Sung Hae L Kang
Baylor College of Medicine
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Sung Hae L Kang.
Nature Genetics | 2008
Nicola Brunetti-Pierri; Jonathan S. Berg; Fernando Scaglia; John W. Belmont; Carlos A. Bacino; Trilochan Sahoo; Seema R. Lalani; Brett H. Graham; Brendan Lee; Marwan Shinawi; Joseph Shen; Sung Hae L Kang; Amber Pursley; Timothy Lotze; Gail Kennedy; Susan Lansky-Shafer; Christine Weaver; Elizabeth Roeder; Theresa A. Grebe; Georgianne L. Arnold; Terry Hutchison; Tyler Reimschisel; Stephen Amato; Michael T. Geragthy; Jeffrey W. Innis; Ewa Obersztyn; Beata Nowakowska; Sally Rosengren; Patricia I. Bader; Dorothy K. Grange
Chromosome region 1q21.1 contains extensive and complex low-copy repeats, and copy number variants (CNVs) in this region have recently been reported in association with congenital heart defects, developmental delay, schizophrenia and related psychoses. We describe 21 probands with the 1q21.1 microdeletion and 15 probands with the 1q21.1 microduplication. These CNVs were inherited in most of the cases in which parental studies were available. Consistent and statistically significant features of microcephaly and macrocephaly were found in individuals with microdeletion and microduplication, respectively. Notably, a paralog of the HYDIN gene located on 16q22.2 and implicated in autosomal recessive hydrocephalus was inserted into the 1q21.1 region during the evolution of Homo sapiens; we found this locus to be deleted or duplicated in the individuals we studied, making it a probable candidate for the head size abnormalities observed. We propose that recurrent reciprocal microdeletions and microduplications within 1q21.1 represent previously unknown genomic disorders characterized by abnormal head size along with a spectrum of developmental delay, neuropsychiatric abnormalities, dysmorphic features and congenital anomalies. These phenotypes are subject to incomplete penetrance and variable expressivity.
Journal of Medical Genetics | 2010
Marwan Shinawi; Pengfei Liu; Sung Hae L Kang; Joseph Shen; John W. Belmont; Daryl A. Scott; Frank J. Probst; William J. Craigen; Brett H. Graham; Amber Pursley; Gary D. Clark; Jennifer A. Lee; Monica Proud; Amber Stocco; Diana L. Rodriguez; Beth A. Kozel; Steven Sparagana; Elizabeth Roeder; Susan G. McGrew; Thaddeus W. Kurczynski; Leslie J. Allison; Stephen Amato; Sarah Savage; Ankita Patel; Pawel Stankiewicz; Arthur L. Beaudet; Sau Wai Cheung; James R. Lupski
Background Deletion and the reciprocal duplication in 16p11.2 were recently associated with autism and developmental delay. Method We indentified 27 deletions and 18 duplications of 16p11.2 were identified in 0.6% of all samples submitted for clinical array-CGH (comparative genomic hybridisation) analysis. Detailed molecular and phenotypic characterisations were performed on 17 deletion subjects and ten subjects with the duplication. Results The most common clinical manifestations in 17 deletion and 10 duplication subjects were speech/language delay and cognitive impairment. Other phenotypes in the deletion patients included motor delay (50%), seizures (∼40%), behavioural problems (∼40%), congenital anomalies (∼30%), and autism (∼20%). The phenotypes among duplication patients included motor delay (6/10), behavioural problems (especially attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)) (6/10), congenital anomalies (5/10), and seizures (3/10). Patients with the 16p11.2 deletion had statistically significant macrocephaly (p<0.0017) and 6 of the 10 patients with the duplication had microcephaly. One subject with the deletion was asymptomatic and another with the duplication had a normal cognitive and behavioural phenotype. Genomic analyses revealed additional complexity to the 16p11.2 region with mechanistic implications. The chromosomal rearrangement was de novo in all but 2 of the 10 deletion cases in which parental studies were available. Additionally, 2 de novo cases were apparently mosaic for the deletion in the analysed blood sample. Three de novo and 2 inherited cases were observed in the 5 of 10 duplication patients where data were available. Conclusions Recurrent reciprocal 16p11.2 deletion and duplication are characterised by a spectrum of primarily neurocognitive phenotypes that are subject to incomplete penetrance and variable expressivity. The autism and macrocephaly observed with deletion and ADHD and microcephaly seen in duplication patients support a diametric model of autism spectrum and psychotic spectrum behavioural phenotypes in genomic sister disorders.
Cell | 2011
Pengfei Liu; Ayelet Erez; Sandesh C.S. Nagamani; Shweta U. Dhar; Katarzyna E. Kolodziejska; Avinash V. Dharmadhikari; M. Lance Cooper; Joanna Wiszniewska; Feng Zhang; Marjorie Withers; Carlos A. Bacino; Luis Daniel Campos-Acevedo; Mauricio R. Delgado; Debra Freedenberg; Adolfo Garnica; Theresa A. Grebe; Dolores Hernández-Almaguer; Ladonna Immken; Seema R. Lalani; Scott D. McLean; Hope Northrup; Fernando Scaglia; Lane Strathearn; Pamela Trapane; Sung Hae L Kang; Ankita Patel; Sau Wai Cheung; P. J. Hastings; Pawel Stankiewicz; James R. Lupski
Complex genomic rearrangements (CGRs) consisting of two or more breakpoint junctions have been observed in genomic disorders. Recently, a chromosome catastrophe phenomenon termed chromothripsis, in which numerous genomic rearrangements are apparently acquired in one single catastrophic event, was described in multiple cancers. Here, we show that constitutionally acquired CGRs share similarities with cancer chromothripsis. In the 17 CGR cases investigated, we observed localization and multiple copy number changes including deletions, duplications, and/or triplications, as well as extensive translocations and inversions. Genomic rearrangements involved varied in size and complexities; in one case, array comparative genomic hybridization revealed 18 copy number changes. Breakpoint sequencing identified characteristic features, including small templated insertions at breakpoints and microhomology at breakpoint junctions, which have been attributed to replicative processes. The resemblance between CGR and chromothripsis suggests similar mechanistic underpinnings. Such chromosome catastrophic events appear to reflect basic DNA metabolism operative throughout an organisms life cycle.
Prenatal Diagnosis | 2009
Ignatia B. Van den Veyver; Ankita Patel; Chad A. Shaw; Amber N. Pursley; Sung Hae L Kang; Marcia J. Simovich; Patricia A. Ward; Sandra Darilek; Anthony Johnson; Sarah Neill; Weimin Bi; Lisa D. White; Christine M. Eng; James R. Lupski; Sau Wai Cheung; Arthur L. Beaudet
To evaluate the use of array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) for prenatal diagnosis, including assessment of variants of uncertain significance, and the ability to detect abnormalities not detected by karyotype, and vice versa.
Human Mutation | 2010
Philip M. Boone; Carlos A. Bacino; Chad A. Shaw; Patricia A. Eng; Patricia Hixson; Amber N. Pursley; Sung Hae L Kang; Yaping Yang; Joanna Wiszniewska; Beata Nowakowska; Daniela del Gaudio; Zhilian Xia; Gayle Simpson-Patel; La Donna Immken; James B. Gibson; Anne C.H. Tsai; Jennifer A. Bowers; Tyler Reimschisel; Christian P. Schaaf; Lorraine Potocki; Fernando Scaglia; Tomasz Gambin; Maciej Sykulski; Magdalena Bartnik; Katarzyna Derwińska; Barbara Wisniowiecka-Kowalnik; Seema R. Lalani; Frank J. Probst; Weimin Bi; Arthur L. Beaudet
Array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) is a powerful tool for the molecular elucidation and diagnosis of disorders resulting from genomic copy‐number variation (CNV). However, intragenic deletions or duplications—those including genomic intervals of a size smaller than a gene—have remained beyond the detection limit of most clinical aCGH analyses. Increasing array probe number improves genomic resolution, although higher cost may limit implementation, and enhanced detection of benign CNV can confound clinical interpretation. We designed an array with exonic coverage of selected disease and candidate genes and used it clinically to identify losses or gains throughout the genome involving at least one exon and as small as several hundred base pairs in size. In some patients, the detected copy‐number change occurs within a gene known to be causative of the observed clinical phenotype, demonstrating the ability of this array to detect clinically relevant CNVs with subkilobase resolution. In summary, we demonstrate the utility of a custom‐designed, exon‐targeted oligonucleotide array to detect intragenic copy‐number changes in patients with various clinical phenotypes. Hum Mutat 31:1–17, 2010.
Genetics in Medicine | 2006
Trilochan Sahoo; Sau Wai Cheung; Patricia A. Ward; Sandra Darilek; Ankita Patel; Daniela del Gaudio; Sung Hae L Kang; Seema R. Lalani; Jiangzhen Li; Sallie McAdoo; Audrey Burke; Chad A. Shaw; Pawel Stankiewicz; A. Craig Chinault; Ignatia B. Van den Veyver; Benjamin B. Roa; Arthur L. Beaudet; Christine M. Eng
Purpose: This study was designed to evaluate the feasibility of using a targeted array-CGH strategy for prenatal diagnosis of genomic imbalances in a clinical setting of current pregnancies.Methods: Women undergoing prenatal diagnosis were counseled and offered array-CGH (BCM V4.0) in addition to routine chromosome analysis. Array-CGH was performed with DNA directly from amniotic fluid cells with whole genome amplification, on chorionic villus samples with amplification as necessary, and on cultured cells without amplification.Results: Ninety-eight pregnancies (56 amniotic fluid and 42 CVS specimens) were studied with complete concordance between karyotype and array results, including 5 positive cases with chromosomal abnormalities. There was complete concordance of array results for direct and cultured cell analysis in 57 cases tested by both methods. In 12 cases, the array detected copy number variation requiring testing of parental samples for optimal interpretation. Array-CGH results were available in an average of 6 and 16 days for direct and cultured cells, respectively. Patient acceptance of array-CGH testing was 74%.Conclusion: This study demonstrates the feasibility of using array-CGH for prenatal diagnosis, including reliance on direct analysis without culturing cells. Use of array-CGH should increase the detection of abnormalities relative to the risk, and is an option for an enhanced level of screening for chromosomal abnormalities in high risk pregnancies.
Genetics in Medicine | 2007
Jonathan S. Berg; Nicola Brunetti-Pierri; Sarika U. Peters; Sung Hae L Kang; Chin-To Fong; Jessica Salamone; Debra Freedenberg; Vickie Hannig; Lisa Albers Prock; David T. Miller; Peter Raffalli; David J. Harris; Robert P. Erickson; Christopher Cunniff; Gary D. Clark; Maria Blazo; Daniel A. Peiffer; Kevin L. Gunderson; Trilochan Sahoo; Ankita Patel; James R. Lupski; Arthur L. Beaudet; Sau Wai Cheung
Purpose: Williams-Beuren syndrome is among the most well-characterized microdeletion syndromes, caused by recurrent de novo microdeletions at 7q11.23 mediated by nonallelic homologous recombination between low copy repeats flanking this critical region. However, the clinical phenotype associated with reciprocal microduplication of this genomic region is less well described. We investigated the molecular, clinical, neurodevelopmental, and behavioral features of seven patients with dup(7)(q11.23), including two children who inherited the microduplication from one of their parents, to more fully characterize this emerging microduplication syndrome.Methods: Patients were identified by array-based comparative genomic hybridization. Clinical examinations were performed on seven affected probands, and detailed cognitive and behavioral evaluations were carried out on four of the affected probands.Results: Our findings confirm initial reports of speech delay seen in patients with dup(7)(q11.23) and further delineate and expand the phenotypic spectrum of this condition to include communication, social interactions, and repetitive interests that are often observed in individuals diagnosed with autism spectrum disorders.Conclusions: Array-based comparative genomic hybridization is a powerful means of detecting genomic imbalances and identifying molecular etiologies in the clinic setting, including genomic disorders such as Williams-Beuren syndrome and dup(7)(q11.23). We propose that dup(7)(q11.23) syndrome may be as frequent as Williams-Beuren syndrome and a previously unrecognized cause of language delay and behavioral abnormalities. Indeed, these individuals may first be referred for evaluation of autism, even if they do not ultimately meet diagnostic criteria for an autism spectrum disorder.
European Journal of Human Genetics | 2011
Sandesh C.S. Nagamani; Ayelet Erez; Patricia I. Bader; Seema R. Lalani; Daryl A. Scott; Fernando Scaglia; Sharon E. Plon; Chun Hui Tsai; Tyler Reimschisel; Elizabeth Roeder; Amy D. Malphrus; Patricia A. Eng; Patricia Hixson; Sung Hae L Kang; Pawel Stankiewicz; Ankita Patel; Sau Wai Cheung
The widespread clinical utilization of array comparative genome hybridization, has led to the unraveling of many new copy number variations (CNVs). Although some of these CNVs are clearly pathogenic, the phenotypic consequences of others, such as those in 16p13.11 remain unclear. Whereas deletions of 16p13.11 have been associated with multiple congenital anomalies, the relevance of duplications of the region is still being debated. We report detailed clinical and molecular characterization of 10 patients with duplication and 4 patients with deletion of 16p13.11. We found that patients with duplication of the region have varied clinical features including behavioral abnormalities, cognitive impairment, congenital heart defects and skeletal manifestations, such as hypermobility, craniosynostosis and polydactyly. These features were incompletely penetrant. Patients with deletion of the region presented with microcephaly, developmental delay and behavioral abnormalities as previously described. The CNVs were of varying sizes and were likely mediated by non-allelic homologous recombination between low copy repeats. Our findings expand the repertoire of clinical features observed in patients with CNV in 16p13.11 and strengthen the hypothesis that this is a dosage sensitive region with clinical relevance.
European Journal of Human Genetics | 2012
Christian P. Schaaf; Philip M. Boone; Srirangan Sampath; Charles A. Williams; Patricia I. Bader; Jennifer Mueller; Oleg A. Shchelochkov; Chester W. Brown; Heather P. Crawford; James A. Phalen; Nicole Tartaglia; Patricia Evans; William M. Campbell; Anne Chun-Hui Tsai; Lea Parsley; Stephanie W. Grayson; Angela Scheuerle; Carol D. Luzzi; Sandra K. Thomas; Patricia A. Eng; Sung Hae L Kang; Ankita Patel; Pawel Stankiewicz; Sau Wai Cheung
Copy number variants (CNVs) and intragenic rearrangements of the NRXN1 (neurexin 1) gene are associated with a wide spectrum of developmental and neuropsychiatric disorders, including intellectual disability, speech delay, autism spectrum disorders (ASDs), hypotonia and schizophrenia. We performed a detailed clinical and molecular characterization of 24 patients who underwent clinical microarray analysis and had intragenic deletions of NRXN1. Seventeen of these deletions involved exons of NRXN1, whereas seven deleted intronic sequences only. The patients with exonic deletions manifested developmental delay/intellectual disability (93%), infantile hypotonia (59%) and ASDs (56%). Congenital malformations and dysmorphic features appeared infrequently and inconsistently among this population of patients with NRXN1 deletions. The more C-terminal deletions, including those affecting the β isoform of neurexin 1, manifested increased head size and a high frequency of seizure disorder (88%) when compared with N-terminal deletions of NRXN1.
European Journal of Human Genetics | 2013
Seema R. Lalani; Chad A. Shaw; Xueqing Wang; Ankita Patel; Lance W. Patterson; Katarzyna E. Kolodziejska; Przemyslaw Szafranski; Zhishuo Ou; Qi Tian; Sung Hae L Kang; Amina Jinnah; Sophia Ali; Aamir Malik; Patricia Hixson; Lorraine Potocki; James R. Lupski; Pawel Stankiewicz; Carlos A. Bacino; Brian Dawson; Arthur L. Beaudet; Fatima M. Boricha; Runako Whittaker; Chumei Li; Stephanie M. Ware; Sau Wai Cheung; Daniel J. Penny; John L. Jefferies; John W. Belmont
Clinically significant cardiovascular malformations (CVMs) occur in 5–8 per 1000 live births. Recurrent copy number variations (CNVs) are among the known causes of syndromic CVMs, accounting for an important fraction of cases. We hypothesized that many additional rare CNVs also cause CVMs and can be detected in patients with CVMs plus extracardiac anomalies (ECAs). Through a genome-wide survey of 203 subjects with CVMs and ECAs, we identified 55 CNVs >50 kb in length that were not present in children without known cardiovascular defects (n=872). Sixteen unique CNVs overlapping these variants were found in an independent CVM plus ECA cohort (n=511), which were not observed in 2011 controls. The study identified 12/16 (75%) novel loci including non-recurrent de novo 16q24.3 loss (4/714) and de novo 2q31.3q32.1 loss encompassing PPP1R1C and PDE1A (2/714). The study also narrowed critical intervals in three well-recognized genomic disorders of CVM, such as the cat-eye syndrome region on 22q11.1, 8p23.1 loss encompassing GATA4 and SOX7 and 17p13.3-p13.2 loss. An analysis of protein-interaction databases shows that the rare inherited and de novo CNVs detected in the combined cohort are enriched for genes encoding proteins that are direct or indirect partners of proteins known to be required for normal cardiac development. Our findings implicate rare variants such as 16q24.3 loss and 2q31.3-q32.1 loss, and delineate regions within previously reported structural variants known to cause CVMs.