Steven D. Kawaler
Iowa State University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Steven D. Kawaler.
The Astrophysical Journal | 1989
Marc H. Pinsonneault; Steven D. Kawaler; Sabatino Sofia; Pierre Demarque
This paper reviews current work on the evolution of a differentially rotating solar model. Although we discuss global features of the evolution with rotation in general terms, the specific models described are those computed with the new Yale Rotating Evolution Code (YREC). YREC uses the Kippenhahn and Thomas (1970, KT) formalism as implemented by Endal and Sofia (1976), although the numerical formulation of our code is totally new. Particular calculations that we describe include the effects of different initial total angular momentum, the consequences of varying the properties and magnitude of angular momentum losses by wind torquing, and the consequences of specific composition and angular momentum redistribution mechanisms. This paper is a progress report which points out the complexity of the problem, and the need for a broad-based observational program to solve it. Because the final solution is not yet in hand, we outline the steps that, in our estimation, need to be undertaken in order to make progress.
The Astrophysical Journal | 1988
Steven D. Kawaler
The wind models discussed by Mestel (1984) are used here to formulate a general expression for the rate of angular momentum loss by magnetic stellar winds as a function of magnetic field configuration, rotation rate, and stellar model properties. The sensitivity of the rotation velocity to the various wind model parameters, the initial angular momenta, and the time dependence of the angular velocity for each mass is shown. The theoretical results are compared with observational ones, and it is found that the existence of very rapidly rotating stars in young clusters implies that low-mass stars are formed with a large spread of angular momentum. The high efficiency of angular momentum loss through magnetic stellar winds causes the rotation velocity to become less dependent on initial angular momentum J0 with time; by 300 million yur, the rotation velocity becomes independent of J0. This results in a decrease with time in the spread of rotation velocities as a function of stellar mass in young clusters.
Nature | 2011
Timothy R. Bedding; Benoit Mosser; Daniel Huber; Josefina Montalban; P. G. Beck; Joergen Christensen-Dalsgaard; Yvonne P. Elsworth; Rafael Arenas Garcia; Andrea Miglio; D. Stello; T. R. White; Joris De Ridder; S. Hekker; Conny Aerts; C. Barban; K. Belkacem; Anne-Marie Broomhall; Timothy M. Brown; Derek L. Buzasi; Fabien Carrier; William J. Chaplin; Maria Pia di Mauro; Marc-Antoine Dupret; S. Frandsen; Ronald L. Gilliland; M. J. Goupil; Jon M. Jenkins; T. Kallinger; Steven D. Kawaler; Hans Kjeldsen
Red giants are evolved stars that have exhausted the supply of hydrogen in their cores and instead burn hydrogen in a surrounding shell. Once a red giant is sufficiently evolved, the helium in the core also undergoes fusion. Outstanding issues in our understanding of red giants include uncertainties in the amount of mass lost at the surface before helium ignition and the amount of internal mixing from rotation and other processes. Progress is hampered by our inability to distinguish between red giants burning helium in the core and those still only burning hydrogen in a shell. Asteroseismology offers a way forward, being a powerful tool for probing the internal structures of stars using their natural oscillation frequencies. Here we report observations of gravity-mode period spacings in red giants that permit a distinction between evolutionary stages to be made. We use high-precision photometry obtained by the Kepler spacecraft over more than a year to measure oscillations in several hundred red giants. We find many stars whose dipole modes show sequences with approximately regular period spacings. These stars fall into two clear groups, allowing us to distinguish unambiguously between hydrogen-shell-burning stars (period spacing mostly ∼50 seconds) and those that are also burning helium (period spacing ∼100 to 300 seconds).
Science | 2012
Joshua A. Carter; Eric Agol; W. J. Chaplin; Sarbani Basu; Timothy R. Bedding; Lars A. Buchhave; Jørgen Christensen-Dalsgaard; Katherine M. Deck; Y. Elsworth; Daniel C. Fabrycky; Eric B. Ford; Jonathan J. Fortney; S. J. Hale; R. Handberg; S. Hekker; Matthew J. Holman; Daniel Huber; Christopher Karoff; Steven D. Kawaler; Hans Kjeldsen; Jack J. Lissauer; Eric D. Lopez; Mikkel N. Lund; M. Lundkvist; T. S. Metcalfe; A. Miglio; Leslie A. Rogers; D. Stello; William J. Borucki; Steve Bryson
So Close and So Different In our solar system, the rocky planets have very distinct orbits from those of the gas giants. Carter et al. (p. 556, published online 21 June) report on a planetary system where this pattern does not apply, posing a challenge to theories of planet formation. Data from the Kepler space telescope reveal two planets with radically different densities orbiting the same star with very similar orbital periods. One planet has a rocky Earth-like composition and the other is akin to Neptune. The Kepler spacecraft detected a super-Earth and a Neptune-like planet in very tightly spaced orbits around the same star. In the solar system, the planets’ compositions vary with orbital distance, with rocky planets in close orbits and lower-density gas giants in wider orbits. The detection of close-in giant planets around other stars was the first clue that this pattern is not universal and that planets’ orbits can change substantially after their formation. Here, we report another violation of the orbit-composition pattern: two planets orbiting the same star with orbital distances differing by only 10% and densities differing by a factor of 8. One planet is likely a rocky “super-Earth,” whereas the other is more akin to Neptune. These planets are 20 times more closely spaced and have a larger density contrast than any adjacent pair of planets in the solar system.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2012
William J. Borucki; David G. Koch; Natalie M. Batalha; Stephen T. Bryson; Jason F. Rowe; Francois Fressin; Guillermo Torres; Douglas A. Caldwell; Jørgen Christensen-Dalsgaard; William D. Cochran; Edna DeVore; Thomas N. Gautier; John C. Geary; Ronald L. Gilliland; Alan Gould; Steve B. Howell; Jon M. Jenkins; David W. Latham; Jack J. Lissauer; Geoffrey W. Marcy; Dimitar D. Sasselov; Alan P. Boss; David Charbonneau; David R. Ciardi; Lisa Kaltenegger; Laurance R. Doyle; Andrea K. Dupree; Eric B. Ford; Jonathan J. Fortney; Matthew J. Holman
A search of the time-series photometry from NASAs Kepler spacecraft reveals a transiting planet candidate orbiting the 11th magnitude G5 dwarf KIC 10593626 with a period of 290 days. The characteristics of the host star are well constrained by high-resolution spectroscopy combined with an asteroseismic analysis of the Kepler photometry, leading to an estimated mass and radius of 0.970 ± 0.060 M ☉ and 0.979 ± 0.020 R ☉. The depth of 492 ± 10 ppm for the three observed transits yields a radius of 2.38 ± 0.13 Re for the planet. The system passes a battery of tests for false positives, including reconnaissance spectroscopy, high-resolution imaging, and centroid motion. A full BLENDER analysis provides further validation of the planet interpretation by showing that contamination of the target by an eclipsing system would rarely mimic the observed shape of the transits. The final validation of the planet is provided by 16 radial velocities (RVs) obtained with the High Resolution Echelle Spectrometer on Keck I over a one-year span. Although the velocities do not lead to a reliable orbit and mass determination, they are able to constrain the mass to a 3σ upper limit of 124 M ⊕, safely in the regime of planetary masses, thus earning the designation Kepler-22b. The radiative equilibrium temperature is 262 K for a planet in Kepler-22bs orbit. Although there is no evidence that Kepler-22b is a rocky planet, it is the first confirmed planet with a measured radius to orbit in the habitable zone of any star other than the Sun.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2013
Daniel Huber; W. J. Chaplin; Jørgen Christensen-Dalsgaard; Ronald L. Gilliland; Hans Kjeldsen; Lars A. Buchhave; Debra A. Fischer; Jack J. Lissauer; Jason F. Rowe; Roberto Sanchis-Ojeda; Sarbani Basu; R. Handberg; S. Hekker; Andrew W. Howard; Howard Isaacson; C. Karoff; David W. Latham; Mikkel N. Lund; M. Lundkvist; Geoffrey W. Marcy; A. Miglio; Victor Silva Aguirre; D. Stello; T. Arentoft; Timothy R. Bedding; Christopher J. Burke; Jessie L. Christiansen; Y. Elsworth; Michael R. Haas; Steven D. Kawaler
We have used asteroseismology to determine fundamental properties for 66 Kepler planet-candidate host stars, with typical uncertainties of 3% and 7% in radius and mass, respectively. The results include new asteroseismic solutions for four host stars with confirmed planets (Kepler-4, Kepler-14, Kepler-23 and Kepler-25) and increase the total number of Kepler host stars with asteroseismic solutions to 77. A comparison with stellar properties in the planet-candidate catalog by Batalha et al. shows that radii for subgiants and giants obtained from spectroscopic follow-up are systematically too low by up to a factor of 1.5, while the properties for unevolved stars are in good agreement. We furthermore apply asteroseismology to confirm that a large majority of cool main-sequence hosts are indeed dwarfs and not misclassified giants. Using the revised stellar properties, we recalculate the radii for 107 planet candidates in our sample, and comment on candidates for which the radii change from a previously giant-planet/brown-dwarf/stellar regime to a sub-Jupiter size or vice versa. A comparison of stellar densities from asteroseismology with densities derived from transit models in Batalha et al. assuming circular orbits shows significant disagreement for more than half of the sample due to systematics in the modeled impact parameters or due to planet candidates that may be in eccentric orbits. Finally, we investigate tentative correlations between host-star masses and planet-candidate radii, orbital periods, and multiplicity, but caution that these results may be influenced by the small sample size and detection biases.
Science | 2013
Daniel Huber; Joshua A. Carter; Mauro Barbieri; A. Miglio; Katherine M. Deck; Daniel C. Fabrycky; Benjamin T. Montet; Lars A. Buchhave; W. J. Chaplin; S. Hekker; Josefina Montalban; Roberto Sanchis-Ojeda; Sarbani Basu; Timothy R. Bedding; T. L. Campante; Joergen Christensen-Dalsgaard; Y. Elsworth; D. Stello; T. Arentoft; Eric B. Ford; Ronald L. Gilliland; R. Handberg; Andrew W. Howard; Howard Isaacson; John Asher Johnson; C. Karoff; Steven D. Kawaler; Hans Kjeldsen; David W. Latham; Mikkel N. Lund
Misaligned Planets Stars with multiple coplanar planets have not been seen to show misalignments between the equatorial plane of the star and the orbital plane of the planets—a diagnostic of the dynamical history of planetary systems. Huber et al. (p. 331) analyzed the Kepler 56 planetary system, which contains a giant-sized and an intermediate-sized planet. The planets have orbits that are close to coplanar, but the planetary orbits are misaligned with the stellar equator. A third companion in a wide orbit, which could be another star or a planet, could explain the misaligned configuration. Kepler observations show that stellar spin-orbit misalignments are not confined to planetary systems with hot Jupiters. Stars hosting hot Jupiters are often observed to have high obliquities, whereas stars with multiple coplanar planets have been seen to have low obliquities. This has been interpreted as evidence that hot-Jupiter formation is linked to dynamical disruption, as opposed to planet migration through a protoplanetary disk. We used asteroseismology to measure a large obliquity for Kepler-56, a red giant star hosting two transiting coplanar planets. These observations show that spin-orbit misalignments are not confined to hot-Jupiter systems. Misalignments in a broader class of systems had been predicted as a consequence of torques from wide-orbiting companions, and indeed radial velocity measurements revealed a third companion in a wide orbit in the Kepler-56 system.
Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series | 1990
Marc H. Pinsonneault; Steven D. Kawaler; Pierre Demarque
Models of stars of various masses and rotational parameters were developed and compared with observations of stars in open clusters of various ages in order to analyze the evolution of rotating stars from the early premain sequence to an age of 1.7 x 10 to the 9th yrs. It is shown that, for stars older than 10 to the 8th yrs and less massive than 1.1 solar mass, the surface rotation rates depend most strongly on the properties of the angular momentum loss. The trends of the currently available observations suggest that the rotation periods are a good indicator of the field-star ages. 110 refs.
Nature | 2013
Jason F. Rowe; Jack J. Lissauer; Daniel Huber; Francois Fressin; Steve B. Howell; Stephen T. Bryson; W. J. Chaplin; J.-M. Desert; Eric D. Lopez; Geoffrey W. Marcy; Fergal Mullally; Darin Ragozzine; Guillermo Torres; Elisabeth R. Adams; Eric Agol; D. Barrado; Sarbani Basu; Timothy R. Bedding; Lars A. Buchhave; David Charbonneau; Jessie L. Christiansen; Jørgen Christensen-Dalsgaard; David R. Ciardi; William D. Cochran; Andrea K. Dupree; Y. Elsworth; Mark E. Everett; Debra A. Fischer; Eric B. Ford; Jonathan J. Fortney
Since the discovery of the first exoplanets, it has been known that other planetary systems can look quite unlike our own. Until fairly recently, we have been able to probe only the upper range of the planet size distribution, and, since last year, to detect planets that are the size of Earth or somewhat smaller. Hitherto, no planets have been found that are smaller than those we see in the Solar System. Here we report a planet significantly smaller than Mercury. This tiny planet is the innermost of three that orbit the Sun-like host star, which we have designated Kepler-37. Owing to its extremely small size, similar to that of the Moon, and highly irradiated surface, the planet, Kepler-37b, is probably rocky with no atmosphere or water, similar to Mercury.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2015
Silva Aguirre; G. R. Davies; Sarbani Basu; J. Christensen-Dalsgaard; O. L. Creevey; T. S. Metcalfe; Timothy R. Bedding; Luca Casagrande; R. Handberg; Mikkel N. Lund; Poul Nissen; W. J. Chaplin; D. Huber; Aldo M. Serenelli; D. Stello; V. Van Eylen; T. L. Campante; Y. Elsworth; R. L. Gilliland; S. Hekker; C. Karoff; Steven D. Kawaler; Hans Kjeldsen; M. Lundkvist
We present a study of 33 {\it Kepler} planet-candidate host stars for which asteroseismic observations have sufficiently high signal-to-noise ratio to allow extraction of individual pulsation frequencies. We implement a new Bayesian scheme that is flexible in its input to process individual oscillation frequencies, combinations of them, and average asteroseismic parameters, and derive robust fundamental properties for these targets. Applying this scheme to grids of evolutionary models yields stellar properties with median statistical uncertainties of 1.2\% (radius), 1.7\% (density), 3.3\% (mass), 4.4\% (distance), and 14\% (age), making this the exoplanet host-star sample with the most precise and uniformly determined fundamental parameters to date. We assess the systematics from changes in the solar abundances and mixing-length parameter, showing that they are smaller than the statistical errors. We also determine the stellar properties with three other fitting algorithms and explore the systematics arising from using different evolution and pulsation codes, resulting in 1\% in density and radius, and 2\% and 7\% in mass and age, respectively. We confirm previous findings of the initial helium abundance being a source of systematics comparable to our statistical uncertainties, and discuss future prospects for constraining this parameter by combining asteroseismology and data from space missions. Finally we compare our derived properties with those obtained using the global average asteroseismic observables along with effective temperature and metallicity, finding an excellent level of agreement. Owing to selection effects, our results show that the majority of the high signal-to-noise ratio asteroseismic {\it Kepler} host stars are older than the Sun.