Swagoto Mukhopadhyay

Global cancer surgery: delivering safe, affordable, and timely cancer surgery

Surgery is essential for global cancer care in all resource settings. Of the 15.2 million new cases of cancer in 2015, over 80% of cases will need surgery, some several times. By 2030, we estimate that annually 45 million surgical procedures will be needed worldwide. Yet, less than 25% of patients with cancer worldwide actually get safe, affordable, or timely surgery. This Commission on global cancer surgery, building on Global Surgery 2030, has examined the state of global cancer surgery through an analysis of the burden of surgical disease and breadth of cancer surgery, economics and financing, factors for strengthening surgical systems for cancer with multiple-country studies, the research agenda, and the political factors that frame policy making in this area. We found wide equity and economic gaps in global cancer surgery. Many patients throughout the world do not have access to cancer surgery, and the failure to train more cancer surgeons and strengthen systems could result in as much as US

Global Surgery 2030: a roadmap for high income country actors

6.2 trillion in lost cumulative gross domestic product by 2030. Many of the key adjunct treatment modalities for cancer surgery--e.g., pathology and imaging--are also inadequate. Our analysis identified substantial issues, but also highlights solutions and innovations. Issues of access, a paucity of investment in public surgical systems, low investment in research, and training and education gaps are remarkably widespread. Solutions include better regulated public systems, international partnerships, super-centralisation of surgical services, novel surgical clinical trials, and new approaches to improve quality and scale up cancer surgical systems through education and training. Our key messages are directed at many global stakeholders, but the central message is that to deliver safe, affordable, and timely cancer surgery to all, surgery must be at the heart of global and national cancer control planning.

Global surgical and anaesthetic task shifting: a systematic literature review and survey

The Millennium Development Goals have ended and the Sustainable Development Goals have begun, marking a shift in the global health landscape. The frame of reference has changed from a focus on 8 development priorities to an expansive set of 17 interrelated goals intended to improve the well-being of all people. In this time of change, several groups, including the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery, have brought a critical problem to the fore: 5 billion people lack access to safe, affordable surgical and anaesthesia care when needed. The magnitude of this problem and the worlds new focus on strengthening health systems mandate reimagined roles for and renewed commitments from high income country actors in global surgery. To discuss the way forward, on 6 May 2015, the Commission held its North American launch event in Boston, Massachusetts. Panels of experts outlined the current state of knowledge and agreed on the roles of surgical colleges and academic medical centres; trainees and training programmes; academia; global health funders; the biomedical devices industry, and news media and advocacy organisations in building sustainable, resilient surgical systems. This paper summarises these discussions and serves as a consensus statement providing practical advice to these groups. It traces a common policy agenda between major actors and provides a roadmap for maximising benefit to surgical patients worldwide. To close the access gap by 2030, individuals and organisations must work collectively, interprofessionally and globally. High income country actors must abandon colonial narratives and work alongside low and middle income country partners to build the surgical systems of the future.

Safe Surgery for All: Early Lessons from Implementing a National Government-Driven Surgical Plan in Ethiopia

BACKGROUND Billions of people worldwide lack access to surgical care; this is in part driven by severe shortages in the global surgical workforce. Task shifting, the movement of tasks to associate clinicians or non-specialist physicians, is a commonly implemented yet often contentious strategy to expand the surgical workforce. A more complete understanding of the global distribution and use of surgical and anaesthetic task shifting is needed to strengthen strategic planning efforts to bridge the gap between surgical and anaesthetic providers. We aimed to document the use of task shifting worldwide with an in-depth review of the literature and subsequent confirmation of practices through a provider survey. METHODS We did a literature search according to PRISMA guidelines. We searched PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, CINAHL, WHOLIS, and five regional databases for journal articles published between Jan 1, 1995, and Aug 29, 2014, for titles or abstracts mentioning surgical or anaesthetic care provision by associate clinicians or non-specialist physicians. We also searched article references and online resources. We extracted data for health cadres performing task shifting, the types of tasks performed, training programmes, and supervision of those performing tasks and compared these across regions and income groups. Additionally, we then undertook an unvalidated survey to investigate the use of task shifting at the country level, which was sent to surgeons and anaesthetists in 19 countries across all major regions of the world. FINDINGS We identified 62 studies. The review and survey provided data for 163 and 51 countries respectively, totalling 174 countries. Surgical task shifting occured in 30 (33%) of 92 countries. Anaesthetic task shifting occured in 108 (65%) of 165 countries. Task shifting was documented across all World Bank income groups. Where relevant data were available, in high-income countries, associate clinicians were commonly supervised (100% [four countries] for surgery and 90% [20 countries] for anaesthesia). In low-income countries, associate clinicians undertook surgical and anaesthetic procedures without supervision (100% for surgery [five countries] and 100% for anaesthesia [22 countries]). INTERPRETATION Task shifting is used to augment the global surgical workforce across all geographical regions and income groups. Associate clinicians are ubiquitous among the global surgical workforce and should be considered in plans to scale up the surgical workforce in countries with workforce shortages. Reporting bias is likely to have favoured the more novel and successful task shifting initiatives, which could have caused our results to underestimate the absolute number of countries that use task shifting. Although surgical and anaesthetic task shifting has been described in many countries, further research is required to assess outcomes, especially in low-income and middle-income countries where supervision is less robust. FUNDING None.

Neurosurgical Care: Availability and Access in Low-Income and Middle-Income Countries

Recognizing the unmet need for surgical care in Ethiopia, the Federal Ministry of Health (FMOH) has pioneered innovative methodologies for surgical system development with Saving Lives through Safe Surgery (SaLTS). SaLTS is a national flagship initiative designed to improve access to safe, essential and emergency surgical and anaesthesia care across all levels of the healthcare system. Sustained commitment from the FMOH and their recruitment of implementing partners has led to notable accomplishments across the breadth of the surgical system, including but not limited to: (1) Leadership, management and governance—a nationally scaled surgical leadership and mentorship programme, (2) Infrastructure—operating room construction and oxygen delivery plan, (3) Supplies and logistics—a national essential surgical procedure and equipment list, (4) Human resource development—a Surgical Workforce Expansion Plan and Anaesthesia National Roadmap, (5) Advocacy and partnership—strong FMOH partnership with international organizations, including GE Foundation’s SafeSurgery2020 initiative, (6) Innovation—facility-driven identification of problems and solutions, (7) Quality of surgical and anaesthesia care service delivery—a national peri-operative guideline and WHO Surgical Safety Checklist implementation, and (8) Monitoring and evaluation—a comprehensive plan for short-term and long-term assessment of surgical quality and capacity. As Ethiopia progresses with its commitment to prioritize surgery within its Health Sector Transformation Plan, disseminating the process and outcomes of the SaLTS initiative will inform other countries on successful national implementation strategies. The following article describes the process by which the Ethiopian FMOH established surgical system reform and the preliminary results of implementation across these eight pillars.

Laparoscopic Versus Open Cholecystectomy: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis at Rwanda Military Hospital.

BACKGROUND An estimated 5 billion people worldwide lack access to basic surgical care. In particular, the vast majority of low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) currently struggle to provide adequate neurosurgical services. Significant barriers exist, including limited access to trained medical, nursing, and allied health staff; lack of equipment; and availability of services at reasonable distance and at reasonable cost to patients. An accurate assessment of current neurosurgical capacity in LIMCs is an essential first step in tackling this deficit. OBJECTIVE To quantify the neurosurgical operational capacity and assess access to neurosurgical services in LMICs, by taking into account the location of workforce and services. METHODS A total of 141 LMICs were contacted and asked to report the number of currently practicing neurosurgeons, access to computed tomographic and magnetic resonance imaging, and availability of neurosurgical equipment (microscope, endoscope, bipolar diathermy, high-speed neurosurgical drill). A proposed World Federation of Neurosurgeons classification was used to stratify cities based on the level of neurosurgical care that could be provided. The data were geocoded and analyzed in Redivis (Redivis Inc.) to assess the percentage of the population covered within a 2-hour travel time of a city offering differing levels of neurosurgical care. RESULTS 68 countries provided complete data (response rate, 48.2%). Eleven countries reported having no practicing neurosurgeons. The average percentage of the population with access to neurosurgical services within a 2-hour window is 25.26% in sub-Saharan Africa, 62.3% in Latin America and the Caribbean, 29.64% in East Asia and the Pacific, 52.83% in South Asia, 79.65% in the Middle East and North Africa, and 93.3% in Eastern Europe and Central Asia. CONCLUSIONS There are several challenges to the provision of adequate neurosurgical services in low-resource settings. This study used mapping techniques to determine the current global neurosurgical workforce capacity and distribution. We have used our findings to identify areas for improvement. These include increasing and improving neurosurgical training programs worldwide, recruiting students and young physicians into the field, and retaining existing neurosurgeons within their home countries.

Guide to research in academic global surgery: A statement of the Society of University Surgeons Global Academic Surgery Committee

BackgroundLaparoscopic cholecystectomy is first-line treatment for uncomplicated gallstone disease in high-income countries due to benefits such as shorter hospital stays, reduced morbidity, more rapid return to work, and lower mortality as well-being considered cost-effective. However, there persists a lack of uptake in low- and middle-income countries. Thus, there is a need to evaluate laparoscopic cholecystectomy in comparison with an open approach in these settings.MethodsA cost–effectiveness analysis was performed to evaluate laparoscopic and open cholecystectomies at Rwanda Military Hospital (RMH), a tertiary care referral hospital in Rwanda. Sensitivity and threshold analyses were performed to determine the robustness of the results.ResultsThe laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy costs and effectiveness values were

Quality of essential surgical care in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of the literature

2664.47 with 0.87 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and

The Economic Case for Surgical Care in Low-Resource Settings

2058.72 with 0.75 QALYs, respectively. The incremental cost–effectiveness ratio for laparoscopic over open cholecystectomy was

Effect of removing the barrier of transportation costs on surgical utilisation in Guinea, Madagascar and the Republic of Congo

4946.18. Results are sensitive to the initial laparoscopic equipment investment and number of cases performed annually but robust to other parameters. The laparoscopic intervention is more cost-effective with investment costs less than