Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Temeika L. Fairley is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Temeika L. Fairley.


Cancer | 2012

Health status of adolescent and young adult cancer survivors

Eric Tai; Natasha Buchanan; Julie S. Townsend; Temeika L. Fairley; Angela R. Moore; Lisa C. Richardson

Adolescents and young adults (AYA) ages 15 to 29 years who are diagnosed with cancer are at risk for long‐term morbidity and mortality associated with treatment of their cancer and the cancer itself. In this article, the authors describe the self‐reported health status of AYA cancer survivors.


Cancer | 2006

Colorectal cancer in U.S. adults younger than 50 years of age, 1998-2001.

Temeika L. Fairley; Cheryll J. Cardinez; Jim Martin; Linda Alley; Carol Friedman; Brenda K. Edwards; Patricia M. Jamison

Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence rates are increasing among persons younger than 50 years of age, a population routinely not screened unless an individual has a high risk of CRC. This population‐based study focuses primarily on describing the CRC burden for persons in this age group.


Cancer | 2012

Racial and regional disparities in lung cancer incidence

J. Michael Underwood; Julie S. Townsend; Eric Tai; Shane P. Davis; Sherri L. Stewart; Arica White; Behnoosh Momin; Temeika L. Fairley

Lung cancer is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer and the leading cause of cancer‐related death in the United States (US). We examined data from 2004 to 2006 for lung cancer incidence rates by demographics, including race and geographic region, to identify potential health disparities.


American Journal of Preventive Medicine | 2014

Health and Economic Impact of Breast Cancer Mortality in Young Women, 1970–2008

Donatus U. Ekwueme; Gery P. Guy; Sun Hee Rim; Arica White; Ingrid J. Hall; Temeika L. Fairley; Hazel D. Dean

BACKGROUND Breast cancer is the second-leading cause of cancer-related deaths among women aged <50 years. Studies on the effects of breast cancer mortality among young women are limited. PURPOSE To assess trends in breast cancer mortality rates among women aged 20-49 years, estimate years of potential life lost (YPLL), and the value of productivity losses due to premature mortality. METHODS Age-adjusted rates and rate ratios (RRs) were calculated using 1970-2008 U.S. mortality data. Breast cancer mortality rates over time were assessed using Joinpoint regression modeling. YPLL was calculated using number of cancer deaths and the remaining life expectancy at the age of death. Value of productivity losses was estimated using the number of deaths and the present value of future lifetime earnings. RESULTS From 1970 to 2008, the age-adjusted breast cancer mortality rate among young women was 12.02/100,000. Rates were higher in the Northeast (RR=1.03, 95% CI, 1.02-1.04). The annual decline in breast cancer mortality rates among blacks was smaller (-0.68%) compared with whites (-2.02%). The total number of deaths associated with breast cancer was 225,866, which accounted for an estimated 7.98 million YPLL. The estimated total productivity loss in 2008 was


Journal of Womens Health | 2009

Addressing Cancer Survivorship Through Public Health: An Update from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Temeika L. Fairley; Lori A. Pollack; Angela R. Moore; Judith Lee Smith

5.49 billion and individual lifetime lost earnings were


Cancer | 2008

Cancer in American Indian and Alaska Native Young Adults (Ages 20-44 Years) : US, 1999-2004

Hannah K. Weir; Melissa A. Jim; Loraine D. Marrett; Temeika L. Fairley

1.10 million. CONCLUSIONS Considering the effect of breast cancer on women of working age and the disproportionate impact on black women, more age-appropriate interventions with multiple strategies are needed to help reduce these substantial health and economic burdens, improve survival, and in turn reduce productivity costs associated with premature death.


Journal of Cancer Survivorship | 2013

Assessment of the status of A National Action Plan for Cancer Survivorship in the USA

Judith Lee Smith; Lori A. Pollack; Juan L. Rodriguez; Nikki A. Hawkins; Tenbroeck Smith; Ruth Rechis; Andy Miller; Anne Willis; Helen Miller; Ingrid J. Hall; Temeika L. Fairley; Brenda Stone-Wiggins

Currently, there are nearly 12 million cancer survivors living in the United States. They face a myriad of personal and health issues related to their cancer treatment. Increased recognition of cancer survivorship as a distinct and important phase that follows the diagnosis and treatment of cancer has contributed to the development of public health-related strategies and plans to address those strategies. CDCs Division of Cancer Prevention and Control (DCPC) uses an interdisciplinary public health approach to address the needs of cancer survivors through applied research, public health surveillance and data collection, education, and health promotion, especially among underserved populations that may be at risk for health disparities. Our surveillance activities contribute to population-based descriptions of the health and treatment experiences of cancer survivors in the United States. These data inform applied research activities as well as provide baseline data on cancer survivors for local comprehensive cancer control programs. The knowledge gained by our research efforts informs the development of interventions, awareness and education campaigns, and other outreach activities targeting cancer survivors and those who care for and support them. Our partnerships with national organizations, state health agencies, and other key groups are essential in the development, implementation, and promotion of effective cancer control practices related to cancer survivorship. This article provides an overview of the cancer survivorship activities currently being implemented by DCPC. We highlight several public health surveillance, research, and programmatic outreach and partnership activities currently underway.


Journal of Psychosocial Oncology | 2014

The Role of Social Support in Posttreatment Surveillance Among African American Survivors of Colorectal Cancer

Daisy Le; Cheryl L. Holt; Maria Pisu; Aquila Brown-Galvan; Temeika L. Fairley; Judith Lee Smith; Arica White; Ingrid J. Hall; Robert A. Oster; Michelle Y. Martin

An examination of cancer incidence patterns in American Indians and Alaska Native (AI/AN) young adults may provide insight into their present and future cancer burden.


American Journal of Preventive Medicine | 2015

Evaluation of a Web-Based Program for African American Young Breast Cancer Survivors.

Ashani Johnson-Turbes; Dara Schlueter; Angela R. Moore; Natasha Buchanan; Temeika L. Fairley

PurposeThere are currently more than 12 million cancer survivors in the USA. Survivors face many issues related to cancer and treatment that are outside the purview of the clinical care system. Therefore, understanding and providing for the evolving needs of cancer survivors offers challenges and opportunities for the public health system. In 2004, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Lance Armstrong Foundation, now the Livestrong Foundation, partnered with national cancer survivorship organizations to develop the National Action Plan for Cancer Survivorship (NAPCS). This plan outlines public health strategies to address the needs of cancer survivors. To date, no assessment of NAPCS strategies and their alignment with domestic cancer survivorship activities has been conducted.MethodsThe activities of five national organizations with organized public health agendas about cancer survivorship were assessed qualitatively during 2003–2007. Using the NAPCS as an organizing framework, interviews were conducted with key informants from all participating organizations. Interview responses were supplemented with relevant materials from informants and reviews of the organizations’ websites.ResultsStrategies associated with surveillance and applied research; communication, education, and training; and programs, policy, and infrastructure represent a large amount of the organizational efforts. However, there are gaps in research on preventive interventions, evaluation of implemented activities, and translation.ConclusionsNumerous NAPCS strategies have been implemented. Future efforts of national cancer survivorship organizations should include rigorous evaluation of implemented activities, increased translation of research to practice, and assessment of dissemination efforts.Implications for Cancer SurvivorsThe results of this descriptive assessment provide cancer survivors, cancer survivorship organizations, researchers, providers, and policy makers with initial information about cancer survivorship public health efforts in the USA. Additionally, results suggest areas in need of further attention and next steps in advancing the national cancer survivorship public health agenda.


Journal of Womens Health | 2013

Opportunities for Public Health Communication, Intervention, and Future Research on Breast Cancer in Younger Women

Natasha Buchanan; Katherine B. Roland; Juan L. Rodriguez; Jacqueline W. Miller; Temeika L. Fairley

African Americans are less likely than other groups to receive appropriate surveillance after colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment. The objective of this study is to qualitatively explore the role of social support in post-CRC treatment surveillance and ultimately, inform interventions to promote surveillance in African American survivors of CRC. Interviews were conducted with 60 African American survivors of CRC recruited from the Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance (CanCORS) study and the Alabama Statewide Cancer Registry. Interviews were recorded and transcribed. Transcripts were reviewed and coded independently by the authors. The NVivo software package was used to facilitate coding and data management. Survivors were from 4 to 6 years post diagnosis, 57% female, 60% older than age 65 years, 57% from rural Alabama, 30% with stage 1, 32% with stage 2, and 38% with stage 3 disease. Material and emotional social support from family and ones faith community were cited as playing an important role in coping with the disease and posttreatment surveillance. Survivors who reported being adherent with posttreatment surveillance recommendations (according to stage of disease based on self-report of colonoscopy, computed tomography scans, and blood work) reported more religious material and non-material social support, and support from other survivors of CRC. In these African American survivors of CRC, support from family, other survivors of cancer, and the faith community was perceived as being important for adherence to posttreatment surveillance. Interventions to increase posttreatment surveillance in this population may be enhanced by including components that emphasize familial, other cancer survivor, and religious support.

Collaboration


Dive into the Temeika L. Fairley's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Angela R. Moore

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Eric Tai

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Arica White

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Julie S. Townsend

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Natasha Buchanan

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J. Michael Underwood

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Judith Lee Smith

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sherri L. Stewart

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ingrid J. Hall

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge