Tsunemasa Takishima

Serum amylase level on admission in the diagnosis of blunt injury to the pancreas: its significance and limitations.

OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to elucidate the significance and limitations of serum amylase levels in the diagnosis of blunt injury to the pancreas. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA Several recently published reports of analyses of patients with blunt abdominal trauma have indicated that determination of the serum amylase level on admission seemed to be of little value in the diagnosis of acute injury to the pancreas. Few previous reports have described clearly the significance and the limitations of the serum amylase level in diagnosing injury to the pancreas. METHODS Retrospective analysis of 73 patients with blunt injury to the pancreas during 16-year period from February 1980 to January 1996 was performed. The factors analyzed in the current study included age, gender, time elapsed from injury to admission, hypotension on admission, type of injury to the pancreas, intra-abdominal- and intracranial-associated injuries, and death. RESULTS The serum amylase level was found to be abnormal in all patients admitted more than 3 hours after trauma. Various comparisons between patients with elevated (n = 61, 83.6%) and nonelevated (n = 12, 16.4%) serum amylase levels showed the statistical significance solely of the time elapsed from injury to admission (7 +/- 1.5 hours vs. 1.3 +/- 0.2 hour, p < 0.001). The major factor that influences the serum amylase level on admission appeared to be the time elapsed from injury to admission. Determination of the serum amylase level is not diagnostic within 3 hours or fewer after trauma, irrespective of the type of injury. CONCLUSIONS To avoid failure in the detection of pancreatic injury, the authors advocate determination of serum amylase levels more than 3 hours after trauma.

Characteristics of pancreatic injury in children: A comparison with such injury in adults

A retrospective study of eight pediatric patients (under 15 years of age) who had pancreatic injuries was undertaken. Comparisons were made with 59 adult patients who sustained pancreatic injuries over the same 15-year period. All the pediatric injuries and 96.6% of the adult resulted from blunt abdominal trauma. Bicycle accidents (children, 75.0%; adults, 0%; P < .001) and automobile accidents (children, 0%; adults, 61.0%; P < .01) were the most common causes of pancreatic injury in the two groups. There was no significant difference in the incidence of abdominal pain or peritoneal irritation between the groups. However, abdominal pain in the adults was poorly localized. Isolated pancreatic injuries were noted in 62.5% of the pediatric patients and in 15.3% of the adult patients (P < .05). Associated intraabdominal injuries were present in 25.0% of the children and in 69.5% of the adults (P < .05). The duodenum was injured in two (25.0%) pediatric patients and in 10 (16.9%) adult patients. Whereas the duodenal injuries in pediatric patients were intramural hematomas without perforation in both cases, all but one of these injuries in adults were perforations or transections (P < .05). There was a significant difference in the type of pancreatic injury between the two groups (P < .05). Surgery was performed in 12.5% of the pediatric cases and in 78.0% of the adult cases (P < .01). There were no deaths among the pediatric patients, but 8.5% of the adults died in the hospital. The difference with respect to clinical course might be related to the differences in cause of injury.

Pancreatographic classification of pancreatic ductal injuries caused by blunt injury to the pancreas.

BACKGROUND In the treatment of patients with pancreatic injury, the focus of attention is usually on main ductal injuries. METHODS To develop a classification system for pancreatic ductal injuries, we retrospectively analyzed blunt pancreatic injuries in 40 patients. We assessed the relationships between findings on pancreatography (36 endoscopic retrograde procedures and 4 transduodenal procedures), the treatment modality, and the clinical course. RESULTS Patients with class 1 injuries (radiographically normal ducts, n = 13) could be treated nonsurgically without major complications. Patients with class 2 injuries (branch injuries, n = 7), in whom contrast medium from ductal branches did not leak from the pancreatic parenchyma (class 2a, n = 3), could be treated nonsurgically. Patients with leaks into the retroperitoneal space (class 2b, n = 4) required at least a drainage laparotomy. Patients with class 3 injuries (main duct injuries, n = 20), including two patients in whom conservative treatment resulted in severe complications, required laparotomy. CONCLUSION This classification system for pancreatic ductal injuries may facilitate the selection of appropriate therapeutic modalities for patients with blunt pancreatic injury.

Large-volume intraoperative peritoneal lavage with an assistant device for treatment of peritonitis caused by blunt traumatic rupture of the small bowel

The benefits of large-volume intraoperative peritoneal lavage (IOPL), with an assistant lavage device, were evaluated retrospectively in 114 patients with peritonitis caused by blunt traumatic rupture of the small bowel. Postoperative complications caused by infection were a major problem after rupture of the small bowel (46 of 114, 39.4%). Both prolongation of the interval between injury and laparotomy and rupture of the lower part of the small bowel were risk factors for postoperative complications caused by infection. Large-volume IOPL (25.2 +/- 2.1 L) with an assistant lavage device reduced the rate of complications caused by infection from 30 of 58 (51.8%) to 15 of 56 (26.8%). The volume used for IOPL was closely related to the occurrence of postoperative complications resulting from infection. No complications from infection occurred in patients who received lavage with of 28.3 +/- 2.7 L of saline, whereas complications occurred in those patients treated with a smaller volume of lavage fluid (18.0 +/- 2.5 L). Large-volume IOPL should be considered in patients with blunt rupture of the small bowel who are at risk for infection, and the assistant device for IOPL may be useful for such treatment.

Role of repeat computed tomography after emergency endoscopic retrograde pancreatography in the diagnosis of traumatic injury to pancreatic ducts

Endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP) is performed on patients with pancreatic injury after abdominal trauma. To delineate pancreatic ductal injuries more accurately, we performed repeat computed tomography (CT) shortly after completion of ERP. We describe our experiences with six patients to demonstrate the feasibility and utility of this method. In our cases, the diagnosis of pancreatic ductal injury was made with certainty on the basis of the presence of extravasated contrast medium. This protocol is useful for reaffirmation of injuries noted on ERP, for diagnosis of injuries not noted on ERP, and for exclusion of injuries in patients with equivocal results of ERP. Moreover, the protocol is easy to implement because it involves only the transfer of the patient from the endoscopy to the CT suite. The technique can be used to clarify potentially confusing situations.

THE MODE OF SPREAD OF PANCREAS CANCER ON MACROSCOPIC AND MICROSCOPIC INVESTIGATION AT OPERATION AND AUTOPSY

北里大学外科で昭和46年7月より昭和60年12月までに経験した膵癌 (Ductcell carcinoma) 手術症例80例, 剖検症例24例につき膵癌の進展形式を検討し以下の結果を得た.1) 切除例においても, 膵被膜浸潤, 膵後方剥離面への癌侵襲陽性のものが多かった.2) 切除剖検例6例の検討では, 全例局在再発, 肝転移がみられ, 腹膜播種も5例にみられた.3) 非切除例の検討では非切除の因子として門脈系浸潤, 動脈系への浸潤, 膵後方浸潤が多かった.また肝転移, 腹膜播種が非切除の因子となったものもみられた.これらの検討をもとに昭和61年1月より積極的に門脈合併切除を伴う拡大手術を行い膵頭部癌の切除率が26.3%より50.0%と向上した.