Takamitsu Takagi

Impact of Coronary Plaque Morphology Assessed by Optical Coherence Tomography on Cardiac Troponin Elevation in Patients With Elective Stent Implantation

Background—Mild elevations of cardiac troponin frequently occur after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and patients with elevated post-PCI biomarkers have a worse prognosis. We used optical coherence tomography (OCT) to study the relationship between pre-PCI plaque morphology and post-PCI cardiac troponin I elevations. Methods and Results—One hundred thirty-one patients with normal pre-PCI cardiac troponin I levels underwent OCT before nonemergency stent implantation. Clinical and OCT findings were compared between patients with (n=31, 23.7%) and without (n=100, 76.3%) post-PCI cardiac troponin I of >3×upper reference limit (post-PCI myocardial infarction [MI]). After PCI, long-term follow-up data were collected. Post-PCI MI was associated with angiographic lesion length, type B2/C lesions, presence of thin-cap fibroatheroma, and fibrous cap thickness. In multivariable analysis, presence of thin-cap fibroatheroma (odds ratio, 10.47; 95% confidence interval, 3.74 to 29.28; P<0.001) and type B2/C lesions (odds ratio, 3.74; 95% confidence interval, 1.41 to 9.92; P=0.008) were predictors of post-PCI MI. At a median follow-up of 12 months, cardiac event-free survival was significantly worse in patients with post-PCI MI (log-rank test &khgr;2=8.9; P=0.003). Cox proportional hazards analysis showed that post-PCI MI (hazard ratio, 3.67; 95% confidence interval, 1.39 to 9.65; P=0.009) and ejection fraction (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.92 to 0.99; P=0.029) were independent predictors of adverse cardiovascular events during follow-up. Conclusions—Type B2/C lesions and the presence of OCT-defined thin-cap fibroatheroma can predict post-PCI MI in patients treated with elective stent implantation, who may require adjunctive therapy after otherwise successful PCI.

Prevalence and clinical outcome of phrenic nerve injury during superior vena cava isolation and circumferential pulmonary vein antrum isolation using radiofrequency energy

BACKGROUND Phrenic nerve injury (PNI) is recognized as an important complication during atrial fibrillation ablation. This study aimed to investigate the incidence and outcome of PNI during superior vena cava isolation (SVCI) and circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVI) using radiofrequency (RF) energy and the factors associated with its occurrence. METHODS AND RESULTS Five hundred sixty-seven consecutive patients who underwent SVCI after CPVI without substrate modification who completed a 12-month follow-up were retrospectively analyzed. Point-by-point RF applications were applied with maximum energy settings of 35 W and 30 seconds for the SVCI. In the former 210 patients, sites where pacing captured the PN were avoided whenever possible; however, the maximum power was 35 W. In the latter 357 patients, RF energy was delivered regardless of PN capture; however, the power at PN capture sites was limited to 10 W during continuous diaphragmatic movement monitoring on fluoroscopy. Circumferential pulmonary vein isolation and SVCI were successfully achieved in all. Twelve patients (2.1%) had PNI during SVCI but not during CPVI. Phrenic nerve injury completely recovered in all patients a median of 8.0 months after the procedure. The prevalence was higher in the former period (3.8% vs 1.1%; P = .03). A multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the study period (odds ratio 3.546; 95% CI 1.051-11.965; P = .041) was the sole independent predictor for identifying patients with PNI during SVCI. CONCLUSIONS Phrenic nerve injury occurred in 2.1% of the patients. All occurred during SVCI but not during contemporary CPVI. Energy titration and continuous diaphragmatic movement monitoring significantly decreased the incidence during SVCI.

Impact of the order of the targeted pulmonary vein on the vagal response during second-generation cryoballoon ablation.

BACKGROUND Radiofrequency applications around pulmonary vein (PV) ostia often induce vagal reflexes. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the order of the targeted PV on the vagal response during second-generation cryoballoon ablation. METHODS Eighty-one consecutive paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) patients undergoing cryoballoon ablation were prospectively enrolled. PV isolation was performed with one 28-mm second-generation balloon using a 3-minute freeze technique. In the first 39 patients, the left superior PV (LSPV) was initially targeted. In the second 42, the LSPV was targeted following the right PVs. RESULTS Baseline rhythms were sinus rhythm and AF in 34 and 5 patients in the first group, and 34 and 8 in the second group, respectively. In the first group, sinus bradycardia/arrest requiring back-up pacing occurred in 13 patients (38.2%) at a median of 41.0 (10.0-55.5) seconds after balloon deflation (90 [60-100] seconds post freezing), and pauses requiring pacing in 1 (20.0%) with AF. In the second group, no sinus bradycardia/arrest occurred throughout the procedure; however, atrioventricular block requiring back-up pacing occurred 21 seconds after balloon deflation in 1 patient in whom right superior PV (RSPV) ablation was performed for only 60 seconds owing to right phrenic nerve injury. The cycle length was similar at baseline and post PV isolation between the 2 groups, and significantly shorter during RSPV ablation (P < .0001) in both. In total, marked vagal responses were significantly higher in the first than second group (14/39 vs 1/42, P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS LSPV cryoballoon ablation often provoked marked vagal responses; however, preceding RSPV ablation markedly suppressed this response.

Factors Associated With Periesophageal Vagal Nerve Injury After Pulmonary Vein Antrum Isolation

Background Periesophageal vagal nerve injury is recognized as a rare complication in atrial fibrillation ablation procedures. We investigated the factors associated with the occurrence of symptomatic periesophageal vagal nerve injury after pulmonary vein antrum isolation. Methods and Results Overall, 535 consecutive patients who underwent sole pulmonary vein antrum isolation were included. Point‐by‐point radiofrequency applications were applied using irrigated‐tip catheters under minimal sedation without esophageal temperature monitoring. In the initial 165 patients, the ablation settings for the posterior left atrium were a maximum energy of 25 to 30 W and a duration of 30 seconds. In the subsequent 370 patients, the power was additionally limited to 20 to 25 W at specific parts of the posterior left atrium where the ablation line transversed the esophagus. Symptomatic gastric hypomotility was found in 13 patients, and all were observed during the initial period (7.9%). No other collateral damage was observed. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the body mass index was the only independent predictor for identifying patients with gastric hypomotility (odds ratio 0.770; 95% confidence interval 0.643 to 0.922; P=0.0045) during the initial period. The prevalence of gastric hypomotility was significantly higher in the initial study period than subsequently (0 of 370, 0%; P<0.0001). All except for 1 patient recovered completely with conservative treatment within 4 months after the procedure. Conclusions Periesophageal vagal nerve injury is more common collateral damage than direct esophageal injury in pulmonary vein antrum isolation procedures. Titrating the radiofrequency energy at specific areas where the ablation line transverses the esophagus and taking account of the body mass index might reduce occurrences not only of direct esophageal damage but also of periesophageal vagal nerve injury in pulmonary vein antrum isolation procedures.

Early Recurrence After Pulmonary Vein Isolation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation With Different Ablation Technologies – Prospective Comparison of Radiofrequency vs. Second-Generation Cryoballoon Ablation –

BACKGROUND Inflammation plays a prominent role in the etiology of the early recurrence of atrial fibrillation (ERAF). We prospectively compared the proportion of ERAF and time-course patterns of biomarkers between radiofrequency (RF) and cryoballoon (CB) ablation. METHODSANDRESULTS We enrolled 82 consecutive paroxysmal AF patients undergoing pulmonary vein (PV) isolation, performed with either a 28-mm 2nd-generation CB and 3-min freeze technique or point-by-point RF ablation. Each group had 41 patients. In the RF group, all PVs were successfully isolated with 28.9 ± 6.5 min of RF delivery. In the CB group, a mean of 5.3 ± 1.4 applications/patient was delivered. The proportion of ERAF was similar between the groups. The time-course patterns significantly differed between the groups for high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) value (P=0.006) and myocardial injury markers (P<0.0001). Greater myocardial injury was observed in the CB than in the RF group (P<0.0001), whereas the peak hs-CRP value was comparable between the groups. The 2-day post-procedure hs-CRP value was the sole factor correlating with ERAF as identified by the multivariable analysis (hazard ratio 1.697; 95% confidence interval, 1.005-2.865; P=0.048) in the RF, but not the CB group. CONCLUSIONS The proportion of ERAF was comparable after RF and 2nd-generation CB ablation. Despite CB ablation exhibiting greater myocardial injury than RF ablation, the inflammatory responses were comparable between the groups. The inflammatory response extent predicted ERAF post-RF ablation but not post-CB ablation.

Quantitative Analysis of the Isolation Area During the Chronic Phase After a 28-mm Second-Generation Cryoballoon Ablation Demarcated by High-Resolution Electroanatomic Mapping

Background—The post–second-generation cryoballoon (CB) ablation isolation area during the chronic phase has not been described. The aim of this study was to quantitatively evaluate the chronic-phase isolation area after 28-mm second-generation CB ablation and compare it to the estimated conventional radiofrequency circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVI) line. Methods and Results—Thirty-two patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation underwent pulmonary vein (PV) isolation using second-generation CB. After a median of 6.0 (4.0–9.0) months, the PV isolation area was evaluated using high-resolution mapping (1-mm electrode, 2-mm interelectrode spacing; 527±99 points per map) and pacing techniques in all patients (17 with and 15 without arrhythmia recurrence beyond blanking period) and compared with estimated conventional radiofrequency CPVI area. PV reconnections were observed in 34 of 126 PVs (27.0%) among 21 of 32 patients (65.6%), which were eliminated by a median of 1.0 (1.0–3.0) focal radiofrequency application. The left- and right-sided PV antrum isolation area and nonablated posterior wall areas were 9.8±1.7, 8.1±2.3, and 17.0±6.1 cm2, respectively. The cryoablated areas were significantly smaller than the estimated conventional radiofrequency CPVI areas in all but the right inferior PV. The difference was highest in the left superior PV. In 2 patients (6.3%), recurrent atrial fibrillation originated from the foci identified at the left superior PV antrum outside the CB isolation area but inside the estimated conventional radiofrequency CPVI line. Conclusions—Although the PV isolation areas during the chronic phase after the second-generation CB ablation were generally wide, they were significantly smaller than the area encircled by the CPVI line except at the right inferior PV antrum. Recurrent atrial fibrillation could originate from the left superior PV antrum and could be isolated by a CPVI but not by a CB.

Clinical Significance of Early Recurrence After Pulmonary Vein Antrum Isolation in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation – Insight Into the Mechanism –

BACKGROUND Early recurrence of atrial fibrillation (ERAF) is common after pulmonary vein antrum isolation (PVAI); however, the definition, study population, and lesion set are not uniform in prior studies. We examined ERAF for paroxysmal AF while complying with the definition in the latest guidelines. METHODSANDRESULTS We included 471 patients undergoing empirical PVAI for paroxysmal AF. ERAF was observed in 180 patients (38.2%) including 49, 16, and 115 within 3, 4-7 days, and 8-90 days, respectively, after the index procedure. ERAF (hazard ratio 6.872; 95% confidence interval 4.803-9.382; P<0.0001) was the strongest factor associated with recurrence beyond 3 months (LR) in the multivariable model, and ERAF patients had worse outcomes than those without, regardless of the time to the first ERAF episode. There were no significant differences in the prevalence of PV reconnections and non-PV foci among 29 and 62 patients, respectively, who underwent redo procedures for ERAF within and more than 3 months after the index procedure, and 21 who underwent redo procedures for LR. Re-ablation was associated with a greater freedom from LR (HR 0.443; 95% CI 0.230-0.854; P=0.015). CONCLUSIONS ERAF occurred in 38.2% of patients and was strongly associated with LR regardless of the time to the first ERAF episode. Re-ablation for ERAF significantly improved the freedom from recurrent atrial arrhythmias, regardless of the time to the first ERAF episode.

Simple Minimal Sedation for Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND Deep sedation or general anesthesia is generally used during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. The aim of this study was to report the safety and feasibility of minimal sedation during AF ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS One thousand and fifty-two AF ablation procedures in 819 patients (62 ± 11 years, 621 men, 506 paroxysmal) were included. Boluses of intravenous hydroxyzine pamoate and pentazocine were administered, with a maximal dose of 100 mg of hydroxyzine and 60 mg of pentazocine in response to pain. If the pain was intolerable or patients requested deeper sedation, moderate sedation using dexmedetomidine or propofol was introduced. Among 819 consecutive first procedures, the procedure was completed under minimal sedation in 795 (97.1%) patients without inotropic drugs or respiratory support, whereas in 20 (2.4%) patients, anesthesia was switched to moderate sedation due to pain. Patients requiring a switch to moderate sedation were significantly younger than those without (53.6 ± 2.3 vs. 62.6 ± 10.4, P<0.01). No procedures were abandoned due to adverse effects of sedation. Significant intra-procedural blood pressure decreases requiring inotropic drugs were not observed in any patients. Among 233 patients who underwent repeat procedures, 6 (2.6%) requested moderate sedation before the procedure. The mean procedure time was 151 ± 54 min. Cardiac tamponade, unrelated to sedation, was observed in 7 (0.66%) procedures. CONCLUSIONS Minimal sedation might be acceptable anesthesia in the vast majority of AF ablation procedures performed in electrophysiological laboratories.

Esophagus-Related Complications During Second-Generation Cryoballoon Ablation-Insight from Simultaneous Esophageal Temperature Monitoring from 2 Esophageal Probes.

Monitoring luminal esophageal temperatures (LETs) helps predict esophageal thermal lesions (ETLs) after catheter ablation. This study aimed to evaluate esophagus‐related complications after second‐generation cryoballoon ablation under simultaneous LETs monitoring from 2 esophageal probes.

Clinical recurrence and electrical pulmonary vein reconnections after second-generation cryoballoon ablation.

BACKGROUND Electrical reconnections after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) are less common after second-generation cryoballoon than radiofrequency ablation. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence and characteristics of pulmonary vein (PV) reconnections after second-generation cryoballoon ablation in patients with and those without clinical recurrences. METHODS Forty patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation undergoing second procedures after cryoballoon ablation were enrolled. Twenty-five patients experienced clinical recurrences, and the remaining 15 did not. RESULTS All 158 PVs were reevaluated a median [25th, 75th percentiles] of 6.0 [4.0-9.0] months after the initial procedure. In total, reconnections were detected in 39 PVs (24.7%) among 25 patients (62.5%). Reconnected PVs included 6 left superior (LS) (15.8%), 7 left inferior (LI) (18.4%), 5 right superior (RS) (12.5%), 20 right inferior (RI) (50.0%), and 1 left common (LC) (50.0%) PV. Reconnected PV potential conduction delays were a median of 112 [76-130], 103 [82-133], 84 [66-96], 68 [49-73], and 204 ms in the LS, LI, RS, RI, and LC PV, respectively. There was no significant difference between those with and those without clinical recurrences with regard to clinical characteristics, procedural results, incidence of reconnections (25/98 vs 14/60, P = .758), and PV conduction delays in each PV. The most common gap location was the RI PV bottom in both groups. Among 5 patients with reconnections of arrhythmogenic PVs (with atrial fibrillation initiation), 2 experienced clinical recurrences, whereas 3 did not. Non-PV foci (with atrial fibrillation initiation) were identified in a second procedures in 10 of 25 patients with clinical recurrences. CONCLUSION The incidence and characteristics of PV reconnections after second-generation cryoballoon ablation were similar between patients with and those without clinical recurrences. The results should be considered when discussing the optimal dose of cryoballoon applications.