Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Sujit K. Bhattacharya is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Sujit K. Bhattacharya.


Clinical Microbiology Reviews | 2007

Global Dissemination of Vibrio parahaemolyticus Serotype O3:K6 and Its Serovariants

G. Balakrish Nair; Thandavarayan Ramamurthy; Sujit K. Bhattacharya; Basabjit Dutta; Yoshifumi Takeda; David A. Sack

SUMMARY Vibrio parahaemolyticus is recognized as a cause of food-borne gastroenteritis, particularly in the Far East, where raw seafood consumption is high. An unusual increase in admissions of V. parahaemolyticus cases was observed at the Infectious Diseases Hospital in Calcutta, a city in the northeastern part of India, beginning February 1996. Analysis of the strains revealed that a unique serotype, O3:K6, not previously isolated during the surveillance in Calcutta accounted for 50 to 80% of the infections in the following months. After this report, O3:K6 isolates identical to those isolated in Calcutta were reported from food-borne outbreaks and from sporadic cases in Bangladesh, Chile, France, Japan, Korea, Laos, Mozambique, Peru, Russia, Spain, Taiwan, Thailand, and the United States. Other serotypes, such as O4:K68, O1:K25, and O1:KUT (untypeable), that had molecular characteristics identical to that of the O3:K6 serotype were subsequently documented. These serotypes appeared to have diverged from the O3:K6 serotype by alteration of the O:K antigens and were defined as “serovariants” of the O3:K6 isolate. O3:K6 and its serovariants have now spread into Asia, America, Africa, and Europe. This review traces the genesis, virulence features, molecular characteristics, serotype variants, environmental occurrence, and global spread of this unique clone of V. parahaemolyticus.


The Lancet | 2009

Efficacy and safety of a modified killed-whole-cell oral cholera vaccine in India: an interim analysis of a cluster-randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Dipika Sur; Anna Lena Lopez; Suman Kanungo; Am Paisley; Byomkesh Manna; Mohammad Ali; Swapan Kumar Niyogi; Jin Kyung Park; Banawarilal Sarkar; Mahesh K. Puri; Deok Ryun Kim; Jacqueline L. Deen; Jan Holmgren; Rodney Carbis; Raman Rao; Nguyen Thu Van; Allan Donner; Ganguly Nk; G. Balakrish Nair; Sujit K. Bhattacharya; John Clemens

BACKGROUND Oral cholera vaccines consisting of killed whole cells have been available for many years, but they have not been used extensively in populations with endemic disease. An inexpensive, locally produced oral killed-whole-cell vaccine has been used in high-risk areas in Vietnam. To expand the use of this vaccine, it was modified to comply with WHO standards. We assessed the efficacy and safety of this modified vaccine in a population with endemic cholera. METHODS In this double-blind trial, 107 774 non-pregnant residents of Kolkata, India, aged 1 year or older, were cluster-randomised by dwelling to receive two doses of either modified killed-whole-cell cholera vaccine (n=52 212; 1966 clusters) or heat-killed Escherichia coli K12 placebo (n=55 562; 1967 clusters), both delivered orally. Randomisation was done by computer-generated sequence in blocks of four. The primary endpoint was prevention of episodes of culture-confirmed Vibrio cholerae O1 diarrhoea severe enough for the patient to seek treatment in a health-care facility. We undertook an interim, per-protocol analysis at 2 years of follow-up that included individuals who received two completely ingested doses of vaccine or placebo. We assessed first episodes of cholera that occurred between 14 days and 730 days after receipt of the second dose. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00289224. FINDINGS 31 932 participants assigned to vaccine (1721 clusters) and 34 968 assigned to placebo (1757 clusters) received two doses of study treatment. There were 20 episodes of cholera in the vaccine group and 68 episodes in the placebo group (protective efficacy 67%; one-tailed 99% CI, lower bound 35%, p<0.0001). The vaccine protected individuals in age-groups 1.0-4.9 years, 5.0-14.9 years, and 15 years and older, and protective efficacy did not differ significantly between age-groups (p=0.28). We recorded no vaccine-related serious adverse events. INTERPRETATION This modified killed-whole-cell oral vaccine, compliant with WHO standards, is safe, provides protection against clinically significant cholera in an endemic setting, and can be used in children aged 1.0-4.9 years, who are at highest risk of developing cholera in endemic settings. FUNDING Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency, Governments of South Korea, Sweden, and Kuwait.


Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy | 2007

Antimicrobial Drug Resistance of Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhi in Asia and Molecular Mechanism of Reduced Susceptibility to the Fluoroquinolones

Tran Thuy Chau; James I. Campbell; Claudia M. Galindo; Nguyen Van Minh Hoang; To Song Diep; Tran Thu Thi Nga; Nguyen Van Vinh Chau; Phung Quoc Tuan; Anne Laure Page; R. Leon Ochiai; Constance Schultsz; John Wain; Zulfiqar A. Bhutta; Christopher M. Parry; Sujit K. Bhattacharya; Shanta Dutta; Magdarina D. Agtini; Baiqing Dong; Yang Honghui; Dang Duc Anh; Do Gia Canh; Aliya Naheed; M. John Albert; Rattanaphone Phetsouvanh; Paul N. Newton; Buddha Basnyat; Amit Arjyal; Tran Thi Phi La; Nguyen Ngoc Rang; Le Thi Phuong

ABSTRACT This study describes the pattern and extent of drug resistance in 1,774 strains of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi isolated across Asia between 1993 and 2005 and characterizes the molecular mechanisms underlying the reduced susceptibilities to fluoroquinolones of these strains. For 1,393 serovar Typhi strains collected in southern Vietnam, the proportion of multidrug resistance has remained high since 1993 (50% in 2004) and there was a dramatic increase in nalidixic acid resistance between 1993 (4%) and 2005 (97%). In a cross-sectional sample of 381 serovar Typhi strains from 8 Asian countries, Bangladesh, China, India, Indonesia, Laos, Nepal, Pakistan, and central Vietnam, collected in 2002 to 2004, various rates of multidrug resistance (16 to 37%) and nalidixic acid resistance (5 to 51%) were found. The eight Asian countries involved in this study are home to approximately 80% of the worlds typhoid fever cases. These results document the scale of drug resistance across Asia. The Ser83→Phe substitution in GyrA was the predominant alteration in serovar Typhi strains from Vietnam (117/127 isolates; 92.1%). No mutations in gyrB, parC, or parE were detected in 55 of these strains. In vitro time-kill experiments showed a reduction in the efficacy of ofloxacin against strains harboring a single-amino-acid substitution at codon 83 or 87 of GyrA; this effect was more marked against a strain with a double substitution. The 8-methoxy fluoroquinolone gatifloxacin showed rapid killing of serovar Typhi harboring both the single- and double-amino-acid substitutions.


Emerging Infectious Diseases | 2005

Salmonella Paratyphi A Rates, Asia

R. Leon Ochiai; Xuan-Yi Wang; Lorenz von Seidlein; Jin Yang; Zulfiqar A. Bhutta; Sujit K. Bhattacharya; Magdarina D. Agtini; Jacqueline L. Deen; John Wain; Deok Ryun Kim; Mohammad Ali; Camilo J. Acosta; Luis Jodar; John D. Clemens

Little is known about the causes of enteric fever in Asia. Most cases are believed to be caused by Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi and the remainder by S. Paratyphi A. We compared their incidences by using standardized methods from population-based studies in China, Indonesia, India, and Pakistan.


The New England Journal of Medicine | 2009

A cluster-randomized effectiveness trial of Vi typhoid vaccine in India.

Dipika Sur; R. Leon Ochiai; Sujit K. Bhattacharya; Ganguly Nk; Mohammad Ali; Byomkesh Manna; Shanta Dutta; Allan Donner; Suman Kanungo; Jin Kyung Park; Mahesh K. Puri; Deok Ryun Kim; Dharitri Dutta; Barnali Bhaduri; Camilo J. Acosta; John Clemens

BACKGROUND Typhoid fever remains an important cause of illness and death in the developing world. Uncertainties about the protective effect of Vi polysaccharide vaccine in children under the age of 5 years and about the vaccines effect under programmatic conditions have inhibited its use in developing countries. METHODS We conducted a phase 4 effectiveness trial in which slum-dwelling residents of Kolkata, India, who were 2 years of age or older were randomly assigned to receive a single dose of either Vi vaccine or inactivated hepatitis A vaccine, according to geographic clusters, with 40 clusters in each study group. The subjects were then followed for 2 years. RESULTS A total of 37,673 subjects received a dose of a study vaccine. The mean rate of vaccine coverage was 61% for the Vi vaccine clusters and 60% for the hepatitis A vaccine clusters. Typhoid fever was diagnosed in 96 subjects in the hepatitis A vaccine group, as compared with 34 in the Vi vaccine group, with no subject having more than one episode. The level of protective effectiveness for the Vi vaccine was 61% (95% confidence interval [CI], 41 to 75; P<0.001 for the comparison with the hepatitis A vaccine group). Children who were vaccinated between the ages of 2 and 5 years had a level of protection of 80% (95% CI, 53 to 91). Among unvaccinated members of the Vi vaccine clusters, the level of protection was 44% (95% CI, 2 to 69). The overall level of protection among all residents of Vi vaccine clusters was 57% (95% CI, 37 to 71). No serious adverse events that were attributed to either vaccine were observed during the month after vaccination. CONCLUSIONS The Vi vaccine was effective in young children and protected unvaccinated neighbors of Vi vaccinees. The potential for combined direct and indirect protection by Vi vaccine should be considered in future deliberations about introducing this vaccine in areas where typhoid fever is endemic. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00125008.)


Lancet Infectious Diseases | 2013

5 year efficacy of a bivalent killed whole-cell oral cholera vaccine in Kolkata, India: a cluster-randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Sujit K. Bhattacharya; Dipika Sur; Mohammad Ali; Suman Kanungo; Young Ae You; Byomkesh Manna; Binod Sah; Swapan Kumar Niyogi; Jin Kyung Park; Banwarilal Sarkar; Mahesh K. Puri; Deok Ryun Kim; Jacqueline L. Deen; Jan Holmgren; Rodney Carbis; Mandeep Singh Dhingra; Allan Donner; G. Balakrish Nair; Anna Lena Lopez; Thomas F. Wierzba; John D. Clemens

BACKGROUND Efficacy and safety of a two-dose regimen of bivalent killed whole-cell oral cholera vaccine (Shantha Biotechnics, Hyderabad, India) to 3 years is established, but long-term efficacy is not. We aimed to assess protective efficacy up to 5 years in a slum area of Kolkata, India. METHODS In our double-blind, cluster-randomised, placebo-controlled trial, we assessed incidence of cholera in non-pregnant individuals older than 1 year residing in 3933 dwellings (clusters) in Kolkata, India. We randomly allocated participants, by dwelling, to receive two oral doses of modified killed bivalent whole-cell cholera vaccine or heat-killed Escherichia coli K12 placebo, 14 days apart. Randomisation was done by use of a computer-generated sequence in blocks of four. The primary endpoint was prevention of episodes of culture-confirmed Vibrio cholerae O1 diarrhoea severe enough for patients to seek treatment in a health-care facility. We identified culture-confirmed cholera cases among participants seeking treatment for diarrhoea at a study clinic or government hospital between 14 days and 1825 days after receipt of the second dose. We assessed vaccine protection in a per-protocol population of participants who had completely ingested two doses of assigned study treatment. FINDINGS 69 of 31 932 recipients of vaccine and 219 of 34 968 recipients of placebo developed cholera during 5 year follow-up (incidence 2·2 per 1000 in the vaccine group and 6·3 per 1000 in the placebo group). Cumulative protective efficacy of the vaccine at 5 years was 65% (95% CI 52-74; p<0·0001), and point estimates by year of follow-up suggested no evidence of decline in protective efficacy. INTERPRETATION Sustained protection for 5 years at the level we reported has not been noted previously with other oral cholera vaccines. Established long-term efficacy of this vaccine could assist policy makers formulate rational vaccination strategies to reduce overall cholera burden in endemic settings. FUNDING Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the governments of South Korea and Sweden.


International Journal of Std & Aids | 2000

Transmission of HIV from injecting drug users to their wives in India.

Samiran Panda; A. Chatterjee; Sujit K. Bhattacharya; Byomkesh Manna; P. N. Singh; S. Sarkar; T. N. Naik; S. Chakrabarti; Roger Detels

We aimed to identify factors associated with transmission of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) from injecting drug users (IDUs) to their wives in Manipur, northeast India, where the prevalence of HIV among IDUs is 80% via a case-control study. One hundred and sixty-one HIV-infected IDUs and their wives were recruited from September 1996 to August 1997 inclusive. HIV status was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) plus Western blot. Interviews were administered anonymously. Regression analysis identified factors associated with transmission of HIV from IDU husbands to their non-injecting wives. Seventy-two wives (45%) were HIV-positive. Only 15% of the couples reported regular usage of condoms during intercourse. On multivariate analysis, a sexually transmitted disease (STD) in either member, reported by the husband, estimated duration of HIV in the husband for >8 years, and a history of blood transfusions were associated with infection in the wife. In conclusion, STDs are associated with transmission of HIV from husband to wife. Improved control of STDs, condom promotion, and improved blood screening are urgently needed in Manipur.


PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases | 2011

Efficacy of a Low-Cost, Inactivated Whole-Cell Oral Cholera Vaccine: Results from 3 Years of Follow-Up of a Randomized, Controlled Trial

Dipika Sur; Suman Kanungo; Binod Sah; Byomkesh Manna; Mohammad Ali; Am Paisley; Swapan Kumar Niyogi; Jin Kyung Park; Banawarilal Sarkar; Mahesh K. Puri; Deok Ryun Kim; Jacqueline L. Deen; Jan Holmgren; Rodney Carbis; Raman Rao; Nguyen Thu Van; Seung Hyun Han; Stephen Richard Attridge; Allan Donner; Ganguly Nk; Sujit K. Bhattacharya; G. Balakrish Nair; John D. Clemens; Anna Lena Lopez

Background Killed oral cholera vaccines (OCVs) have been licensed for use in developing countries, but protection conferred by licensed OCVs beyond two years of follow-up has not been demonstrated in randomized, clinical trials. Methods/Principal Findings We conducted a cluster-randomized, placebo-controlled trial of a two-dose regimen of a low-cost killed whole cell OCV in residents 1 year of age and older living in 3,933 clusters in Kolkata, India. The primary endpoint was culture-proven Vibrio cholerae O1 diarrhea episodes severe enough to require treatment in a health care facility. Of the 66,900 fully dosed individuals (31,932 vaccinees and 34,968 placebo recipients), 38 vaccinees and 128 placebo-recipients developed cholera during three years of follow-up (protective efficacy 66%; one-sided 95%CI lower bound = 53%, p<0.001). Vaccine protection during the third year of follow-up was 65% (one-sided 95%CI lower bound = 44%, p<0.001). Significant protection was evident in the second year of follow-up in children vaccinated at ages 1–4 years and in the third year in older age groups. Conclusions/Significance The killed whole-cell OCV conferred significant protection that was evident in the second year of follow-up in young children and was sustained for at least three years in older age groups. Continued follow-up will be important to establish the vaccines duration of protection. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00289224.


PLOS ONE | 2008

A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of the bivalent killed, whole-cell, oral cholera vaccine in adults and children in a cholera endemic area in Kolkata, India.

Dilip Mahalanabis; Anna Lena Lopez; Dipika Sur; Jacqueline L. Deen; Byomkesh Manna; Suman Kanungo; Lorenz von Seidlein; Rodney Carbis; Seung Hyun Han; Seong Hye Shin; Stephen Richard Attridge; Raman Rao; Jan Holmgren; John D. Clemens; Sujit K. Bhattacharya

Objectives An effective vaccine against cholera has been used for public health purposes in Vietnam since the 1990s. This vaccine was reformulated to meet WHO requirements. We assessed the safety and immunogenicity of the reformulated bivalent (Vibrio cholerae 01 and 0139) killed whole cell oral vaccine in a cholera endemic area in Kolkata, India. Design Double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled trial Setting The trial was conducted in the clinical trial ward of the Infectious Diseases Hospital in Kolkata, India Participants The participants were 101 healthy adults (males and non-pregnant females) aged 18–40 years and 100 healthy children (males and non-pregnant females) aged 1–17 years. Interventions Participants were randomized to receive either the bivalent killed whole cell oral cholera vaccine or placebo (killed oral Escherichia coli K12) Outcome Measures For safety: proportion of subjects with adverse events during the duration of study participation. For immunogenicity: Proportion of subjects who had a ≥4-fold rise in serum vibriocidal antibody titers 14 days after the second dose of vaccine or placebo. Results Adverse reactions were observed with similar frequency among vaccine and placebo recipients in both age groups. Among adults 4% of vaccine and 8% of placebo recipients and among children 4% of vaccine and 2% of placebo recipients had at least one adverse event within 28 days of the first dose of the vaccine. Following immunization, 53% of adult and 80% of children vaccinees showed a ≥4 fold rise in serum V. cholerae O1 vibriocidal antibody titers. A less pronounced response to V. cholerae O139 vibriocidal antibody titers post-immunization was noted among vaccinees. Conclusions We found the vaccine to be safe and immunogenic in a cholera-endemic area in India. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00119197


Journal of Clinical Microbiology | 2003

Emergence of Novel Human Group A Rotavirus G12 Strains in India

Soma Das; Vici Varghese; S. Chaudhury; P. Barman; S. Mahapatra; K. Kojima; Sujit K. Bhattacharya; Triveni Krishnan; R. K. Ratho; G. P. Chhotray; A. C. Phukan; Nobumichi Kobayashi; Trailokya Nath Naik

ABSTRACT Three rare human G12 strains were detected from diarrheic clinical samples of children (<8 months of age) in Calcutta during a routine surveillance study of rotaviral diarrhea in India. The VP7 genes of G12 strains and their products showed maximum homology (97 to 99% at the nucleotide level and 98% at the amino acid level, respectively) with those of two recently reported G12 strains (from the United States and Thailand) but lesser homology with those of prototype G12 strain L26.

Collaboration


Dive into the Sujit K. Bhattacharya's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Dipika Sur

Indian Council of Medical Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Byomkesh Manna

Indian Council of Medical Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John D. Clemens

International Vaccine Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Suman Kanungo

Indian Council of Medical Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mohammad Ali

International Vaccine Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jacqueline L. Deen

University of the Philippines Manila

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bhattacharya Mk

Indian Council of Medical Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

R. Leon Ochiai

International Vaccine Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Deok Ryun Kim

International Vaccine Institute

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge