T. Joseph McKenna

Frequent Misdiagnosis and Mismanagement of Hyperprolactinemic Patients before the Introduction of Macroprolactin Screening: Application of a New Strict Laboratory Definition of Macroprolactinemia

BACKGROUND Macroprolactin (big big prolactin) has reduced bioactivity and is measured by immunoassays for prolactin when it accumulates in the plasma of some individuals. We applied normative data for serum prolactin after treatment of sera to remove macroprolactin to elucidate the contribution of macroprolactin to misleading diagnoses, inappropriate investigations, and unnecessary treatment. METHODS We reviewed records of women attending a tertiary referral center who had prolactin >1000 mIU/L. Application of a reference interval to polyethylene glycol (PEG)-treated hyperprolactinemic sera identified 21 patients in whom hyperprolactinemia was accounted for entirely by the presence of macroprolactin. Presenting clinical features, diagnoses, and treatment were compared in these patients and 42 age-matched true hyperprolactinemic patients. RESULTS Prolactin concentrations in sera of 110 healthy individuals ranged from 78 to 564 mIU/L. The range of values for the sera after PEG treatment was 70-403 mIU/L. For macroprolactinemic samples, PEG treatment decreased mean (SD) prolactin from 1524 (202) mIU/L to 202 (27) mIU/L but decreased it only from 2096 (233) mIU/L to 1705 (190) mIU/L in true hyperprolactinemic patients (P <0.01 between groups). Oligomenorrhea or amenorrhea and galactorrhea were the most common clinical features in both groups, although they occurred more frequently in true hyperprolactinemic patients (P <0.05). Serum estradiol and luteinizing hormone concentrations were significantly higher in participants with macroprolactinemia than in those with true hyperprolactinemia (P <0.05). Among participants with retrospectively identified macroprolactinemia, pituitary imaging was performed in 93% and treatment with dopamine agonist was prescribed in 87%. CONCLUSIONS Macroprolactin is a significant cause of misdiagnosis, unnecessary investigation, and inappropriate treatment. The use of an appropriate reference interval for the PEG immunoprecipitation procedure may be of particular importance in those patients who have an excess of both macroprolactin and monomeric prolactin.

The overnight single-dose metyrapone test is a simple and reliable index of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis

OBJECTIVES The ACTH stimulation test examines adrenal responsiveness but may not examine the entire hypothalamic‐pituitary‐adrenal (HPA) axis and requires parenteral administration. The cortisol response to hypoglycaemia provides an index of activity of the entire HPA axis but is demanding for patients and medical staff. The aim of the present study was to examine the performance of the overnight single‐dose metyrapone test as it provides a simple alternative test for HPA axis function.

Clinical relevance of macroprolactin

The anterior pituitary hormone PRL was identified in animal species as early as 1933 1 but only purified in humans in 1972. 2 Since then, the clinical syndrome of hyperprolactinaemia has been characterized extensively, the predominant symptoms being galactorrhoea, oligomenorrhoea or amenorrhoea and infertility in women and reduced libido, impotence and galactorrhoea in men. 3–8 Hyperprolactinaemia has an estimated prevalence of 15% in women with secondary amenorrhoea, 9,10 a condition that affects at least 3% of women of reproductive age. 11

Serum Total Prolactin and Monomeric Prolactin Reference Intervals Determined by Precipitation with Polyethylene Glycol: Evaluation and Validation on Common ImmunoAssay Platforms

BACKGROUND Macroprolactin is an important source of immunoassay interference that commonly leads to misdiagnosis and mismanagement of hyperprolactinemic patients. We used the predominant immunoassay platforms for prolactin to assay serum samples treated with polyethylene glycol (PEG) and establish and validate reference intervals for total and monomeric prolactin. METHODS We used the Architect (Abbott), ADVIA Centaur and Immulite (Siemens Diagnostics), Access (Beckman Coulter), Elecsys (Roche Diagnostics), and AIA (Tosoh) analyzers with samples from healthy males (n = 53) and females (n = 93) to derive parametric reference intervals for total and post-PEG monomeric prolactin. Concentrations of immunoreactive prolactin isoforms in serum samples from healthy individuals were established by gel filtration chromatography (GFC). We then used samples from 22 individuals whose hyperprolactinemia was entirely attributable to macroprolactin and 32 patients with true hyperprolactinemia to compare patient classifications and prolactin concentrations measured by GFC with the newly derived post-PEG reference intervals. RESULTS Parametric reference intervals for post-PEG prolactin in male and female serum samples, respectively, were (in mIU/L): 61-196, 66-278 (Centaur); 63-245, 75-381 (Elecsys); 70-301, 92-469 (Access); 72-229, 79-347 (Architect); 73-247, 83-383 (AIA); and 78-263, 85-394 (Immulite). Concordance between GFC and immunoassay-specific post-PEG reference intervals was observed in 311 of 324 cases and for 31 of 32 patients with true hyperprolactinemia and 17 of 22 patients with macroprolactinemia. Results leading to misclassification occurred in a few analyzers for 5 macroprolactinemia patient samples with relatively minor increases in post-PEG prolactin (mean 61 mIU/L). CONCLUSIONS Our validated normative reference data for sera pretreated with PEG and analyzed on the most commonly used immunoassay platforms should facilitate the more widespread introduction of macroprolactin screening by clinical laboratories.

The low‐dose ACTH test does not provide a useful assessment of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis in secondary adrenal insufficiency

OBJECTIVE The 1 µg ACTH stimulation test has been introduced to improve the sensitivity of ACTH as a test of the integrity of hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis (HPAA). This study aims to compare the sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of the ‘low‐dose’ 1 µg ACTH (LDACTH) test and the ‘standard dose’ 250 µg ACTH (SDACTH) test, with the overnight metyrapone test (OMT) which assesses the entire HPAA.

The impact of different glucocorticoid replacement schedules on bone turnover and insulin sensitivity in patients with adrenal insufficiency

objective Optimization of physiological replacement of glucocorticoid in patients with adrenal insufficiency is controversial. The present study was undertaken to compare the relative impact of three different regimes of glucocorticoid replacement in patients with adrenal insufficiency on parameters of bone turnover and insulin sensitivity.

Characterization of macroprolactin and assessment of markers of autoimmunity in macroprolactinaemic patients.

Objective  It has been reported that macroprolactin is a complex of PRL and an immunoglobulin G (IgG). This study further characterizes macroprolactin and evaluates for other markers of autoimmunity using a cohort of macroprolactinaemic sera.

Should macroprolactin be measured in all hyperprolactinaemic sera

Macroprolactin is a nonbioactive prolactin isoform usually composed of a monomer of prolactin and a IgG molecule which has a prolonged clearance rate similar to that of the immunoglobulins. Macroprolactinaemia, hyperprolactinaemia entirely accounted for by the presence of macroprolactin, is estimated to account for approximately 10% of all hyperprolactinaemia coming to clinical attention in the United Kingdom and the United States. Failure to recognize that macroprolactinaemia can explain hyperprolactinaemia, leads to unnecessary investigation, incorrect diagnosis and inappropriate treatment. Screening of hyperprolactinaemic sera for the presence of misleading concentrations of macroprolactin is readily performed in biochemistry laboratories although the procedures have not been automated. The most widely employed method is to treat the hyperprolactinaemic sera with polyethylene glycol which precipitates out high-molecular weight constituents including immunoglobulins. Re-assay of the sera for prolactin will then identify those sera which yield values within the relevant normal range indicative of macroprolactinaemia and not true hyperprolactinaemia. The case for the routine screening of all hyperprolactinaemic sera for macroprolactin is compelling. The consequences of failure to recognize macroprolactinaemia are significant, the problem is frequently encountered, the means of addressing it are immediately available and it is cost effective.Macroprolactin is a nonbioactive prolactin isoform usually composed of a monomer of prolactin and a IgG molecule which has a prolonged clearance rate similar to that of the immunoglobulins. Macroprolactinaemia, hyperprolactinaemia entirely accounted for by the presence of macroprolactin, is estimated to account for approximately 10% of all hyperprolactinaemia coming to clinical attention in the United Kingdom and the United States. Failure to recognize that macroprolactinaemia can explain hyperprolactinaemia, leads to unnecessary investigation, incorrect diagnosis and inappropriate treatment. Screening of hyperprolactinaemic sera for the presence of misleading concentrations of macroprolactin is readily performed in biochemistry laboratories although the procedures have not been automated. The most widely employed method is to treat the hyperprolactinaemic sera with polyethylene glycol which precipitates out high‐molecular weight constituents including immunoglobulins. Re‐assay of the sera for prolactin will then identify those sera which yield values within the relevant normal range indicative of macroprolactinaemia and not true hyperprolactinaemia. The case for the routine screening of all hyperprolactinaemic sera for macroprolactin is compelling. The consequences of failure to recognize macroprolactinaemia are significant, the problem is frequently encountered, the means of addressing it are immediately available and it is cost effective.

ADRENAL ABNORMALITIES IN IDIOPATHIC HIRSUTISM

The possibility that abnormal adrenal androgen production may be present in patients with idiopathic hirsutism was examined. Plasma testosterone, dihydrotestosterone and androstenedione levels were elevated in hirsute patients. In response to exogenous α1–24 ACTH the increments in plasma androstenedione, dehydroepiandrosterone (DHA) and cortisol were significantly greater in hirsute patients than in normal subjects. The testosterone response was exaggerated following endogenous stimulation induced by metyrapone. Treatment with dexamethasone, 0.5 mg each night for 3 months, corrected both the androgen excess and the exaggerated androgen responses but not the excessive cortisol response to stimulation. These observations indicate adrenal abnormalities in idiopathic hirsutism. The dissociation of cortisol and adrenal androgen responsiveness following dexamethasone suggests that the abnormalities observed may be due to excessive adrenal androgen production stimulated by a dexamethasone‐suppressible factor other than ACTH. Excess adrenal androgen production may be the primary disorder leading to the development of idiopathic hirsutism.

Gender difference in the response of growth hormone (GH)-deficient adults to GH therapy

While individual hypopituitary patients undoubtedly benefit from growth hormone (GH) therapy, there is considerable variability in the response to treatment. Given the expense, possible lack of benefit, and potential risks associated with long-term therapy, we sought to identify characteristics potentially associated with a favorable response to GH replacement. Twelve GH-deficient adults (seven men and five women aged 35.4+/-2.5 years, mean +/- SEM) participated in a 12-month open study of GH replacement (0.125 IU/kg/wk for 4 weeks and 0.25 IU/kg/wk thereafter) designed to examine the impact of GH on body composition, lipid profile, and psychological well-being. Using bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), there was a reduction in body fat (BF) and an increase in lean body mass (LBM) and total body water (TBW) (P < .05) following 12 months of GH treatment. In addition, there was a significant improvement in psychological well-being as indicated by a decrease in the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) score (P < .05) and a decrease in both total cholesterol (P = .005) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (P < .03). GH therapy was associated with an increase in fasting plasma glucose (P = .008) and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c (P = .06). When analyzed by gender, the beneficial effect of GH was greater in men versus women for the increment in insulin-like growth factor-1 ([IGF-1] 375+/-59 v 148+/-73 microg/L, mean +/- SEM), increase in LBM (6.8+/-2.5 v -0.06+/-1.6 kg), reduction in BF (5.6+/-1.6 v 1.0+/-1.9 kg), and increase in TBW (5.0+/-1.6 v 0.14+/-1.29 L) (P < .05). HbA1c increased significantly in women (P < .05). The beneficial effect of GH tended to be greatest in those with the most significant abnormality in baseline values (P < .05). The duration of hypopituitarism showed an indirect correlation with the change in total cholesterol (P < .005). Baseline IGF-1 levels correlated directly with changes in TBW (P < .05). These data indicate that men with GH deficiency appear more responsive to GH therapy than women with respect to the increase in IGF-1 levels and improvement in body composition. In general, patients with the most significant abnormality in baseline values, the highest IGF-1 levels, and the shortest duration of hypopituitarism respond best. With long-term GH therapy, careful monitoring of glucose tolerance is indicated.