Suzana Barbosa

Affordances indutoras de inovação no jornalismo móvel de revistas para tablets

Este artigo examina a inovacao no jornalismo movel a partir do conceito de affordance aplicado no estudo de revistas para tablets em tres momentos definidos, entre 2010 e 2016. Criou-se uma ferramenta metodologica de analise com o objetivo de explorar os quatro conjuntos de affordances identificados: operacao, colecao, compartilhamento e multimidialidade. A partir destes grupos, pontuou-se a emersao de affordances inovadoras possibilitadas pelos recursos e funcionalidades dos tablets e que tambem permitem interacoes ineditas ou renovadas na relacao entre usuarios e revistas. Entre elas estao: ouvir, assistir, jogar, pesquisar, armazenar. A comparacao entre as revistas analisadas que mais se destacaram pela inovacao tambem revelou uma tendencia de estabilizacao de um formato para exploracao dos recursos e funcionalidades do tablet , apesar de reconhecermos que ha possibilidades ainda nao exploradas pelos produtos que tem o potencial de induzir mais inovacoes.

Estudos sobre jornalismo digital no Brasil

Who are the precursors in digital journalism research in Brazil? How many thesis and dissertations were already defended about this topic? What is the profile of these publications? These are some of the questions that we intend to answer in this article which proposes to outline a preliminary survey of the studies carried out during the first decade of development in this journalistic modality in the country. Our assumption is that there are four research clusters located in the Northeast, Center-west, Southeast and South regions of the country.

Beyound Prophecies: A critique of "news news' retrospective: is online news reaching its potential?"

From April 27 to 29, 1995, the Poynter Institute organized a seminar with specialists in the fi eld to discuss the future of digital journalism. After a decade had passed since that seminar, Professor Nora Paul wrote an article for the Online Journalism Review in which she commented on the predictions made when digital journalism was barely starting to try out production models adapted to the world of the networks. In this joint article by members of the Online Journalism Research Group (GJOL)1, we intend to establish a dialogue with Professor Paul’s text, contributing new elements to the analysis of this phenomenon that, from our viewpoint, should be considered as a complex of continuities, ruptures and potentialities with respect to the conventional model of journalistic practice. Our text is especially centered on three topics that merit comments and criticism in Paul’s text: 1) the absence of an explicit methodological reference; 2) the biased evaluation centered only on part of the American production; 3) the very limited approach in dealing with the peculiarities of the new practice.