Takamaru Koda

Chemoradiation therapy with S-1 for primary squamous cell carcinoma of the rectum: report of three cases

PurposeAlthough successful treatment of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the rectum using chemoradiation therapy (CRT) has been reported, a standard protocol has yet to be established. The aim is to ascertain the effectiveness of CRT with S-1 for three patients with SCC of the rectum.Case presentationWe treated three female patients complaining of rectal bleeding. The patients were diagnosed as having primary SCC of the rectum by means of routine examinations; one of them was a very rare case because of the presence of two lesions in the lower rectum. We treated the patients using CRT with S1 at a radiation dose of 1.8 Gy/fraction given five times weekly (Monday to Friday) to a median dose of 59.4 (45 to 59.4) Gy; S-1 (80 mg/m2/day) was administered orally during radiation therapy. One of three patients had an adverse event involving massive hemorrhage from the tumor. All patients exhibited an excellent response to CRT with S-1; two patients had a complete response, and one patient had a partial response and underwent a posterior pelvic exenteration with advancement flap reconstruction as a salvage treatment. Pathological examination of the resected specimen and lymph nodes revealed no tumor cells indicating a pathological complete response. In this series, the response rate was 100%.ConclusionsWe suggest that CRT with S-1 be chosen as the first-line therapy for SCC of the rectum. However, a large study will be required to establish a safe and effective regimen.

Clinical feasibility of sphincter-preserving resection with transanal rectal dissection for low-lying rectal cancer in Japanese patients: a single-center cohort study

Aim: Recently, the transanal down-to-up rectal dissection, a new approach to improve the difficult total mesorectal excision (TME) for low-lying rectal cancer, has been popularized. This study assessed the long-term oncologic and functional outcomes after sphincter-preserving resection combined with transanal rectal dissection (TARD) under direct vision for both complete TME and preservation of the internal anal sphincter (IAS) as much as possible to clarify the clinical feasibility of this approach. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted in 90 Japanese patients between April 2003 and March 2012. Results: Abdominoperineal resection (APR) was needed in 17 patients (18.9%) including 14 salvage APRs. Local recurrences occurred in 5 sphincter-preserving resection patients (6.8%). No significant between-group differences were observed in overall survival or 5-year disease-free survival. A significant benefit of preserving the internal anal sphincter completely in sphincter-preserving resection was found on the Wexner incontinence score (P = 0.005), low anterior resection syndrome score (P = 0.002), and visual analogue scale (P = 0.047). Conclusion: TARD, performed under direct vision for both complete TME and preservation of the IAS as much as possible in sphincter-preserving resections for low-lying rectal cancers in Japanese patients, does not negatively impact oncologic outcomes and could have the benefit of minimizing postoperative anorectal dysfunction by preserving the internal anal sphincter.