Teresa Tempkin

Predictors of nursing home placement in Huntington disease

Objective: To determine whether motor, behavioral, or psychiatric symptoms in Huntington disease (HD) predict skilled nursing facility (SNF) placement. Methods: Subjects were participants in the Huntington Study Group’s Unified Huntington Disease Rating Scale Database (Rochester, NY) between January 1994 and September 1999. Specific motor, psychiatric, and behavioral variables in subjects residing at home and in SNF were analyzed using χ2 and Student’s t-tests. For a subset of subjects for whom longitudinal data existed, a Cox proportional hazards model controlling for age, sex, and disease duration was used. Results: Among 4,809 subjects enrolled, 3,070 had clinically definite HD. Of these, 228 (7.4%) resided in SNF. The SNF residents’ average age was 52 years, average disease duration was 8.6 years, and they were predominantly women (63%). The SNF residents had worse motor function (chorea, bradykinesia, gait abnormality, and imbalance, p < 0.0001); were more likely to have obsessions, compulsions, delusions, and auditory hallucinations; and had more aggressive, disruptive (p < 0.0001), and irritable behaviors (p = 0.0012). For 1,559 subjects, longitudinal data existed (average length of follow-up, 1.9 years), and 87 (5%) moved from home to SNF. In the Cox model, bradykinesia (HR 1.965, 95% CI 1.083 to 3.564), impaired gait (HR 3.004, 95% CI 1.353 to 6.668), and impaired tandem walking (HR 2.546, 95% CI 1.460 to 4.439) were predictive of SNF placement. Conclusions: Institutionalized patients with HD are more motorically, psychiatrically, and behaviorally impaired than their counterparts living at home. However, motor variables alone predicted institutionalization. Treatment strategies that delay the progression of motor dysfunction in HD may postpone the need for institutionalization.

Genetically engineered mesenchymal stem cells as a proposed therapeutic for Huntington's disease.

There is much interest in the use of mesenchymal stem cells/marrow stromal cells (MSC) to treat neurodegenerative disorders, in particular those that are fatal and difficult to treat, such as Huntington’s disease. MSC present a promising tool for cell therapy and are currently being tested in FDA-approved phase I–III clinical trials for many disorders. In preclinical studies of neurodegenerative disorders, MSC have demonstrated efficacy, when used as delivery vehicles for neural growth factors. A number of investigators have examined the potential benefits of innate MSC-secreted trophic support and augmented growth factors to support injured neurons. These include overexpression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor and glial-derived neurotrophic factor, using genetically engineered MSC as a vehicle to deliver the cytokines directly into the microenvironment. Proposed regenerative approaches to neurological diseases using MSC include cell therapies in which cells are delivered via intracerebral or intrathecal injection. Upon transplantation, MSC in the brain promote endogenous neuronal growth, encourage synaptic connection from damaged neurons, decrease apoptosis, reduce levels of free radicals, and regulate inflammation. These abilities are primarily modulated through paracrine actions. Clinical trials for MSC injection into the central nervous system to treat amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, traumatic brain injury, and stroke are currently ongoing. The current data in support of applying MSC-based cellular therapies to the treatment of Huntington’s disease is discussed.

Developing stem cell therapies for juvenile and adult-onset Huntington's disease

Stem cell therapies have been explored as a new avenue for the treatment of neurologic disease and damage within the CNS in part due to their native ability to mimic repair mechanisms in the brain. Mesenchymal stem cells have been of particular clinical interest due to their ability to release beneficial neurotrophic factors and their ability to foster a neuroprotective microenviroment. While early stem cell transplantation therapies have been fraught with technical and political concerns as well as limited clinical benefits, mesenchymal stem cell therapies have been shown to be clinically beneficial and derivable from nonembryonic, adult sources. The focus of this review will be on emerging and extant stem cell therapies for juvenile and adult-onset Huntington’s disease.

Allele-Specific Reduction of the Mutant Huntingtin Allele Using Transcription Activator-Like Effectors in Human Huntington's Disease Fibroblasts.

Huntingtons disease (HD) is an autosomal dominant neurodegenerative disorder caused by an abnormal expansion of CAG repeats. Although pathogenesis has been attributed to this polyglutamine expansion, the underlying mechanisms through which the huntingtin protein functions have yet to be elucidated. It has been suggested that postnatal reduction of mutant huntingtin through protein interference or conditional gene knockout could prove to be an effective therapy for patients suffering from HD. For allele-specific targeting, transcription activator-like effectors (TALE) were designed to target single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in the mutant allele and packaged into a vector backbone containing KRAB to promote transcriptional repression of the disease-associated allele. Additional TALEs were packaged into a vector backbone containing heterodimeric FokI and were designed to be used as nucleases (TALEN) to cause a CAG-collapse in the mutant allele. Human HD fibroblasts were treated with each TALE-SNP or TALEN. Allele-expression was measured using a SNP-genotyping assay and mutant protein aggregation was quantified with Western blots for anti-ubiquitin. The TALE-SNP and TALEN significantly reduced mutant allele expression (p < 0.05) when compared to control transfections while not affecting expression of the nondisease allele. This study demonstrates the potential of allele-specific gene modification using TALE proteins, and provides a foundation for targeted treatment for individuals suffering from Huntingtons or other genetically linked diseases.

The Complex Ethics of First in Human Stem Cell Clinical Trials

We applaud Dr. Hess for raising an issue of critical importance regarding Phase I clinical trials of novel stem cell (sc) transplants, which is the role that clinical efficacy endpoints should play in assuring the ethical design and conduct of such trials.1 In what follows, we highlight significant considerations, all interrelated, that can challenge efforts to incorporate ethically appropriate clinical efficacy endpoints in Phase I sc trials. First and foremost is the need to preserve the principal aim of safety in such trials. Second is the degree of difficulty researchers can face in trying to minimize the risks that Phase I sc trials pose to clinical volunteers. Third is the difficulty of knowing what should count as adequate pre-clinical data that warrant the launch of Phase I trials with realistic expectations for clinical efficacy. Finally, there is the challenge of not permitting those clinical efficacy measures to introduce unrealistic expectations of therapeutic benefit into the informed consent process. Throughout we will draw from ongoing research, including research at our own institution, that targets sc therapies for both Huntington’s disease (HD) and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS).