Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Steven R. Shackford is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Steven R. Shackford.


Journal of Trauma-injury Infection and Critical Care | 2003

Both primary and secondary abdominal compartment syndrome can be predicted early and are harbingers of multiple organ failure

Zsolt J. Balogh; Bruce A. McKinley; John B. Holcomb; Charles C. Miller; Christine S. Cocanour; Rosemary A. Kozar; Alicia Valdivia; Drue N. Ware; Frederick A. Moore; Patrick M. Reilly; Steven R. Shackford; Dennis Wang

BACKGROUND Primary abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) is a known complication of damage control. Recently secondary ACS has been reported in patients without abdominal injury who require aggressive resuscitation. The purpose of this study was to compare the epidemiology of primary and secondary ACS and develop early prediction models in a high-risk cohort who were treated in a similar fashion. METHODS Major torso trauma patients underwent standardized resuscitation and had prospective data collected including occurrence of ACS, demographics, ISS, urinary bladder pressure, gastric tonometry (GAP(CO2) = gastric regional CO(2) minus end tidal CO(2)), laboratory, respiratory, and hemodynamic data. With primary and secondary ACS as endpoints, variables were tested by uni- and multivariate logistic analysis (MLA). RESULTS From 188 study patients during the 44-month period, 26 (14%) developed ACS-11 (6%) were primary ACS and 15 (8%) secondary ACS. Primary and secondary ACS had similar demographics, shock, and injury severity. Significant univariate differences included: time to decompression from ICU admit (600 +/- 112 vs. 360 +/- 48 min), Emergency Department (ED) crystalloid (4 +/- 1 vs. 7 +/- 1 L), preICU crystalloid (8 +/- 1 vs. 12 +/- 1L), ED blood administration (2 +/- 1 vs. 6 +/- 1 U), GAP(CO2) (24 +/- 3 vs. 36 +/- 3 mmHg), requiring pelvic embolization (9 vs. 47%), and emergency operation (82% vs. 40%). Early predictors identified by MLA of primary ACS included hemoglobin concentration, GAP(CO2), temperature, and base deficit; and for secondary ACS they included crystalloid, urinary output, and GAP(CO2). The areas under the receiver-operator characteristic curves calculated upon ICU admission are primary= 0.977 and secondary= 0.983. Primary and secondary ACS patients had similar poor outcomes compared with nonACS patients including ventilator days (primary= 13 +/- 3 vs. secondary= 14 +/- 3 vs. nonACS = 8 +/- 2), multiple organ failure (55% vs. 53% vs. 12%), and mortality (64% vs. 53% vs. 17%). CONCLUSION Primary and secondary ACS have similar demographics, injury severity, time to decompression from hospital admit, and bad outcome. 2 degrees ACS is an earlier ICU event preceded by more crystalloid administration. With appropriate monitoring both could be accurately predicted upon ICU admission.


Journal of Trauma-injury Infection and Critical Care | 1996

Status of nonoperative management of blunt hepatic injuries in 1995: a multicenter experience with 404 patients

Pachter Hl; M. Margaret Knudson; Esrig B; Steven E. Ross; David B. Hoyt; Thomas H. Cogbill; Sherman H; Thomas M. Scalea; Harrison P; Steven R. Shackford

INTRODUCTION Nonoperative management is presently considered the treatment modality of choice in over 50% of adult patients sustaining blunt hepatic trauma who meet inclusion criteria. A multicenter study was retrospectively undertaken to assess whether the combined experiences at level I trauma centers could validate the currently reported high success rate, low morbidity, and virtually nonexistent mortality associated with this approach. Thirteen level I trauma centers accrued 404 adult patients sustaining blunt hepatic injuries managed nonoperatively over the last 5 years. Seventy-two percent of the injuries resulted from motor vehicle crashes. The mean injury severity score for the entire group was 20.2 (range, 4-75), and the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma-computerized axial tomography scan grading was as follows: grade I, 19% (n = 76); grade II, 31% (n = 124); grade III, 36% (n = 146); grade IV, 10% (n = 42); and grade V, 4% (n = 16). There were 27 deaths (7%) in the series, with 59% directly related to head trauma. Only two deaths (0.4%) could be attributed to hepatic injury. Twenty-one (5%) complications were documented, with the most common being hemorrhage, occurring in 14 (3.5%). Only 3 (0.7%) of these 14 patients required surgical intervention, 6 were treated by transfusions alone (0.5 to 5 U), 4 underwent angio-embolization, and 1 was further observed. Other complications included 2 bilomas and 3 perihepatic abscesses (all drained percutaneously). Two small bowel injuries were initially missed (0.5%), and diagnosed 2 and 3 days after admission. Overall, 6 patients required operative intervention: 3 for hemorrhage, 2 for missed enteric injuries, and 1 for persistent sepsis after unsuccessful percutaneous drainage. Average length of stay was 13 days. Nonoperative management of blunt hepatic injuries is clearly the treatment modality of choice in hemodynamically stable patients, irrespective of grade of injury or degree of hemoperitoneum. Current data would suggest that 50 to 80% (47% in this series) of all adult patients with blunt hepatic injuries are candidates for this form of therapy. Exactly 98.5% of patients analyzed in this study successfully avoided operative intervention. Bleeding complications are infrequently encountered (3.5%) and can often be managed nonoperatively. Although grades IV and V injuries composed 14% of the series, they represented 66.6% of the patients requiring operative intervention and thus merit constant re-evaluation and close observation in critical care units. The optimal time for follow-up computerized axial tomography scanning seems to be within 7 to 10 days after injury.


Journal of Pediatric Surgery | 1993

The effect of hypotension and hypoxia on children with severe head injuries

Frank A. Pigula; Steven L. Wald; Steven R. Shackford; Dennis W. Vane

Survival of children (< 17 years) with severe head injuries (Glascow Coma Scale [GCS] score < 8) has been shown to be better than that of adults. The addition of hypotension (HT) or hypoxia (H) has a deleterious effect on outcome in adults but no information is currently available about their effects in children. Over a 5-year period, 58 children with GCS scores < 8 were admitted and prospectively evaluated at this institution. Patients were divided into two groups on the basis of systolic blood pressure (SBP) and arterial blood gasses. Patients exhibiting HT, defined as a SBP < 90 mm Hg, and patients demonstrating H with a PaO2 < 60 mm Hg were compared with normoxic, normotensive children. Survival was increased fourfold in patients with neither H nor HT as compared with children with either H or HT (P < .001). To validate these observations we reviewed the data from the National Pediatric Trauma Registry for similar patients and included our cohort in the analysis. In total, 509 children had sufficient data for analysis and were studied. Hypoxia alone was not associated with increased mortality in normotensive patients (P = .34). Hypotension significantly increased mortality in these children even without concomitant H (P < .00001). If both HT and H were found together, mortality was only slightly increased over those children with HT alone (P = .056). These data confirm that HT with or without H causes significantly increased mortality in head-injured children to those levels normally found in adults (P = .9), alleviating any age-related protective mechanisms normally afforded.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


Journal of Trauma-injury Infection and Critical Care | 1990

Blunt carotid artery dissection : incidence, associated injuries, screening, and treatment

James W. Davis; Troy L. Holbrook; David B. Hoyt; Robert C. Mackersie; Thomas O. Field; Steven R. Shackford

Blunt carotid dissection (BCD) is a rare injury occurring in less than one in 1,000 victims of blunt injuries. Using a 4-year experience in a trauma system with 14 cases of BCD, we performed a matched blunt trauma patient case-control analysis to determine if there were patterns of injuries that were associated with increased risk of BCD. Patients with combinations of head, facial, and cervical spine injuries with or without extremity fractures proved to be at significantly increased risk for BCD. Duplex scanning appears to be a useful screening tool for these patients. Anticoagulation was the preferred treatment once neurologic deficits were present.


Journal of Trauma-injury Infection and Critical Care | 1988

Base deficit as a guide to volume resuscitation.

James W. Davis; Steven R. Shackford; Robert C. Mackersie; David B. Hoyt

The base deficit (BD), is a potentially useful indicator of volume deficit in trauma patients. To evaluate BD as an index for fluid resuscitation, the records of 209 trauma patients with serial arterial blood gases (ABGs) were reviewed. The patients were grouped according to initial BD: mild, 2 to -5; moderate, -6 to -14; and severe, less than -15. The volume of resuscitative fluid administered, change in BD, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and presence of ongoing hemorrhage were analyzed for differences between the BD groups. The MAP decreased significantly and the volume of fluid required for resuscitation increased with increasing severity of BD group. A BD that increased (became more negative) with resuscitation was associated with ongoing hemorrhage in 65%. The data suggest that the BD is a useful guide to volume replacement in the resuscitation of trauma patients.


Journal of Trauma-injury Infection and Critical Care | 1989

Nonoperative Management of Blunt Splenic Trauma: A Multicenter Experience

Thomas H. Cogbill; Ernest E. Moore; Gregory J. Jurkovich; John A. Morris; Peter Mucha; Steven R. Shackford; Randel T. Stolee; Frederick A. Moore; Susan Pilcher; Richard Locicero; Michael B. Farnell; Melinda Molin

The experience of six referral trauma centers with 832 blunt splenic injuries was reviewed to determine the indications, methods, and outcome of nonoperative management. During this 5-year period, 112 splenic injuries were intentionally managed by observation. There were 40 (36%) patients less than 16 years old and 72 adults. The diagnosis was established by computed tomography in 89 (79%) patients, nuclear scan in 23 (21%), ultrasound in four (4%), and arteriography in two (2%). There were 28 Class I, 51 Class II, 31 Class III, two Class IV, and no Class V splenic injuries. Nonoperative management was unsuccessful in one (2%) child and 12 (17%) adults (p less than 0.05). Failure was due to ongoing hemorrhage in 12 patients and delayed recognition of pancreatic injury in one patient. Of the 12 patients ultimately requiring laparotomy for control of hemorrhage, seven (58%) were successfully treated with splenic salvage techniques. Overall mortality was 3%; none of the four deaths was due to splenic or associated abdominal injury. This contemporary multicenter experience suggests that patients with Class I, II, or III splenic injuries after blunt trauma are candidates for nonoperative management if there is: 1) no hemodynamic instability after initial fluid resuscitation; 2) no serious associated abdominal organ injury; and 3) no extra-abdominal condition which precludes assessment of the abdomen. Strict adherence to these principles yielded initial nonoperative success in 98% of children and 83% of adults. Application of standard splenic salvage techniques to treat the patients with persistent hemorrhage resulted in ultimate splenic preservation in 100% of children and 93% of adults.


American Journal of Surgery | 1990

Venous thromboembolism in patients with major trauma

Steven R. Shackford; James W. Davis; Peggy Hollingsworth-Fridlund; Nancy S. Brewer; David B. Hoyt; Robert C. Mackersie

The risk of venous thromboembolism after trauma is thought to be high, but the specific risk factors and the incidence of venous thromboembolism in the trauma population are poorly defined. Between October 1, 1987, and March 1, 1988, 719 patients were evaluated; 542 had no risk factors and 177 had at least 1 risk factor. No venous thromboembolism occurred in any of the 542 patients without a risk factor, whereas 12 of 177 patients (7%) with at least 1 risk factor had a venous thromboembolism. Pneumatic compression hose was the most common form of prophylaxis used, but it could not be applied to 35% of limbs because of plaster immobilizers, external fixators, complex wounds, or traction. In the high-risk group, 25 patients (14%) received no prophylaxis because of a physical impediment to application of these hose and a contraindication to anticoagulation. Age greater than 45 years was the only risk factor predictive of venous thromboembolism by logistic regression analysis. Patients with more than one risk factor had a significantly higher incidence of venous thromboembolism than those with only one risk factor. We conclude that a selected subgroup of trauma patients appears to be at risk of venous thromboembolism and should receive prophylaxis. Approximately one in seven high-risk patients cannot receive anticoagulant or mechanical prophylaxis because of their injuries.


Journal of Trauma-injury Infection and Critical Care | 1990

Implications of admission hypothermia in trauma patients.

Susan Steinemann; Steven R. Shackford; James W. Davis

Hypothermia is common after severe injury, and has been associated with an increased mortality rate in patients stratified by anatomic indices of injury severity. In this retrospective study of 173 patients, early post-traumatic hypothermia was found to correlate with physiologic indicators of volume deficit, independently of the amount of intravenous fluid received. There was no correlation found between admission core temperature and time from injury, blood alcohol, or presence of severe closed head injury. Hypothermic patients (less than 35 degrees C) had a lower predicted probability of survival and a higher mortality rate than euthermic patients (greater than or equal to 35 degrees C). However, when patients were stratified by physiologic and anatomic indicators of injury severity, mortality rates among the euthermic and hypothermic patients were not significantly different. Early post-traumatic hypothermia does not appear to exert an independent effect upon outcome.


Journal of Trauma-injury Infection and Critical Care | 1992

The Deleterious Effects Of Intraoperative Hypotension On Outcome In Patients With Severe Head Injuries

John A. Pietropaoli; Frederick B. Rogers; Steven R. Shackford; Steven L. Wald; Joseph D. Schmoker; Jing Zhuang

Prehospital or admission hypotension doubles the mortality for patients with severe head injury (SHI = Glasgow Coma Scale score less than or equal to 8). To our knowledge no study to date has determined the effects of intraoperative hypotension [IH: systolic blood pressure (SBP) less than 90 mm Hg] on outcome in patients with SHI. This study examined 53 patients who had SHI and required early surgical intervention (surgery within 72 hours of injury). All patients were initially normotensive on arrival. There were 17 patients (32%) who developed IH and 36 (68%) who remained normotensive throughout surgery. The mortality rate was 82% in the IH group and 25% in the normotensive group (p less than 0.001). The duration of IH was inversely correlated with Glasgow Outcome Scale using linear regression (R = -0.30; p = 0.02). Despite vigorous fluid resuscitation in the IH group, additional pharmacologic support was used in only 32%. These data suggest that IH is not uncommon after SHI (32%) and that it does have a significant effect on patient outcome.


Journal of Trauma-injury Infection and Critical Care | 2003

Improving the Glasgow Coma Scale score: motor score alone is a better predictor

Christopher T. Healey; Turner M. Osler; Frederick B. Rogers; Mark A. Healey; Laurent G. Glance; Patrick D. Kilgo; Steven R. Shackford; J. Wayne Meredith

BACKGROUND The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) has served as an assessment tool in head trauma and as a measure of physiologic derangement in outcome models (e.g., TRISS and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation), but it has not been rigorously examined as a predictor of outcome. METHODS Using a large trauma data set (National Trauma Data Bank, N = 204,181), we compared the predictive power (pseudo R2, receiver operating characteristic [ROC]) and calibration of the GCS to its components. RESULTS The GCS is actually a collection of 120 different combinations of its 3 predictors grouped into 12 different scores by simple addition (motor [m] + verbal [v] + eye [e] = GCS score). Problematically, different combinations summing to a single GCS score may actually have very different mortalities. For example, the GCS score of 4 can represent any of three mve combinations: 2/1/1 (survival = 0.52), 1/2/1 (survival = 0.73), or 1/1/2 (survival = 0.81). In addition, the relationship between GCS score and survival is not linear, and furthermore, a logistic model based on GCS score is poorly calibrated even after fractional polynomial transformation. The m component of the GCS, by contrast, is not only linearly related to survival, but preserves almost all the predictive power of the GCS (ROC(GCS) = 0.89, ROC(m) = 0.87; pseudo R2(GCS) = 0.42, pseudo R2(m) = 0.40) and has a better calibrated logistic model. CONCLUSION Because the motor component of the GCS contains virtually all the information of the GCS itself, can be measured in intubated patients, and is much better behaved statistically than the GCS, we believe that the motor component of the GCS should replace the GCS in outcome prediction models. Because the m component is nonlinear in the log odds of survival, however, it should be mathematically transformed before its inclusion in broader outcome prediction models.

Collaboration


Dive into the Steven R. Shackford's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David B. Hoyt

American College of Surgeons

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

James W. Davis

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge