Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Susan Lea is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Susan Lea.


British Journal of Psychiatry | 2017

Costs of the police service and mental healthcare pathways experienced by individuals with enduring mental health needs

Margaret Heslin; Lynne Callaghan; Barbara Barrett; Susan Lea; Susan Eick; John F. Morgan; Mark Bolt; Graham Thornicroft; Diana Rose; Andrew Healey; Anita Patel

Background Substantial policy, communication and operational gaps exist between mental health services and the police for individuals with enduring mental health needs. Aims To map and cost pathways through mental health and police services, and to model the cost impact of implementing key policy recommendations. Method Within a case-linkage study, we estimated 1-year individual-level healthcare and policing costs. Using decision modelling, we then estimated the potential impact on costs of three recommended service enhancements: street triage, Mental Health Act assessments for all Section 136 detainees and outreach custody link workers. Results Under current care, average 1-year mental health and police costs were £10 812 and £4552 per individual respectively (n = 55). The cost per police incident was £522. Models suggested that each service enhancement would alter per incident costs by between −8% and +6%. Conclusions Recommended enhancements to care pathways only marginally increase individual-level costs.


Drug and Alcohol Review | 2017

Accounting for intimate partner violence perpetration. A cross-cultural comparison of English and Brazilian male substance users' explanations

Polly Radcliffe; Ana Flávia Pires Lucas d'Oliveira; Susan Lea; Wagner dos Santos Figueiredo; Gail Gilchrist

Abstract Introduction and Aims This paper describes how substance use features in the accounts of intimate partner violence (IPV) perpetrators in treatment in England and Brazil. The aim of the research was to better understand cross cultural constructions of IPV perpetration amongst men in treatment for substance use. Design and Methods Semi‐structured interviews were conducted with 40 men in community substance use treatment in Sao Paolo, Brazil and London and the South East of England who had reported IPV perpetration in a questionnaire survey. A thematic, narrative analysis was carried out of mens explanations for IPV perpetration. Findings Three types of narratives were distinguished: (i) disputes, centred on substance use, that escalate to IPV perpetration; (ii) IPV perpetration that is explained by uncharacteristic loss of control, as a result of intoxication; and (iii) IPV perpetration provoked by a perceived betrayal, in which substance use is incidental. In all types of accounts hegemonic principles of male and female roles and behaviour provided a context for and make IPV perpetration explicable. Discussion and Conclusions Substance use and IPV are culturally constructed and contextually defined. Understanding the meaning‐making of substance using IPV perpetrators has implications for the treatment of both substance abuse and IPV. [Radcliffe P, dOliveira AFPL, Lea S, dos Santos Figueiredo W, Gilchrist G. Accounting for intimate partner violence perpetration. A cross‐cultural comparison of English and Brazilian male substance users explanations. Drug Alcohol Rev 2017;36:64–71]


Journal of Foot and Ankle Research | 2015

Identifying factors which enhance capacity to engage in clinical education among podiatry practitioners: an action research project.

Sally Abey; Susan Lea; Lynne Callaghan; Steve Shaw; Debbie Cotton

BackgroundHealth profession students develop practical skills whilst integrating theory with practice in a real world environment as an important component of their training. Research in the area of practice placements has identified challenges and barriers to the delivery of effective placement learning. However, there has been little research in podiatry and the question of which factors impact upon clinical educators’ capacity to engage with the role remains an under-researched area. This paper presents the second phase of an action research project designed to determine the factors that impact upon clinical educators’ capacity to engage with the mentorship role.MethodsAn online survey was developed and podiatry clinical educators recruited through National Health Service (NHS) Trusts. The survey included socio-demographic items, and questions relating to the factors identified as possible variables influencing clinical educator capacity; the latter was assessed using the ‘Clinical Educator Capacity to Engage’ scale (CECE). Descriptive statistics were used to explore demographic data whilst the relationship between the CECE and socio-demographic factors were examined using inferential statistics in relation to academic profile, career profile and organisation of the placement.ResultsThe survey response rate was 42xa0% (nu2009=u200966). Multiple linear regression identified four independent variables which explain a significant proportion of the variability of the dependent variable, ‘capacity to engage with clinical education’, with an adjusted R2 of 0.428. The four variables were: protected mentorship time, clinical educator relationship with university, sign-off responsibility, and volunteer status.ConclusionThe identification of factors that impact upon clinical educators’ capacity to engage in mentoring of students has relevance for strategic planning and policy-making with the emphasis upon capacity-building at an individual level, so that the key attitudes and characteristics that are linked with good clinical supervision are preserved.


Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy | 2017

What IAPT CBT High-Intensity Trainees Do After Training

Sheena Liness; Susan Lea; Steffen Nestler; Hannah Parker; David M. Clark

BACKGROUNDnThe UK Department of Health Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) initiative set out to train a large number of therapists in cognitive behaviour therapies (CBT) for depression and anxiety disorders. Little is currently known about the retention of IAPT CBT trainees, or the use of CBT skills acquired on the course in the workplace after training has finished.nnnAIMSnThis study set out to conduct a follow-up survey of past CBT trainees on the IAPT High Intensity CBT Course at the Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), Kings College London (KCL), one of the largest IAPT High Intensity courses in the UK.nnnMETHODnPast trainees (n = 212) across 6 cohorts (2008-2014 intakes) were contacted and invited to participate in a follow-up survey. A response rate of 92.5% (n = 196) was achieved.nnnRESULTSnThe vast majority of IAPT trainees continue to work in IAPT services posttraining (79%) and to practise CBT as their main therapy modality (94%); 61% have become CBT supervisors. A minority (23%) have progressed to other senior roles in the services. Shortcomings are reported in the use of out-of-office CBT interventions, the use of disorder-specific outcome measures and therapy recordings to inform therapy and supervision.nnnCONCLUSIONSnPast trainees stay working in IAPT services and continue to use CBT methods taught on the course. Some NICE recommended treatment procedures that are likely to facilitate patients recovery are not being routinely implemented across IAPT services. The results have implications for the continued roll out of the IAPT programme, and other future large scale training initiatives.


Archive | 2015

Data collection fields

Susan Lea; Lynne Callaghan; Susan Eick; Margaret Heslin; John F. Morgan; Mark Bolt; Andrew Healey; Barbara Barrett; Diana Rose; Anita Patel; Graham Thornicroft


Archive | 2015

Stage 3: stakeholder consultation

Susan Lea; Lynne Callaghan; Susan Eick; Margaret Heslin; John F. Morgan; Mark Bolt; Andrew Healey; Barbara Barrett; Diana Rose; Anita Patel; Graham Thornicroft


Archive | 2015

Health economics component: unit costs

Susan Lea; Lynne Callaghan; Susan Eick; Margaret Heslin; John F. Morgan; Mark Bolt; Andrew Healey; Barbara Barrett; Diana Rose; Anita Patel; Graham Thornicroft


Archive | 2015

Stage 1: policy into practice review and clinical audit

Susan Lea; Lynne Callaghan; Susan Eick; Margaret Heslin; John F. Morgan; Mark Bolt; Andrew Healey; Barbara Barrett; Diana Rose; Anita Patel; Graham Thornicroft


Archive | 2015

Implementation strategy following clinical audit

Susan Lea; Lynne Callaghan; Susan Eick; Margaret Heslin; John F. Morgan; Mark Bolt; Andrew Healey; Barbara Barrett; Diana Rose; Anita Patel; Graham Thornicroft


Archive | 2015

Changes to project

Susan Lea; Lynne Callaghan; Susan Eick; Margaret Heslin; John F. Morgan; Mark Bolt; Andrew Healey; Barbara Barrett; Diana Rose; Anita Patel; Graham Thornicroft

Collaboration


Dive into the Susan Lea's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lynne Callaghan

Plymouth State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Susan Eick

Plymouth State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Anita Patel

Queen Mary University of London

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sally Abey

Plymouth State University

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge