Stuart A. Weinzimer
Endocrine Society
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Stuart A. Weinzimer.
Diabetes Care | 2009
Roy W. Beck; Irl B. Hirsch; Lori Laffel; William V. Tamborlane; Bruce W. Bode; Bruce Buckingham; Peter Chase; Robert Clemons; Rosanna Fiallo-Scharer; Larry A. Fox; Lisa K. Gilliam; Elbert S. Huang; Craig Kollman; Aaron J. Kowalski; Jean M. Lawrence; Joyce M. Lee; Mauras N; Michael J. O'Grady; Katrina J. Ruedy; Michael Tansey; Eva Tsalikian; Stuart A. Weinzimer; Darrell Wilson; Howard Wolpert; Timothy Wysocki; Dongyuan Xing
OBJECTIVE The potential benefits of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in the management of adults and children with well-controlled type 1 diabetes have not been examined. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A total of 129 adults and children with intensively treated type 1 diabetes (age range 8–69 years) and A1C <7.0% were randomly assigned to either continuous or standard glucose monitoring for 26 weeks. The main study outcomes were time with glucose level ≤70 mg/dl, A1C level, and severe hypoglycemic events. RESULTS At 26 weeks, biochemical hypoglycemia (≤70 mg/dl) was less frequent in the CGM group than in the control group (median 54 vs. 91 min/day), but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.16). Median time with a glucose level ≤60 mg/dl was 18 versus 35 min/day, respectively (P = 0.05). Time out of range (≤70 or >180 mg/dl) was significantly lower in the CGM group than in the control group (377 vs. 491 min/day, P = 0.003). There was a significant treatment group difference favoring the CGM group in mean A1C at 26 weeks adjusted for baseline (P < 0.001). One or more severe hypoglycemic events occurred in 10 and 11% of the two groups, respectively (P = 1.0). Four outcome measures combining A1C and hypoglycemia data favored the CGM group in comparison with the control group (P < 0.001, 0.007, 0.005, and 0.003). CONCLUSIONS Most outcomes, including those combining A1C and hypoglycemia, favored the CGM group. The weight of evidence suggests that CGM is beneficial for individuals with type 1 diabetes who have already achieved excellent control with A1C <7.0%.
Pediatric Diabetes | 2008
Bruce Buckingham; Dongyuan Xing; Stuart A. Weinzimer; Rosanna Fiallo-Scharer; Craig Kollman; Mauras N; Eva Tsalikian; William V. Tamborlane; Timothy Wysocki; Katrina J. Ruedy; Roy W. Beck
Background:u2002 There are no published guidelines for use of real‐time continuous glucose monitoring data by a patient; we therefore developed the DirecNet Applied Treatment Algorithm (DATA). The DATA provides algorithms for making diabetes management decisions using glucose values: (i) in real time which include the direction and rate of change of glucose levels, and (ii) retrospectively based on downloaded sensor data.
Pediatric Diabetes | 2009
Stuart A. Weinzimer; Dongyuan Xing; Michael Tansey; Rosanna Fiallo-Scharer; Mauras N; Timothy Wysocki; Roy W. Beck; William V. Tamborlane; Katrina J. Ruedy
Objective:u2002 For continuous glucose sensors to improve the treatment of children with type 1 diabetes (T1D), they must be accurate, comfortable to wear, and easy to use. We conducted a pilot study of the FreeStyle Navigator™ Continuous Glucose Monitoring System (Abbott Diabetes Care) to examine the feasibility of daily use of a continuous glucose monitor (CGM) in an extended ambulatory setting.
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics | 2013
Bruce Buckingham; Roy W. Beck; Katrina J. Ruedy; Peiyao Cheng; Craig Kollman; Stuart A. Weinzimer; Linda A. DiMeglio; Andrew A. Bremer; Robert Slover; Martin T. Cantwell
BACKGROUNDnThis article describes our experience with inpatient hybrid closed-loop control (HCLC) initiated shortly after the diagnosis of type 1 diabetes in a randomized trial designed to assess the effectiveness of inpatient HCLC followed by outpatient sensor-augmented pump (SAP) therapy on the preservation of β-cell function.nnnSUBJECTS AND METHODSnForty-eight individuals with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes and positive pancreatic autoantibodies (7.8-37.7 years old) received inpatient HCLC therapy for up to 93 h, initiated within 7 days of diagnosis.nnnRESULTSnOn initiation of HCLC, mean glucose concentration was 240±100 mg/dL. During the first day of HCLC, median of the participants mean glucose concentrations fell rapidly to 146 mg/dL, a level of control that was sustained on Days 2 and 3 (138 mg/dL and 139 mg/dL, respectively). By Day 3, the median percentage of glucose values >250 and <60 mg/dL was <1%. During the first 2 weeks of SAP treatment at home, the median participant mean glucose level was 126 mg/dL (interquartile range, 117, 137 mg/dL), and the median percentage of values between 71 and 180 mg/dL was 85% (interquartile range, 80%, 90%).nnnCONCLUSIONSnInpatient HCLC followed by outpatient SAP therapy can provide a safe and effective means to rapidly reverse glucose toxicity and establish near-normal glycemic control in patients with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes.
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics | 2006
Bruce Buckingham; Craig Kollman; Roy W. Beck; Andrea Kalajian; Rosanna Fiallo-Scharer; Michael Tansey; Larry A. Fox; Darrell M. Wilson; Stuart A. Weinzimer; Katrina J. Ruedy; William V. Tamborlane
The Journal of Pediatrics | 2007
Bruce Buckingham; Roy W. Beck; William V. Tamborlane; Dongyuan Xing; Craig Kollman; Rosanna Fiallo-Scharer; Mauras N; Katrina J. Ruedy; Michael Tansey; Stuart A. Weinzimer; Timothy Wysocki
Diabetes Care | 2005
Chase Hp; Roy W. Beck; William V. Tamborlane; Bruce Buckingham; Mauras N; Eva Tsalikian; Timothy Wysocki; Stuart A. Weinzimer; Craig Kollman; Katrina J. Ruedy; Dongyuan Xing
Diabetes Care | 2017
Gina Agiostratidou; Henry Anhalt; Dana Ball; Lawrence Blonde; Evgenia Gourgari; Karen N. Harriman; Aaron J. Kowalski; Paul Madden; Alicia H. McAuliffe-Fogarty; Molly McElwee-Malloy; Anne Peters; Sripriya Raman; Kent Reifschneider; Karen Rubin; Stuart A. Weinzimer
Archive | 2008
William V. Tamborlane; Bruce W. Bode; Bruce Buckingham; H. Peter Chase; Robert Clemons; Larry A. Fox; Lisa K. Gilliam; Irl B. Hirsch; Elbert S. Huang; Craig Kollman; Aaron J. Kowalski; Lori Laffel; Mauras N; Katrina J. Ruedy; Michael Tansey; Eva Tsa; Stuart A. Weinzimer; M. Wilson; Howard Wolpert; Tim Wysocki
Pediatric Endocrinology (Third Edition) | 2008
Mark A. Sperling; Stuart A. Weinzimer; William V. Tamborlane