Sue Gao

Cost of illness in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Abstract Objectives: To estimate total costs and metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)-related costs and assess primary cost drivers of treating newly diagnosed mCRC patients after the introduction of biologic therapies. Methods: Using a large national claims database, costs of mCRC patients were estimated in 2004–2009 by examining (1) the cost difference between mCRC patient and their matched non-cancer cohorts, and (2) mCRC-related costs. Costs were further assessed by phase of disease (diagnostic, treatment, and death). The survival analysis technique was used to estimate cost of handling variable length of follow-up and data censoring. Results: A total of 6,746 mCRC patients met all eligibility criteria, 6,675 of them were matched to patients without cancer. Among the three phases of disease, the treatment phase was the longest (16.4 months). Compared with matched patients with no cancer, total monthly costs were

Patterns of treatment with chemotherapy and monoclonal antibodies for metastatic colorectal cancer in Western Europe

14,585 higher for mCRC patients, which was driven by higher inpatient (

Economic burden of toxicities associated with metastatic colorectal cancer treatment regimens containing monoclonal antibodies.

7,546) and outpatient (

Characterizing Medical Care by Disease Phase in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

6,749) care (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). During the study period, cost share of biologics increased from 4.8% among patients diagnosed in 2004 to 9.4% for those diagnosed in 2008. Conclusions: The costs associated with treating mCRC are substantial. Inpatient and outpatient care remain key cost drivers in the medical management of mCRC. Cost chare of biologics was low, but increased between 2004 and 2009. The study sample only included patients with commercial and Medicare supplemental insurance in the US thus may not be generalizable to patients with other insurance or in other countries. Indirect costs associated with mCRC were not examined.

Tumor hormone/HER2 receptor status and pharmacologic treatment of metastatic breast cancer in Western Europe

Abstract Background and objectives: Treatment outcomes improved in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) due to the introduction of new chemotherapies and monoclonal antibodies. This study describes current patterns of pharmacological treatment for mCRC in clinical practice in four European countries. Methods: This cohort study used physician-survey data from the LifeLink Oncology Analyzer Database for mCRC patients in France, Germany, Italy and Spain. All patients aged ≥21 years at mCRC diagnosis and with data collected during 2009 were included. Treatment patterns were examined descriptively by lines of therapy. Results: The study sample included 2682 mCRC patients. In first-line, more patients received FOLFOX (infusional 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin and oxaliplatin)- than FOLFIRI (infusional 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin and irinotecan)-, containing regimens in Germany (42 vs. 30%) and Spain (25 vs. 16%), while in Italy and France the reverse was true (Italy: 34% FOLFIRI vs.29% FOLFOX; France: 26 vs. 19%). In second-line, FOLFIRI-containing regimens were more commonly used than FOLFOX-containing regimens in Germany (36 vs. 18%), Italy (29 vs. 14%), and Spain (34 vs. 6%), while similar proportions of FOLFOX and FOLFIRI were used in France (18 vs. 15%). As part of first-line treatment, bevacizumab use ranged from 44% of patients in Italy to 30% in Spain, with slightly lower rates in second-line. Cetuximab first-line use ranged from 14% of patients in Spain to 7% in Italy, increasing in second-line to 30% in Spain, 26% in Italy, 20% in Germany, and 17% in France. Limitations: This analysis focused on description of treatment patterns, however, the actual clinical benefits of these treatment regimens on survival or quality of life were not addressed due to lack of relevant information in the data source. Some country differences in treatment patterns were observed. These differences might be partly explained by differences in local treatment guidelines, physician prescribing behaviours, reimbursement policies, and response to various regimens due to genetic differences. Conclusions: In clinical practice in four European countries, FOLFOX- and FOLFIRI-based regimens are common standard of care chemotherapies for mCRC (FOLFOX and bevacizumab + FOLFIRI are the most common regimens), and monoclonal antibodies are often combined with these chemotherapies.

Healthcare costs in postmenopausal women with hormone-positive metastatic breast cancer.

Abstract Objectives: Little is known about toxicity-related costs of monoclonal antibody treatments in metastatic colorectal cancer. This study aimed to identify toxicities associated with bevacizumab, cetuximab, and panitumumab and estimate the direct costs of these toxicities. Methods: Grade 3 and 4 toxicities were identified by a comprehensive literature search. Inpatient costs were estimated using ICD-9 codes and 2007 Medicare payments from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project database; costs were converted to 2010 dollars. Outpatient costs were estimated by applying 2010 Medicare reimbursement rates to resource use assumptions (based on in-depth clinical interviews). Results: Toxicities associated with bevacizumab included hypertension, arterial thrombosis, hemorrhage, gastrointestinal (GI) perforation, fistula, and wound-healing complications; toxicities associated with cetuximab and panitumumab included skin rash, hypomagnesemia, and infusion reactions. The inpatient cost per event was highest for GI perforation (USD 32,443), followed by fistula (USD 29,062), arterial thrombosis (USD 20,346), and wound-healing complications (USD 13,240), while inpatient costs per event for hypomagnesemia and skin rash were among the lowest. The cost per event of toxicities treated in the outpatient setting included USD 185 for skin rash up to USD 585 for wound-healing complications. Limitations: Treatment costs of toxicities for the outpatient setting were determined using assumptions validated by clinicians, and unit costs were based on Medicare reimbursement rates, which are often lower than the reimbursement rates for commercial health insurance plans. Toxicities included were only grades 3 and 4 adverse events and might be limited by differences between clinical studies. Conclusions: Monoclonal antibodies have different toxicity profiles and the costs associated with managing these toxicities vary greatly.

The impact of infusion reactions associated with monoclonal antibodies in metastatic colorectal cancer: a European perspective.

PURPOSE To characterize patterns of medical care by disease phase in patients with newly diagnosed metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). METHODS Patients with mCRC newly diagnosed between 2004 and 2008 were selected from a large US national commercially insured claims database and were observed from initial mCRC diagnosis to death, disenrollment, or end of study period (July 31, 2009), whichever occurred first. The observation period was divided into three distinct phases of disease: diagnostic, treatment, and death. Within each phase, patterns of medical care were examined by the mutually exclusive service categories of inpatient, emergency room (ER), outpatient office and facility, outpatient pharmacy, chemotherapy, and biologic therapy, as measured by estimation of aggregate and category costs per patient per month. RESULTS A total of 6,675 patients with newly diagnosed mCRC were analyzed. Mean age was 64.1 years; 55.5% were males. Mean costs per patient per month for diagnostic, treatment, and death phases were

PCN144 CURRENT CHEMOTHERAPY AND MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY USE PATTERNS IN METASTATIC COLORECTAL CANCER IN WESTERN EUROPE

16,895,

Healthcare costs in women with metastatic breast cancer receiving chemotherapy as their principal treatment modality.

8,891, and

Healthcare costs in patients with metastatic lung cancer receiving chemotherapy

27,554, respectively. Inpatient care was the primary driver of medical care for both the diagnostic (41.7% of costs) and death (71.4% of costs) phases. The largest category of medical care for the treatment phase was outpatient care (45.0% of costs). Chemotherapy and biologic therapy accounted for 15.6% and 17.6% of costs in the treatment phase, respectively. CONCLUSION Substantial differences in patterns of medical care were found between mCRC disease phases. Inpatient care was the key driver of medical care in the diagnostic and death phases compared with outpatient care in the treatment phase.