Teresa González-Alujas

Long-Term Follow-Up of Aortic Intramural Hematoma Predictors of Outcome

Background—Aortic intramural hematoma (IMH) evolves very dynamically in the short-term to regression, dissection, or aortic rupture. The aim of the present study was to assess the long-term clinical and morphological evolution of medically treated IMH. Methods and Results—Fifty of 68 consecutive patients with aortic IMH monitored clinically and by imaging techniques at 3, 6, and 12 months and annually thereafter were prospectively studied. Mean follow-up was 45±31 months. In the first 6 months, total IMH regression was observed in 14 and progression to aortic dissection in 18 patients; in 14 of these, the dissection was localized, and 12 later developed pseudoaneurysm. At the end of follow-up, the IMH had regressed completely without dilatation in 17 patients (34%), progressed to classical dissection in 6 (12%), evolved to fusiform aneurysm in 11 (22%), evolved to saccular aneurysm in 4 (8%), and evolved to pseudoaneurysm in 12 (24%). Evolution to dissection was related to echolucency (P <0.02) and to longitudinal extension of IMH (P <0.01). Multivariate analysis showed an independent association between regression and smaller maximum aortic diameter and between aneurysm formation and atherosclerotic ulcerated plaque and absence of echolucent areas in IMH. Conclusions—The most frequent long-term evolution of IMH is to aortic aneurysm or pseudoaneurysm. Complete regression without changes in aorta size is observed in one third of cases, and progression to classical dissection is less common. A normal aortic diameter in the acute phase is the best predictor of IMH regression without complications, and absence of echolucent areas and atherosclerotic ulcerated plaque are associated with evolution to aortic aneurysm.

Long-Term Outcome of Aortic Dissection With Patent False Lumen Predictive Role of Entry Tear Size and Location

Background— Patent false lumen in aortic dissection has been associated with poor prognosis. We aimed to assess the natural evolution of this condition and predictive factors. Methods and Results— One hundred eighty-four consecutive patients, 108 surgically treated type A and 76 medically treated type B, were discharged after an acute aortic dissection with patent false lumen. Transesophageal echocardiography was performed before discharge, and computed tomography was performed at 3 months and yearly thereafter. Median follow-up was 6.42 years (quartile 1 to quartile 3: 3.31–10.49). Forty-nine patients died during follow-up (22 type A, 27 type B), 31 suddenly. Surgical or endovascular treatment was indicated in 10 type A and 25 type B cases. Survival free from sudden death and surgical-endovascular treatment was 0.90, 0.81, and 0.46 (95% CI, 0.36–0.55) at 3, 5, and 10 years, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified baseline maximum descending aorta diameter (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.32 [1.10–1.59]; P =0.003), proximal location (HR: 1.84 [1.06–3.19]; P =0.03), and entry tear size (HR: 1.13 [1.08–1.2]; P <0.001) as predictors of dissection-related adverse events, whereas mortality was predicted by baseline maximum descending aorta diameter (HR: 1.36 [1.08–1.70]; P =0.008), entry tear size (HR: 1.1 [1.04–1.16]; P =0.001), and Marfan syndrome (HR: 3.66 [1.65–8.13]; P =0.001). Conclusions— Aortic dissection with persistent patent false lumen carries a high risk of complications. In addition to Marfan syndrome and aorta diameter, a large entry tear located in the proximal part of the dissection identifies a high-risk subgroup of patients who may benefit from earlier and more aggressive therapy. # Clinical Perspective {#article-title-39}Background— Patent false lumen in aortic dissection has been associated with poor prognosis. We aimed to assess the natural evolution of this condition and predictive factors. Methods and Results— One hundred eighty-four consecutive patients, 108 surgically treated type A and 76 medically treated type B, were discharged after an acute aortic dissection with patent false lumen. Transesophageal echocardiography was performed before discharge, and computed tomography was performed at 3 months and yearly thereafter. Median follow-up was 6.42 years (quartile 1 to quartile 3: 3.31–10.49). Forty-nine patients died during follow-up (22 type A, 27 type B), 31 suddenly. Surgical or endovascular treatment was indicated in 10 type A and 25 type B cases. Survival free from sudden death and surgical-endovascular treatment was 0.90, 0.81, and 0.46 (95% CI, 0.36–0.55) at 3, 5, and 10 years, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified baseline maximum descending aorta diameter (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.32 [1.10–1.59]; P=0.003), proximal location (HR: 1.84 [1.06–3.19]; P=0.03), and entry tear size (HR: 1.13 [1.08–1.2]; P<0.001) as predictors of dissection-related adverse events, whereas mortality was predicted by baseline maximum descending aorta diameter (HR: 1.36 [1.08–1.70]; P=0.008), entry tear size (HR: 1.1 [1.04–1.16]; P=0.001), and Marfan syndrome (HR: 3.66 [1.65–8.13]; P=0.001). Conclusions— Aortic dissection with persistent patent false lumen carries a high risk of complications. In addition to Marfan syndrome and aorta diameter, a large entry tear located in the proximal part of the dissection identifies a high-risk subgroup of patients who may benefit from earlier and more aggressive therapy.

Diagnosis of ascending aortic dissection by transesophageal echocardiography: Utility of M-mode in recognizing artifacts

OBJECTIVES This study sought to assess the reliability of biplanar transesophageal echocardiography in the diagnosis of ascending aortic dissection and to test the utility of M-mode information in the differential diagnosis of ascending aortic ultrasound artifacts and intimal flap images. BACKGROUND Transesophageal echocardiography is a useful technique in the diagnosis of aortic dissection. However, ultrasound artifacts in the ascending aorta are an important limitation. METHODS Transesophageal echocardiography was performed in 132 consecutive patients with clinically suspected aortic dissection. Two-dimensional and M-mode echocardiography and color Doppler were used to diagnose intimal flap and artifact images. Diagnoses were validated either anatomically or with reference techniques. RESULTS The sensitivity and specificity of transesophageal echocardiography in the diagnosis of ascending aortic dissection were 96.8% and 100%, respectively. Ninety-three artifacts were observed in 56 (55%) of 101 patients without ascending aortic dissection. Two-dimensional echocardiography easily identified 74 artifacts (80%). Color Doppler showed no ascending flow abnormalities in 71% of artifact images. M-mode echocardiography showed three location and mobility artifact patterns related to the posterior wall of the aorta or the right pulmonary artery. In contrast, intimal flap movement showed no relation to the aortic wall movement in 25 cases (83%). Blind analysis of transesophageal echocardiographic study tapes underlined the utility of M-mode in the differential diagnosis. Ranges of sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value (established by including doubtful results as either positive or negative) improved from 87.1-93.5% to 93.5-96.8%, from 85.1-94.1% to 99-100% and from 65.9-81.8% to 96.8-100%, respectively, with the inclusion of M-mode data. CONCLUSIONS Biplanar transesophageal echocardiography permits reliable diagnosis of ascending aortic dissection. Ultrasound artifacts are common, but assessment of the location and mobility of intraluminal images by M-mode echocardiography definitely improves diagnostic accuracy.

Impact of contrast-enhanced echocardiography on the diagnostic algorithm of acute aortic dissection

AIMS To determine the usefulness of contrast echocardiography in the diagnosis of aortic dissection (AD) and in the assessment of findings necessary for adequate patient management. METHODS AND RESULTS Conventional and contrast-enhanced transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) were performed in 128 consecutive patients with clinically suspected acute AD. Results were validated independently against intraoperative findings in 45 patients and computed tomography information in 83. Sensitivity and specificity of conventional TTE increased after contrast enhancement from 73.7 to 86.8% (P< 0.005) and 71.2 to 90.4% (P < 0.05), respectively. Sensitivity and specificity of enhanced TTE were similar to conventional TOE in ascending aorta (93.3 vs. 95.6% and 97.6 vs. 96.4%, respectively) and in the arch (88.4 vs. 93.0% and 95.3 vs. 98.82%, respectively). Contrast-enhanced TOE permitted the location of non-visualized entry tear in seven cases (10.6%), helped to correctly identify the true lumen in six (9.1%), and diagnosed retrograde dissection in nine (13.6%). CONCLUSION Contrast enhancement substantially improves TTE in the diagnosis of AD and should be considered as the initial imaging modality in the emergency setting. Contrast enhancement also has significant value for obtaining critical morphological and haemokinetic information by TOE useful for adequate patient management.

Infective Endocarditis: The European Viewpoint

Infective endocarditis (IE) is a difficult and complex disease. In recent years epidemiology and microbiology have changed. In developed countries IE is now affecting older patients and patients with no previously known valve disease. Prosthetic IE (prosthetic valve endocarditis [PVE]) and endocarditis in patients with pacemakers and other devices (cardiac device related infective endocarditis [CDRIE]) are becoming more frequent. The number of Staphylococcus aureus IE is increasing related to the number of endocarditis that occurs because of health care associated procedures, especially in diabetics or patients on chronic hemodialysis. The change in the underlying population and the increase in the number of cases caused by very virulent organism explain why the disease still carries a poor prognosis and a high mortality. The variety of clinical manifestations and complications, as well as the serious prognosis, makes it mandatory that IE patients need to be treated in experienced hospitals with a collaborative approach between different specialists, involving cardiologists, infectious disease specialists, microbiologists, surgeons, and frequently others, including neurologists and radiologists. Only an early diagnosis followed by risk stratification and a prompt institution of the correct antibiotic treatment as well as an appropriate and timed surgical indication may improve mortality figures. The recent European Guidelines try to provide clear and simple recommendations, obtained by expert consensus after thorough review of the available literature to all specialists involved in clinical decision-making of this difficult and changing disease.

Cardiac index quantification by Doppler ultrasound in patients without left ventricular outflow tract abnormalities.

OBJECTIVES We attempted to ascertain whether cardiac index can be directly estimated from Doppler mean velocity. BACKGROUND Although diverse Doppler echocardiographic methods have been described for cardiac output quantification, they are not widely used in clinical practice. Cross-sectional area measurement has been identified as the main source of error in flow volume quantification. METHODS A three-phase study by Doppler echocardiography was conducted in 306 patients. In phase I, the normal mean velocity ratio of the left and right ventricular outflow tracts was established in 170 normal subjects. In phase II, cardiac index, calculated as the product of aortic annular area index by mean velocity (conventional method), and mean velocity determined in the left ventricular outflow tract and ascending aorta by pulsed and continuous wave Doppler, respectively, were correlated with thermodilution cardiac index in 66 patients. In phase III, the accuracy of the regression equations obtained was prospectively assessed in an additional 70 patients. RESULTS The normal left/right ventricular outflow tract mean velocity ratio by pulsed wave Doppler was 1.1 +/- 0.1. Cardiac index (CI) calculated by the conventional method and thermodilution (TD) showed acceptable correlation (r = 0.90, CITD = 1.20 CIPWD + 357; r = 0.86, CITD = 0.90 CICWD + 262) for pulsed (PWD) and continuous wave (CWD) Doppler, respectively, but with systematic underestimation (-28 +/- 13%, p < 0.01) by pulsed wave Doppler. Mean velocity (MV) showed excellent correlation with the thermodilution cardiac index (r = 0.97, CITD = 172 MVPWD - 172; r = 0.93, CITD = 129 MVCWD - 255). When these regression equations were prospectively applied, better agreement with the thermodilution cardiac index was obtained by pulsed wave Doppler directly from mean velocity (SD 240 ml/min per m2) than when aortic annular area was considered in the calculation (SD 428 ml/min per m2). Similar results were obtained by continuous wave Doppler (SD 433 vs. 599 ml/min per m2) but with less accuracy. CONCLUSIONS Left ventricular outflow tract mean velocity determined by pulsed wave Doppler permits easy, accurate cardiac index quantification in the absence of left ventricular outflow abnormalities. The simplicity of this method enhances its clinical applicability in noninvasive monitoring of cardiac index.

Strategy for optimal aortic regurgitation quantification by Doppler echocardiography: Agreement among different methods

BACKGROUND Although different Doppler methods have been validated for aortic regurgitation quantification, the benefit of combining information from different methods has not been defined. METHODS Our study included 2 phases. In the initial phase (60 patients), Doppler parameters (jet width, short-axis jet area, apical jet area, regurgitant fraction from pulmonary and mitral flow, and deceleration slope) were correlated with angiography; range values for each severity grade were defined and intraobserver and interobserver and intermachine variability were studied. In the validation phase (158 patients), defined value ranges were prospectively tested and a strategy based on considering as the definitive severity grade that in which the two best methods agreed was tested. RESULTS Jet width had the best correlation with angiography (r = 0.91), and its ratio with the left ventricular outflow diameter did not improve the correlation (r = 0.85) and decreased reproducibility. Apical jet area and regurgitant fraction from pulmonary flow permitted acceptable quantification (r = 0.87 and 0.86, respectively) but with worse reproducibility. The other methods were not assessable in 20% to 30% of studies. Concordance with angiography decreased in jet width when the jet was eccentric (90% vs 77%, P <.01), in apical jet area when mitral valve disease was present (84% vs 65%, P <.02), and in short-axis jet area and regurgitant fraction from pulmonary flow with concomitant aortic stenosis (77% vs 44%, P <.002 and 77% vs 53%, P <.02, respectively). Agreement with angiography was very high (94 [95%] of 99) when severity grade coincided in both jet width and apical jet area. In 59 cases without concordance, regurgitant fraction from pulmonary flow was used as a third method. Overall, this strategy permitted concordance with angiography in 146 patients (92%). CONCLUSIONS Jet width is the best predictor in aortic regurgitation quantification by Doppler echocardiography. However, better results were obtained when a strategy based on concordance between jet width and another Doppler method was established, particularly when the jet was eccentric.

Sex Differences in Native-Valve Infective Endocarditis in a Single Tertiary-Care Hospital

The aim of this study was to assess whether the clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes of infective endocarditis differ in women and men through a prospective observational cohort study at a single tertiary care teaching hospital. From January 2000 to December 2008, 271 new cases of infective endocarditis were diagnosed (183 in men, 88 in women) according to modified Duke criteria, and patients were followed for 1 year. Women were older than men (mean age 63 +/- 16 vs 58 +/- 18 years, p = 0.006); more women were taking immunosuppressants (14% vs 3%, p = 0.006) and had mitral valve involvement (52% vs 36%, p = 0.02). However, more men had human immunodeficiency virus infection than women. There were no gender differences in Charlson index, regurgitation severity, culprit pathogens, or major complications. When surgery was indicated, women were less likely to undergo the procedure (26% vs 47%, relative risk [RR] 0.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.2 to 0.7), p = 0.001). Mortality tended to be higher in women in the hospital (32% vs 23%, RR 1.58, 95% CI 1 to 2.5, p = 0.05) and at 1 year (38% vs 26%, RR 1.7, 95% CI 1.0 to 2.9, p = 0.04). Surgical treatment was a protective factor against death in the hospital (RR 0.18, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.77, p = 0.02) and at 1 year (RR 0.12, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.48, p = 0.03) after adjustment for age, gender, Charlson index, infection by Staphylococcus aureus, severity at presentation, heart failure, acute renal failure, stroke, and the ejection fraction. In conclusion, women with infective endocarditis were slightly older than men but showed similar co-morbidities. Women underwent surgery less frequently and consequently had worse prognosis than men.

Diagnóstico y cuantificación del foramen oval permeable. ¿Cuál es la técnica de referencia? Estudio simultáneo con Doppler transcraneal, ecocardiografía transtorácica y transesofágica

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is the most common cause of cryptogenic stroke in patients younger than 55. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has been accepted as the reference diagnostic technique. The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), TEE and transcranial Doppler (TCD) in the diagnosis and quantification of patent foramen ovale. METHODS We studied 134 patients prospectively. Simultaneous TTE with TCD and TEE with TCD were performed, using agitated saline solution to detect right to left shunt. RESULTS In 93 patients diagnosed with PFO, the shunt was visualized at baseline by TCD in 69% of cases, by TTE in 74% and by TEE in 58%. The Valsalva maneuver produced a similar improvement in shunt diagnosis with all 3 techniques (26%-28%). TTE and TCD showed higher sensitivity (100% vs 97%; non significant difference) than TEE in the diagnosis of PFO (86%; P<.001). TCD performed during TEE did not diagnose 12 (13%) shunts previously diagnosed during TTE. Similarly, TEE underestimated shunt severity. CONCLUSIONS TTE enables adequate diagnosis and quantification of PFO. TEE is less sensitive and tends to underestimate the severity of the shunt.

Usefulness of real-time three-dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography in the assessment of chronic aortic dissection

AIMS To assess the usefulness of three-dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography (3D-TOE) vs. two-dimensional (2D)-TOE in the evaluation of morphological and dynamic findings of aortic dissection, and compare the results with those obtained by multi-slice computed tomography (CT). METHODS AND RESULTS Twenty-six patients (21 men and 5 women, median age: 67 years, range: 28-74 years) diagnosed of chronic aortic dissection with patent false lumen were studied. A comprehensive 2D-TOE and a real-time 3D-TOE study targeted at assessing dissection variables were performed and compared with CT within 3 months. Both 3D-TOE and 2D-TOE visualized the intimal flap extension and presence of flow in aortic dissection lumina in the same aortic segments. Three-dimensional TOE correctly identified true lumen in all cases, being superior to 2D-TOE in three cases with a spiroidal course of the dissection in descending aorta. Maximum entry tear diameter measured by 3D-TOE showed a better correlation with CT than 2D-TOE (0.96 and 0.87, P< 0.001, respectively). Compared with CT, 2D-TOE underestimated maximum entry tear diameter (-1.75 ± 3.28 mm, P< 0.01) but 3D-TOE did not (-0.20 ± 1.92 mm, P: n.s.). However, entry tear area measured by 3D-TOE and CT showed the best correlation (r: 0.97) and agreement (0.05 ± 0.20 cm(2), P: n.s.). CONCLUSION Three-dimensional TOE provides additional information to 2D-TOE in aortic dissection assessment, particularly in entry tear size quantification. Agreement between entry tear area defined by 3D-TOE and CT was excellent. Three-dimensional TOE permits better morphological and dynamic understanding of aortic dissection when the flap is spiroidal.