Tara K. Knight

Quality of Anticoagulation Monitoring in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients: Comparison of Anticoagulation Clinic versus Usual Care

Background: Prior research suggests that receiving specialized anticoagulation services enables patients to achieve better clinical outcomes. Objective: To assess the quality of anticoagulation therapy in patents with atrial fibrillation who were enrolled in an anticoagulation clinic (ACC) versus usual care (UC). Methods: Using Sharp Rees-Stealy physician group claims data, we estimated time spent in therapeutic range and time to first major bleeding episode or stroke for ACC and UC patients. t-Tests were used to compare time h therapeutic range proportions, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to compare rates of bleeding and stroke between groups. Results: We identified 1107 patients (351 ACC, 756 UC) treated with anticoagulation therapy for atrial fibrillation with more than one international normalized ratio (INR) reported between March 2001 and March 2004. ACC patients spent a greater proportion (68.14%) of time in therapeutic range compared with UC patients (42.07%; p < 0.001). There was a significant difference between groups in average time between INR tests (ACC = 14.31 days, UC = 18.39 days; p < 0.001). ACC patients were 59% less likely to experience a bleed following the index date than were UC patients (HR = 0.41; 95% CI 0.2444 to 0.6999; p = 0.001), but type of care was not a significant predictor for stroke (HR = 0.95; 95% CI 0.5125 to 1.7777; p value NS). Conclusions: Results from this observational study reinforce the positive impact that anticoagulation services have on anticoagulation therapy outcomes, emphasizing the importance of providing such services for patients undergoing treatment with warfarin.

Evaluating Use Patterns of and Adherence to Medications for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

PURPOSE We investigated adherence to benign prostatic hyperplasia medications in a California Medicaid population. MATERIALS AND METHODS Using California Medicaid data on 1995 to 2004 we identified adult males 40 years old or older with 1 or more diagnosis and 2 or more prescription fills for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Patients with 2 fills on the same day were assigned to the multiple medication cohort. Adherence was measured using the medication possession ratio for the index medication and the proportion of days covered for any benign prostatic hyperplasia medication. Patients with a medication possession ratio or proportion of days covered of 0.8 or greater were considered adherent. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the relative hazards associated with discontinuation. Multiple logistic regression was used to investigate factors associated with nonadherence or a benign prostatic hyperplasia related procedure. RESULTS Of the total population of 2,640 men 40% were adherent with any benign prostatic hyperplasia medication. A significantly greater proportion of patients using multiple medications and finasteride were adherent with any benign prostatic hyperplasia medication (62% and 55%, respectively, p <0.0001). Doxazosin, terazosin and tamsulosin use was associated with nonadherence (p = 0.008, 0.04 and 0.03, respectively). Younger patients and those changing medications were more likely to discontinue (p = 0.01 and <0.0001), while patients using multiple medications and those experiencing a gap were at lower risk for discontinuation (p = 0.01 and <0.0001, respectively). Predictors of a procedure included an index prescription in 1999 or later, a urologist visit and nonadherence to any benign prostatic hyperplasia medication (p = 0.01, <0.0001 and <0.0001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Adherence to alpha-blockers was less than adherence to finasteride or multiple medications and nonadherence was significantly associated with a procedure. Interventions focused on improving adherence to benign prostatic hyperplasia medications are clearly needed.

Cost of care for early- and late-stage oral and pharyngeal cancer in the California Medicaid population†

This study documents the direct medical costs associated with treating oral and pharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) as early‐ or late‐stage disease according to the current standard of care.

Use of behavioral economics and social psychology to improve treatment of acute respiratory infections (BEARI): rationale and design of a cluster randomized controlled trial [1RC4AG039115-01] - study protocol and baseline practice and provider characteristics

BackgroundInappropriate antibiotic prescribing for nonbacterial infections leads to increases in the costs of care, antibiotic resistance among bacteria, and adverse drug events. Acute respiratory infections (ARIs) are the most common reason for inappropriate antibiotic use. Most prior efforts to decrease inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for ARIs (e.g., educational or informational interventions) have relied on the implicit assumption that clinicians inappropriately prescribe antibiotics because they are unaware of guideline recommendations for ARIs. If lack of guideline awareness is not the reason for inappropriate prescribing, educational interventions may have limited impact on prescribing rates. Instead, interventions that apply social psychological and behavioral economic principles may be more effective in deterring inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for ARIs by well-informed clinicians.Methods/designThe Application of Behavioral Economics to Improve the Treatment of Acute Respiratory Infections (BEARI) Trial is a multisite, cluster-randomized controlled trial with practice as the unit of randomization. The primary aim is to test the ability of three interventions based on behavioral economic principles to reduce the rate of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for ARIs. We randomized practices in a 2 × 2 × 2 factorial design to receive up to three interventions for non-antibiotic-appropriate diagnoses: 1) Accountable Justifications: When prescribing an antibiotic for an ARI, clinicians are prompted to record an explicit justification that appears in the patient electronic health record; 2) Suggested Alternatives: Through computerized clinical decision support, clinicians prescribing an antibiotic for an ARI receive a list of non-antibiotic treatment choices (including prescription options) prior to completing the antibiotic prescription; and 3) Peer Comparison: Each provider’s rate of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing relative to top-performing peers is reported back to the provider periodically by email. We enrolled 269 clinicians (practicing attending physicians or advanced practice nurses) in 49 participating clinic sites and collected baseline data. The primary outcome is the antibiotic prescribing rate for office visits with non-antibiotic-appropriate ARI diagnoses. Secondary outcomes will examine antibiotic prescribing more broadly. The 18-month intervention period will be followed by a one year follow-up period to measure persistence of effects after interventions cease.DiscussionThe ongoing BEARI Trial will evaluate the effectiveness of behavioral economic strategies in reducing inappropriate prescribing of antibiotics.Trials registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01454947

Nonadherence to clinical practice guidelines and medications for multiple chronic conditions in a California Medicaid population

OBJECTIVES To assess and profile quality of care in California Medicaid beneficiaries with chronic conditions. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING California from 2002 to 2004. PATIENTS 1,123,577 beneficiaries. INTERVENTION Eligibility and claims data (2002-2004) were used to identify beneficiaries with dyslipidemia, hypertension, coronary artery disease (CAD), heart failure, or diabetes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Quality of care was based on nonadherence with clinical practice guidelines including recommended medications. Chi-square was used to evaluate nonadherence and patient characteristics. RESULTS The proportion of patients without a prescription fill for recommended medications varied by disease (43% hypertension, 40% dyslipidemia and CAD, and 25% diabetes and heart failure). For Medicaid-only beneficiaries with diabetes, 78% lacked glycosylated hemoglobin tests, 62% lacked low-density lipoprotein cholesterol tests, and 50% lacked eye exams. Medication nonadherence was high (69% hypertension, 64% CAD, 57% heart failure, 48% dyslipidemia, 41% diabetes). Overall, younger age, Medicaid-only status, and black/other race were associated with poorer rates. CONCLUSION Quality of care was suboptimal, with nonadherence varying by condition. Programs targeting both patients and providers and addressing patient-related characteristics (e.g., age, race) and policy reform addressing alterable factors (e.g., insurance eligibility) should be developed to improve guideline adherence.

Transition Probabilities and Predictors of Adherence in a California Medicaid Population Using Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Medications

OBJECTIVES To determine adherence rates, transition probabilities, and factors associated with transition from higher to lower adherence in antihypertensive (AH) and lipid-lowering (LL) medications. METHODS California Medicaid data (1995-2003) were used to identify hypertensive patients with prescriptions for both AH and LL medications. Proportion of days covered (PDC) was used to define three adherence classifications: fully adherent (FA, PDC >or= 0.8), partially adherent (PA, 0.2 <or= PDC < 0.8), and nonadherent (NA, PDC < 0.2). Annual transition matrices documented the probability of adherence status changes. RESULTS Only 13% of the 5943 patients were FA to both drugs at baseline. Patients who were FA (60%) or NA (84%) to both drugs had high probability of maintaining status at year two (Y2). Significant variables associated with a transition from adherent to NA at Y2 included African American race (odds ratio [OR] 1.5), other race groups (OR 1.2), lack of Medicare eligibility (OR 1.3), and initiating LL therapy of fibric acid derivatives (OR 1.3) or niacin (OR 1.8). CONCLUSIONS Patients FA or NA with both drugs at baseline were more likely to maintain their adherence status. Race, insurance coverage, and type of LL medication were significantly associated with transitioning from any adherence status to nonadherence. These findings may be useful in guiding cost-effectiveness analyses incorporating adherence estimates.

Prevalence and incidence of adult attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder in a large managed care population

Abstract Objectives: To estimate longitudinal trends in prevalence and incidence rates of adult ADHD 2006–2009. Research design and methods: Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC) electronic medical records were analyzed to assess prevalence and incidence rates for adult ADHD. Trends over time were estimated and compared using three case definitions (ADHD diagnosis only [DX], ADHD DX and ≥2 FDA-approved ADHD prescriptions [DX + RX], and ADHD DX and ≥1 behavioral therapy visit [DX + BT]). Main outcome measures: Prevalence and incidence rates of adult ADHD. Results: Prevalence ranged from 151 (DX + RX) to 312 (DX) cases per 100,000 members in 2006, increasing to 239 (DX + RX) and 415 (DX) cases in 2009. Prevalence based on DX + BT declined from 185 in 2006 to 94 cases per 100,000 in 2009. In 2006, incidence ranged from 15 (DX + BT) to 68 (DX) cases per 100,000 person-years. Incidence rates remained stable throughout the study period. Stratified analyses based on DX + RX revealed only slight variations by gender, but sharp differences by age, with younger adults demonstrating a higher prevalence overall as well as dramatic increases over the study period. Prevalence was highest among Caucasians, increasing substantially across all race groups over time. Limitations: A limitation of this study is that incidence rates may not be representative of new cases if diagnoses existed prior to enrollment in KPSC. Similarly, prevalence rates may be affected if patients sought care outside of the health plan. Conclusions: Adult ADHD prevalence in this managed care organization appears low, but showed increasing prevalence and incidence rates over time.

Impact of Mental Health Comorbidities on Health Care Utilization and Expenditure in a Large US Managed Care Adult Population with ADHD

OBJECTIVE To estimate the health resource use (HRU) and expenditure of adult patients with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) subsequently diagnosed with one or more mental health (MH) comorbidities. METHODS Using Kaiser Permanente Southern California electronic medical records (January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2009), we identified adults with at least one ADHD diagnosis and at least two subsequent prescriptions fills for ADHD medication. The date of first MH comorbidity diagnosis after the index ADHD diagnosis was defined as the index transition date. Continuous eligibility 12 months before and after the index transition date was required. For patients with multiple transitions (≥2), the post-transition period reflected the 12 months after the second transition. HRU for all-cause inpatient, outpatient, emergency department, behavioral therapy, overall prescription fill counts, and ADHD-specific prescription fill counts and mean patient expenditure (2010 US

Adults with type 1 diabetes: Partner relationships and outcomes.

) were estimated. Generalized estimating equations were used to evaluate differences in HRU and expenditure between the pre- and post-transition periods, respectively. RESULTS Of the 3809 patients with ADHD identified, 989 (26%) had at least one transition (n = 357 single and n = 632 multiple). From the pre- to the post-transition period, for single transition cohort, all HRU increased significantly except for behavioral therapy. In the multiple transition cohort, all HRU increased significantly. Total expenditure increased by mean ± SE of

CM4 NONADHERENCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES FOR MULTIPLE DISEASE CONDITIONS IN A CALIFORNIA MEDICAID POPULATION

1822 ±