T A Gonwa

The use of marginal donors for liver transplantation: A retrospective study of 365 liver donors

A total of 365 donor hepatectomies performed between May 1985 and March 1990 were reviewed and analyzed retrospectively to identify risk factors associated with poor graft function and to study the outcome of grafts retrieved from marginal donors. The donor mean age was 27.1 years (8-69 years). Mean ICU donor stay was 2.7 days (range 0 to 18 days), and the mean ischemic time was 8.6 hr (range 3 to 22 hr). The pancreas was retrieved in 39 donors. Donors weight above 100 kg was the only variable found to be associated with both significantly increased 3-month graft loss (P less than 0.01) and early hepatocellular damage--AST or ALT greater than 2000 U/ml, 1st day posttransplant (P less than 0.02). Prolonged stay in the ICU (greater than 3 days), although associated with a significantly increased rate of hepatocellular damage (P less than 0.05), did not affect early graft survival. A systolic blood pressure less than 90 mmHg despite the use of high-dose dopamine (greater than 15 micrograms/mg/min), but not each of these variables itself, was also associated with a significantly increase rate of hepatocellular damage (P less than 0.001). All other variables, including age greater than 50, ischemic time greater than 12 hr, combined liver-pancreas procurement, and liver function test abnormalities, did not affect the outcome. We conclude that extending our limits to accept donors of the higher age group and those who have moderately abnormal liver function tests or a prolonged ischemic time will not jeopardize our results. It is suggested to perform liver biopsy in overweight donors during the retrieval to prevent using grafts with severe fatty infiltration. It is hypothesized that hormonal changes, starvation, and increased risk to develop infection might jeopardize the outcome of grafts from donors with a prolonged ICU stay. Although 70% of the early hepatocellular injuries are reversible, the remaining 30% result in graft failure.

HEPATIC ARTERY STENOSIS AFTER LIVER TRANSPLANTATION-INCIDENCE, PRESENTATION, TREATMENT, AND LONG TERM OUTCOME1

Little is known about hepatic artery (HA) patency and patient clinical course when the nonthrombosed HA has been revised. We undertook this study to evaluate the risk factors in the development of HA stenosis and to assess the impact of HA revision on the outcome. A total of 857 adult consecutive OLT in 780 patients performed over a 6-year period were studied. Patients who underwent revision of their nonthrombosed but stenotic HA were reviewed for patient/graft survival, method of HA revision, incidence of biliary strictures, and long-term HA patency. Overall 39 patients (5%) with 41 allografts underwent HA revision for stenosis. Median time to diagnosis was 100 days posttransplant (range 1-1220 days). HA flow at the time of OLT was found to be the only significant variable of an anastomotic stenosis. No risk factor could be identified for the graft HA stenosis. Treatment methods included resection of the stenotic segment with primary reanastomosis (n = 17), aortohepatic iliac artery graft (n = 11), interposition vein graft (n = 4), vein patch angioplasty (n = 2), interposition artery graft (n = 1), and percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty (n = 6). Postrevisional HA patency was demonstrated in 32 (78%) cases. At a median follow-up of 25 months, 26 patients (67%) were asymptomatic with good liver function. Nine patients had developed biliary strictures. Seven patients had undergone retransplantation and 8 patients had died. The actuarial patient and graft survivals at 4 years in the patients with revised HA were 65% and 56%, respectively. HA stenosis requiring revision is an infrequent occurrence after OLT. Long-term patency of the revised HA is good. Revision of the HA may help prevent biliary strictures and allow for good long-term graft function in the majority of patients.

Readmission to the intensive care unit after liver transplantation

ObjectiveWe undertook this study to understand the factors at our transplant center that contribute to patients’ return to the ICU after their liver transplant and their initial discharge from that unit. Patients who, after liver transplantation, fail discharge from the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and must be readmitted to that unit may well utilize many more resources than those patients who are well enough to stay out of the ICU. DesignA retrospective review of a prospectively maintained liver transplant research database followed by a retrospective review of (a subgroup) patient charts and contemporaneous controls. SettingA large metropolitan tertiary care center and adult liver transplant center. PatientsA total of 1,197 consecutive adult patients who underwent their initial liver transplantation from 1984 to 1996. InterventionReadmission to the intensive care unit after adult liver transplantation and discharge from that unit. Main ResultsOnly recipient age, pretransplant synthetic function labs (protime and albumin), bilirubin levels, and intraoperative blood product requirements could be statistically linked to the group requiring ICU readmission. The primary etiology for ICU readmission was cardiopulmonary deterioration. Readmission was associated with significantly lower patient and graft survivals. A detailed review of 23 patients transplanted from October 1994 to June 1996 was made, with special emphasis on cardiopulmonary status (hemodynamics, respiratory variables, and chest radiograph findings). This subgroup was compared with 30 temporally matched controls who were not readmitted to the ICU. Intravascular fluid overload and lower inspiratory capacity were significant factors related to ICU readmission. Readmitted patients had a longer hospitalization with higher hospital charges than the control group. ConclusionsWe conclude that the most important means of preventing ICU readmission in liver transplantation patients is to optimize cardiopulmonary function and status. Close monitoring of fluid balance to avoid hypervolemia is essential. Readmitted patients have a greater resource utilization and have lower survival rates.

A comparison of UW with eurocollins preservation solution in liver transplantation

Fifty consecutive liver transplants were performed using livers perfused with and stored in University of Wisconsin preservation solution. These grafts were compared with the preceding 55 consecutive transplants performed using livers perfused and preserved with Eurocollins solution. The purpose of the study was to determine if organs preserved with UW solution functioned better after transplantation than organs preserved with Eurocollins. Extensive retrospective analysis of prospectively accumulated data included enzyme levels through 30 days, cost and length of hospital stay, blood product usage, and ischemia time. Average age of patients in the UW group was 47.1 years compared with 39.6 years in the EC group (P less than 0.05); cold ischemia time was 7.21 hr in the UW group compared with 5.21 in EC (P = 0.0001). Total bilirubin values were significantly lower on days 0-6 and day 14, but not day 30, in the UW group. Aspartate aminotransferase was significantly lower in the UW group on days 0-1, 3-6, and 14, but not on day 3 or day 30. Prothrombin times were significantly lower in the UW group across all times (days 0-6, 14, and 30). Intraoperative and postoperative use of packed red blood cells and fresh frozen plasma was lower in the UW group (P less than or equal to .05). Also, total hospital days, intensive care unit days, and hospital cost to the patient were lower in the UW group (P less than or equal to .05). A second analysis was done comparing only nonemergent transplants from both groups. These results confirmed the initial analysis of a longer cold ischemia time in the UW group (P less than 0.001), and improved enzyme values in the TBR, AST, and PT in the UW group (P less than 0.05). Also, hospital cost in the UW group was again lower (P less than 0.05). In this nonrandomized study, the cold ischemia time was increased but kept close to that of the control group. We conclude that UW solution is an improved donor liver preservation solution on the basis of improved enzyme values, decreased blood usage, shorter hospital stay, and lower hospital charges.