T. Leahy

Sperm surface changes and physiological consequences induced by sperm handling and storage

Spermatozoa interact with their immediate environment and this contact remodels the sperm surface in preparation for fertilisation. These fundamental membrane changes will be critically covered in this review with special emphasis on the very specific surface destabilisation event, capacitation. This process involves very subtle and intricate modifications of the sperm membrane including removal of suppression (decapacitation) factors and changes in the lateral organisation of the proteins and lipids of the sperm surface. Processing of sperm for assisted reproduction (storage, sex-sorting, etc.) subjects spermatozoa to numerous stressors, and it is possible that this processing overrides such delicate processes resulting in sperm instability and cell damage. To improve sperm quality, novel mechanisms must be used to stabilise the sperm surface during handling. In this review, different types of membrane stress are considered, as well as novel surface manipulation methods to improve sperm stability.

Comprehensive mapping of the bull sperm surface proteome

While the mechanisms that underpin maturation, capacitation, and sperm–egg interactions remain elusive it is known that these essential fertilisation events are driven by the protein complement of the sperm surface. Understanding these processes is critical to the regulation of animal reproduction, but few studies have attempted to define the full repertoire of sperm surface proteins in animals of agricultural importance. Recent developments in proteomics technologies, subcellular fractionation, and optimised solubilisation strategies have enhanced the potential for the comprehensive characterisation of the sperm surface proteome. Here we report the identification of 419 proteins from a mature bull sperm plasma membrane fraction. Protein domain enrichment analyses indicate that 67% of all the proteins identified may be membrane associated. A large number of the proteins identified are conserved between mammalian species and are reported to play key roles in sperm–egg communication, capacitation and fertility. The major functional pathways identified were related to protein catabolism (26S proteasome complex), chaperonin‐containing TCP‐1 (CCT) complex and fundamental metabolic processes such as glycolysis and energy production. We have also identified 118 predicted transmembrane proteins, some of which are implicated in cell adhesion, acrosomal exocytosis, vesicle transport and immunity and fertilisation events, while others have not been reported in mammalian LC‐MS‐derived sperm proteomes to date. Comparative proteomics and functional network analyses of these proteins expand our systems level of understanding of the bull sperm proteome and provide important clues toward finding the essential conserved function of these proteins.

Seminal Plasma and its Effect on Ruminant Spermatozoa During Processing

Seminal plasma can both inhibit and stimulate sperm function, making its use as a supportive medium somewhat contradictory. These effects are directed by the multifunctional action of numerous inorganic and organic components, but it is the direct association of seminal plasma proteins with the sperm membrane that is thought to exert the most significant response. In vitro handling of spermatozoa in preparation for artificial insemination may involve washing, dilution, cooling, freezing, re-warming and sex-sorting. These processes can alter proteins of the sperm surface and reduce seminal plasma in the sperm environment. This, among other factors, may destabilize the sperm membrane and reduce the fertilizable lifespan of spermatozoa. Such handling-induced damage may be prevented or reversed through supplementation of seminal plasma, but the effectiveness of this technique differs with species, and the source and subsequent treatment of both spermatozoa and seminal plasma. Seminal plasma appears to act as a protective medium during in vitro processing of ram spermatozoa, but this does not appear to be the case for bull spermatozoa. The reasons for this divergent effect will be discussed with particular emphasis on the influence of the major proteins of ruminant seminal plasma, known as BSP proteins. The biochemical and biophysical properties of these proteins are well documented, and this information has provided greater insight into the signalling pathways of capacitation and the protective action of extender components.

Seasonal variation in the protective effect of seminal plasma on frozen-thawed ram spermatozoa.

The response of ram spermatozoa to seminal plasma is highly variable, in part due to the presence of both stimulatory and inhibitory factors. The aim of this study was to assess variation in the protection of ram spermatozoa during freezing by seminal plasma. The seminal plasma variables studied were season of collection, fractionation and method of supplementation. Spermatozoa were supplemented before freezing with 4 mg of seminal plasma proteins (SPPs) per 10(8) cells, and their motility and viability were assessed during post-thaw incubation (37 degrees C). In Experiment 1, semen was (a) frozen with no supplementation (Control) (b) extended with a Tris-based diluent (C + TRIS), or (c) supplemented with seminal plasma collected throughout the year (in the Southern Hemisphere) and pooled for January-March, April-June, July-August and October-December, and either fractionated to produce a concentrated >10 kDa seminal plasma protein retentate (>10 kDa SPP), or kept as crude seminal plasma (CP). There was no effect of season or seminal plasma type (CP or >10 kDa SPP) on motility of spermatozoa. CP and >10 kDa SPP improved the viability of spermatozoa when collected from January-September compared to Control. Supplementation with >10 kDa SPP increased viability of spermatozoa, compared to CP, when collected from January to July. In Experiment 2, >10 kDa SPP were either added directly to the spermatozoa or included in the cryodiluent or >10 kDa SPP were not supplemented (Control). Both supplementation methods improved the motility and the proportion of viable, acrosome-intact spermatozoa but direct supplementation resulted in more viable, acrosome-intact spermatozoa compared with supplementation of the cryodiluent. These results show that supplementation of ram spermatozoa with CP, or its protein component (>10 kDa SPP), before freezing protects them from freeze-thaw damage. The protective effect is greatest when seminal plasma is collected during the breeding season, fractionated with >10 kDa filters and added directly to the spermatozoa.

Application of seminal plasma in sex-sorting and sperm cryopreservation

Substantial dilution of boar semen during processing decreased the concentration of seminal plasma, perhaps contributing to the decline in sperm quality after cryopreservation and sex-sorting. Results of replacing seminal plasma in investigations from many laboratories have been contradictory. Results and discussion here suggest that whereas membrane status can be influenced by seminal plasma, the action of its various components, both positive and negative, is determined in part by the membrane status of the spermatozoa to which it is being exposed. Although progress has been made in identifying components of seminal plasma responsible for its protective effect (notably PSP-I/II spermadhesin for sex-sorted boar spermatozoa), little is known (in any species) regarding how external factors may influence their levels, and their functionality, in seminal plasma. It is noteworthy that seminal plasma is beneficial to post-thaw quality of sex-sorted ram spermatozoa only when added before freezing, not after thawing. Therefore, the action of seminal plasma and its components is dependent on sperm-related factors, in particular the type of processing to which they have been previously exposed. Further research is needed to unravel these biological complexities, and then characterise and synthesise useful proteins within seminal plasma.

New insights into the regulation of cholesterol efflux from the sperm membrane

Cholesterol is an essential component of the mammalian plasma membrane because it promotes membrane stability without comprising membrane fluidity. Given this important cellular role, cholesterol levels are tightly controlled at multiple levels. It has been clearly shown that cholesterol redistribution and depletion from the sperm membrane is a key part of the spermatozoon′s preparation for fertilization. Some factors that regulate these events are described (e.g., bicarbonate, calcium) but the mechanisms underlying cholesterol export are poorly understood. How does a hydrophobic cholesterol molecule inserted in the sperm plasma membrane enter the energetically unfavorable aqueous surroundings? This review will provide an overview of knowledge in this area and highlight our gaps in understanding. The overall aim is to better understand cholesterol redistribution in the sperm plasma membrane, its relation to the possible activation of a cholesterol transporter and the role of cholesterol acceptors. Armed with such knowledge, sperm handling techniques can be adapted to better prepare spermatozoa for in vitro and in vivo fertilization.

Capacitation and capacitation-like sperm surface changes induced by handling boar semen

Since it has been well recognized that reproductive technologies, such as cryopreservation and sex-sorting, have a detrimental impact on sperm quality. These procedures cause sperm membrane destabilization which resembles that of capacitation. The pathways of this complex biochemical event are slowly unravelling, including the vital role of coating and decoating factors on the sperm surface. Characterization of these factors is leading to the development of novel surface manipulation techniques to stabilize the sperm membrane during handling. The possible application of these for assisted pig reproduction is discussed.

Seminal plasma proteins protect flow-sorted ram spermatozoa from freeze–thaw damage

Seminal plasma improves the functional integrity of compromised ram spermatozoa but has been reported to be toxic to sorted spermatozoa. The present study attempted to clarify this paradoxical effect and improve the functional integrity of spermatozoa following sorting and cryopreservation. The in vitro function of sorted spermatozoa (motility characteristics and membrane integrity) was examined after supplementation with differing concentrations and protein fractions of seminal plasma at various stages of the sorting and freezing process. For all experiments, spermatozoa (two males, n=four ejaculates per male) were processed through a high-speed flow cytometer before cryopreservation, thawing and incubation for 6 h (37 degrees C). Supplementation of crude seminal plasma (CP), its low molecular weight fraction (LP; <10 kDa) or protein-rich fraction (SPP; >10 kDa), immediately before freezing improved the functional integrity of sorted spermatozoa compared with no supplementation (control), whereas supplementation after thawing had no effect for CP and LP. The protective effect of seminal plasma was not altered by increasing the amount of protein supplementation. No toxic effect of CP, SPP or LP was evident even when supplemented at high protein concentrations. It is concluded that seminal plasma protein, if added to ram spermatozoa after sorting and before freezing, can improve post-thaw sperm quality and consequently the efficiency of sorting. This effect is most likely related to protection of the spermatozoa during freeze-thawing.

Flow-sorted ram spermatozoa are highly susceptible to hydrogen peroxide damage but are protected by seminal plasma and catalase

To determine whether flow sorting increased the susceptibility of spermatozoa to reactive oxygen species (ROS), ram semen was either diluted with Tris medium (100 x 10(6) spermatozoa mL(-1); D) or highly diluted (10(6) spermatozoa mL(-1)) before being centrifuged (DC) at 750g for 7.5 min at 21 degrees C or flow-sorted (S) before cryopreservation. Thawed spermatozoa were resuspended in graded concentrations of hydrogen peroxide to induce oxidative stress. In Experiment 1, following exposure to 30 or 45 muM hydrogen peroxide (H(2)O(2)), the total motility (%) of DC (41.0 +/- 7.3 or 25.7 +/- 6.7, respectively) and S spermatozoa (33.8 +/- 6.3 or 20.1 +/- 6.3, respectively) was lower (P < 0.001) than that of D spermatozoa (58.7 +/- 5.6 or 44.5 +/- 6.7, respectively). In Experiment 2, supplementation of samples containing H(2)O(2) with catalase (150 IU mL(-1)) or seminal plasma proteins (4 mg protein per 10(8) spermatozoa) negated oxidative stress, resulting in comparable values to samples receiving no H(2)O(2)in terms of the proportion of spermatozoa with stable plasmalemma (as determined using merocyanine-540 and Yo-Pro-1) in the D and S groups, the proportion of viable, acrosome-intact spermatozoa (as determined by fluorescein isothiocyanate and propidium iodide staining) in the D group and the motility of control (undiluted) and S spermatozoa. Neither H(2)O(2) nor sperm type (i.e. D, DC or S) had any effect on intracellular concentrations of ROS. These results show that flow sorting increases the susceptibility of spermatozoa to ROS, but the inclusion of anti-oxidants or seminal plasma as part of the sorting protocol improves resistance to oxidative stress.

Seminal plasma proteins do not consistently improve fertility after cervical insemination of ewes with non-sorted or sex-sorted frozen–thawed ram spermatozoa

The effect of supplementation of sex-sorted and non-sorted spermatozoa with seminal plasma protein (SPP) on fertility after cervical insemination was examined in the present study. Spermatozoa were sorted into high purity X and Y chromosome-bearing spermatozoa or not sorted and then either supplemented with SPP (>10 kDa) before freezing and/or after thawing (non-sorted only) or processed without supplementation. Inseminations were performed over 2 days with ewes receiving 100 or 25 million motile non-sorted spermatozoa in the cervix or uterus, respectively, or two cervical inseminations of 3.5 million motile sorted spermatozoa. Pregnancy rates in cervically inseminated ewes were unaffected by supplementation of sorted or non-sorted spermatozoa with SPP before freezing compared with no supplementation. The effect of post-thaw supplementation of non-sorted spermatozoa with SPP on pregnancy rates after cervical insemination varied with the day of insemination (P < 0.05); fertility was similar to laparoscopic insemination on Day 1 (56.0 +/- 10.2% v. 58.6 +/- 10.1%), but not on Day 2 (23.1 +/- 7.4% v. 66.7 +/- 9.2%). In conclusion, under the conditions of the present study, SPP did not consistently improve pregnancy rates after cervical insemination with frozen-thawed ram spermatozoa. This is the first report of pregnancies (5/56 ewes inseminated) after cervical insemination with frozen-thawed sex-sorted ram spermatozoa. Although the success rate is low, the findings are encouraging because ewes inseminated with the sex-sorted spermatozoa received only 7% of the recommended dose (100 million motile) for cervical insemination of frozen-thawed spermatozoa.