Sunil Bhavsar

Synergy between amylin and cholecystokinin for inhibition of food intake in mice

Several gastrointestinal peptides which are secreted in response to nutrients have been reported to suppress food intake. Amylin is a peptide hormone co-secreted with insulin from pancreatic beta-cells in response to nutrient stimuli. Cholesystokinin (CCK) is secreted from duodenal and jejunal mucosal cells in response to fat and protein. Amylin and CCK-8 have been reported to reduce food intake in rodents when given centrally as well as peripherally. Amylin injected intraperitoneally (i.p.) reduced food intake over the subsequent 30 min in overnight fasted mice by a maximum of 57 +/- 6% with an ED50 of 0.93 nmol/kg (3.63 microg/kg) +/- 0.34 log units. On a molar basis, this potency was similar to that of CCK-8 (ED50 0.85 nmol/kg (0.97 microg/kg) +/- 0.28 log units; p = 0.93) which inhibited food intake by a maximum of 71 +/- 7%. When amylin and CCK-8 were injected i.p. as an amylin:CCK-8 mixture, immediately before presentation of food in overnight fasted mice, food intake in the subsequent 30 min was reduced by a maximum of 91%, an amount that was greater than that producable by i.p. injection of amylin or CCK-8 alone. Isobolar analysis revealed a marked synergy between amylin and CCK-8 in reducing food intake, such that statistically ineffective doses of amylin and CCK, when combined, evoked near-maximal inhibition of food intake. Because the typical physiological event is for amylin and CCK both to be secreted in response to mixed meals, the synergy between them could indicate a shared role in physiological appetite control.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of exenatide following alternate routes of administration

Exenatide is a 39-amino acid peptide incretin mimetic approved for adjunctive treatment of type 2 diabetes. It shares several glucoregulatory activities with the mammalian hormone, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1). In clinical use, subcutaneous exenatide injections demonstrate glucoregulatory and weight loss effects with sustained plasma concentrations in the 50-100 pM range. We investigated the pharmacokinetics of exenatide in normoglycemic rats and biological activity in diabetic db/db mice after delivery to various epithelial surfaces of the intestinal and respiratory tracts. In rats, elimination kinetics were similar for all routes of administration (median k(e) 0.017 min(-1)). Bioavailability (versus intravenous administration) and C(max) per unit dose differed markedly. For gastrointestinal administration, sublingual administration invoked the highest bioavailability (0.37%); in db/db mice, potentially therapeutic concentrations were obtainable. In contrast, intraduodenal bioavailability was low (0.0053%). In regard to respiratory surfaces, bioavailability of intratracheal exenatide was up to 13.6%, and for nasal administration, 1.68%. Both routes of administration produced therapeutic plasma concentrations and glucose-lowering in db/db mice. At high doses, aerosolized exenatide also achieved effective concentrations and glucose-lowering. In summary, the intestinal tract seems to have limited potential as a route of exenatide administration, with sublingual being most promising. In contrast, the respiratory tract appears to be more viable, comparing favorably with the clinically approved subcutaneous route. Despite little optimization of the delivery formulation, exenatide bioavailability compared favorable to that of several commercially available bioactive peptides.