Tárcio Soares

Avaliação neuropsicológica na esquizofrenia: revisão sistemática

This article aims at summarizing studies on the most commonly used neuropsychological tests in schizophrenia. A systematic literature review was performed on PubMed, MEDLINE (via PubMed) and LILACS, from 1995 through 2006. The keywords were cognition and schizophrenia; evaluation and cognition and schizophrenia; functioning and cognition and schizophrenia. A manual research of references in most frequently cited articles was performed, including meta-analysis studies, theoretical reviews, and the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia. Inclusion criteria were studies on schizophrenia patients that reported use of neuropsychological tests. A review of the most frequently cited tests was performed to check nomenclature, indications, and which were validated for Brazil. A total of 98 studies were identified: 77 empirical studies, eight meta-analyses, six theoretical reviews and seven from the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia. There were 102 different names of neuropsychological tests; 10 batteries of tests were cited, most of them composed by previously standardized subtests. Of the 77 empirical studies, 22 (28.57%) were about validation of instruments or batteries of tests. Of the 10 most frequently cited tests, only three had been validated for Brazil (WCST; Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale; Mini-Mental Status Examination). These findings show a wide heterogeneity in the selection criteria of neuropsychological tests, disagreement as to the nomenclature, and a certain trend toward creation of new tests and batteries for evaluating cognitive functions. The relevance and characteristics of cognitive impairments in schizophrenia confirm the urgent necessity of specific and standardized identification of neuropsychological evaluation methods for Brazilian patients.

A systematic review of cognitive rehabilitation for bipolar disorder

INTRODUCTION It has been shown that bipolar disorder (BD) has a direct impact on neurocognitive functioning and behavior. This finding has prompted studies to investigate cognitive enhancement programs as potential treatments for BD, primarily focusing on cognitive reinforcement and daily functioning and not restricted to psychoeducation and coping strategies, unlike traditional psychosocial treatments. OBJECTIVE This study presents a systematic review of controlled trials of cognitive rehabilitation (CR) for BD. Our main objective is to describe the results of studies of rehabilitation programs for BD and related methodological issues. METHOD Electronic database searches (MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Embase) were conducted to identify articles using terms related to BD and CR. The methodological quality of each article was measured using the 5-item Jadad scale. RESULTS A total of 239 articles were initially identified, but after application of exclusion criteria, only four were retained for this review. An average of 17 hours of intervention sessions were conducted, distributed as 0.95 hours per week and three of the four studies reported better executive function performance after CR interventions. CONCLUSIONS We did not find robust evidence to support cognitive rehabilitation as an effective treatment for BD, because of: 1) the variety of intervention designs; 2) the methodological limitations of the studies; and 3) the lack of studies in the field.