Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Susan E. Thompson is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Susan E. Thompson.


Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series | 2013

Planetary Candidates Observed by Kepler III: Analysis of the First 16 Months of Data

Natalie M. Batalha; Jason F. Rowe; Stephen T. Bryson; Christopher J. Burke; Douglas A. Caldwell; Jessie L. Christiansen; Fergal Mullally; Susan E. Thompson; Timothy M. Brown; Andrea K. Dupree; Daniel C. Fabrycky; Eric B. Ford; Jonathan J. Fortney; Ronald L. Gilliland; Howard Isaacson; David W. Latham; Geoffrey W. Marcy; Samuel N. Quinn; Darin Ragozzine; Avi Shporer; William J. Borucki; David R. Ciardi; Thomas N. Gautier; Michael R. Haas; Jon M. Jenkins; David G. Koch; Jack J. Lissauer; William Rapin; Gibor Basri; Alan P. Boss

New transiting planet candidates are identified in 16 months (2009 May-2010 September) of data from the Kepler spacecraft. Nearly 5000 periodic transit-like signals are vetted against astrophysical and instrumental false positives yielding 1108 viable new planet candidates, bringing the total count up to over 2300. Improved vetting metrics are employed, contributing to higher catalog reliability. Most notable is the noise-weighted robust averaging of multi-quarter photo-center offsets derived from difference image analysis that identifies likely background eclipsing binaries. Twenty-two months of photometry are used for the purpose of characterizing each of the candidates. Ephemerides (transit epoch, T_0, and orbital period, P) are tabulated as well as the products of light curve modeling: reduced radius (R_P/R_★), reduced semimajor axis (d/R_★), and impact parameter (b). The largest fractional increases are seen for the smallest planet candidates (201% for candidates smaller than 2 R_⊕ compared to 53% for candidates larger than 2 R_⊕) and those at longer orbital periods (124% for candidates outside of 50 day orbits versus 86% for candidates inside of 50 day orbits). The gains are larger than expected from increasing the observing window from 13 months (Quarters 1-5) to 16 months (Quarters 1-6) even in regions of parameter space where one would have expected the previous catalogs to be complete. Analyses of planet frequencies based on previous catalogs will be affected by such incompleteness. The fraction of all planet candidate host stars with multiple candidates has grown from 17% to 20%, and the paucity of short-period giant planets in multiple systems is still evident. The progression toward smaller planets at longer orbital periods with each new catalog release suggests that Earth-size planets in the habitable zone are forthcoming if, indeed, such planets are abundant.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2014

Validation of Kepler's Multiple Planet Candidates. III. Light Curve Analysis and Announcement of Hundreds of New Multi-planet Systems

Jason F. Rowe; Stephen T. Bryson; Geoffrey W. Marcy; Jack J. Lissauer; Daniel Jontof-Hutter; Fergal Mullally; Ronald L. Gilliland; Howard Issacson; Eric B. Ford; Steve B. Howell; William J. Borucki; Michael R. Haas; Daniel Huber; Jason H. Steffen; Susan E. Thompson; Elisa V. Quintana; Martin Still; Jonathan J. Fortney; Thomas N. Gautier; Roger C. Hunter; Douglas A. Caldwell; David R. Ciardi; Edna DeVore; William D. Cochran; Jon M. Jenkins; Eric Agol; Joshua A. Carter; John C. Geary

The Kepler mission has discovered more than 2500 exoplanet candidates in the first two years of spacecraft data, with approximately 40% of those in candidate multi-planet systems. The high rate of multiplicity combined with the low rate of identified false positives indicates that the multiplanet systems contain very few false positive signals due to other systems not gravitationally bound to the target star. False positives in the multi-planet systems are identified and removed, leaving behind a residual population of candidate multi-planet transiting systems expected to have a false positive rate less than 1%. We present a sample of 340 planetary systems that contain 851 planets that are validated to substantially better than the 99% confidence level; the vast majority of these have not been previously verified as planets. We expect ~two unidentified false positives making our sample of planet very reliable. We present fundamental planetary properties of our sample based on a comprehensive analysis of Kepler light curves, ground-based spectroscopy, and high-resolution imaging. Since we do not require spectroscopy or high-resolution imaging for validation, some of our derived parameters for a planetary system may be systematically incorrect due to dilution from light due to additional stars in the photometric aperture. Nonetheless, our result nearly doubles the number verified exoplanets.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2012

Kepler-22b: A 2.4 Earth-radius Planet in the Habitable Zone of a Sun-like Star

William J. Borucki; David G. Koch; Natalie M. Batalha; Stephen T. Bryson; Jason F. Rowe; Francois Fressin; Guillermo Torres; Douglas A. Caldwell; Jørgen Christensen-Dalsgaard; William D. Cochran; Edna DeVore; Thomas N. Gautier; John C. Geary; Ronald L. Gilliland; Alan Gould; Steve B. Howell; Jon M. Jenkins; David W. Latham; Jack J. Lissauer; Geoffrey W. Marcy; Dimitar D. Sasselov; Alan P. Boss; David Charbonneau; David R. Ciardi; Lisa Kaltenegger; Laurance R. Doyle; Andrea K. Dupree; Eric B. Ford; Jonathan J. Fortney; Matthew J. Holman

A search of the time-series photometry from NASAs Kepler spacecraft reveals a transiting planet candidate orbiting the 11th magnitude G5 dwarf KIC 10593626 with a period of 290 days. The characteristics of the host star are well constrained by high-resolution spectroscopy combined with an asteroseismic analysis of the Kepler photometry, leading to an estimated mass and radius of 0.970 ± 0.060 M ☉ and 0.979 ± 0.020 R ☉. The depth of 492 ± 10 ppm for the three observed transits yields a radius of 2.38 ± 0.13 Re for the planet. The system passes a battery of tests for false positives, including reconnaissance spectroscopy, high-resolution imaging, and centroid motion. A full BLENDER analysis provides further validation of the planet interpretation by showing that contamination of the target by an eclipsing system would rarely mimic the observed shape of the transits. The final validation of the planet is provided by 16 radial velocities (RVs) obtained with the High Resolution Echelle Spectrometer on Keck I over a one-year span. Although the velocities do not lead to a reliable orbit and mass determination, they are able to constrain the mass to a 3σ upper limit of 124 M ⊕, safely in the regime of planetary masses, thus earning the designation Kepler-22b. The radiative equilibrium temperature is 262 K for a planet in Kepler-22bs orbit. Although there is no evidence that Kepler-22b is a rocky planet, it is the first confirmed planet with a measured radius to orbit in the habitable zone of any star other than the Sun.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2013

FUNDAMENTAL PROPERTIES OF KEPLER PLANET-CANDIDATE HOST STARS USING ASTEROSEISMOLOGY

Daniel Huber; W. J. Chaplin; Jørgen Christensen-Dalsgaard; Ronald L. Gilliland; Hans Kjeldsen; Lars A. Buchhave; Debra A. Fischer; Jack J. Lissauer; Jason F. Rowe; Roberto Sanchis-Ojeda; Sarbani Basu; R. Handberg; S. Hekker; Andrew W. Howard; Howard Isaacson; C. Karoff; David W. Latham; Mikkel N. Lund; M. Lundkvist; Geoffrey W. Marcy; A. Miglio; Victor Silva Aguirre; D. Stello; T. Arentoft; Timothy R. Bedding; Christopher J. Burke; Jessie L. Christiansen; Y. Elsworth; Michael R. Haas; Steven D. Kawaler

We have used asteroseismology to determine fundamental properties for 66 Kepler planet-candidate host stars, with typical uncertainties of 3% and 7% in radius and mass, respectively. The results include new asteroseismic solutions for four host stars with confirmed planets (Kepler-4, Kepler-14, Kepler-23 and Kepler-25) and increase the total number of Kepler host stars with asteroseismic solutions to 77. A comparison with stellar properties in the planet-candidate catalog by Batalha et al. shows that radii for subgiants and giants obtained from spectroscopic follow-up are systematically too low by up to a factor of 1.5, while the properties for unevolved stars are in good agreement. We furthermore apply asteroseismology to confirm that a large majority of cool main-sequence hosts are indeed dwarfs and not misclassified giants. Using the revised stellar properties, we recalculate the radii for 107 planet candidates in our sample, and comment on candidates for which the radii change from a previously giant-planet/brown-dwarf/stellar regime to a sub-Jupiter size or vice versa. A comparison of stellar densities from asteroseismology with densities derived from transit models in Batalha et al. assuming circular orbits shows significant disagreement for more than half of the sample due to systematics in the modeled impact parameters or due to planet candidates that may be in eccentric orbits. Finally, we investigate tentative correlations between host-star masses and planet-candidate radii, orbital periods, and multiplicity, but caution that these results may be influenced by the small sample size and detection biases.


Astronomy and Astrophysics | 2011

The Kepler characterization of the variability among A- and F-type stars. - I: General overview

K. Uytterhoeven; A. Moya; A. Grigahcène; Joyce Ann Guzik; J. Gutierrez-Soto; B. Smalley; G. Handler; L. A. Balona; E. Niemczura; L. Fox Machado; Serena Benatti; E. Chapellier; A. Tkachenko; R. Szabó; J. C. Suárez; V. Ripepi; J. Pascual; P. Mathias; S. Martín-Ruiz; H. Lehmann; Jason Jackiewicz; S. Hekker; M. Gruberbauer; R. A. García; X. Dumusque; D. Díaz-Fraile; P. A. Bradley; V. Antoci; M. Roth; B. Leroy

Context. The Kepler spacecraft is providing time series of photometric data with micromagnitude precision for hundreds of A-F type stars. Aims. We present a first general characterization of the pulsational behaviour of A-F type stars as observed in the Kepler light curves of a sample of 750 candidate A-F type stars, and observationally investigate the relation between γ Doradus (γ Dor), δ Scuti (δ Sct), and hybrid stars. Methods. We compile a database of physical parameters for the sample stars from the literature and new ground-based observations. We analyse the Kepler light curve of each star and extract the pulsational frequencies using different frequency analysis methods. We construct two new observables, “energy ”a nd “efficiency”, related to the driving energy of the pulsation mode and the convective efficiency of the outer convective zone, respectively. Results. We propose three main groups to describe the observed variety in pulsating A-F type stars: γ Dor, δ Sct, and hybrid stars. We assign 63% of our sample to one of the three groups, and identify the remaining part as rotationally modulated/active stars, binaries, stars of different spectral type, or stars that show no clear periodic variability. 23% of the stars (171 stars) are hybrid stars, which is a much higher fraction than what has been observed before. We characterize for the first time a large number of A-F type stars (475 stars) in terms of number of detected frequencies, frequency range, and typical pulsation amplitudes. The majority of hybrid stars show frequencies with all kinds of periodicities within the γ Dor and δ Sct range, also between 5 and 10 d −1 , which is a challenge for the current models. We find indications for the existence of δ Sct and γ Dor stars beyond the edges of the current observational instability strips. The hybrid stars occupy the entire region within the δ Sct and γ Dor instability strips and beyond. Non-variable stars seem to exist within the instability strips. The location of γ Dor and δ Sct classes in the (Teff ,l ogg)-diagram has been extended. We investigate two newly constructed variables, “efficiency ”a nd “energy”, as a means to explore the relation between γ Dor and δ Sct stars. Conclusions. Our results suggest a revision of the current observational instability strips of δ Sct and γ Dor stars and imply an investigation of pulsation mechanisms to supplement the κ mechanism and convective blocking effect to drive hybrid pulsations. Accurate physical parameters for all stars are needed to confirm these findings.


Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series | 2014

PLANETARY CANDIDATES OBSERVED BY KEPLER IV: PLANET SAMPLE FROM Q1-Q8 (22 MONTHS)

Christopher J. Burke; Stephen T. Bryson; Fergal Mullally; Jason F. Rowe; Jessie L. Christiansen; Susan E. Thompson; Jeffrey L. Coughlin; Michael R. Haas; Natalie M. Batalha; Douglas A. Caldwell; Jon M. Jenkins; Martin Still; William J. Borucki; W. J. Chaplin; David R. Ciardi; Bruce D. Clarke; William D. Cochran; Brice-Olivier Demory; Gilbert A. Esquerdo; Thomas N. Gautier; Ronald L. Gilliland; Forrest R. Girouard; Mathieu Havel; Christopher E. Henze; Steve B. Howell; Daniel Huber; David W. Latham; Jie Li; Robert C. Morehead; Timothy D. Morton

We provide updates to the Kepler planet candidate sample based upon nearly two years of highprecision photometry (i.e., Q1-Q8). From an initial list of nearly 13,400 Threshold Crossing Events (TCEs), 480 new host stars are identified from their flux time series as consistent with hosting transiting planets. Potential transit signals are subjected to further analysis using the pixel-level data, which allows background eclipsing binaries to be identified through small image position shifts during transit. We also re-evaluate Kepler Objects of Interest (KOI) 1-1609, which were identified early in the mission, using substantially more data to test for background false positives and to find additional multiple systems. Combining the new and previous KOI samples, we provide updated parameters for 2,738 Kepler planet candidates distributed across 2,017 host stars. From the combined Kepler planet candidates, 472 are new from the Q1-Q8 data examined in this study. The new Kepler planet candidates represent ∼40% of the sample with RP∼1R⊕ and represent ∼40% of the low equilibrium temperature (Teq<300 K) sample. We review the known biases in the current sample of Kepler planet candidates relevant to evaluating planet population statistics with the current Kepler planet candidate sample. Subject headings: catalogs – eclipses – planetary systems – space vehicles


Science | 2013

Kepler-62: A Five-Planet System with Planets of 1.4 and 1.6 Earth Radii in the Habitable Zone

William J. Borucki; Eric Agol; Francois Fressin; Lisa Kaltenegger; Jason F. Rowe; Howard Isaacson; Debra A. Fischer; Natalie M. Batalha; Jack J. Lissauer; Geoffrey W. Marcy; Daniel C. Fabrycky; J.-M. Desert; Stephen T. Bryson; Fabienne A. Bastien; Alan P. Boss; Erik Brugamyer; Lars A. Buchhave; Christopher J. Burke; Douglas A. Caldwell; Josh Carter; David Charbonneau; Justin R. Crepp; Jørgen Christensen-Dalsgaard; Jessie L. Christiansen; David R. Ciardi; William D. Cochran; Edna DeVore; Laurance R. Doyle; Andrea K. Dupree; Michael Endl

Two Small Habitable Planets NASAs Kepler space telescope was launched in 2009 with the goal of detecting planets the size of Earth in the habitable zone of Sun-like stars and determining the frequency of these planets. Using data from Kepler, Borucki et al. (p. 587, published online 18 April) report the detection of a five-planet system where all the planets are smaller than twice the size of Earth and where the two outermost planets orbit in the habitable zone of their star, defined as the region where a rocky planet can host liquid water on its solid surface. The star, Kepler-62, is smaller and cooler than the Sun. The Kepler mission detected a five-planet system with two small planets in the habitable zone of a star lighter than the Sun. We present the detection of five planets—Kepler-62b, c, d, e, and f—of size 1.31, 0.54, 1.95, 1.61 and 1.41 Earth radii (R⊕), orbiting a K2V star at periods of 5.7, 12.4, 18.2, 122.4, and 267.3 days, respectively. The outermost planets, Kepler-62e and -62f, are super–Earth-size (1.25 R⊕ < planet radius ≤ 2.0 R⊕) planets in the habitable zone of their host star, respectively receiving 1.2 ± 0.2 times and 0.41 ± 0.05 times the solar flux at Earth’s orbit. Theoretical models of Kepler-62e and -62f for a stellar age of ~7 billion years suggest that both planets could be solid, either with a rocky composition or composed of mostly solid water in their bulk.


Nature | 2012

Two Earth-sized planets orbiting Kepler-20

Francois Fressin; Guillermo Torres; Jason F. Rowe; David Charbonneau; Leslie A. Rogers; Sarah Ballard; Natalie M. Batalha; William J. Borucki; Stephen T. Bryson; Lars A. Buchhave; David R. Ciardi; J.-M. Desert; Courtney D. Dressing; Daniel C. Fabrycky; Eric B. Ford; Thomas N. Gautier; Christopher E. Henze; Matthew J. Holman; Andrew W. Howard; Steve B. Howell; Jon M. Jenkins; David G. Koch; David W. Latham; Jack J. Lissauer; Geoffrey W. Marcy; Samuel N. Quinn; Darin Ragozzine; Dimitar D. Sasselov; Sara Seager; Fergal Mullally

Since the discovery of the first extrasolar giant planets around Sun-like stars, evolving observational capabilities have brought us closer to the detection of true Earth analogues. The size of an exoplanet can be determined when it periodically passes in front of (transits) its parent star, causing a decrease in starlight proportional to its radius. The smallest exoplanet hitherto discovered has a radius 1.42 times that of the Earth’s radius (R⊕), and hence has 2.9 times its volume. Here we report the discovery of two planets, one Earth-sized (1.03R⊕) and the other smaller than the Earth (0.87R⊕), orbiting the star Kepler-20, which is already known to host three other, larger, transiting planets. The gravitational pull of the new planets on the parent star is too small to measure with current instrumentation. We apply a statistical method to show that the likelihood of the planetary interpretation of the transit signals is more than three orders of magnitude larger than that of the alternative hypothesis that the signals result from an eclipsing binary star. Theoretical considerations imply that these planets are rocky, with a composition of iron and silicate. The outer planet could have developed a thick water vapour atmosphere.


Nature | 2013

A sub-Mercury-sized exoplanet

Jason F. Rowe; Jack J. Lissauer; Daniel Huber; Francois Fressin; Steve B. Howell; Stephen T. Bryson; W. J. Chaplin; J.-M. Desert; Eric D. Lopez; Geoffrey W. Marcy; Fergal Mullally; Darin Ragozzine; Guillermo Torres; Elisabeth R. Adams; Eric Agol; D. Barrado; Sarbani Basu; Timothy R. Bedding; Lars A. Buchhave; David Charbonneau; Jessie L. Christiansen; Jørgen Christensen-Dalsgaard; David R. Ciardi; William D. Cochran; Andrea K. Dupree; Y. Elsworth; Mark E. Everett; Debra A. Fischer; Eric B. Ford; Jonathan J. Fortney

Since the discovery of the first exoplanets, it has been known that other planetary systems can look quite unlike our own. Until fairly recently, we have been able to probe only the upper range of the planet size distribution, and, since last year, to detect planets that are the size of Earth or somewhat smaller. Hitherto, no planets have been found that are smaller than those we see in the Solar System. Here we report a planet significantly smaller than Mercury. This tiny planet is the innermost of three that orbit the Sun-like host star, which we have designated Kepler-37. Owing to its extremely small size, similar to that of the Moon, and highly irradiated surface, the planet, Kepler-37b, is probably rocky with no atmosphere or water, similar to Mercury.


Nature | 2012

Alignment of the stellar spin with the orbits of a three-planet system

Roberto Sanchis-Ojeda; Daniel C. Fabrycky; Joshua N. Winn; Bruce D. Clarke; Eric B. Ford; Jonathan J. Fortney; John C. Geary; Matthew J. Holman; Andrew W. Howard; Jon M. Jenkins; David G. Koch; Jack J. Lissauer; Geoffrey W. Marcy; Fergal Mullally; Darin Ragozzine; Shawn E. Seader; Martin Still; Susan E. Thompson

The Sun’s equator and the planets’ orbital planes are nearly aligned, which is presumably a consequence of their formation from a single spinning gaseous disk. For exoplanetary systems this well-aligned configuration is not guaranteed: dynamical interactions may tilt planetary orbits, or stars may be misaligned with the protoplanetary disk through chaotic accretion , magnetic interactions or torques from neighbouring stars. Indeed, isolated ‘hot Jupiters’ are often misaligned and even orbiting retrograde. Here we report an analysis of transits of planets over starspots on the Sun-like star Kepler-30 (ref. 8), and show that the orbits of its three planets are aligned with the stellar equator. Furthermore, the orbits are aligned with one another to within a few degrees. This configuration is similar to that of our Solar System, and contrasts with the isolated hot Jupiters. The orderly alignment seen in the Kepler-30 system suggests that high obliquities are confined to systems that experienced disruptive dynamical interactions. Should this be corroborated by observations of other coplanar multi-planet systems, then star–disk misalignments would be ruled out as the explanation for the high obliquities of hot Jupiters, and dynamical interactions would be implicated as the origin of hot Jupiters.

Collaboration


Dive into the Susan E. Thompson's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jon M. Jenkins

University of British Columbia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jessie L. Christiansen

California Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jason F. Rowe

University of British Columbia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge