Terry W. Hermiston

Forced degradation of Fas inhibits apoptosis in adenovirus-infected cells

DNA viruses have evolved elaborate mechanisms to overcome host antiviral defences. In adenovirus-infected cells, programmed cell death (apoptosis) induced by the cytokine tumour necrosis factor (TNF) is inhibited by several adenovirus-encoded proteins. Occupation of the cell-surface receptor Fas, a member of the TNF-receptor superfamily that is expressed on most cell types, triggers apoptosis of that cell. Here we show that the adenovirus RID (for receptor internalization and degradation) protein complex, which is an inhibitor of TNF-induced apoptosis, mediates internalization of cell-surface Fas and its destruction inside lysosomes within the cell. Fas has not previously been shown to be internalized and then degraded. RID also mediates internalization of the receptor for epidermal growth factor,, but it does not affect the transferrin receptor or class I antigens of the major histocompatibility complex. Removal of Fas from the surface of adenovirus-infected cells expressing RID may allow infected cells to resist Fas-mediated cell death and thus promote their survival.

Inhibition of TRAIL-Induced Apoptosis and Forced Internalization of TRAIL Receptor 1 by Adenovirus Proteins

ABSTRACT Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) induces apoptosis through two receptors, TRAIL-R1 (also known as death receptor 4) and TRAIL-R2 (also known as death receptor 5), that are members of the TNF receptor superfamily of death domain-containing receptors. We show that human adenovirus type 5 encodes three proteins, named RID (previously named E3-10.4K/14.5K), E3-14.7K, and E1B-19K, that independently inhibit TRAIL-induced apoptosis of infected human cells. This conclusion was derived from studies using wild-type adenovirus, adenovirus replication-competent mutants that lack one or more of the RID,E3-14.7K, and E1B-19K genes, and adenovirus E1-minus replication-defective vectors that express all E3 genes, RID plus E3-14.7K only, RID only, or E3-14.7K only. RID inhibits TRAIL-induced apoptosis when cells are sensitized to TRAIL either by adenovirus infection or treatment with cycloheximide. RID induces the internalization of TRAIL-R1 from the cell surface, as shown by flow cytometry and indirect immunofluorescence for TRAIL-R1. TRAIL-R1 was internalized in distinct vesicles which are very likely to be endosomes and lysosomes. TRAIL-R1 is degraded, as indicated by the disappearance of the TRAIL-R1 immunofluorescence signal. Degradation was inhibited by bafilomycin A1, a drug that prevents acidification of vesicles and the sorting of receptors from late endosomes to lysosomes, implying that degradation occurs in lysosomes. RID was also shown previously to internalize and degrade another death domain receptor, Fas, and to prevent apoptosis through Fas and the TNF receptor. RID was shown previously to force the internalization and degradation of the epidermal growth factor receptor. E1B-19K was shown previously to block apoptosis through Fas, and both E1B-19K and E3-14.7K were found to prevent apoptosis through the TNF receptor. These findings suggest that the receptors for TRAIL, Fas ligand, and TNF play a role in limiting virus infections. The ability of adenovirus to inhibit killing through these receptors may prolong acute and persistent infections.

E3 transcription unit of adenovirus

Mammals have innate and adaptive defenses that protect them from virus infections. Viruses, in particular the large DNA viruses (adenoviruses, herpesviruses, poxviruses), have evolved mechanisms that counteract the host’s antiviral defenses. In general, these viruses prevent killing of infected cells by cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL), block the inflammatory response, inhibit complement fixation, prevent shut-off of cellular protein synthesis in response to interferon, and block apoptosis (which may be a host defense against virus infection). Reviews have appeared recently on how some of these proteins function (Gooding 1992; G.L. Smith 1994). Here we will focus on the human adenoviruses, in particular the E3 transcription unit, which appears to be, at least in part, a cassette of genes that functions to counteract the host’s antiviral defenses. Recent reviews on this topic are by Paabo et al. (1989), Wold and Gooding (1989, 1991), Gooding and Wold (1990), Gooding (1992), and Wold (1993).

Adenovirus proteins that subvert host defenses.

Adenovirus encodes numerous products that counteract host defenses. A virus-encoded RNA, VA RNA1, prevents interferon-mediated shut-off of protein synthesis. Other protein products inhibit interferon-induced gene transcription, prevent cell killing by cytotoxic T cells or block apoptosis, and three sets of proteins independently block the cytolysis and inflammation induced by tumor necrosis factor. Studies of these factors are providing insights into viral pathogenesis.

Analyses of Single-Amino-Acid Substitution Mutants of Adenovirus Type 5 E1B-55K Protein

ABSTRACT The E1B-55K protein plays an important role during human adenovirus type 5 productive infection. In the early phase of the viral infection, E1B-55K binds to and inactivates the tumor suppressor protein p53, allowing efficient replication of the virus. During the late phase of infection, E1B-55K is required for efficient nucleocytoplasmic transport and translation of late viral mRNAs, as well as for host cell shutoff. In an effort to separate the p53 binding and inactivation function and the late functions of the E1B-55K protein, we have generated 26 single-amino-acid mutations in the E1B-55K protein. These mutants were characterized for their ability to modulate the p53 level, interact with the E4orf6 protein, mediate viral late-gene expression, and support virus replication in human cancer cells. Of the 26 mutants, 24 can mediate p53 degradation as efficiently as the wild-type protein. Two mutants, R240A (ONYX-051) and H260A (ONYX-053), failed to degrade p53 in the infected cells. In vitro binding assays indicated that R240A and H260A bound p53 poorly compared to the wild-type protein. When interaction with another viral protein, E4orf6, was examined, H260A significantly lost its ability to bind E4orf6, while R240A was fully functional in this interaction. Another mutant, T255A, lost the ability to bind E4orf6, but unexpectedly, viral late-gene expression was not affected. This raised the possibility that the interaction between E1B-55K and E4orf6 was not required for efficient viral mRNA transport. Both R240A and H260A have retained, at least partially, the late functions of wild-type E1B-55K, as determined by the expression of viral late proteins, host cell shutoff, and lack of a cold-sensitive phenotype. Virus expressing R240A (ONYX-051) replicated very efficiently in human cancer cells, while virus expressing H260A (ONYX-053) was attenuated compared to wild-type virus dl309 but was more active than ONYX-015. The ability to separate the p53-inactivation activity and the late functions of E1B-55K raises the possibility of generating adenovirus variants that retain the tumor selectivity of ONYX-015 but can replicate more efficiently than ONYX-015 in a broad spectrum of cell types.