score well on all diagnostics except the seasonal cycle of water vapor. Only four of the models are consistently below average. The lack of tropospheric chemistry in most models limits their evaluation in the upper troposphere. Finally, the UTLS is relatively sparsely sampled by observations, limiting our ability to quantitatively evaluate many aspects of model performance.

Collaboration


Dive into the Steven C. Hardiman's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Peter Braesicke

Karlsruhe Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Olaf Morgenstern

National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Hideharu Akiyoshi

National Institute for Environmental Studies

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Slimane Bekki

Centre national de la recherche scientifique

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Marion Marchand

Centre national de la recherche scientifique

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge