Terry Coad

VARIABILITY OF TARGET VOLUME DELINEATION IN CERVICAL ESOPHAGEAL CANCER

PURPOSE Three-dimensional (3D) conformal radiation therapy (CRT) assumes and requires the precise delineation of the target volume. To assess the consistency of target volume delineation by radiation oncologists, who treat esophageal cancers, we have performed a transCanada survey. MATERIALS AND METHODS One of three case presentations, including CT scan images, of different stages of cervical esophageal cancer was randomly chosen and sent by mail. Respondents were asked to fill in questionnaires regarding treatment techniques and to outline boost target volumes for the primary tumor on CT scans, using ICRU-50 definitions. RESULTS Of 58 radiation oncologists who agreed to participate, 48 (83%) responded. The external beam techniques used were mostly anterior-posterior fields, followed by a multifield boost technique. Brachytherapy was employed by 21% of the oncologists, and concurrent chemotherapy by 88%. For a given case, and the three volumes defined by ICRU-50 (i.e., gross tumor volume [GTV], clinical target volume [CTV], and planning target volume [PTV]) we determined: 1. The total length in the cranio-caudal dimension; 2. the mean diameter in the transverse slice that was located in a CT slice that was common to all participants; 3. the total volume for each ICRU volume; and 4. the (5, 95) percentiles for each parameter. The PTV showed a mean length of 14.4 (9.6, 18.0) cm for Case A, 9.4 (5.0, 15.0) cm for Case B, 11.8 (6.0, 16.0) cm for Case C, a mean diameter of 6.4 (5.0, 9.4) cm for Case A, 4.4 (0.0, 7.3) cm for Case B, 5.2 (3.9, 7.3) cm for Case C, and a mean volume of 320 (167, 840) cm3 for Case A and 176 (60, 362) cm3 for Case C. The results indicate variability factors (95 percentile divided by 5 percentile values) in target diameters of 1.5 to 2.6, and in target lengths of 1.9 to 5.0. CONCLUSION There was a substantial inconsistency in defining the planning target volume, both transversely and longitudinally, among radiation oncologists. The potential benefits of 3D treatment planning with high-precision dose delivery could be offset by this inconsistency in target-volume delineation by radiation oncologists. This may be particularly important for multicenter clinical trials, for which quality assurance of this step will be essential to the interpretation of results.

Pelvic fractures following irradiation of endometrial and vaginal cancers-a case series and review of literature.

PURPOSE To review the induction of pelvic fractures as a result of radiation therapy and to assess their management. MATERIALS AND METHODS The charts of patients with endometrial and vaginal cancers irradiated between 1991 and 1995 were reviewed. All patients were treated with megavoltage machines, energy ranging from cobalt to 25 MV photons. RESULTS We treated 336 patients, with a median follow-up duration of 28.9 months (range 0-73.3). Sixteen patients had symptomatic pelvic fractures. The 5-year actuarial incidence of symptomatic pelvic fracture was 2.1%. All patients had pain as the first symptom. The median time of onset was 11 months (range 4-46). Imaging studies of 37.5% (6/16) were initially interpreted to be recurrent malignancy. All patients were managed conservatively and nine patients showed radiological evidence of healing over a median time of 13 months (range 2-34). Six patients had specific drug treatment including provera, premarin, calcium supplements, or pamidronate. Of these, five healed. For the ten patients who did not have any specific treatment, only four showed signs of healing at the time of last follow-up. There was a trend toward earlier healing with specific drug treatment (P=0.11). CONCLUSIONS Fractures can easily be mistaken for metastatic lesions (37.5% in this series) which might be treated with further irradiation. Although not statistically significant, there was a trend towards early healing with drug therapy. More studies are required to generate quantitative data for dose-response relationships and to evaluate the effect of drug therapy on the healing of such fractures.

Comparing two strategies of dynamic intensity modulated radiation therapy (dIMRT) with 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) in the hypofractionated treatment of high-risk prostate cancer

BackgroundTo compare two strategies of dynamic intensity modulated radiation therapy (dIMRT) with 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) in the setting of hypofractionated high-risk prostate cancer treatment.Methods3DCRT and dIMRT/Helical Tomotherapy(HT) planning with 10 CT datasets was undertaken to deliver 68 Gy in 25 fractions (prostate) and simultaneously delivering 45 Gy in 25 fractions (pelvic lymph node targets) in a single phase. The paradigms of pelvic vessel targeting (iliac vessels with margin are used to target pelvic nodes) and conformal normal tissue avoidance (treated soft tissues of the pelvis while limiting dose to identified pelvic critical structures) were assessed compared to 3DCRT controls. Both dIMRT/HT and 3DCRT solutions were compared to each other using repeated measures ANOVA and post-hoc paired t-tests.ResultsWhen compared to conformal pelvic vessel targeting, conformal normal tissue avoidance delivered more homogenous PTV delivery (2/2 t-test comparisons; p < 0.001), similar nodal coverage (8/8 t-test comparisons; p = ns), higher and more homogenous pelvic tissue dose (6/6 t-test comparisons; p < 0.03), at the cost of slightly higher critical structure dose (Ddose, 1–3 Gy over 5/10 dose points; p < 0.03). The dIMRT/HT approaches were superior to 3DCRT in sparing organs at risk (22/24 t-test comparisons; p < 0.05).ConclusiondIMRT/HT nodal and pelvic targeting is superior to 3DCRT in dose delivery and critical structure sparing in the setting of hypofractionation for high-risk prostate cancer. The pelvic targeting paradigm is a potential solution to deliver highly conformal pelvic radiation treatment in the setting of nodal location uncertainty in prostate cancer and other pelvic malignancies.

Radiation treatment for cervical esophagus: patterns of practice study in Canada, 1996 ☆

PURPOSE To assess the patterns of practice among Canadian radiation oncologists who treat esophageal cancers, using a trans-Canada survey, completed at the end of 1996. METHODS AND MATERIALS One of 3 case presentations of different stages of cervical esophageal cancer was randomly assigned and sent to participating radiation oncologists by mail. Respondents were asked to fill in questionnaires regarding treatment techniques and to outline target volumes for the boost phase of radiotherapy. Radiation oncologists from 26 of 27 (96%) of all Canadian centers participated. RESULTS High-energy X-rays (>/= 10 MV) were employed by 68% of the respondents in part of the treatment course. The majority (83%) of the radiation oncologists used at least two phases of treatment. Very few, 10 of 59 (17%), responses started with multifield treatment. The most frequently used prescription dose was 60 Gy/30 fractions/6 weeks, given with concurrent chemotherapy. Dose prescriptions were to the isocenter in 39 of 48 (81%) or to a particular isodose line in 9 of 48 (19%) of respondents. CONCLUSION There was a variety of radiation treatment techniques in this trans-Canada survey. The majority of the patients had combined cisplatin-based chemoradiation. The isocenter was not used consistently as a dose prescription point.

Novel application of helical tomotherapy in whole skull palliative radiotherapy.

Helical tomotherapy (HT) is a radiation planning/delivery platform that combines inversely planned IMRT with on-board megavoltage imaging. A unique HT radiotherapy whole skull brain sparing technique is described in a patient with metastatic prostate cancer. An inverse HT plan and an accompanying back-up conventional lateral 6-MV parallel opposed pair (POP) plan with corresponding isodose distributions and dose-volume histograms (DVH) were created and assessed prior to initiation of therapy. Plans conforming to the planning treatment volume (PTV) with significant sparing of brain, optic nerve, and eye were created. Dose heterogeneity to the PTV target was slightly higher in the HT plan compared to the back-up POP plan. Conformal sparing of brain, optic nerve, and eye was achieved by the HT plan. Similar lens and brain stem/spinal cord doses were seen with both plans. Prospective clinical evaluation with relevant end points (quality of life, symptom relief) are required to confirm the potential benefits of highly conformal therapies applied to palliative situations such as this case.

Sci-AM2 Sat - 09: Towards objective plan comparisons in radiation therapy

In recent years, various novel techniques for radiation treatment of cancer patients have been introduced to clinical practice: intensity‐modulated radiation therapy(IMRT), intensity‐modulated arc therapy (IMAT), helical tomotherapy (HT), light ions irradiation, etc. Such variety of instrumentation possibilities requires some initial comparative assessment of which particular technique would be the most beneficial for a given patient case. In clinical practice a balanced trade‐off between homogeneous and sufficient tumour irradiation and maximal sparing of sensitive structures is needed. A dose quality factor (DQF) was introduced to evaluate the plan quality for different treatment techniques based on realistic clinical requirements for target and organs at risk irradiation. A correlation between plan quality quantified by DQF with some set of patient specific features characterised by patient feature factor (PFF) is analysed in a comparative planning studies for 15 patients with stage III inoperable non‐small cell lungcancer using 3D conformal technique, IMRT and HT. For this set of patients, PFF is chosen as the product of three patient characteristics: the target complexity parameter, overlap between target and lungs, and the ratio between involved and non‐involved lungs. Future work would require validation in larger patient data sets, other disease sites and weighting of different factors of the PFF. This approach can help to select the most beneficial treatment technique prior to actual planning.