T. N. Varga
Max Planck Society
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by T. N. Varga.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2018
C. L. Chang; E. Baxter; Bhuvnesh Jain; C. Sanchez; Susmita Adhikari; T. N. Varga; Y. Fang; Eduardo Rozo; Eli S. Rykoff; Andrey V. Kravtsov; D. Gruen; W. G. Hartley; Eric Huff; M. J. Jarvis; A. G. Kim; J. Prat; N. MacCrann; T. McClintock; A. Palmese; D. Rapetti; R. P. Rollins; S. Samuroff; E. Sheldon; M. A. Troxel; Risa H. Wechsler; Y. Zhang; J. Zuntz; T. M. C. Abbott; F. B. Abdalla; S. Allam
Splashback refers to the process of matter that is accreting onto a dark matter halo reaching its first orbital apocenter and turning around in its orbit. The clustercentric radius at which this process occurs, r(sp), defines a halo boundary that is connected to the dynamics of the cluster. A rapid decline in the halo profile is expected near rsp. We measure the galaxy number density and weak lensing mass profiles around REDMAPPER galaxy clusters in the first-year Dark Energy Survey (DES) data. For a cluster sample with mean M-200m mass approximate to 2.5 x 10(14)M(circle dot), we find strong evidence of a splashback-like steepening of the galaxy density profile and measure r(sp) = 1.13 +/- 0.07 h(-1) Mpc, consistent with the earlier Sloan Digital Sky Survey measurements of More et al. and Baxter et al. Moreover, our weak lensing measurement demonstrates for the first time the existence of a splashback-like steepening of the matter profile of galaxy clusters. We measure r(sp) = 1.34 +/- 0.21 h(-1) Mpc from the weak lensing data, in good agreement with our galaxy density measurements. For different cluster and galaxy samples, we find that, consistent with.CDM simulations, rsp scales with R-200m and does not evolve with redshift over the redshift range of 0.3-0.6. We also find that potential systematic effects associated with the REDMAPPER algorithm may impact the location of rsp. We discuss the progress needed to understand the systematic uncertainties and fully exploit forthcoming data from DES and future surveys, emphasizing the importance of more realistic mock catalogs and independent cluster samples.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2019
Matteo Costanzi; Eduardo Rozo; E. S. Rykoff; Arya Farahi; T. Jeltema; A. E. Evrard; A. Mantz; D. Gruen; Rachel Mandelbaum; J. DeRose; T. McClintock; T. N. Varga; Y. Zhang; J. Weller; Risa H. Wechsler; M. Aguena
The cosmological utility of galaxy cluster catalogues is primarily limited by our ability to calibrate the relation between halo mass and observable mass proxies such as cluster richness, X-ray luminosity or the Sunyaev-Zeldovich signal. Projection effects are a particularly pernicious systematic effect that can impact observable mass proxies; structure along the line of sight can both bias and increase the scatter of the observable mass proxies used in cluster abundance studies. In this work, we develop an empirical method to characterize the impact of projection effects on redMaPPer cluster catalogues. We use numerical simulations to validate our method and illustrate its robustness. We demonstrate that modeling of projection effects is a necessary component for cluster abundance studies capable of reaching
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2017
P. Melchior; D. Gruen; T. McClintock; T. N. Varga; E. Sheldon; Eduardo Rozo; Adam Amara; M. R. Becker; B. A. Benson; Alberto Bermeo; Sarah Bridle; Joseph Clampitt; J. P. Dietrich; W. G. Hartley; D. Hollowood; Bhuvnesh Jain; M. Jarvis; T. Jeltema; Tomasz Kacprzak; N. MacCrann; E. S. Rykoff; A. Saro; E. Suchyta; M. A. Troxel; J. Zuntz; C. Bonnett; A. A. Plazas; T. M. C. Abbott; F. B. Abdalla; J. Annis
\approx 5\%
arXiv: Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics | 2018
D. Gruen; Y. Zhang; A. Palmese; Brian Yanny; V. Busti; B. Hoyle; P. Melchior; Christopher J. Miller; E. Rozo; Eli S. Rykoff; T. N. Varga; F. B. Abdalla; S. Allam; J. Annis; S. Avila; David J. Brooks; D. L. Burke; A. Carnero Rosell; M. Carrasco Kind; J. Carretero; R. Cawthon; M. Crocce; C. E. Cunha; L. N. da Costa; C. J. Davis; J. De Vicente; S. Desai; H. T. Diehl; J. P. Dietrich; A. Drlica-Wagner
mass calibration uncertainties (e.g. the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 sample). Specifically, ignoring the impact of projection effects in the observable--mass relation --- i.e. marginalizing over a log-normal model only --- biases the posterior of the cluster normalization condition
arXiv: Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics | 2018
Matteo Costanzi; E. Rozo; Melanie Simet; Y. Zhang; August E. Evrard; A. Mantz; Eli S. Rykoff; T. Jeltema; D. Gruen; S. Allen T. McClintock; A. K. Romer; A. von der Linden; Arya Farahi; J. DeRose; T. N. Varga; J. Weller; P. Giles; D. L. Hollowood; S. Bhargava; A. Bermeo-Hernandez; Xiangjun Chen; T. M. C. Abbott; F. B. Abdalla; S. Avila; K. Bechtol; David J. Brooks; E. Buckley-Geer; D. L. Burke; A. Carnero Rosell; M. Carrasco Kind
S_8 \equiv \sigma_8 (\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3)^{1/2}
arXiv: Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics | 2018
S. Raghunathan; S. Patil; E. Baxter; B. A. Benson; L. E. Bleem; T. L. Chou; T. M. Crawford; G. P. Holder; T. McClintock; C. L. Reichardt; E. Rozo; T. N. Varga; T. M. C. Abbott; Peter A. R. Ade; S. Allam; A. J. Anderson; J. Annis; J. E. Austermann; S. Avila; J. A. Beall; K. Bechtol; A. N. Bender; G. M. Bernstein; E. Bertin; F. Bianchini; David J. Brooks; D. L. Burke; J. E. Carlstrom; J. Carretero; C. L. Chang
by