Susan S. Alguindigue

Synthesis, characterization and molecular structures of six-coordinate manganese nitrosyl porphyrinsElectronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Molecular structure of (TTP)Mn(NO)(1-MeIm). See http://www.rsc.org/suppdata/dt/b3/b308143p/

Manganese(II) porphyrins are isoelectronic with iron(III) porphyrins, and previously reported work suggests that manganese nitrosyl porphyrins are good structural models for their kinetically unstable and biologically relevant ferric-NO analogues. We have prepared a new set of six-coordinate manganese nitrosyl porphyrins of the general form (por)Mn(NO)(L)(por = TTP, T(p-OCH3)PP; L = piperidine, methanol, 1-methylimidazole) in moderate to high yields. The (por)Mn(NO)(pip) complexes were prepared from the reductive nitrosylation of the (por)MnCl compounds with NO in the presence of piperidine. The IR spectra of the (por)Mn(NO)(pip) compounds as KBr pellets show new strong bands at 1746 cm(-1)(for TTP) and 1748 cm(-1)(for (T(p-OCH3)PP) due to the NO ligands. Attempted crystallization of one of these compounds (por = TTP) from dichloromethane-methanol resulted in the generation of the methanol complex (TTP)Mn(NO)(CH3OH). Reaction of the (por)Mn(NO)(pip) compounds with excess 1-methylimidazole gave the (por)Mn(NO)(1-MeIm) derivatives in good yields. The IR spectra of these compounds show nu(NO) bands that are approximately 12 cm(-1) lower than those of the (por)Mn(NO)(pip) precursors, indicative of greater Mn-->NO pi-backdonation in the 1-MeIm derivatives. X-Ray crystal structures of three of these compounds, namely (TTP)Mn(NO)(CH3OH), (TTP)Mn(NO)(1-MeIm) and (T(p-OCH3)PP)Mn(NO)(1-MeIm) were obtained, and reveal that the NO ligands in these complexes are linear.

Misdirected π-donor ligands: (η5-C5H5)2Zr(Cl) (SR) with sterically more demanding R groups have lower rotational barriers

Rotational barriers about the M-S bonds of 16-electron bent metallocene monothiolates (η 5 -C 5 H 5 ) 2 Zr(Cl) (SR) (R = −CH 3 , −CH 2 CH 3 , −CH(CH 3 ) 2 , −C(CH 3 ) 3 ) ( 1a–d ) have been measured by dynamic 1 H NMR methods: 32, 33, 35 and 26 kJ mol −1 , respectively. The ground-state orientation about the Zr-S bonds of 1 that maximizes Spπ → Mdπ bonding (Cl-Zr-S-R ≈ 90°) also maximizes CpR steric interaction, whereas the rotational transition-state orientation (Cl-Zr-S-R ≈ 0°) is one that minimizes Spπ → Mdπ bonding and maximizes ClR steric interaction. Deviation from a ground-state orientation that is ideal for Spπ → Mdπ bonding might be expected as the size of the R group and CpR steric interaction increases. Thus, the aberrant trend for the R = −C(CH 3 ) 3 derivative could be attributed to a ground-state steric effect where the sterically demanding −C(CH 3 ) 3 group forces an unfavorable (misdirected) orientation for Mdπ-Spπ bonding, but a favorable orientation with respect to CpR and ClR steric interactions. However, the solid-state structures of (η 5 -C 5 H 5 ) 2 Zr(SR) 2 (R = −CH 3 , −CH 2 CH 3 , −CH(CH 3 ) 2 , −C(CH 3 ) 3 ) ( 2a–d ) exhibit regular variation of their metric parameters as evidenced by their Zr-S-C bond angles of 108, 109, 113, and 124° and S-Zr-S′ bond angles of 97, 99, 100 and 106°, respectively. Neither the S′-Zr-S-R torsion angles nor the dihedral angles that describe the relationship between the S/Zr/S′ and Cp(centroid)/Zr/Cp′ (centroid) planes (both indicators of the relative orientation of the Zr dπ acceptor orbital and the thiolate S pπ donor orbital) reflect the steric demand of the R group. Thus, the size of the R group imposes a measured effect on the geometry of 2 and the tert-butyl group is not extraordinary. Although the enthalpic and entropic effects could not be deconvoluted for rotation about the Zr-S bond of 1 in the present study, literature precedents suggest that both enthalpic and entropic effects may play a role in determining the irregular trend that is observed.

Syntheses and molecular structures of ruthenium(II) complexes of the atropisomeric ligands 1,1′-biphenyl-2,2′-diamine and 3,3′-diamino-2,2′-bipyridine

Abstract The unique ligands of [Ru(bipy)2(bpda)](PF6)2 (1, bpda=1,1′-biphenyl-2,2′-diamine) and [Ru(bipy)2(dabipy)](PF6)2 (2, dabipy=3,3′-diamino-2,2′-bipyridine) are atropisomeric (exhibit hindered rotation about the sigma bonds that connect the two aromatic groups), so the complexes are diasteromeric with conformation isomers possible for the atropisomeric ligands and configurational isomers possible at the metal centers. Only one diastereomer is observed in the solid-state in both cases. The seven- (1) and five-membered (2) chelate ring of dabipy and bpda (the ligand is bound through its pyridyl groups) ligands are δ when the configuration at the metal is Δ. No evidence for atropisomerization is found in solution. For 1, we conclude bpda binds stereospecifically; however, the atropisomerization barrier of dabipy may be sufficiently low for 2 to preclude the observation of diastereomers by low-temperature NMR spectroscopy.