Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Tarek Sayed is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Tarek Sayed.


Accident Analysis & Prevention | 2009

Collision prediction models using multivariate Poisson-lognormal regression

Karim El-Basyouny; Tarek Sayed

This paper advocates the use of multivariate Poisson-lognormal (MVPLN) regression to develop models for collision count data. The MVPLN approach presents an opportunity to incorporate the correlations across collision severity levels and their influence on safety analyses. The paper introduces a new multivariate hazardous location identification technique, which generalizes the univariate posterior probability of excess that has been commonly proposed and applied in the literature. In addition, the paper presents an alternative approach for quantifying the effect of the multivariate structure on the precision of expected collision frequency. The MVPLN approach is compared with the independent (separate) univariate Poisson-lognormal (PLN) models with respect to model inference, goodness-of-fit, identification of hot spots and precision of expected collision frequency. The MVPLN is modeled using the WinBUGS platform which facilitates computation of posterior distributions as well as providing a goodness-of-fit measure for model comparisons. The results indicate that the estimates of the extra Poisson variation parameters were considerably smaller under MVPLN leading to higher precision. The improvement in precision is due mainly to the fact that MVPLN accounts for the correlation between the latent variables representing property damage only (PDO) and injuries plus fatalities (I+F). This correlation was estimated at 0.758, which is highly significant, suggesting that higher PDO rates are associated with higher I+F rates, as the collision likelihood for both types is likely to rise due to similar deficiencies in roadway design and/or other unobserved factors. In terms of goodness-of-fit, the MVPLN model provided a superior fit than the independent univariate models. The multivariate hazardous location identification results demonstrated that some hazardous locations could be overlooked if the analysis was restricted to the univariate models.


Accident Analysis & Prevention | 2009

Accident prediction models with random corridor parameters.

Karim El-Basyouny; Tarek Sayed

Recent research advocates the use of count models with random parameters as an alternative method for analyzing accident frequencies. In this paper a dataset composed of urban arterials in Vancouver, British Columbia, is considered where the 392 segments were clustered into 58 corridors. The main objective is to assess the corridor effects with alternate specifications. The proposed models were estimated in a Full Bayes context via Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulation and were compared in terms of their goodness of fit and inference. A variety of covariates were found to significantly influence accident frequencies. However, these covariates resulted in random parameters and thereby their effects on accident frequency were found to vary significantly across corridors. Further, a Poisson-lognormal (PLN) model with random parameters for each corridor provided the best fit. Apart from the improvement in goodness of fit, such an approach is useful in gaining new insights into how accident frequencies are influenced by the covariates, and in accounting for heterogeneity due to unobserved road geometrics, traffic characteristics, environmental factors and driver behavior. The inclusion of corridor effects in the mean function could also explain enough variation that some of the model covariates would be rendered non-significant and thereby affecting model inference.


Transportation Planning and Technology | 1999

Traffic conflict standards for intersections

Tarek Sayed; Sany Zein

This paper describes the application of the traffic conflict technique to estimate, traffic safety at intersections. Using data collected from 94 conflict surveys, traffic conflict frequency and severity standards for signalized and unsignalized intersections have been established. These standards allow for the relative comparison of the conflict risk at various intersections. An Intersection Conflict Index (ICI) measure was developed to summarize conflict risk and provide an indication regarding the relative risk of being involved in a conflict at an intersection. In addition, regression analysis was used to develop predictive models which relate the number of traffic conflicts to traffic volume and accidents. The regression analysis results indicate that: (i) the average hourly conflict rate (AHC) and the average hourly severe conflict rate (AHC 4+) correlated reasonably well with traffic volume for both signalized and unsignalized intersections, and (ii) strong relationships between accidents and conflicts were obtained for signalized intersections only. These research efforts are expected to further enhance the usefulness of the traffic conflict technique as a tool to evaluate the safety of intersections. Finally, a case study is presented as an example of the usefulness of traffic conflict analysis.


canadian conference on computer and robot vision | 2006

A feature-based tracking algorithm for vehicles in intersections

Nicolas Saunier; Tarek Sayed

Intelligent Transportation Systems need methods to automatically monitor the road traffic, and especially track vehicles. Most research has concentrated on highways. Traffic in intersections is more variable, with multiple entrance and exit regions. This paper describes an extension to intersections of the feature-tracking algorithm described in [1]. Vehicle features are rarely tracked from their entrance in the field of view to their exit. Our algorithm can accommodate the problem caused by the disruption of feature tracks. It is evaluated on video sequences recorded on four different intersections.


Transportation Research Record | 2009

Automated Analysis of Pedestrian-Vehicle Conflicts Using Video Data

Karim Ismail; Tarek Sayed; Nicolas Saunier; Connie Lim

Pedestrians are vulnerable road users, and despite their limited representation in traffic events, pedestrian-involved injuries and fatalities are overrepresented in traffic collisions. However, little is known about pedestrian exposure to the risk of collision, especially when compared with the amount of knowledge available for motorized traffic. More data and analysis are therefore required to understand the processes that involve pedestrians in collisions. Collision statistics alone are inadequate for the study of pedestrian–vehicle collisions because of data quantity and quality issues. Surrogate safety measures, as provided by the collection and study of traffic conflicts, were developed as a proactive complementary approach to offer more in-depth safety analysis. However, high costs and reliability issues have inhibited the extensive application of traffic conflict analysis. An automated video analysis system is presented that can (a) detect and track road users in a traffic scene and classify them as pedestrians or motorized road users, (b) identify important events that may lead to collisions, and (c) calculate several severity conflict indicators. The system seeks to classify important events and conflicts automatically but can also be used to summarize large amounts of data that can be further reviewed by safety experts. The functionality of the system is demonstrated on a video data set collected over 2 days at an intersection in downtown Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Four conflict indicators are automatically computed for all pedestrian–vehicle events and provide detailed insight into the conflict process. Simple detection rules on the indicators are tested to classify traffic events. This study is unique in its attempt to extract conflict indicators from video sequences in a fully automated way.


Transportation Research Record | 2010

Large-Scale Automated Analysis of Vehicle Interactions and Collisions

Nicolas Saunier; Tarek Sayed; Karim Ismail

Road collisions are a worldwide pandemic that can be addressed through the improvement of existing tools for safety analysis. A refined probabilistic framework is presented for the analysis of road-user interactions. In particular, the identification of potential collision points is used to estimate collision probabilities, and their spatial distribution can be visualized. A probabilistic time to collision is introduced, and interactions are grouped into four categories: head-on, rear-end, side, and parallel. The framework is applied to a large data set of video recordings collected in Kentucky that contains more than 300 severe interactions and collisions. The results demonstrate the usefulness of the approach for studying road-user behavior and mechanisms that may lead to collisions.


Accident Analysis & Prevention | 1994

SIMULATION OF TRAFFIC CONFLICTS AT UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS WITH TSC-SIM

Tarek Sayed; Gregory M. Brown; Francis P. D. Navin

This paper describes a traffic conflicts computer simulation model and graphic display for both T and 4-leg unsignalized intersections. The goal of the model is to study traffic conflicts as critical-event traffic situations and the effect of driver and traffic parameters on the occurrence of conflicts. The analysis extends conventional gap acceptance criteria to describe drivers behaviour at unsignalized intersections by combining some aspects of gap acceptance criteria and the effect of several parameters including drivers characteristics such as age, sex, and waiting time. The effect of different traffic parameters such as volume and speed on the number and severity of traffic conflicts is also investigated. The model is unique insofar as it uses a technique of importance sampling and stores the traffic conflicts that occur during the simulation for later study. A graphical animation display is used to show how these conflicts occurred and the values of critical variables at the time. Model results were evaluated against previous work in the literature and validated by using field observations from four unsignalized intersections. The simulation results correlated reasonably well with actual conflict observations and should prove useful for assessing safety performance and feasible solutions for other unsignalized intersections.


Transportation Research Record | 2010

Automated Analysis of Pedestrian-Vehicle Conflicts Context for Before-and-After Studies

Karim Ismail; Tarek Sayed; Nicolas Saunier

This paper presents a novel application of automated video analysis for a before-and-after (BA) safety evaluation of a scramble phase treatment. Data availability has been a common challenge to pedestrian studies, especially for proactive safety analysis. The traditional reliance on collision data has many shortcomings because of the quality and quantity of collision records. Qualitative and quantitative issues with road collision data are more pronounced in pedestrian safety studies. In addition, little information on the mechanism of action implicated can be drawn from collision reports. Traffic conflict techniques have been advocated as supplements or alternatives to collision-based safety analysis. Automated conflict analysis has been advocated as a new safety analysis paradigm that empowers the drawbacks of survey-based and observer-based traffic conflict analysis. One of the areas of focus of pedestrian safety that could greatly benefit from vision-based road user tracking is BA evaluation of safety treatments. This paper demonstrates the feasibility of conducting a BA analysis with video data collected from a commercial-grade camera in Chinatown, Oakland, California. Video sequences for a period of 2 h before and 2 h after scramble were automatically analyzed. The BA results of the automated analysis exhibit a declining pattern of conflict frequency, a reduction in the spatial density of conflicts, and a shift in the spatial distribution of conflicts farther from crosswalks.


Transportation Research Record | 2006

Comparison of Two Negative Binomial Regression Techniques in Developing Accident Prediction Models

Karim El-Basyouny; Tarek Sayed

There are several regression techniques to develop accident prediction models. Model development and subsequently the results are affected by the choice of regression technique. The objective of this paper is to compare two types of regression techniques: the traditional negative binomial (TNB) and the modified negative binomial (MNB). The TNB approach assumes that the shape parameter of the negative binomial distribution is fixed for all locations, while the MNB approach assumes that this shape parameter varies with the locations characteristics. The difference between the two approaches in terms of their goodness of fit and the identification and ranking of accident-prone locations is investigated. The study makes use of a sample of accident, volume, and geometric data corresponding to 392 arterial segments in British Columbia, Canada. Both models appear to fit the data well. However, the MNB approach provides a statistically significant improvement in model fit over the TNB approach. A total of 100 locations were identified as accident-prone by both approaches. A comparison between the ranks showed a close agreement in the general trend of ranking between the two models. While the MNB approach appears to fit the data better than the TNB approach, there was little difference in the results of the identification and ranking of accident-prone locations. This is likely due to the nature of the application and the data set used. The difference in results will depend on the extent to which deviant sites exist in the data set.


Transportation Research Record | 2007

Automated Analysis of Road Safety with Video Data

Nicolas Saunier; Tarek Sayed

Traffic safety analysis has often been undertaken with historical collision data. However, well-recognized availability and quality problems are associated with collision data. In addition, the use of collision records for safety analysis is reactive: a significant number of collisions has to be recorded before action is taken. Therefore, the observation of traffic conflicts has been advocated as a complementary approach in the analysis of traffic safety. However, incomplete conceptualization and the cost of training observers and collecting conflict data have been factors inhibiting extensive application of the traffic conflict technique. The goal of this research is to develop a method for automated analysis of road safety with video sensors to address the problem of dependency on the deteriorating collision data. The method automates the extraction of traffic conflicts from video sensor data. This method should address the main shortcomings of the traffic conflict technique. A comprehensive system is described for traffic conflict detection in video data. The system is composed of a feature-based vehicle tracking algorithm adapted for intersections and a traffic conflict detection method based on the clustering of vehicle trajectories. The clustering uses a K-means approach with hidden Markov models and a simple heuristic to find the number of clusters automatically. Traffic conflicts can then be detected by identifying and adapting pairs of models of conflicting trajectories. The technique is demonstrated on real-world video sequences of traffic conflicts.

Collaboration


Dive into the Tarek Sayed's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mohamed H. Zaki

University of British Columbia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nicolas Saunier

École Polytechnique de Montréal

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Clark Lim

University of British Columbia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Emanuele Sacchi

University of British Columbia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ahmed Tageldin

University of British Columbia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mohamed Hussein

University of British Columbia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ahmed Osama

University of British Columbia

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge