T. Teo
Singapore General Hospital
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by T. Teo.
Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology | 2010
T. Teo; Kiang Hiong Tay; Shueh En Lin; Seck Guan Tan; Richard Lo; Manish Taneja; Farah G. Irani; Mathew George Sebastien; Kiat Hon Lim; Bien Soo Tan
PURPOSE To assess the efficacy of endovenous laser therapy (EVLT) in the treatment of lower-limb venous ulcers secondary to venous reflux. MATERIALS AND METHODS Forty-four of 139 patients referred for EVLT from January 2004 to August 2007 had nonhealing venous ulcers. Preprocedural duplex ultrasound (US) was performed to document saphenous venous reflux secondary to saphenofemoral/saphenopopliteal junction incompetence, deep venous insufficiency, and deep vein thrombosis. Follow-up intervals were within 1 week, monthly until ulcer healing, and every 6 months thereafter. Mean follow-up period was 35.8 months (range, 8.1-59.3 months). RESULTS Mean great saphenous vein (GSV) diameter and length treated were 9.9 mm (range, 5.5-16.0 mm) and 36.7 cm (range, 20.0-60.0 cm). Mean laser energy used was 3,292 J (range, 1,392-4,971 J). Mean energy deposited per centimeter of vein was 93.6 J/cm (range, 45.2-182.0 J/cm). Mean laser time was 232 seconds (range, 99-347 sec). Fifteen patients with follow-up duplex US had no GSV flow at 6 months, with nonvisualization indicating complete obliteration. Ulcer healing occurred as early as 1 week after the procedure in some patients. Cumulative healing rates at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months were 82.1%, 92.5%, 92.5%, and 97.4%, respectively. No ulcer had recurred at 1 year, but ulcers recurred in five patients at 14, 14, 23, 35, and 52 months after EVLT, respectively. One patient with a nonhealing ulcer 2 years after treatment developed well differentiated squamous cell carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS Ulcer epithelization occurred with continued GSV occlusion and loss of flow. Most ulcers healed within 3 months with no recurrence at 1 year. Nonhealing ulcers should undergo biopsy to exclude malignant transformation.
Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology | 2012
M.C. Burgmans; Yung Hsiang Kao; Farah G. Irani; Erin Leslee Dames; T. Teo; Anthony Goh; Pierce K. H. Chow; Kiang Hiong Tay; Richard Hoau Gong Lo
PURPOSE To evaluate the feasibility and safety of yttrium-90 ((90)Y) radioembolization through the inferior phrenic arteries (IPAs). MATERIALS AND METHODS Retrospective analysis of 108 patients referred for radioembolization to treat primary (n = 103) or secondary (n = 5) liver malignancy was performed. Five patients had malignant hepatic tumors supplied by the IPA and met criteria for infusion of (90)Y spheres into the IPA. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA), catheter-directed computed tomographic (CT) angiography, and technetium-99m ((99m)Tc) macroaggregated albumin (MAA) single photon emission CT (SPECT)/CT were used to plan treatment. Bremsstrahlung SPECT/CT was performed 1 day after radioembolization. Follow-up included clinical and biochemical tests and cross-sectional CT or magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS Parasitized extrahepatic arteries were detected in 37% of patients (n = 40). Of these, 62.5% (n = 25) had tumor supply through an IPA. Of the patients with IPA supply, 20% (n = 5) underwent infusion of (90)Y into the right IPA. Reasons for disqualifying patients from infusion into the IPA were less than 10% tumor supply (n = 11), failed catheterization of IPA (n = 3), arterioportovenous shunt (n = 2), failed identification of IPA on pretreatment angiography (n = 1), and gastric or esophageal enhancement on catheter-directed CT angiography (n = 3). In all five patients, technical success was demonstrated on (90)Y imaging, with no significant extrahepatic radionuclide activity. No adverse events related to IPA radioembolization occurred at mean follow-up of 4.5 months (range, 2.2-10.1 mo). CONCLUSIONS Delivery of (90)Y microspheres through the right IPA is feasible and safe with the use of catheter-directed CT angiography in addition to DSA and (99m)Tc MAA SPECT/CT in patients with tumors with greater than 10% IPA supply.
Radiology | 2018
Farah G. Irani; T. Teo; Kiang Hiong Tay; Win Htet Yin; Hlaing Hlaing Win; Apoorva Gogna; A. Patel; Chow Wei Too; S.X. Chan; Richard Hoau Gong Lo; Luke Han Wei Toh; Siew Ping Chng; Hui Lin Choong; Bien Soo Tan
Purpose To compare lesion primary patency and restenosis rates between drug-eluting balloon (DEB) percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and conventional balloon PTA (cPTA) in the treatment of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) and arteriovenous graft (AVG) stenosis. Materials and Methods In this prospective study, 119 participants (mean age, 59.2 years; 79 men, 40 women) with failing AVFs (n = 98) or AVGs (n = 21) were randomly assigned to undergo either DEB PTA (n = 59) or cPTA (n = 60) from January 2012 to May 2013. Primary end points were lesion primary patency and restenosis rates at 6 months; secondary outcomes were anatomic and clinical success after PTA, circuit primary patency at 6 months and 1 year, and lesion primary patency at 1 year. Statistical analysis was performed by using the Kaplan-Meier product limit estimator, and hazard ratio was calculated by using Cox proportional hazards regression. Complication rates were assessed in both groups. Results Estimated lesion primary patency in the DEB PTA and cPTA arms was 0.81 and 0.61, respectively, at 6 months (P = .03) and 0.51 and 0.34, respectively, at 1 year (P = .04). Estimated circuit primary patency in the DEB PTA and cPTA arms was 0.76 and 0.56, respectively, at 6 months (P = .048) and 0.45 and 0.32, respectively, at 1 year (P = .16). Restenosis rate was 34.0% (16 of 47) for DEB PTA and 62.9% (22 of 35) for cPTA at 6 months (P = .01). No major complications were noted. Conclusion Drug-eluting balloon angioplasty was effective in prolonging lesion primary patency of dialysis access stenoses at 6 months and 1 year.
Singapore Medical Journal | 2009
Manish Taneja; K. Tay; Mathew G. Sebastian; S. Pasupathy; Shueh En Lin; T. Teo; Reginald I. Low; Farah G. Irani; S. P. Chng; A. Dewan; B. Tan
Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology | 2013
T. Teo; B. Tan; W. Yin; R. Lo; F.G. Irani; H.S. Choong; S. Pasupathy; S. Chng; B. Chua; T. Yeow; Apoorva Gogna; S. Ramamurthy; Chow Wei Too; S.X. Chan; A. Patel; K. Tay
Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology | 2011
K. Tay; Farah G. Irani; R. Lo; Manish Taneja; T. Teo; L. Khoo; M.C. Burgmans; W. Yang; L. Choong; S. Tan; S. Chng; S. Pasupathy; B. Tan
Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology | 2012
C. Soon; Kiang Hiong Tay; Manish Taneja; T. Teo; R. Lo; M.C. Burgmans; Farah G. Irani; T. Yeow; Apoorva Gogna; S. Pasupathy; S. Chng; B. Chua; S. Tan; M. Pwint; Bien Soo Tan
Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology | 2013
Y. Yan; F.G. Irani; T. Teo; T. Yeow; Apoorva Gogna; S. Ramamurthy; A. Patel; S.X. Chan; Chow Wei Too; R. Lo; B. Tan; K. Tay
Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology | 2012
F.G. Irani; K. Tay; M.C. Burgmans; T. Teo; Manish Taneja; B. Tan; Anthony Sw Goh; S. Choo; Pierce K. H. Chow; R. Lo
Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology | 2013
X. Liu; T. Teo; B. Tan; F.G. Irani; Apoorva Gogna; A. Patel; R. Lo; S. Ramamurthy; Chow Wei Too; S.X. Chan; S. Tan; B. Chua; S. Chng; S. Pasupathy; L. Choong; C.M. Chan; K. Tay