Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Szu-Chuan Hsieh is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Szu-Chuan Hsieh.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2007

Identification of a peripheral blood transcriptional biomarker panel associated with operational renal allograft tolerance

Sophie Brouard; Elaine Mansfield; Christophe Braud; Li Li; Magali Giral; Szu-Chuan Hsieh; Dominique Baeten; Meixia Zhang; Joanna Ashton-Chess; Cécile Braudeau; Frank Hsieh; Alexandre Dupont; Annaik Pallier; Anne Moreau; Stéphanie Louis; Catherine Ruiz; Oscar Salvatierra; Jean-Paul Soulillou; Minnie M. Sarwal

Long-term allograft survival generally requires lifelong immunosuppression (IS). Rarely, recipients display spontaneous “operational tolerance” with stable graft function in the absence of IS. The lack of biological markers of this phenomenon precludes identification of potentially tolerant patients in which IS could be tapered and hinders the development of new tolerance-inducing strategies. The objective of this study was to identify minimally invasive blood biomarkers for operational tolerance and use these biomarkers to determine the frequency of this state in immunosuppressed patients with stable graft function. Blood gene expression profiles from 75 renal-transplant patient cohorts (operational tolerance/acute and chronic rejection/stable graft function on IS) and 16 healthy individuals were analyzed. A subset of samples was used for microarray analysis where three-class comparison of the different groups of patients identified a “tolerant footprint” of 49 genes. These biomarkers were applied for prediction of operational tolerance by microarray and real-time PCR in independent test groups. Thirty-three of 49 genes correctly segregated tolerance and chronic rejection phenotypes with 99% and 86% specificity. The signature is shared with 1 of 12 and 5 of 10 stable patients on triple IS and low-dose steroid monotherapy, respectively. The gene signature suggests a pattern of reduced costimulatory signaling, immune quiescence, apoptosis, and memory T cell responses. This study identifies in the blood of kidney recipients a set of genes associated with operational tolerance that may have utility as a minimally invasive monitoring tool for guiding IS titration. Further validation of this tool for safe IS minimization in prospective clinical trials is warranted.


Journal of The American Society of Nephrology | 2009

Expression of Complement Components Differs Between Kidney Allografts from Living and Deceased Donors

Maarten Naesens; Li Li; Lihua Ying; Poonam Sansanwal; Tara K. Sigdel; Szu-Chuan Hsieh; Neeraja Kambham; Evelyne Lerut; Oscar Salvatierra; Atul J. Butte; Minnie M. Sarwal

A disparity remains between graft survival of renal allografts from deceased donors and from living donors. A better understanding of the molecular mechanisms that underlie this disparity may allow the development of targeted therapies to enhance graft survival. Here, we used microarrays to examine whole genome expression profiles using tissue from 53 human renal allograft protocol biopsies obtained both at implantation and after transplantation. The gene expression profiles of living-donor kidneys and pristine deceased-donor kidneys (normal histology, young age) were significantly different before reperfusion at implantation. Deceased-donor kidneys exhibited a significant increase in renal expression of complement genes; posttransplantation biopsies from well-functioning, nonrejecting kidneys, regardless of donor source, also demonstrated a significant increase in complement expression. Peritransplantation phenomena, such as donor death and possibly cold ischemia time, contributed to differences in complement pathway gene expression. In addition, complement gene expression at the time of implantation was associated with both early and late graft function. These data suggest that complement-modulating therapy may improve graft outcomes in renal transplantation.


Kidney International | 2008

Characterization of intra-graft B cells during renal allograft rejection

Valeriya Zarkhin; Neeraja Kambham; Li Li; Shirley Kwok; Szu-Chuan Hsieh; Oscar Salvatierra; Minnie M. Sarwal

Intra-graft CD20(+) B-cell clusters are found during acute rejection of renal allografts and correlate with graft recovery following rejection injury. Here using archived kidney tissue we conducted immunohistochemical studies to measure specific subsets of pathogenic B cells during graft rejection. Cluster-forming CD20(+) B cells in the rejected graft are likely derived from the recipient and are composed of mature B cells. These cells are activated (CD79a(+)), and present MHC Class II antigen (HLADR(+)) to CD4(+) T cells. Some of these clusters contained memory B cells (CD27(+)) and they did not correlate with intra-graft C4d deposition or with detection of donor-specific antibody. Further, several non-cluster forming CD20(-) B-lineage CD38(+) plasmablasts and plasma cells were found to infiltrate the rejected grafts and these cells strongly correlated with circulating donor-specific antibody, and to a lesser extent with intra-graft C4d. Both CD20(+) B cells and CD38(+) cells correlated with poor response of the rejection to steroids. Reduced graft survival was associated with the presence of CD20 cells in the graft. In conclusion, a specific subset of early lineage B cells appears to be an antigen-presenting cell and which when present in the rejected graft may support a steroid-resistant T-cell-mediated cellular rejection. Late lineage interstitial plasmablasts and plasma cells may also support humoral rejection. These studies suggest that detailed analysis of interstitial cellular infiltrates may allow better use of B-cell lineage specific treatments to improve graft outcomes.


American Journal of Transplantation | 2012

A Peripheral Blood Diagnostic Test for Acute Rejection in Renal Transplantation

Li Li; Purvesh Khatri; Tara K. Sigdel; Tim Q. Tran; Lihua Ying; Matthew J. Vitalone; Amery Chen; Szu-Chuan Hsieh; Hong Dai; Meixia Zhang; Maarten Naesens; Valeriya Zarkhin; Poonam Sansanwal; Ron Chen; Michael Mindrinos; Wenzhong Xiao; M. Benfield; Robert B. Ettenger; Vikas R. Dharnidharka; Robert S. Mathias; Anthony A. Portale; Ruth A. McDonald; William E. Harmon; David B. Kershaw; V. M. Vehaskari; Elaine S. Kamil; H. J. Baluarte; Bradley A. Warady; Ronald W. Davis; Atul J. Butte

Monitoring of renal graft status through peripheral blood (PB) rather than invasive biopsy is important as it will lessen the risk of infection and other stresses, while reducing the costs of rejection diagnosis. Blood gene biomarker panels were discovered by microarrays at a single center and subsequently validated and cross‐validated by QPCR in the NIH SNSO1 randomized study from 12 US pediatric transplant programs. A total of 367 unique human PB samples, each paired with a graft biopsy for centralized, blinded phenotype classification, were analyzed (115 acute rejection (AR), 180 stable and 72 other causes of graft injury). Of the differentially expressed genes by microarray, Q‐PCR analysis of a five gene‐set (DUSP1, PBEF1, PSEN1, MAPK9 and NKTR) classified AR with high accuracy. A logistic regression model was built on independent training‐set (n = 47) and validated on independent test‐set (n = 198)samples, discriminating AR from STA with 91% sensitivity and 94% specificity and AR from all other non‐AR phenotypes with 91% sensitivity and 90% specificity. The 5‐gene set can diagnose AR potentially avoiding the need for invasive renal biopsy. These data support the conduct of a prospective study to validate the clinical predictive utility of this diagnostic tool.


PLOS Computational Biology | 2010

Differentially Expressed RNA from Public Microarray Data Identifies Serum Protein Biomarkers for Cross-Organ Transplant Rejection and Other Conditions

Rong Chen; Tara K. Sigdel; Li Li; Neeraja Kambham; Joel T. Dudley; Szu-Chuan Hsieh; R. Bryan Klassen; Amery Chen; Tuyen Caohuu; Alexander A. Morgan; Hannah A. Valantine; Kiran K. Khush; Minnie M. Sarwal; Atul J. Butte

Serum proteins are routinely used to diagnose diseases, but are hard to find due to low sensitivity in screening the serum proteome. Public repositories of microarray data, such as the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), contain RNA expression profiles for more than 16,000 biological conditions, covering more than 30% of United States mortality. We hypothesized that genes coding for serum- and urine-detectable proteins, and showing differential expression of RNA in disease-damaged tissues would make ideal diagnostic protein biomarkers for those diseases. We showed that predicted protein biomarkers are significantly enriched for known diagnostic protein biomarkers in 22 diseases, with enrichment significantly higher in diseases for which at least three datasets are available. We then used this strategy to search for new biomarkers indicating acute rejection (AR) across different types of transplanted solid organs. We integrated three biopsy-based microarray studies of AR from pediatric renal, adult renal and adult cardiac transplantation and identified 45 genes upregulated in all three. From this set, we chose 10 proteins for serum ELISA assays in 39 renal transplant patients, and discovered three that were significantly higher in AR. Interestingly, all three proteins were also significantly higher during AR in the 63 cardiac transplant recipients studied. Our best marker, serum PECAM1, identified renal AR with 89% sensitivity and 75% specificity, and also showed increased expression in AR by immunohistochemistry in renal, hepatic and cardiac transplant biopsies. Our results demonstrate that integrating gene expression microarray measurements from disease samples and even publicly-available data sets can be a powerful, fast, and cost-effective strategy for the discovery of new diagnostic serum protein biomarkers.


Journal of The American Society of Nephrology | 2012

Non-HLA antibodies to immunogenic epitopes predict the evolution of chronic renal allograft injury

Tara K. Sigdel; Li Li; Tim Q. Tran; Purvesh Khatri; Maarten Naesens; Poonam Sansanwal; Hong Dai; Szu-Chuan Hsieh; Minnie M. Sarwal

Chronic allograft injury (CAI) results from a humoral response to mismatches in immunogenic epitopes between the donor and recipient. Although alloantibodies against HLA antigens contribute to the pathogenesis of CAI, alloantibodies against non-HLA antigens likely contribute as well. Here, we used high-density protein arrays to identify non-HLA antibodies in CAI and subsequently validated a subset in a cohort of 172 serum samples collected serially post-transplantation. There were 38 de novo non-HLA antibodies that significantly associated with the development of CAI (P<0.01) on protocol post-transplant biopsies, with enrichment of their corresponding antigens in the renal cortex. Baseline levels of preformed antibodies to MIG (also called CXCL9), ITAC (also called CXCL11), IFN-γ, and glial-derived neurotrophic factor positively correlated with histologic injury at 24 months. Measuring levels of these four antibodies could help clinicians predict the development of CAI with >80% sensitivity and 100% specificity. In conclusion, pretransplant serum levels of a defined panel of alloantibodies targeting non-HLA immunogenic antigens associate with histologic CAI in the post-transplant period. Validation in a larger, prospective transplant cohort may lead to a noninvasive method to predict and monitor for CAI.


Pediatric Transplantation | 2003

Increased expression of cytotoxic effector molecules: Different interpretations for steroid‐based and steroid‐free immunosuppression

Thomas Satterwhite; Mei-Sze Chua; Szu-Chuan Hsieh; Stella Chang; John D. Scandling; Oscar Salvatierra; Minnie M. Sarwal

Abstract: Cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) effector molecules have been studied as markers of acute rejection in renal allograft recipients on steroid‐based immunosuppression. We hypothesized that basal CTL gene expression may vary with time post‐transplantation as well as with different immunosuppression protocols (steroid‐based or steroid‐free). Variations in CTL gene expression may thus impact on the ability to predict acute allograft rejection. We used the non‐invasive method of quantitative competitive‐reverse transcription‐polymerase chain reaction (QC‐RT‐PCR) to quantify the amounts of CTL effector molecules (granulysin, GL; perforin, P; granzyme B, GB) in serial peripheral blood lymphocyte (PBL) samples from steroid‐free and steroid‐based adult and pediatric renal allograft recipients. Patients on both protocols were clinically monitored by protocol biopsies at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post‐transplantation and for graft function at 1 yr post‐transplantation in a separate clinical study. Steroid‐free patients with stable graft function showed an increase in GL, P, and GB gene expression over time post‐transplantation with the increase being seen largely by the first post‐transplant month. A further increase in GL expression was noted at the end of the first post‐transplant year in the absence of acute rejection, whereas GB and P levels were unchanged. At comparative time‐points post‐transplantation, CTL genes were found to be higher in steroid‐free patients with stable graft function, compared to steroid‐based recipients with either clinically stable graft function or acute rejection. This study suggests that levels of CTL gene expression, although important in a steroid‐based regimen to monitor the risk of acute rejection, may not be similarly applied in patients on steroid‐free immunosuppression. The early increase in levels seen in steroid‐free patients appears to correlate with the total absence of steroids. As steroid‐free patients seem to have a lower incidence of acute rejection and better long‐term graft function at 1 yr, the early increase in CTL genes in the absence of acute rejection may suggest an early adaptive immune activation response, promoting early graft acceptance in this protocol.


Journal of The American Society of Nephrology | 2013

The Clinical Impact of Humoral Immunity in Pediatric Renal Transplantation

Abanti Chaudhuri; Mikki Ozawa; Matthew J. Everly; Ettenger Rb; Vikas R. Dharnidharka; Mark C. Benfield; Robert S. Mathias; Anthony A. Portale; Ruth A. McDonald; William E. Harmon; David B. Kershaw; V. Matti Vehaskari; Elaine S. Kamil; H. Jorge Baluarte; Bradley A. Warady; Li Li; Tara K. Sigdel; Szu-Chuan Hsieh; Hong Dai; Maarten Naesens; Janie Waskerwitz; Oscar Salvatierra; Paul I. Terasaki; Minnie M. Sarwal

The development of anti-donor humoral responses after transplantation associates with higher risks for acute rejection and 1-year graft survival in adults, but the influence of humoral immunity on transplant outcomes in children is not well understood. Here, we studied the evolution of humoral immunity in low-risk pediatric patients during the first 2 years after renal transplantation. Using data from 130 pediatric renal transplant patients randomized to steroid-free (SF) or steroid-based (SB) immunosuppression in the NIH-SNSO1 trial, we correlated the presence of serum anti-HLA antibodies to donor HLA antigens (donor-specific antibodies) and serum MHC class 1-related chain A (MICA) antibody with both clinical outcomes and histology identified on protocol biopsies at 0, 6, 12, and 24 months. We detected de novo antibodies after transplant in 24% (23% of SF group and 25% of SB group), most often after the first year. Overall, 22% developed anti-HLA antibodies, of which 6% were donor-specific antibodies, and 6% developed anti-MICA antibody. Presence of these antibodies de novo associated with significantly higher risks for acute rejection (P=0.02), chronic graft injury (P=0.02), and decline in graft function (P=0.02). In summary, antibodies to HLA and MICA antigens appear in approximately 25% of unsensitized pediatric patients, placing them at greater risk for acute and chronic rejection with accelerated loss of graft function. Avoiding steroids does not seem to modify this incidence. Whether serial assessments of these antibodies after transplant could guide individual tailoring of immunosuppression requires additional study.


Transplantation | 2013

A rapid noninvasive assay for the detection of renal transplant injury.

Tara K. Sigdel; Matthew J. Vitalone; Tim Q. Tran; Hong Dai; Szu-Chuan Hsieh; Oscar Salvatierra; Minnie M. Sarwal

Background The copy number of donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) in blood correlates with acute rejection (AR) in heart transplantation. We analyzed urinary dd-cfDNA as a surrogate marker of kidney transplant injury. Methods Sixty-three biopsy-matched urine samples (41 stable and 22 allograft injury) were analyzed from female recipients of male donors for chromosome Y (donor)–specific dd-cfDNA. All biopsies were semiquantitatively scored by a single pathologist. Standard statistical measures of correlation and significance were used. Results There was baseline scatter for urinary dd-cfDNA/&mgr;g urine creatinine across different patients, even at the time of stable graft (STA) function (undetected to 12.26 copies). The mean urinary dd-cfDNA in AR (20.5±13.9) was significantly greater compared with STA (2.4±3.3; P<0.0001) or those with chronic allograft injury (CAI; 2.4±2.4; P=0.001) but no different from BK virus nephropathy (BKVN; 20.3±15.7; P=0.98). In AR and BKVN, the intrapatient drift was highly significant versus STA or CAI patients (10.3±7.4 in AR; 12.3±8.4 in BKVN vs. −0.5±3.5 in STA and 2.3±2.6 in CAI; P<0.05). Urinary dd-cfDNA correlated with protein/creatinine ratio (r=0.48; P<0.014) and calculated glomerular filtration rate (r=−0.52; P<0.007) but was most sensitive for acute allograft injury (area under the curve=0.80; P<0.0006; 95% confidence interval, 0.67–0.93). Conclusion Urinary dd-cfDNA after renal transplantation has patient specific thresholds, reflecting the apoptotic injury load of the donor organ. Serial monitoring of urinary dd-cfDNA can be a surrogate sensitive biomarker of acute injury in the donor organ but lacks the specificity to distinguish between AR and BKVN injury.


Journal of The American Society of Nephrology | 2015

A Three-Gene Assay for Monitoring Immune Quiescence in Kidney Transplantation

Silke Roedder; Li Li; Michael N. Alonso; Szu-Chuan Hsieh; Minh Thien Vu; Hong Dai; Tara K. Sigdel; Ian C. Bostock; Camila Macedo; A. Zeevi; Ron Shapiro; Oscar Salvatierra; John D. Scandling; Josefina Alberú; Edgar G. Engleman; Minnie M. Sarwal

Organ transplant recipients face life-long immunosuppression and consequently are at high risk of comorbidities. Occasionally, kidney transplant recipients develop a state of targeted immune quiescence (operational tolerance) against an HLA-mismatched graft, allowing them to withdraw all immunosuppression and retain stable graft function while resuming immune responses to third-party antigens. Methods to better understand and monitor this state of alloimmune quiescence by transcriptional profiling may reveal a gene signature that identifies patients for whom immunosuppression could be titrated to reduce patient and graft morbidities. Therefore, we investigated 571 unique peripheral blood samples from 348 HLA-mismatched renal transplant recipients and 101 nontransplant controls in a four-stage study including microarray, quantitative PCR, and flow cytometry analyses. We report a refined and highly validated (area under the curve, 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.92 to 0.97) peripheral blood three-gene assay (KLF6, BNC2, CYP1B1) to detect the state of operational tolerance by quantitative PCR. The frequency of predicted alloimmune quiescence in stable renal transplant patients receiving long-term immunosuppression (n=150) was 7.3% by the three-gene assay. Targeted cell sorting of peripheral blood from operationally tolerant patients showed a significant shift in the ratio of circulating monocyte-derived dendritic cells with significantly different expression of the genes constituting the three-gene assay. Our results suggest that incorporation of patient screening by specific cellular and gene expression assays may support the safety of drug minimization trials and protocols.

Collaboration


Dive into the Szu-Chuan Hsieh's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Tara K. Sigdel

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Li Li

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Maarten Naesens

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Hong Dai

California Pacific Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge