T. Holmes
Stanford University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by T. Holmes.
Classical and Quantum Gravity | 2015
C.W.F. Everitt; Barry Muhlfelder; D. DeBra; Brad Parkinson; John P. Turneaure; A S Silbergleit; E B Acworth; M Adams; Ronald J. Adler; William J. Bencze; J E Berberian; R J Bernier; K A Bower; Robert W. Brumley; Sasha Buchman; K Burns; B. Clarke; John Conklin; M L Eglington; G Green; Gregory M. Gutt; D H Gwo; G Hanuschak; X He; M I Heifetz; David Hipkins; T. Holmes; R A Kahn; G. M. Keiser; J. Kozaczuk
The Gravity Probe B mission provided two new quantitative tests of Einsteins theory of gravity, general relativity (GR), by cryogenic gyroscopes in Earths orbit. Data from four gyroscopes gave a geodetic drift-rate of −6601.8 ± 18.3 marc-s yr−1 and a frame-dragging of −37.2 ± 7.2 marc-s yr−1, to be compared with GR predictions of −6606.1 and −39.2 marc-s yr−1 (1 marc-s = 4.848 × 10−9 radians). The present paper introduces the science, engineering, data analysis, and heritage of Gravity Probe B, detailed in the accompanying 20 CQG papers.
Classical and Quantum Gravity | 2015
A S Silbergleit; John Conklin; M I Heifetz; T. Holmes; J. Li; Ilya Mandel; V G Solomonik; K Stahl; Paul Worden; C.W.F. Everitt; M Adams; J E Berberian; William J. Bencze; B. Clarke; A Al-Jadaan; G. M. Keiser; J. Kozaczuk; M Al-Meshari; Barry Muhlfelder; Michael Salomon; David I. Santiago; B Al-Suwaidan; John P. Turneaure; J Wade
The results of the Gravity Probe B relativity science mission published in Everitt et al (2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 221101) required a rather sophisticated analysis of experimental data due to several unexpected complications discovered on-orbit. We give a detailed description of the Gravity Probe B data reduction. In the first paper (Silbergleit et al Class. Quantum Grav. 22 224018) we derived the measurement models, i.e., mathematical expressions for all the signals to analyze. In the third paper (Conklin et al Class. Quantum Grav. 22 224020) we explain the estimation algorithms and their program implementation, and discuss the experiment results obtained through data reduction. This paper deals with the science data preparation for the main analysis yielding the relativistic drift estimates.
Classical and Quantum Gravity | 2015
John Conklin; M I Heifetz; T. Holmes; M Al-Meshari; Bradford W. Parkinson; A S Silbergleit; C.W.F. Everitt; A Al-Jaadan; G. M. Keiser; Barry Muhlfelder; V G Solomonik; H Aljabreen
This paper provides detailed descriptions of the numerical estimation algorithms used to fit physics-based models to the data from the Gravity Probe B spacecraft, as well as the scientific results of the experiment, and the statistical and systematic uncertainties. The first paper in this series of three data analysis papers derives the mathematical expressions for the signals to be analyzed, and the second paper deals with science data acquisition and their preparation for the relativistic drift rate estimation. The data from each of the four gyroscopes are partitioned into six segments, each spanning several weeks to several months. These segments are first analyzed individually to check the validity of the mathematical models and the accuracy of the estimation routine by examining the consistency of the relativistic drift rate estimates from each of these 24 gyro-segments. Then, the drift rate estimates and uncertainties are calculated for each individual gyroscope and for the four gyroscopes combined. These results are presented and compared with each other and with the prediction of general relativity.
Classical and Quantum Gravity | 2015
John Conklin; M Adams; William J. Bencze; D. DeBra; G Green; L Herman; T. Holmes; Barry Muhlfelder; Brad Parkinson; A S Silbergleit; J Kirschenbaum
The Gravity Probe B satellite used ultra-precise gyroscopes in low Earth orbit to compare the orientation of the local inertial reference frame with that of distant space in order to test predictions of general relativity. The experiment required that the Gravity Probe B spacecraft have milliarcsecond-level attitude knowledge for the science measurement, and milliarcsecond-level control to minimize classical torques acting on the science gyroscopes. The primary sensor was a custom Cassegrainian telescope, which measured the pitch and yaw angles of the experiment package with respect to a guide star. The spacecraft rolled uniformly about the direction to the guide star, and the roll angle was measured by star trackers. Attitude control was performed with sixteen proportional thrusters that used boil-off from the experiments liquid Helium cryogen as propellant. This paper summarizes the attitude control systems design and on-orbit performance.
Classical and Quantum Gravity | 2015
A S Silbergleit; G. M. Keiser; John P. Turneaure; John Conklin; C.W.F. Everitt; M I Heifetz; T. Holmes; Paul Worden
Gravity Probe B (GP-B) was a cryogenic, space-based experiment testing the geodetic and frame-dragging predictions of Einsteins theory of general relativity (GR) by means of gyroscopes in Earth orbit. This first of three data analysis papers reviews the GR predictions and details the models that provide the framework for the relativity analysis. In the second paper we describe the flight data and their preprocessing. The third paper covers the algorithms and software tools that fit the preprocessed flight data to the models to give the experimental results published in Everitt et al (2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 221101–4).
Classical and Quantum Gravity | 2015
William J. Bencze; Robert W. Brumley; M L Eglington; David Hipkins; T. Holmes; Brad Parkinson; Y Ohshima; C.W.F. Everitt
A spaceflight electrostatic suspension system was developed for the Gravity Probe B (GP-B) Relativity Missions cryogenic electrostatic vacuum gyroscopes which serve as an indicator of the local inertial frame about Earth. The Gyroscope Suspension System (GSS) regulates the translational position of the gyroscope rotors within their housings, while (1) minimizing classical electrostatic torques on the gyroscope to preserve the instruments sensitivity to effects of General Relativity, (2) handling the effects of external forces on the space vehicle, (3) providing a means of precisely aligning the spin axis of the gyroscopes after spin-up, and (4) acting as an accelerometer as part of the spacecrafts drag-free control system. The flight design was tested using an innovative, precision gyroscope simulator Testbed that could faithfully mimic the behavior of a physical gyroscope under all operational conditions, from ground test to science data collection. Four GSS systems were built, tested, and operated successfully aboard the GP-B spacecraft from launch in 2004 to the end of the mission in 2008.
Physical Review Letters | 2011
C.W.F. Everitt; D. DeBra; Bradford W. Parkinson; John P. Turneaure; John Conklin; M I Heifetz; G. M. Keiser; A S Silbergleit; T. Holmes; Jeffery J. Kolodziejczak; M Al-Meshari; John Mester; Barry Muhlfelder; V G Solomonik; K Stahl; Paul Worden; William J. Bencze; Sasha Buchman; B. Clarke; Ahmad Aljadaan; Hamoud Aljibreen; J. Li; John A. Lipa; J.M. Lockhart; Badr N. Alsuwaidan; M. A. Taber; S. Wang
Space Science Reviews | 2009
C.W.F. Everitt; M Adams; William J. Bencze; Sasha Buchman; B. Clarke; John Conklin; D. DeBra; M. Dolphin; M I Heifetz; David Hipkins; T. Holmes; G. M. Keiser; J. Kolodziejczak; J. Li; John A. Lipa; J.M. Lockhart; John Mester; Barry Muhlfelder; Y Ohshima; Bradford W. Parkinson; Michael Salomon; A S Silbergleit; V G Solomonik; K Stahl; M. A. Taber; John P. Turneaure; S. Wang; Paul Worden
Archive | 2009
G. M. Keiser; M Adams; William J. Bencze; Robert W. Brumley; Sasha Buchman; Bruce D. Clarke; John Conklin; D. DeBra; M. Dolphin; David Hipkins; T. Holmes; C.W.F. Everitt; John H. Goebel; J.M. Lockhart; John Mester; Barry Muhlfelder
Advances in Space Research | 2007
J. Li; William J. Bencze; D. DeBra; G. Hanuschak; T. Holmes; G. M. Keiser; John Mester; Paul Shestople; H. Small