Takaaki Kikuno

Characteristics of pancreatic injury in children: A comparison with such injury in adults

A retrospective study of eight pediatric patients (under 15 years of age) who had pancreatic injuries was undertaken. Comparisons were made with 59 adult patients who sustained pancreatic injuries over the same 15-year period. All the pediatric injuries and 96.6% of the adult resulted from blunt abdominal trauma. Bicycle accidents (children, 75.0%; adults, 0%; P < .001) and automobile accidents (children, 0%; adults, 61.0%; P < .01) were the most common causes of pancreatic injury in the two groups. There was no significant difference in the incidence of abdominal pain or peritoneal irritation between the groups. However, abdominal pain in the adults was poorly localized. Isolated pancreatic injuries were noted in 62.5% of the pediatric patients and in 15.3% of the adult patients (P < .05). Associated intraabdominal injuries were present in 25.0% of the children and in 69.5% of the adults (P < .05). The duodenum was injured in two (25.0%) pediatric patients and in 10 (16.9%) adult patients. Whereas the duodenal injuries in pediatric patients were intramural hematomas without perforation in both cases, all but one of these injuries in adults were perforations or transections (P < .05). There was a significant difference in the type of pancreatic injury between the two groups (P < .05). Surgery was performed in 12.5% of the pediatric cases and in 78.0% of the adult cases (P < .01). There were no deaths among the pediatric patients, but 8.5% of the adults died in the hospital. The difference with respect to clinical course might be related to the differences in cause of injury.

Large-volume intraoperative peritoneal lavage with an assistant device for treatment of peritonitis caused by blunt traumatic rupture of the small bowel

The benefits of large-volume intraoperative peritoneal lavage (IOPL), with an assistant lavage device, were evaluated retrospectively in 114 patients with peritonitis caused by blunt traumatic rupture of the small bowel. Postoperative complications caused by infection were a major problem after rupture of the small bowel (46 of 114, 39.4%). Both prolongation of the interval between injury and laparotomy and rupture of the lower part of the small bowel were risk factors for postoperative complications caused by infection. Large-volume IOPL (25.2 +/- 2.1 L) with an assistant lavage device reduced the rate of complications caused by infection from 30 of 58 (51.8%) to 15 of 56 (26.8%). The volume used for IOPL was closely related to the occurrence of postoperative complications resulting from infection. No complications from infection occurred in patients who received lavage with of 28.3 +/- 2.7 L of saline, whereas complications occurred in those patients treated with a smaller volume of lavage fluid (18.0 +/- 2.5 L). Large-volume IOPL should be considered in patients with blunt rupture of the small bowel who are at risk for infection, and the assistant device for IOPL may be useful for such treatment.

Role of repeat computed tomography after emergency endoscopic retrograde pancreatography in the diagnosis of traumatic injury to pancreatic ducts

Endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP) is performed on patients with pancreatic injury after abdominal trauma. To delineate pancreatic ductal injuries more accurately, we performed repeat computed tomography (CT) shortly after completion of ERP. We describe our experiences with six patients to demonstrate the feasibility and utility of this method. In our cases, the diagnosis of pancreatic ductal injury was made with certainty on the basis of the presence of extravasated contrast medium. This protocol is useful for reaffirmation of injuries noted on ERP, for diagnosis of injuries not noted on ERP, and for exclusion of injuries in patients with equivocal results of ERP. Moreover, the protocol is easy to implement because it involves only the transfer of the patient from the endoscopy to the CT suite. The technique can be used to clarify potentially confusing situations.